White House Must Answer Petition To 'Build Death Star'

EdIII writes "The White House petition to secure funding for building the Death Star has garnered over 25,000 signatures, which means the White House must officially respond. I can't wait to see it. My question to Slashdot readers: what modifications would you add to the proposed Death Star? Obviously, as one journalist put it, 'guardrails around any of the facility's seemingly endless number of bridges, spans, shafts and pits.' What other changes would you ask your representatives to make?"

Comments

Remove the obvious structural weaknesses

[DaemonDan]

No more shafts leading directly to the core, please.

Re:Remove the obvious structural weaknesses

[bondsbw]

Such as the White House?

Re:Remove the obvious structural weaknesses

[tonywong]

iFixit will give the new Death Star a repairability rating lower than the new iMac, then.

Re:Remove the obvious structural weaknesses

[Savage-Rabbit]

No more shafts leading directly to the core, please.

They already fixed that on the Endor variant (they just had a lousy slow contractor building it).

My vote is that they add an exterminator or two to the crew. I hear the first Death Star had quite a pest problem in it's garbage compactors.

What none of you realise is that we are about to witness yet another round of trials and tests of the new death star concept demonstrator, the USS Apophis. They only made it look like an Asteroid to fool the Chinese. This has been common knowledge among UFOlogists for years now.

Re:Remove the obvious structural weaknesses

[aix tom]

Don't remind me about Alderaan.

Put your money in the Bank of Aldreaan, they said. Safest bank in the universe, they said. They'd have to to blow up the entire planet to get in there, they said.

The White House should be all:

[smittyoneeach]

"What, our Debt Star isn't enough? Don't try to out-greed us, peasants."