Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 13.04 Will Allow Instant Purchasing, Right From the Dash

sfcrazy writes "Ubuntu is becoming a shopping center. Instead of addressing the queries raised by Stallman and the EFF, Canonical is now pushing for making Ubuntu a shopping cart. With Ubuntu 13.04 Canonical is going one step forward, and soon you will be able to purchase software and music right from the Dash without opening the software center or web browser.This is intended to make the whole experience even more interactive and useful for the end user."

10 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. Unity by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As the Canonical developer's Unity DE shows, Canonical is not really that interested in the opinions of its current users.

    1. Re:Unity by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      MINT is going to get a lot of traffic.

      ubuntu annoyed me enough over the last year or two that I've moved.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Unity by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dash -> Privacy

      Record Activity: OFF
      Include Online Search Results: OFF

    3. Re:Unity by Volanin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Current Ubuntu user here as well.
      I'm all for this too... but in a ***separate*** shopping lens.

      Even Stallman said so:
      "[To protect users' privacy] is easy: all it takes is to have separate buttons for network searches and local searches, as earlier versions of Ubuntu did."

      Goddamn, having shopping result when I am searching for local files is not only a privacy issue... it is damnright annoying.

      --
      If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
      If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
    4. Re:Unity by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      By making one questionable move after another we begin to believe Ubuntu's business model has failed.

      No wonder, when they're trying to make money off a user base that froths like a rabid dog whenever they feel they're being monetized. That tend to get furious any time a website uses a workaround to get past their ad blocker without the slightest bit of irony in that they use an ad blocker as a workaround to get content without ads. Or get their panties in a bunch over product placement after advertisers switched to those because everyone was skipping ads on their DVR/PVR. Ubuntu may be free as in beer and in speech, but it's also free as in "There's no such thing as a free lunch". You're not required to say yes to anything of course, but if the "free" lunch never results in any business you're not going to get invited to any more lunches.

      Red Hat figured this out long ago when they killed Red Hat Linux, spun off Fedora and bet everything on RHEL that had paying customers, they could offer a damn good desktop distro but they couldn't make any money off it. Now Ubuntu is starting to feel in the same bind, they're spending lots of money building Ubuntu for the desktop but they're not making any money off it so they're aiming for smart TVs and tablets and trying to cash in on their users without them disappearing in a puff of smoke. I wouldn't be surprised if they disappear out, a new company comes in thinking they can become another Facebook or Youtube if only they get enough users but in the end "We lose money on every sale, but we make up for it on volume" is not a good business model, not even for Linux distros.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Unity by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry to be overly blunt, but that is asnine. Ubuntu is integrating an app store to its DE, that's all. It's a convenience every other major OS already has (Windows, Android, OSX, iOS etc), only made a bit more convenient by not requiring you to open the store app. It's not the end of the world. As long as they stay firmly based on Debian, strenghtening Ubuntu strenghtens Linux and open source as a whole. The more market/mind share it gets, the better driver support we get, more attention from developers and so on.

      So I wish Ubuntu lots of success. If I dislike a particular feature, I can either deactivate it in Ubuntu, use a different DE, jump ship to their source, Debian, directly, or a derivative that doesn't implement those functions, like Mint. I can even roll my own flavor of Ubuntu, since the source is public. Such plethora of alternatives is exactly what free/open software is all about and people bitching that Ubuntu is "turning their backs on open software" don't seem to understand it at all.

    6. Re:Unity by agiacalone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Current Ubuntu user also.

      I completely agree with Stallman on this issue: Canonical needs to seperate this out for users who don't want this stuff showing up in their dash searches.

      But in the mean time, there's always this:

      'sudo apt-get remove unity-lens-shopping'

      Solves the problem for me rather easily.

  2. Stallman has 1 point that's important... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "When the user searches her own local files for a string using the Ubuntu desktop, Ubuntu sends that string to one of Canonical's servers. (Canonical is the company that develops Ubuntu.)" from -> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu

    * Says all I needed to see... & though Mr. Stallman MAY be a wee bit "odd" in some things he does or has done or said? He's not "off" here... no way.

    APK

    P.S.=> Thus, I suppose the next time I try Linux, it will be MINT vs. KUbuntu (my former favorite)...

    ... apk

    1. Re:Stallman has 1 point that's important... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, his best point is this:
      "free software won't spy on you, unless it's Ubuntu,"

      Ubuntu's actions make all free software look bad.

  3. Re:Next up, grep and find by cabraverde · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait until Ubuntu starts altering grep and find to start using libcurl to report search terms to amazon. Maybe even return ads to a new IO stream: stdadvert.

    Then keep your eye on Bug #1055766