Slashdot Mirror


Four Cups of Coffee A Day Cuts Risk of Oral Cancer

An anonymous reader writes "Coffee may help lower the risk of developing oral and pharyngeal cancer and of dying from the disease. The study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, was conducted using the Cancer Prevention Study II. The large cohort study began in 1982 by the American Cancer Society. Researchers were able to examine 968,432 men and women, none of whom had cancer at the time of their enrollment in the study." Four or more cups a day lowered the risk of getting oral cancers by a whopping 49%.

35 of 151 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah, but ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... my dental hygienist will kill me if she has to scrape any more Starbucks stains off my teeth.

    At least cancer may give me a few more years to live.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Yeah, but ... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... my dental hygienist will kill me if she has to scrape any more Starbucks stains off my teeth.

      No worries, the article clearly said "coffee."

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Yeah, but ... by somersault · · Score: 2

      Maybe calcium protects against oral cancer? :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Yeah, but ... by Guignol · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's the wrong "Yeah, but"
      The real "Yeah, but" is this one:
      Yeah, but my gf thinks it tastes bad when I drink too much coffee, therefore
      Four Cups of Coffee A Day Cuts Risk of Oral Sex
      I'm so sorry but the balance is just not there

    4. Re:Yeah, but ... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      And oral sex increases your risk.

      So it's up to you to decide how to start the day.

      Between oral sex and coffee? I'll take my chances with the BJ 8 days a week!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  2. That's great... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but what does it increase the chances of? Well, besides drug (caffeine) addiction?

    Come on, there's always a catch...

    1. Re:That's great... by kenj0418 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on, there's always a catch...

      don't be so negative there is no catch drinking coffee coffee doesn't have a catch I drink lots of coffee and I don't have any side-effects I think you are being paranoid ha ha I'm not going to have oral cancer and you are just mad about it why don't you chill out and have a cup of coffee like everyone else I think I need another cup of coffee what the hell is this slashdot says I have to wait 30 seconds to post aaahhhh *click* *click* *click* ahhh still 28 more seconds

    2. Re:That's great... by ygslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...but what does it increase the chances of? Well, besides drug (caffeine) addiction?

      I'll bet the rate of cancer morbidity among heroin users is extremely low.

    3. Re:That's great... by epSos-de · · Score: 2

      Correct. We should use our common sense in here.
      Hot coffee can actually increase the chances of cancer, if you burn your tissue way too often.

      The coffee producers funded a study that said that hot tea can create cancer. Now they funded a study that promotes coffee, but actually the tea is far more superior than coffee against cancer, because it can be blended and have multiple effects, instead of one. Most of the medicine was extracted from herbs. And most of tea is made from herbs too.

      The most healthiest coffee is probably the non-roasted, green coffee that is blended with mate and honey.

    4. Re:That's great... by Creepy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The catch is this is American style drip brewed coffee. I'd be curious to see if this same finding is true for French Press or Espresso, which previously have been found to contain oils that are cancer causing, but these are removed in filtered coffee. Perhaps they counteract each other. Also I'd be curious if they used teabags or a tea ball in their research (that didn't find results in favor or against), which would be similar to filtered vs unfiltered coffee.

  3. COFFEE? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like coffee. I REALLY LIKE COFFEE. I drink a lot of coffee. SURE I PEE A LOT, and YES well MAYBE but not REALLY, Iâ(TM)m NOT HIGH STRUNG. I just tell MY FRIENDS to MELLOW THE FUCK OUT. Itâ(TM)s not me, itâ(TM)s you. YOU MOTHER FUCKER. Not me, you. I love coffee. HOW FAST ARE WE GOING? I have things to do. Good bye⦠SERIOUSLY, GOOD FUCKING BYE. Good bye. I love coffee. Or is it cocaine, Iâ(TM)m not sure. Or maybe Iâ(TM)m a crack head? HELLO! HELLO! Yellow mellow. Coffee? Did someone say coffee? I love coffee. Mostly triple espressos, no water no ice. LOVE the drip. I LOVE THE FUCKING DRIP. Coffee that is.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:COFFEE? by needsomemoola · · Score: 2

      Maybe you confused your cocaine for your creamer mix or sugar. I keep mine next to each other bye the coffee machine too. Easy mistake.

      --
      "That'll never compile."
  4. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by masternerdguy · · Score: 2

    I'm skeptical because, yet again, coffee has flip flopped from harmful stimulant that can increase hypertension and cause heart disease to wonderfood that cures everything wrong with you.

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  5. You Sure? by okmijnuhb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You sure it doesn't mean that those with the physical constitution to withstand 4 cups of coffee are resistant to oral cancers?
    These studies are meaningless.

  6. Relative versus absolute risk by gringer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find that changing relative risk to absolute risk makes the wow factor of these studies go down considerably. The absolute risk is of getting oral cancers and dying from them can be derived from the abstract:

    Among 968,432 men and women who were cancer free at enrollment, 868 deaths due to oral/pharyngeal cancer occurred during 26 years of follow-up.

    So the 26-year absolute risk of death due to oral/pharyngeal cancer in this study was about 1 in 1,000 (one thousand). Assuming an even spread across the years, that's also about 1 in 30,000 for any given year.

    Drinking greater than 4 cups of coffee a day has a relative risk of about 0.5, so that's about 1 in 2,000 over 26 years (a difference of 0.045%), or about 1 in 60,000 in any given year (a difference of 0.0017%).

    Note that this risk reduction is associated with death due specifically to oral/pharyngeal cancer, not the cancer alone -- it does not follow from these results that drinking coffee reduces your risk of getting cancer. If you get oral/pharyngeal cancer, but die from being impaled by an angry unicorn, it doesn't count for the purposes of this result / association.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:Relative versus absolute risk by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Note that this risk reduction is associated with death due specifically to oral/pharyngeal cancer, not the cancer alone -- it does not follow from these results that drinking coffee reduces your risk of getting cancer. If you get oral/pharyngeal cancer, but die from being impaled by an angry unicorn, it doesn't count for the purposes of this result / association.

      Thank you! A beacon of logic in an attic of doubt and uncertainty.

      In order to assess the risk, we need to compare the total risk of drinking coffee with the total risk of not drinking coffee. Just examining and comparing one aspect is not enough - we need to take everything into account.

      I've been considering starting to drink coffee now that I'm getting older (>50 yrs), and have been doing a bunch of research on it. I've found a number of benefits in the literature to drinking coffee; for example, it lowers the risk of kidney stones (surprising, in my view).

      I have not found any long-term health disadvantages to drinking coffee (setting aside obvious short-term effects), and the number of benefits is surprising. I'm not ready to consider coffee as "safe" quite yet, but so far as I can tell it's a good bet.

      We need a study of the total risk associated with drinking coffee, in the manner that we have total risks associated with smoking and drinking.

  7. Re:statistics by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2

    22% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  8. surely, there were other results... by Goldsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A 26 year study, following 968,432 people and these guys draw a conclusion revolving around coffee and a cancer involving 0.09% of the people in the study?

    That's some serious barrel scraping on that data set.

    That said, it's one more argument to use when my wife complains that I drink too much coffee. Go science!

  9. Subsequent research will show ... by kawabago · · Score: 3, Funny

    Subsequent research will no doubt show that the coffee isn't directly responsible. People drinking 4 or more cups of coffee a day are far too wired to engage in oral sex, so the result of fewer infections of oral STD's leads to fewer oral cancers.

    1. Re:Subsequent research will show ... by Zibodiz · · Score: 2

      Actually, my hypothesis is that oral cancer is caused by drinking soda; so the people who drink 4+ cups of coffee/day don't get it, because they never have any soda.
      Now, somebody, please come out with a study that refutes my hypothesis so I can get back to drinking Mountain Dew by next sumer!

  10. Not quite as impressive... by dalias · · Score: 2

    Not quite as impressive as the 100% reduction in the rate of Alzheimer's, but 49% is still pretty damn good. Not sure what's up with all the anti-coffee trolls calling this propaganda from "the coffee industry".

  11. Re:statistics by narcc · · Score: 2

    Google "Relative risk"

  12. Re:You Sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This. There is a reason 2/3s~ of the human race don't get cancer. Hint, it isn't because they were lucky.

    Most people develop and destroy minor cancers throughout their entire life, a little known fact that seems to be forgotten by the majority.
    These people, even exposed to high numbers of carcinogens still don't develop full-on cancers.
    That is a genetic reason and one we still don't fully understand yet, that is different even from diet. (but diet does increase your defences too)
    No, Petri-dish tests aren't a human body. So don't say you can infect anyone with cancer straight-up. Biology doesn't work like that.

    Research on cancer lines isn't exactly helpful, either, since those came from people who developed full-on cancers!

  13. Re:Lurking variables... by hrvatska · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Neglects to mention that people who work in an occupation where they have an opportunity to get four cups of coffee a day are usually office or transport jobs.... not dangerous ones. Any thoughts?

    I grew up in town where most people worked some sort of blue collar job, and I recall plenty of big coffee drinkers. I spent a summer working in a steel mill and it wasn't unusual to see guys arriving with large thermoses of coffee. Those that didn't bring it to work could purchase it from vending machines in the break rooms. A couple of cups before work, a couple during breaks or lunch, and by the end of the day they had had at least four cups of coffee.

  14. Hurray! by docilespelunker · · Score: 2

    Now for the study proving that pizza and beer are good also. I feel I may be a valid entry to the data set there...

  15. It's the antioxidants by Andrio · · Score: 3

    It's not the coffee. It's the antioxidants in the coffee. For a lot of Americans, coffee is probably the only steady source of antioxidants in their diets.

    It's the same thing as with wine. Drinking some wine everyday isn't good for your heart because the wine is good for you. It's because of the antioxidants that were in the grapes.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:It's the antioxidants by Andrio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Back in the 1800s, scientists discovered the three macronutrients: carbs, protein, and fat. They said to themselves "We now understand food. If people get enough of all these three, they will be healthy."

      Of course, that didn't work. People still got things like scurvy.

      Then scientists discovered Vitamins. And they said "We now understand food. If people get enough of all of these, they'll be healthy."

      Of course, that doesn't seem to be really working either. Even processed and refined food is often loaded with vitamins (100% Vitamin C!) because it's marketable.

      Now recently scientists started to pay attention to these things called Polyphenols. There's thousands of different ones, found in food (well, natural foods); they're what "antioxidants" can be classified as. Not all that much is known about them so far (It doesn't pay much to do research in non-patentable stuff, like natural food). But I suspect they will eventually they'll become as common in dietery speak as the macro and micro nutrients are.

      In short, food, and foods effects on the body are a very complex thing, and only fools believe we know all there is to be know about it.

      --
      The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  16. Traditional coffee "cup" = 6 floz by jabberw0k · · Score: 2

    The traditional measure of a "cup" of coffee, at least in the United States, is 6 fluid ounces, 177 ml. So "four cups" would be about 700ml.

  17. Probably just affects the flora in the mouth. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many diseases are mediated by the microflora living on and in the human body; e.g. we now know that ulcers mostly result from bacterial infections in the stomach. A lot of oral cancer comes from the STD HPV. I'd bet that a lot of coffee changes the balance of bateria and fungus and viruses living in the mouth, leading indirectly to a lower incidence of cancer.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  18. Re:Lurking variables... by denmarkw00t · · Score: 2

    Mod parent up! Same goes for construction workers (at least when I was growing up). I'd go to the sites with my dad and most of the guys working had thermoses in-hand, hopefully with coffee inside...

  19. AARP had this first... by Zibodiz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, not to be a wet blanket, but my Dad told me about this a week ago, after reading about it in his subscription of AARP's [print] magazine. Shouldn't us young[er], technologically-savvy, electronically-delivered folks be getting science news a little bit faster than the old people get it in their mainstream print magazines?

  20. Bless the Maker and his coffee. by sexybomber · · Score: 2

    It is by coffee alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the juice of the arabica bean that the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking. The shaking becomes a warning. It is by coffee alone I set my mind in motion.

  21. Re:statistics by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Informative

    If 100 out of 10000 non-coffee-drinkers got cancer (1%) and 51 out of 10000 coffee drinkers got cancer (0.51%) that's a 49% decrease.

  22. Re:Possible FRAUD ALERT. by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm VERY skeptical.

    Seriously? Did you not RTFS? "The study, published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, was conducted using the Cancer Prevention Study II. The large cohort study began in 1982 by the American Cancer Society. Researchers were able to examine 968,432 men and women, none of whom had cancer at the time of their enrollment in the study."

    What is someone who doesn't trust science fucking doing at slashdot, anyway? Go back to Sports Illustrated and leave us nerds alone, dumbass.

  23. Correlationn is not causation by davidannis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One study found that you are less likely to die young if you drink wine instead of beer. It's not because beer causes death or because wine wards death off. It is because at the time the study was done the ratio of wine to beer consumption was strongly correlated with income. Having a higher income was positively correlated with adequate nutrition and health care. Just because drinking coffee correlates with something doesn't mean that it causes it.