Slashdot Mirror


Inside the World's Biggest Consumer 3D Printing Factory

Sparrowvsrevolution writes "Much has been made of consumer 3D printers like Makerbot's Replicator and the open-source RepRap. But for those not yet willing to shell out thousands of dollars for their own machine, Shapeways offers 3D printing as a mail-order service. And its new Queens, NY factory is now the biggest production facility for consumer 3D printing in the world. Just one of Shapeways' industrial 3D printers, which use lasers to fuse nylon dust, can print a thousand objects in a day, with far higher resolution than a consumer machine as well as intricate features like interlocking and nested parts. The company hopes to have more than fifty of those printers up and running within a year. And it also offers printing in materials that aren't attainable at home, like gold, silver, ceramic, sandstone and steel."

20 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. so what's the barrier to entry on this? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    If I front some capital, can I become the next Shapeways? Do I just buy machines people can't afford, and then print things on those machines, selling them at a markup sufficient to recoup my costs? Or is there something else going on?

    1. Re:so what's the barrier to entry on this? by Anaerin · · Score: 3, Informative

      To answer your questions, in order:

      • Yes
      • Yes
      • No, that's all there is to it.
    2. Re:so what's the barrier to entry on this? by Tr3vin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a bit more going on. I don't know how easily you could jump into the market at this point. Shapeways benefited from being one of the first to offer a 3D printing service, so they didn't have too much competition. There was also a bit of an overlap with their early community and the community around Blender, so the userbase was able to grow quickly. They had some growing pains early on with delays in printing although it appears that they have worked through most of the issues at this point. It wouldn't be impossible to have similar success, but being the new guy in the market isn't always the easiest. The best bet of course is to not just join the market but expand it.

    3. Re:so what's the barrier to entry on this? by Kielistic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would require a lot of capital. These machines and their materials are absurdly expensive. You require knowledge on how these machines function. You need to be able to translate what the customer wants to the given machine (high 3d modelling and CAD skills). You need the know-how to put objects together into single prints so you're not waiting for one single small object (optimization). And most importantly you need to be able to add the support structures so the objects do not break in the process (physics, 3d modelling, CAD). Etc etc.

      So essentially, like any other highly specialized tech field, it requires lots of expertise. You don't just load up a docx and hit print.

    4. Re:so what's the barrier to entry on this? by poity · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The most important part is getting people to know you exist (and getting them to trust you). Now that Shapeways has an article on Forbes, everyone else, including you, is miles behind.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    5. Re:so what's the barrier to entry on this? by samkass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One barrier to entry could conceivably be (of course!) patents. The first company to do large-scale 3D printing I'm aware of was Align Technology, Inc., maker of Invisalign plastic braces (I'm a former employee). They've been printing positive molds for the aligners using stereolithography for over a dozen years, and have a lot of patents in the "mass customization" industry. When you start printing tens of thousands of unique objects a day like they've been doing for years there are certain methods that give you economies of scale despite each piece being different. It's not applicable to low-volume home printing, but when you get to a warehouse of 3D printers things could get interesting. There are probably other companies out there with additional work in this space that will crop up if it gets lucrative enough. (And hey, many aren't even software patents.)

      --
      E pluribus unum
    6. Re:so what's the barrier to entry on this? by NoMaster · · Score: 2

      You left out the bit about getting your advertising for free...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    7. Re:so what's the barrier to entry on this? by Kielistic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know quite well how their printers work. But in case you don't believe me here's Shapeways' take on the topic: support structures

  2. Good service by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Informative

    I ordered the sintered steel thorn dice set from them for roleplaying games, and I have to say I'm delighted. I'd imagine in about fifty years home manufactories will be about as common as power tool sets are today, although if you want the best quality you'll have to go to larger producers. Mostly they will be used for short term, specialised, low stress, or artistic requirements though, I can't see anyone printing off high end tech like the latest laptop cheaper than it could be bought through regular channels.

  3. Re:Cost by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 3, Informative

    Eh its all on their site. The steel dice that let me roll like Sauron cost about $12-$15 each, with the expected postage. Those were the most expensive ones though except the gold plated versions, so material used would be the main thing associated with the cost. http://www.shapeways.com/model/126266/thorn-dice-set-with-decader.html

  4. Re:Questionable goods by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, what if I submit a design to print a 3D gun (or replacement parts for one)? What about the packaging for, say, a credit card skimmer? How about a timing circuit made entirely out of electrically-conductive plastic (so it doesn't show up on an x-ray scanner)?

    Um, then you should receive a 3D gun, the packaging for a credit card skimmer, or a timing circuit. Haven't we gotten past this "make the tools illegal" crap yet? It's what you do with them, not the item itself that's problematic, and there are valid uses for all the above.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  5. Re:Cost by Anaerin · · Score: 2

    They charge by the amount of material used, as a simple glance at http://www.shapeways.com/materials would show you.

  6. Re:Questionable goods by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Um, then you should receive a 3D gun, the packaging for a credit card skimmer, or a timing circuit. Haven't we gotten past this "make the tools illegal" crap yet? It's what you do with them, not the item itself that's problematic, and there are valid uses for all the above.

    I've tried telling my government that... but they keep arresting, torturing, threatening, and imprisoning me whenever I do. I'm also on a whole bunch of watch lists, kill lists, security lists, lists of lists, databases of lists, lists of databases... I don't even know anymore whether I'm coded green, yellow, orange, additional screening, deportation... it seems like they come up with new ways to criminalize things every day. I don't know a single person who isn't a felon anymore... the only difference is, not all of them have been caught or pissed in the cheerios of someone "important".

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  7. Won't be long now... by SwampChicken · · Score: 2

    before the MAFIAA turn their attention to these 3D printing outfits.

  8. Tea Party hates TSA, likes guns by raymorris · · Score: 2

    You've got that exactly backwards. Tea Party people hate government interference and enjoy usenet shootong on weekends. His comments are those of a liberal weenie.

  9. Since it's a new industry, marketing. Don't buy... by raymorris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In a banjs new industry, it's all about marketing, getting market share. Profits come later, after the market stabilizes and you are the market leader. So plan to spend a lot more on marketing than machines at first. Also, three months later, better machines will come out. Buy smart and plan to replace often. Better processes will also be developed, so budget big for research and development so that your process is better than the other guy's.

  10. Re:I challenge you by drkim · · Score: 2

    I challenge you to use a modern, fully equipped machine shop to machine a fully functional horse.

    A horse is not low tech. It's taken 4 billion years of evolution and controlled breeding to make a modern horse.

  11. Re:Is it just me or... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 3, Informative

    Control + scrolwheel down works in most browsers

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  12. Re:Cost by guises · · Score: 2

    Without an opening in the cavity you can't get the powder out. You're starting with a bed of powder and you're fusing parts of it together - if you try to make an unbroken shell you're just going to wind up with something full of your material powder.

  13. Re:Is it just me or... by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    Rich old people don't have poor eyesight, poor old people do. Rich old people can have their cataracts, nearsightedness, age-related farsightedness, and astigmatism completely cured for $15,000, the price of two CrystaLens implant surgeries.

    I'm 60 and have one in my left eye, my vision is better than 20/20 at all distances. My eyesight (which used to be incredibly nearsighted as well as age-related farsighted; I had contacts AND reading glasses) is better than most 20 year olds. I now need no corrective lenses at all.

    Hooray for technology!

    You will be assimilated... if you can afford it.

    Maybe Forbes is for poor old people who wish they were rich?