Slashdot Mirror


New Theory About the Source of Pioneer Space Probe Deceleration

First time accepted submitter deathcow writes "After forty years, a fresh perspective on old Pioneer data leads to new conclusions as to why the Pioneer probes are decelerating. Many theories to the slowing probes have persisted over the years — was it gravity? some type of unforeseen radiation? dark matter? Thanks to the data backup preservation efforts of a NASA Ames Research engineer, mountains of old telemetry data were still available for studying this curious anomaly."

15 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Article too long, let me save you some time by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's thermal recall force from heat generated by components on Pioneer.

    The article is way too long but here's the essential paragraph:

    "we estimated the magnitude of the thermal recoil force at different times over the course of the Pioneer missions. After matching the model to the Pioneers’ temperature and electrical readings, we found that the spacecraft did experience a sizable thermal recoil force, corresponding to an excess of about 60 W even after 20 years in deep space. The magnitude of the force was still tiny by Earth standards—about the same as the backward push your car experiences in reaction to the photons spit out by its high-beam headlights. The team found that a good half of the force came from heat from the RTGs (radioisotope thermoelectric generators), which bounced off the back of the spacecraft antenna. The other half came from electrical heat from circuitry in the heart of the spacecraft"

    There, you may resume.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
    1. Re:Article too long, let me save you some time by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The most impressive thing is that we can actually measure this minute effect to such an accuracy that we know there is something unexpected going on. And then subsequently accurately explain this inaccuracy.

    2. Re:Article too long, let me save you some time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      about the same as the backward push your car experiences in reaction to the photons spit out by its high-beam headlights.

      Damn, I'm gonna start driving without my headlights on to get better gas mileage!

    3. Re:Article too long, let me save you some time by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Keep them on and drive backwards.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:Article too long, let me save you some time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      ... wasn't this already determined, around a year ago?

      Well not positively determined, the new analysis of the data does a better job of confirming it. So yes, as usual the summary is horribly wrong- it's a better proof of an existing theory, not a new theory.

    5. Re:Article too long, let me save you some time by steelyeyedmissileman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably I missed some variables that have to be taken into account here.

      You forgot the thermal radiation asymmetry. Don't worry; you're in good company.

  2. I hate IEEE Spectrum by TrekkieGod · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hate Spectrum. Not because they have bad articles, but because they never have anything that I haven't already been reading about for the past months, or even years.

    Hint to editors. If you ever get a submission with a link to Spectrum, chances are very high that Slashdot has covered it before.

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    1. Re:I hate IEEE Spectrum by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 5, Funny

      And if you're reading it on Slashdot, chances are that Slashdot has also covered it before.

    2. Re:I hate IEEE Spectrum by gagol · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suggest to anyone unhappy about repeat articles to help with moderation of submitted articles in "Recent".

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  3. Not so new by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not so new of a theory, and already discussed here at Slashdot:

    http://science.slashdot.org/story/11/07/26/0135234/heat-most-likely-cause-of-pioneer-anomaly

    Everything from clouds of dark matter, weird gravitational effects, alien tampering and exotic new physics have all been blamed for the 'Pioneer Anomaly' — the tiny, inexplicable sun-ward acceleration acting on the veteran Pioneer deep space probes. However, evidence is mounting for a more mundane explanation. Yes, it's the emission of heat from the spacecrafts' onboard radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs), slowly nudging the Pioneers off course, that looks like the most likely culprit. It's unlikely that this new finding will completely silence advocates of more exotic explanations, however.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  4. Regardless - the science is fascinating by blanchae · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The design of these spacecrafts is simply amazing. No wonder the US was the technological marvel of the world at the time. Considering the tools that were available then and the thought that was put into the effects of space on the motion, is mind boggling. Not to mention a power source that will last 88 years and the fact that they are still going and communicating while using a 1 bit camera to create fantastic pictures. I am humbled. The technology that was created and developed as a side effect of this monumental tasks is what made the US a technology giant. We need more of this positive vision and less of the negative sabre rattling.

  5. Re:Nah by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is science kid...

    Which is exactly why it shouldn't be written like a suspense novel.

    Quick summary for all the people who know the background, full story underneath for those who don't (or just like to re-read it...)

    --
    No sig today...
  6. Re:Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is science kid, leave it for people who can read a full paragraph without needing a red bull.

    Err no. Science starts by giving you a brief summary of the theory and conclusions, then proceeds to get into the details. We call it an Abstract. This is a fluff piece which should have been titled "Thermal radiation theory confirmed as source of Pioneer slowdown". Most of the space is spent rambling on about the history of the mission and very little about the methods used to determine the results.

  7. Here's something sad by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ....the entire mission cost -all the years in total - for Pioneer 10 was approximately $350 million (2001) USD. (It'll reach Aldebaran in about 2 million years.)

    That's a little bit under a single week of NASA's budget this year. ($19bill) ...or about 4 hours of the Defense budget ($677 bill) ...or about an hour of the Social Security+Medicare budgets ($1.92 trillion).

    --
    -Styopa
  8. Thermal force by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's thermal recall force from heat generated by components on Pioneer.

    Right. and the headline is a little misleading, it's a "new" explanation only if you weren't following; since it was announced in late 2010. The "anomaly" is solved.

    Popular Science article about Toth and Turyshev's work here: http://www.popsci.com/pioneeranomaly

    More detailed calculations supporting the explanation:
    Phys Rev Letters paper by Toth and Turyshev here: http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v108/i24/e241101
    ArXIV paper confirming the work with more details: http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5222v1

    JPL press release: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2012-209&cid=release_2012-209&msource=12209
    Centauri Dreams article: http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=23720

    Still, it's a nice article to read about how the work is done.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com