Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 13.04 Will Allow Instant Purchasing, Right From the Dash

sfcrazy writes "Ubuntu is becoming a shopping center. Instead of addressing the queries raised by Stallman and the EFF, Canonical is now pushing for making Ubuntu a shopping cart. With Ubuntu 13.04 Canonical is going one step forward, and soon you will be able to purchase software and music right from the Dash without opening the software center or web browser.This is intended to make the whole experience even more interactive and useful for the end user."

63 of 273 comments (clear)

  1. Unity by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As the Canonical developer's Unity DE shows, Canonical is not really that interested in the opinions of its current users.

    1. Re:Unity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, current Ubuntu user here. I'm all for this.

    2. Re:Unity by John+Holmes · · Score: 2

      It's following the same course as Microsoft. I'll stick with Linux Mint for now.

    3. Re:Unity by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I'm on 12.04 LTE with Gnome Classic for now. I don't see my next upgrade being Ubuntu.

    4. Re:Unity by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      MINT is going to get a lot of traffic.

      ubuntu annoyed me enough over the last year or two that I've moved.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Unity by InlawBiker · · Score: 2

      By making one questionable move after another we begin to believe Ubuntu's business model has failed. Now they seem to be grasping at straws. They're completely turning their back on the open software that got them here. It doesn't bode well for Linux at all.

    6. Re:Unity by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      Me too. On the other hand, 12.04 works just fine, and it's going to be supported for five years, so it's not like people like us have to make any abrupt decisions. Come August 2017, who knows what the landscape will look like?

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    7. Re:Unity by cheesybagel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dash -> Privacy

      Record Activity: OFF
      Include Online Search Results: OFF

    8. Re:Unity by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those should be the defaults, in my opinion.

    9. Re:Unity by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Note the wording:
      Include Online Search Results =/= Search Online Also
      They can still search and give amazon et al your searches, but they just won't show you the results.

    10. Re:Unity by Volanin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Current Ubuntu user here as well.
      I'm all for this too... but in a ***separate*** shopping lens.

      Even Stallman said so:
      "[To protect users' privacy] is easy: all it takes is to have separate buttons for network searches and local searches, as earlier versions of Ubuntu did."

      Goddamn, having shopping result when I am searching for local files is not only a privacy issue... it is damnright annoying.

      --
      If I clone myself, can I call it a thread?
      If a girl winks to us, can I call it a race condition?
    11. Re:Unity by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 2

      Both. There are separate editions.

    12. Re:Unity by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      By making one questionable move after another we begin to believe Ubuntu's business model has failed.

      No wonder, when they're trying to make money off a user base that froths like a rabid dog whenever they feel they're being monetized. That tend to get furious any time a website uses a workaround to get past their ad blocker without the slightest bit of irony in that they use an ad blocker as a workaround to get content without ads. Or get their panties in a bunch over product placement after advertisers switched to those because everyone was skipping ads on their DVR/PVR. Ubuntu may be free as in beer and in speech, but it's also free as in "There's no such thing as a free lunch". You're not required to say yes to anything of course, but if the "free" lunch never results in any business you're not going to get invited to any more lunches.

      Red Hat figured this out long ago when they killed Red Hat Linux, spun off Fedora and bet everything on RHEL that had paying customers, they could offer a damn good desktop distro but they couldn't make any money off it. Now Ubuntu is starting to feel in the same bind, they're spending lots of money building Ubuntu for the desktop but they're not making any money off it so they're aiming for smart TVs and tablets and trying to cash in on their users without them disappearing in a puff of smoke. I wouldn't be surprised if they disappear out, a new company comes in thinking they can become another Facebook or Youtube if only they get enough users but in the end "We lose money on every sale, but we make up for it on volume" is not a good business model, not even for Linux distros.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    13. Re:Unity by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry to be overly blunt, but that is asnine. Ubuntu is integrating an app store to its DE, that's all. It's a convenience every other major OS already has (Windows, Android, OSX, iOS etc), only made a bit more convenient by not requiring you to open the store app. It's not the end of the world. As long as they stay firmly based on Debian, strenghtening Ubuntu strenghtens Linux and open source as a whole. The more market/mind share it gets, the better driver support we get, more attention from developers and so on.

      So I wish Ubuntu lots of success. If I dislike a particular feature, I can either deactivate it in Ubuntu, use a different DE, jump ship to their source, Debian, directly, or a derivative that doesn't implement those functions, like Mint. I can even roll my own flavor of Ubuntu, since the source is public. Such plethora of alternatives is exactly what free/open software is all about and people bitching that Ubuntu is "turning their backs on open software" don't seem to understand it at all.

    14. Re:Unity by loufoque · · Score: 2

      It does somewhat, yes.

    15. Re:Unity by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ultimately, do you think the end users mind that their apps are closed source?

      Most of the world's developer mind share is closed source. If you want your OS to be successful, you have to embrace developers. Which means you have to support both closed source and open source applications.

      And you have to make it just as easy for both types of apps to be deployed as well. If unusual or extra steps are required to deploy a closed source app on your platform, most closed source devs will simply ignore it.

      Most applications that are professionally designed, and do what users will want will be closed source, due to the cost. It is a minority of projects that are developed as open source -- most of them get funding from large corporations.

      Linux itself is the exception to the rule rather than the rule.

    16. Re:Unity by agiacalone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Current Ubuntu user also.

      I completely agree with Stallman on this issue: Canonical needs to seperate this out for users who don't want this stuff showing up in their dash searches.

      But in the mean time, there's always this:

      'sudo apt-get remove unity-lens-shopping'

      Solves the problem for me rather easily.

    17. Re:Unity by Roderic9 · · Score: 2

      Do you have a shred of evidence that this is actually how the privacy settings work?

      No, but if you'll note my wording, I don't exactly accuse them of doing so. I'm just pointing out that the phrasing allows for things which people don't expect at first glance. It should be phrased more clearly one way or the other.

      When this first came up I checked with Wireshark and confirmed that nothing is sent to cannonical or amazon if on-line search results are turned off.
      However, you're right that the wording does not preclude this in the future, so I wouldn't trust them.

    18. Re:Unity by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I'm sorry to be overly blunt, but that is asnine. Ubuntu is integrating an app store to its DE,

      Except there is no technical or usability justification for such a thing.

      Tools don't need to be "integrated". This is Unix where you can have a toolbox full of tools that all work together. You don't need to take the "microsoft office" approach to things.

      In truth, the app stores on the other platforms don't need to be any more "integrated" than the Linux tools that they are knockoffs of.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    19. Re:Unity by TranquilVoid · · Score: 2

      Have to agree, also whenever I search for programs and turn up paid software amongst the usal FOSS stuff it feels wrong, and this is the crux of the problem (for you and I); Canonical's focus is on making Ubuntu a non-technical OS with things that are nice for non-technical users, like a free i-Device.

      There's nothing wrong with that, but because it's based on Linux many of the existing users are technically inclined and are increasingly being disenfranchised as Canonical moves closer to their target demographic. I'm starting to see the writing on the wall personally.

      There's something libre about gratis. This is why I use Linux in the first place - there's a sense of peace in knowing that the software was developed with nothing in mind save solving the problem. As soon as money is introduced trust goes out the window. I don't want to have to watch my OS to catch it herding me into purchases.

  2. And if you're unhappy... by skovnymfe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... you can just download another distro. Because it's Linux and Linux comes in more flavors than ice cream. Heck if you don't like any of the flavors, make your own. No need to log on Slashdot and moan and cry about how terrible Ubuntu is and how much it reminds you of them terrible yanks uppin Micro$oft yonder, because you don't know anyway. You wouldn't come within 1000 feet of it, right? You despise it, you loathe it, yes? Good.

    1. Re:And if you're unhappy... by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Beggars can't be choosers

      Which is precisely why Canonical should stop begging us to like Unity and actually listen to their users; Otherwise us "beggars" will CHOOSE from among all the other options available (sorry didn't mean to obliterate your analogy so completely, it was just bad to begin with). If you're trying to say GNU/Linux community needs Canonical and not the other way around, then you're pretty well confused.

    2. Re:And if you're unhappy... by mysidia · · Score: 2

      I shouldn't have to research my operating system every year to make sure it hasn't changed it's core principles.

      Which core principal did they change, or what exactly are they doing that violates one of them, and how does that violate the principal?

  3. Wrong Approach by GeneralTurgidson · · Score: 2

    Ubuntu would make more money by moving towards Red Hats model of licensing instead of their (outrageous) support hours. Their cost model for enterprise support is a huge reason my workplace won't use them.

    1. Re:Wrong Approach by rgbrenner · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ubuntu has been selling support for years, and it's cheaper than Red Hat:
      http://www.canonical.com/enterprise-services/ubuntu-advantage/overview

    2. Re:Wrong Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're.

      For fuck's sake, geeks seem to be able to fluently code in 20 programming languages, but can't grasp the syntax of the first language they learned, and spent the most time learning.

  4. Stallman has 1 point that's important... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "When the user searches her own local files for a string using the Ubuntu desktop, Ubuntu sends that string to one of Canonical's servers. (Canonical is the company that develops Ubuntu.)" from -> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/12/07/1527225/rms-speaks-out-against-ubuntu

    * Says all I needed to see... & though Mr. Stallman MAY be a wee bit "odd" in some things he does or has done or said? He's not "off" here... no way.

    APK

    P.S.=> Thus, I suppose the next time I try Linux, it will be MINT vs. KUbuntu (my former favorite)...

    ... apk

    1. Re:Stallman has 1 point that's important... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, his best point is this:
      "free software won't spy on you, unless it's Ubuntu,"

      Ubuntu's actions make all free software look bad.

    2. Re:Stallman has 1 point that's important... apk by thereitis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is an absolutely unacceptable spyware 'feature' from Canonical. I'm sad to say they've obviously lost the plot. Thankfully there are other Linux distros that behave much better.

    3. Re:Stallman has 1 point that's important... apk by YurB · · Score: 2

      I agree with you. All these ads, "for purchase" software, give-us-money-with-one-click stuff just takes away the spirit that was always important to me: it used to make me feel like they (the individual developers) really want the software to be useful because they do it for themselves and/or their close people, and because they just love doing it. Now Ubuntu is showing an example of doing free software the way proprietary software is done: for some abstract success of some corpocation. But luckily it's still free software every one can fork. P.S. Actually, I've newer used Ubuntu, because this extra-user-friendliness was looking like too much for me. Despite this, they've undoubtely made a significant contribution to development of desktop gnu/linux (and now we have Mint, xubuntu, kubuntu which are built on foundations provided by Ubuntu).

  5. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anrego · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's one of those polarizing subjects. Some see absolutely no problem with this kind of thing, whilst others are mortified by it and can't understand why everyone else is ok with it. Both sides call each other idiots who "just don't get it" for whatever reason, no ones opinion changes, and life goes on.

  6. However, in a bizarre decision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All purchases will require the use of BitCoin.

  7. It's their binary. by Jartan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How they want to compile it is their choice. That's the entire point of open source.

  8. Good for Ubuntu and Some Users by ninetyninebottles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the Canonical Blog Post on the new feature:

    Privacy is extremely important to Canonical. The data we collect is not user-identifiable (we automatically anonymize user logs and that information is never available to the teams delivering services to end users), we make users aware of what data will be collected and which third party services will be queried through a notice right in the Dash, and we only collect data that allows us to deliver a great search experience to Ubuntu users. We also recognize that there is always a minority of users who prefer complete data protection, often choosing to avoid services like Google, Facebook or Twitter for those reasons – and for those users, we have made it dead easy to switch the online search tools off with a simple toggle in settings.

    So while I think the privacy concerns with sending data to Canonical when you'e doing searches is significant, so long as the user is aware and has the option, more power to them. I don't think I want to integrate my desktop and network search, but I certainly see a mass market that may want this. Depending upon how easy it is to create and configure these "scopes" to plug into this system it might be a great way to build customized searching without the need for Google to know everything about me.

    I think people are too reactionary when it comes to both privacy and commercialism. From the previous posts you'd think this was a mandatory feature and Canonical was selling user data or something. They seem to be responsible players here creating cool tech that some of us may not want. I see nothing for me to get upset about.

  9. This is a good thing by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For each of such change we're seeing in Ubuntu, people are coming back to Debian. Welcome back!

    1. Re:This is a good thing by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, my discontent with recent Ubuntu releases has driven me not to Debian, but to Mint.

      When I was recently frustrated with Ubuntu, I did attempt OSS purity by installing Debian. But the relative complexity of the installation process, including lack of closed-source drivers, reminded me of the rough edges that Ubuntu smooths over.

      Fortunately, Mint smooths over what I consider to be the rough edges that Ubuntu introduces.

    2. Re:This is a good thing by LateArthurDent · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, my discontent with recent Ubuntu releases has driven me not to Debian, but to Mint.

      Eh. I have a serious moral problems with mint, starting with their stance that search engines should "share the revenue Linux Mint users generate for them" with Mint, and stunts like editing code to make them amazon affiliates in banshee's music store instead of the original developers or the ubuntu packagers, ie, the people who actually did all the hard work.

      Granted, this shopping lens bullshit from Ubuntu is making me having severe moral problems with them as well, but that's definitely a reason to switch back to Debian, not Mint.

    3. Re:This is a good thing by mverwijs · · Score: 2

      > But the relative complexity of the installation process,....

      Funny story.

      My first job in IT was for Cistron Internet Services in the Netherlands. They were one of the first ISP's in NL. And had a few Debian developers working there. They had built this CD-Rom that, when inserted into your Windows 9x PC would autorun some installer that would setup your dial-in modem and stuff. Since the diskspace on the CD-rom was about 99% unused, they also included a complete copy of the first disc of Debian. Which was worth it's weight in gold at the time. I think it was Slink-1-and-a-half, but it could be Potato.

      Now, this was a bootable CD, for obvious reasons.

      I was on the helpdesk at the time. I had 2 new customers a year that would phone up and ask how they should proceed onto the internet now that they had finished the installer. After talking to them a few minutes I realized that they had actually managed to fully install Debian. They had rebooted their PC for some reason, with the bootable CD in it. They had managed to re-partition their drives, enter root passwords, enter user details, completely installing the whole shebang. They were looking at a Debian login screen and wondering how to proceed now. And then, and only then, did they bother to call the helpdesk as they couldn't figure out what to do next.

      These were not tech-savvy people. These were small business owners that wanted to see what was up with that whole internet thing. And yet they managed that in 2001 and

      Every time I hear someone say 'the $Distro installer is complicated', it brings back a fond memory of great times at Cistron. So thanks for that.

      Kindly,

      mverwijs

      Ps: Cistron ADSL will come to YOUR area within two weeks! Really!

    4. Re:This is a good thing by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      You have issues with some aspects of Ubuntu, so you use Mint which simply parasitizes off of Ubuntu.

      Well yeah, but why shouldn't I?

    5. Re:This is a good thing by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      "But the relative complexity of the installation process, including lack of closed-source drivers, reminded me of the rough edges that Ubuntu smooths over."

      Ubuntu: Ancient African word for "Can't install Debian".

      There's a big difference between "can't" and "don't feel like taking the time to when another option exists". Some of us have a lot of things to get done, and that puts a premium on our time. As long as the downsides to using Mint (vs. Debian) don't outweigh the benefits of a simple and quick installation, I'm going with Mint.

  10. Re:sigh... by jones_supa · · Score: 2
  11. Countermeasures by Framboise · · Score: 2

    If Canonical becomes that much unfriendly, some users will be encouraged to setup a light daemon generating a multiple of random queries for each real ones. Then Canonical will try to filter out the noise, and the escalation with more clever scripts inundating their servers with trash will continue :)

  12. Embarrassing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This almost seems like a sick joke at this point. Not only are they loading up the system with advertising, but it's so poorly implemented at this point that Canonical is slowly becoming a caricature of modern software companies. What does anyone have to gain from this? When did opening a web browser and typing "amazon.com" become too much work? Have we reached the point where the only thing people want out of their computers is a shopping/advertising hub?

    Seriously, this fails on so many levels that I'm completely baffled. This is supposed to be a major new feature, but it obviously will become completely non-functional when you get disconnected from the net. Ignoring all the other problems, why is there a major OS-level feature that works COMPLETELY differently depending on whether or not you are connected to the internet? I'm trying but I can't find any way to stretch this so that it actually makes sense.

  13. Re:Ubuntu is done. by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    Heh. I wonder if BSDs are taking the crown of "alternative operating system" from Linux, while Linux becomes an actual mainstream thing.

  14. Use xfce by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2

    Uh, current Ubuntu user here. I'm all for this.

    Current Xubuntu user here (2 desktops, 2 laptops). I don't particularly care how Unity is distorted, other than remarking that this sort of thing ensures I stay away from it. We had Gnome 2 on all the PCs, but switched every one of them to xfce when both Unity and Gnome 3 showed their differing ugliness while testing them in a VM.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  15. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It doesn't matter. The GPL lets them steal your code! That's why I use a CC-No Ubuntu license for all my projects.

  16. Re:Why is this a problem? by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually don't have much of a problem with this, but I really dislike them sending searches to Amazon by default. It should be an opt-in behaviour, not default.

  17. How the Dash already works by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I wanted to update/install my nvidia drivers, so I opened the dash and typed "drivers". IT DISPLAYED GOLF CLUBS on sale at Amazon!"

    Presumably the new version will buy them for you as well.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  18. Re:Why is this a problem? by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    By the way, here's how Jono Bacon responded to the criticism from Stallman.

  19. Canonical current users? by dgharmon · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Canonical is not really that interested in the opinions of its current users ..

    If not satisfied, then why not ask for your money back ..

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Canonical current users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or your private data?

    2. Re:Canonical current users? by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They actually do have a 'send us money' option when downloading now, and many of us have paid for it. I like this approach a lot better than having a privacy invading default setup. I think it would get them a lot more money from their users in the end as well.

    3. Re:Canonical current users? by kangsterizer · · Score: 2

      When I first saw the donate button on Ubuntu download page, I went to archlinux and donated there, and used their iso instead.
      Simply because their whole model switched to "we really need to make money now" instead of caring for the users, open source, ideals, etc.

    4. Re:Canonical current users? by gtall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And Ubuntu is created by elves, they cost nothing to employ, singing joyous songs of open source and ideals while they work tirelessly just to satisfy you and your bunny world.

    5. Re:Canonical current users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. Ubuntu is created by Debian, mostly.

    6. Re:Canonical current users? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      For those who need to know: Debian is a Leprechaun, and definitely not an elf!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  20. Re:Why is this a problem? by Superdarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read through the whole thing and I can tell you that he said nothing at all. No reason for the decision, no address of the privacy concerns, no nothing. He wrote a huge page of politician dribble.

  21. Re:Why is this a problem? by nullchar · · Score: 2

    What a whiny non-response from Jono Bacon. His counter argument to Stallman is: [summarized] "Privacy is personal, there is only one RMS who cares about privacy in his own way, so we can collect your data. Look at Facebook and Apple: see, we're better!".

    The community is fine with new features and trying out new things, but we just want the defaults to be sane. Only turn on Amazon searches or Canonical feedback as an op-in mechanism. A default install of any gnu/linux distro should be privacy-aware and not require disabling any features.

  22. Linux Mint by davydagger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll say this before and I'll say it again, if you haven't ditched Ubuntu for Mint, now is the time
    http://linuxmint.com/

    Its also funny to note that install base of Ubuntu has taken a nose dive in the last year(two?). with mint taking up the slack.

    I wonder why.

    1. Re:Linux Mint by davydagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      they developed a whole new desktop called "Cinamon", and help maintain "MATE", in response to both gnome-shell and unity.

      If Ubuntu didn't spend the last 2 years making piss poor decisions, and Mint cleaning up the mess, you'd have a point.

      If Ubuntu didn't fuck up, no one, self included, would give a damn about mint.

  23. Time to switch to Debian by epp_b · · Score: 2

    It's essentially the same to use as Ubuntu 10 -- the last version before all the Unity crap, crippled Gnome and spyware commercializing -- plus, the software and updates are carefully vetted and upgrades are not so annoyingly frequent. And, of course, there's none of this commercialization BS.

    I've been running it in a VM to prepare for the switch and it will be soon.

  24. Re:Why is this a problem? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

    A default install of any gnu/linux distro should be privacy-aware and not require disabling any features.

    Minor nitpick: This should apply to all software, hardware and (web) services not just GNU/Linux distros.

  25. Re:Next up, grep and find by cabraverde · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait until Ubuntu starts altering grep and find to start using libcurl to report search terms to amazon. Maybe even return ads to a new IO stream: stdadvert.

    Then keep your eye on Bug #1055766