Slashdot Mirror


Vivos Founder Builds an Underground City Where You Can Ride Out the Apocalypse

pigrabbitbear writes "'I was inspired with a very powerful message around 1980 that I needed to build a shelter for 1,000 people deep underground to survive something that was coming that was going to be an extinction event,' he explained in an extensive phone interview. 'That's it, that's all I had. But it was powerful. So powerful that I had a successful business with 100 employees and I took time off to go up into the mountains and search on weekends looking for an underground mine or cave that could be cartoned and converted.' Today, Vicino is the owner and founder of Vivos, a company that sells space in luxury survival complexes around the country. It's what he likes to call 'life assurance'--mini underground cities, in effect, for people ride out the end of civilization in a community setting with good food, television, even a potential dating pool. He says demand has increased 1,000 percent this year compared to last—itself a 1,000 percent increase over the year before."

150 comments

  1. so... up to 100 customers then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    #MATH

    1. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless he started with an imaginary customer.

      --

      Liberty.

    2. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by aquabat · · Score: 1

      At least 100 customers, assuming he had at least one customer two years ago. Geez, he could have just said "100 times the customers in two years," and it would have sounded impressive and straightforward.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    3. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by Kreychek · · Score: 1

      Obligatory XKCD regarding percent-based growth figures: http://www.xkcd.com/1102/

    4. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the way they said it makes it clear that the increase is over two years, and not just one big surge at one point.

    5. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless he started with an imaginary customer.

      No, he was his own 1st customer. But still it's not "up to 100" ...

      1000% != 1000% increase

      1
      (1 + 1*10) = 11
      (11 + 11*10) = 121

      Math wins.

    6. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      121 customers, 100.
      Maths (with an S)

      FTFY

    7. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant:

      121 customers, not 100.

      Each year was a 1000% increase, rather than 10 times as many.

    8. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      111, unless the customers from previous years have already bailed.

    9. Re:so... up to 100 customers then? by Misterfixit · · Score: 0

      Read the novel "Wool" ISBN: 1469984202.

      --
      nar
  2. 1000% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 to 10, 10 to 100 would qualify!

  3. To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a marvelous idea. We'll just hide in this handy cave and watch TV until the zombies have all eaten each other. After that we can come out and someone will be ready with McDonalds and Starbucks waiting for us.

    1. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have to wonder if the perversely optimistic nature of most 'survival' plans(optimistic compared to, say, a collapse of complex social systems where service industries don't just spring up again to take your hoarded gold in exchange for fresh food, not optimistic compared to non-collapse scenarios) has to do with psychological self-selection....

      The greater one's confidence in one's own individual agency, capability, ability to achieve goals, etc. as opposed to a general lack of confidence or overt recognition of dependence in some areas of life, the more likely somebody might be to treat surviving an apocalypse of some flavor as a plausible goal. However, the same sorts of traits frequently predispose people to adopt vaguely antisocial and tech-heavy solutions for a problem that is (short of magic nanites or something) unlikely to be solvable alone.

      In terms of surviving hostile conditions and the closest thing to isolation from modern society that the planet currently has to offer, empirical observation pretty much forces you to bet on the various relatively low-tech, clannish, kin groups that have lots of experience with scrounging in their own squalor. It isn't a pretty strategy; but it has worked for essentially the entire period between the evolution of Homo Sapiens and the rise of agricultural civilization(and for a time thereafter, albeit only in places marginal enough that agricultural civilizations couldn't be bothered to send in the army for a bit of the old 'civilizing').

      By contrast, your techie-nerd survival-through-gadgets-and-stockpiles types can be expected to last only slightly longer than their MRE supply...

    2. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a single Starbucks remains, civilization CAN be rebuilt. But if a single McDonalds survives doomsday, all is lost -- we will know the Zombies have won.

    3. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      You missed the part about "potential dating pool."

      Read that as "escort service."

      You might as well go out with a fuck . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Ichijo · · Score: 0

      But don't eat the meat.

      On an unrelated note, have you ever noticed how ethnic restaurants tend to be located right next to animal hospitals?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    5. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mien Fuhrer! I can walk!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by PvtVoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up, please. The number one thing you need to survive the coming apocalypse (which isn't actually coming) is a community that works together. Stock rice and beans, but instead of stockpiling ammo, get to know your neighbor. You won't have to shoot them, then.

    7. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by countach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he might sell more spots in this venture if he gave away a few free bonus spots to some hot young blondes. Otherwise 99% of the buyers will probably be old geriatric corporate guys.

    8. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up, please.

      The number one thing you need to survive the coming apocalypse (which isn't actually coming) is a community that works together. Stock rice and beans, but instead of stockpiling ammo, get to know your neighbor. You won't have to shoot them, then.

      If human history is anything to go by, you'll unfortunately have to master both skills. Not only do you have to be good enough neighbors that your attempt at agriculture doesn't end in mass starvation and not too many disagreements over the neighborhood's offspring and their foolish dating choices end in generations-long blood feuds; but you also have to be ready for a more or less constant series of meat-grinder skirmishes with the guys who live a valley over from you, all for reasons that are largely inchoate but will seem like a big deal at the time...

    9. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by countach · · Score: 1

      Why buy into this plan? If doomsday comes, rock up to the shelters with an AK-47, and commandeer it. Even if you buy into it with $$, you'll still have to fight off the other 6 billion people to actually use it.

    10. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      The greater one's confidence in one's own individual agency, capability, ability to achieve goals, etc. as opposed to a general lack of confidence or overt recognition of dependence in some areas of life, the more likely somebody might be to treat surviving an apocalypse of some flavor as a plausible goal. However, the same sorts of traits frequently predispose people to adopt vaguely antisocial and tech-heavy solutions for a problem that is (short of magic nanites or something) unlikely to be solvable alone.

      The goal of these 'caves' isn't to rebirth the human race. They're there for those who buy in to live out the rest of their lives in comfort. You're right, one can't rebuild humanity alone, but when so few humans give a shit beyond tomorrow's episode of jersey whore, what other choice is there?

    11. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Funny

      Socialist rubbish. You'll need to learn to get along, sure, but you must MASTER the ability to perceive deception before you get fucked over, because being fucked over, even once, in such a situation, probably means you starve to death or are killed outright and robbed. such a world will be very thin on people willing to share what they have. The sane default is to assume deception at some point along the way in any cooperative endeavor. That doesn't mean you avoid all coops but you should plan contingencies. A lot of them..

    12. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Yeah this guy blew it.. He should've kept it as secret as possible..and in as remote an area as possible.

    13. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are people out there with the attitude of "why work and stockpile food when your armaments can ensure food from your neighbors?"

      The problem is that in the country, people need skills like knowing how to grow crops, irrigation, weather, what types of livestock are best for the land and for trade, how to build a farm for most effective growth, how to handle coyotes, pumas, and other predators, dealing with rats and other vermin, maintaining a livable home, making sure one has enough firewood, making sure drinking water is sanitary, basic sanitation, first aid, basic/advanced medical knowledge, knowing plants and what is edible versus what will kill you, how to store food for longest life and minimizing rot and rodent inroads, how to get animals and crops to a trading post, bazaar, or farmer's market, how to keep vehicles working when the nearest mechanic would be days if one had to walk, how to deal with two-legged vermin, how to deal with trash, burying the dead so it doesn't cause a sanitation hazard, keeping grass low to protect against snakes, and many other things that if listed would be paragraphs long.

      A person in the city just needs cunning, and they can thrive. Knowing how to manipulate other people is the sole skill needed to eke out a living in urban areas. One can have a well-off life being an absolute parasite and produce nothing.

      Now, take the city people, and try to make them deal with "real" life. Not a life with food trucks coming in at all hours to restock the nearest Starbucks or Wal-Mart, but having to actually grow/kill what they eat. With no other skillsets, they will go the route of what they can seize by force. Even if a farm is well defended, unless one has a militia with 24/7 guards, someone will be coming in after dark to set fire to buildings just out of "if I can't have it, nobody can" attitude. We saw that with Katrina where people's houses were turned into their funeral pyres because they defended their place successfully, but couldn't stay up 24/7 or see people intruding at night. Yes, those people will starve, but they will take the food producers with them.

      What is one's best bet? Live at least 50-100 miles away from a city. That is enough distance that average cars will not have enough gas to cover, and cars that do will be stuck in permanent traffic jams (the last hurricane from Houston had people trying to leave three days in advance... and roads were so bad that there were people still stuck on the interstates when the winds hit.) So, while the hive-people fight each other for scraps of fuel, areas past the no-man's land will be relatively safe.

    14. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Deception, theft, betrayal, and violent death are certainly common outcomes; but that's the major reason(second only to the fact that even small-scale division of labor beats the hell out of farming alone) why cooperation is rewarded: It is very difficult to prepare yourself against all acts of violence or deception. It is easier to have people know that yes, they could stab you while your back is turned; but they'll be shitting teeth for weeks when your displeased kin group shows up for revenge if they actually try it...

      (Also, just as a matter of terminology, concepts like 'socialism' aren't really very well defined, if they mean anything at all, on the scale we are talking about here. Only once you have a nation state, some amount of surplus production, a mechanism(usually currency, since agricultural commodities are heavy and perishable) for distributing or redistributing that surplus, and some degree of fraying in legacy social frameworks does it really make sense to start using words that more or less imply positions about how state power should be deployed to modify economic outcomes. It also helps to have enough technology that your society has capital goods other than agricultural land and enough bureaucratic development that the state can actually execute policies in any useful sense.)

    15. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^ has never been camping.

    16. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post-apocalyptic victors will be those who stockpiled (and defended) guns, ammo, fuel, tools, and food. Oh, and my automatic zombie-tracking gun turrets definitely give me an edge.

    17. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried camping once. The experience helped shape my current "head for a decent bar located as close as possible to something worth nuking and attempt to be vaporized with a gin and tonic in hand" strategy for apocalypse management...

    18. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      by 'socialism' in this context, I only meant that those who expect mass sharing of stockpiled resources, especially in the beginning, will probably be shot themselves. I could see remnant governments attempting this as a power grab.

    19. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      What a marvelous idea. We'll just hide in this handy cave and watch TV until the zombies have all eaten each other. After that we can come out and someone will be ready with McDonalds and Starbucks waiting for us.

      Cave??? Is THAT what they call your parents' basement these days???

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    20. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by drkim · · Score: 1

      You missed the part about "potential dating pool."

      Read that as "escort service."

      You might as well go out with a fuck . . .

      Actually, "Go Out With A Fuck" would be a good name for an escort service.

    21. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, it doesn't matter if you're good at the "people" side of things if you're the person everyone is looking to to help them survive.

      Short of being surrounded by like-minded people, you're going to have to rely on ordinaries. Ordinaries will need you, too.

      There is only one way to avoid the long running blood fueds and eventually being wiped out. It's to build a new Empire of a single, cooperative and cohesive culture with its own internal enforcement structure. Think the Romans or the Khans.

      That said, it's all moot once you die. Guns, ammo, MREs, etc. are short term (albeit single lifetime) thinking. Most people aren't going to think much beyond one or two generations.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    22. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Give me a tent, water purifier, food to hunt and wood to burn.... oh and Heather Graham Grrrrrrr :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    23. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, it doesn't matter if you're good at the "people" side of things if you're the person everyone is looking to to help them survive.

      All it takes is one asshole willing to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs, and it doesn't matter how many people are looking to you to help them survive. Community is the only thing that can possibly get you through any serious badness... a community of people who have stockpiled ammo and know how to shoot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a bar stool waiting for you. First round is on me.

    25. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by That_Dan_Guy · · Score: 1

      I think this girl will be there with you:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBP6yriRFiQ

    26. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he might sell more spots in this venture if he gave away a few free bonus spots to some hot young blondes.

      They're called 'furniture'.

    27. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An individual "roughing it" will probably find plenty of wood to burn... as long as you don't gather it from someone's land that they're patrolling with a deer rifle.

      However, multiply that by a hundred million urban refugees all looking for wood to burn... it won't last long.

    28. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Most survivalist guides (at least, the saner ones) actually emphasize that community / tribe aspect. James Wesley Rawles, for example, which is a prominent figure in conservative / far-right part of the movement, advocates for like-minded people to all move and settle together in a specific part of the country, with an explicit goal of forming self-supported communities after "SHTF". And he is specifically promoting selection on the basis of religion to ensure strong bonds.

    29. Re:To ride out the end of civilization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The greater one's confidence in one's own individual agency, capability, ability to achieve goals, etc. as opposed to a general lack of confidence or overt recognition of dependence in some areas of life, the more likely somebody might be to treat surviving an apocalypse of some flavor as a plausible goal. However, the same sorts of traits frequently predispose people to adopt vaguely antisocial and tech-heavy solutions for a problem that is (short of magic nanites or something) unlikely to be solvable alone.

      When that person survives while you die of hunger and radiation poisoning, I guess you'll conclude that your logic was wrong.

  4. Your own vault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Vault tec comes to life

    1. Re:Your own vault by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      As long as I get to be Overseer (assuming it's not in Vault 11).

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    2. Re:Your own vault by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Vault tec comes to life

      Honestly, this story would be much better if each little habi-pod had its own fucked-up dystopian social engineering theme. Much more interesting that the generic 'thermonuclear Marriott' shtick.

    3. Re:Your own vault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they do...

    4. Re:Your own vault by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      You have been assigned as overseer of vault 157.

      The vault contains 2 of each apex predator, (1 who will remain in stasis until only 1 species is left alive) and no doors or weapons.

      Have fun.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    5. Re:Your own vault by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 1

      Now you've done it. In which novel(s) did that happen? I seem to remember reading something like that.. even wars between the pods.

  5. Can I just go live there by Todamont · · Score: 1

    ... *until* the apocalypse?

    --
    Kharma is like a boomerang. Mine is broken.
  6. not totally irrational by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    nuclear weapons exist. you might make it to your shelter.

    1. Re:not totally irrational by TFAFalcon · · Score: 2

      Well there are two ways that things may go : either a quick nuclear war, where you're unlikely to even know the war is happening before you're vaporized, or a slow buildup to a war. And if it's slow I can guarantee you the government it going to seize all shelters for 'vital personnel'.

    2. Re:not totally irrational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will try to seize them. At that point, I don't think many people will be afraid of revolting.

    3. Re:not totally irrational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Vital personnel" being the 2% and the other people who caused the damn war in the first place. With any luck they would soon kill each other.

    4. Re:not totally irrational by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are other alternatives, also unpalatable:

      Depending on where you fall on the spectrum of confidence in second-through-Nth-strike capabilities, it doesn't necessarily have to be the case that a nuclear war would involve everybody shouting FIRE ZE MISSILES!!! and launching the world's supply of strategic nukes. If confidence in second strike is very low, or is based entirely on a 'we can get our rockets off the ground in the time between when theirs pop up on the big board and when they hit', then it will be over hard and fast. If, though, you assume a much more robust and survivable capability(missile subs, widely distributed 'Davy Crocket' style low-yield tactical devices in the hands of military units, significant optimism about how hard your bunkers really are) you might see a relatively prolonged exchange of a mixture of tactical and strategic weapons, with massive destruction of centralize infrastructure(the US gulf coast refining capacity, say) in the first few hours or days; but a fairly large number of civilians who avoid nuclear annihilation in favor of dying in the rubble.

      You could also postulate a scenario where the government's ability to execute coherent strategies like 'seize all the shelters' is what collapses relatively early(for economic reasons, because of a successful nuclear decapitation, some sort of nasty plague, etc.), with various well-armed-but-ill-led armed forces fragments and numerous-but-hapless civilians left to figure things out by trial and error.

      Now, it isn't obvious that any of these scenarios actually makes a short duration bomb shelter worth having access to; but some of them would give you a chance to drive to your tomb and close the door before the supermutants get you.

    5. Re:not totally irrational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who is directly responsible for a nuclear war already has a shelter.

    6. Re:not totally irrational by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      You could even get the drawn-out nuclear war by accident.

      Assume there's some fraction of the nuclear arsenal held back from the initial exchange as a strategic reserve. Then the sky falls on Washington (or Moscow, or Beijing, or whatever) and command and control over those forces completely disintegrates. Now you've got widely dispersed units with no clear orders having to decide for themselves if being unable to raise command on the radio means they should let their birds fly or not. Some of those units are going to be really out of touch -- missile submarines, say, ordered at the outbreak of war to find a quiet spot at the bottom of the Pacific and sit there silently for a couple of weeks before coming up for new orders -- so you could imagine periodic ragged exchanges breaking out for weeks or months after the war is actually over, as those captains come up and discover that there's nobody around to give them those new orders. Some of them may take that as a signal to launch on their own initiative; others may be under explicit "dead hand" orders to launch unless they are given an affirmative order not to.

      The novel Warday , about the aftermath of a limited nuclear exchange between the US and USSR in the mid-'80s, had an interesting chapter along these lines: an "interview" with a Royal Navy destroyer captain tasked in the postwar world with running down remaining Soviet missile submarines and trying to explain to them that the Soviet Union had collapsed and their mission was over. (And with sinking them if they refused to believe it.)

    7. Re:not totally irrational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For those of you who, like me, don't know the difference between strategy and tactics, I looked it up. Strategy is a general, undetailed plan of action,encompassing a long period of time to achive a complicated goal.
      Tactics are small white mints much favoured by children.

    8. Re:not totally irrational by Nyder · · Score: 1

      nuclear weapons exist. you might make it to your shelter.

      Ya, you can name it Megaton.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    9. Re:not totally irrational by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Well there are a few scenarios where having a shelter might save you. But you'd have to live outside a city and very near the shelter.
      Any nuclear strike will still panic the people and cause them to rush out of the cities, causing roadblocks that would prevent you from reaching your shelter. Forget air travel - the army is going to shoot down anything they don't own.
      And when you get to the shelter my guess is that you're going to find it overfilled by a few 100% - why sell a spot once when you can sell it a hundred times - what are they going to do when they find out? Sue you?

    10. Re:not totally irrational by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      So we let them run to their shelters, then cut the comms links and pile rocks on the entrances, and let them have long productive lives where they can't hurt anyone, or start any wars.

  7. EOW scam by shuz · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Mayan calendar is base 20 with the first place only going to 18. This year represents the end of the 13th "great cycle"(13.0.0.0.0). That means that there have been 12 "end of the world events" preceding this year. So the next real end of the calendar doesn't happen until 4000 something when we reach the 20th great cycle. But then it will just start all over with 1.0.0.0.0.0. In short this is NOT the end of the Mayan Calendar.

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    1. Re:EOW scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Mayan calendar is base 20 with the first place only going to 18. This year represents the end of the 13th "great cycle"(13.0.0.0.0). That means that there have been 12 "end of the world events" preceding this year. So the next real end of the calendar doesn't happen until 4000 something when we reach the 20th great cycle. But then it will just start all over with 1.0.0.0.0.0. In short this is NOT the end of the Mayan Calendar.

      Wrong! The great catastrophic event killing large amounts of people around the globe did happen early this morning. Don't believe the media hype - it's just a cover up.

      The event only killed people below ground.

    2. Re:EOW scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, Mayans know how to widen their IP address spaces constructively!

    3. Re:EOW scam by paiute · · Score: 2

      The event only killed people below ground.

      12/20: The Earth Fracked Back.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:EOW scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, win 1 internet.

    5. Re:EOW scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHUT UP!!! It wouldn't be the end of the world anyway. No matter what they say it won't be. Can we please stop entertaining this dumb ass notion? Fucking put it to bed.

    6. Re:EOW scam by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      Evidently the Earth is a Cylon.

      Eh, I've seen worse plot twists.

    7. Re:EOW scam by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I seen that picture on FB. Australia is GONE, but at least they have wifi in Hell!

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    8. Re:EOW scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is serious, I can verify.

      My next door neighbor (Someone Who Isn't Me) took his family down to the cellar, there was a big explosion type thing.
      The light coming out was bright as day.

    9. Re:EOW scam by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      In short this is NOT the end of the Mayan Calendar.

      True. It already ended centuries ago, after their culture was forgotten and their calendar was replaced by the Gregorian one.

  8. Welcome to the Vault by KagatoLNX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is so Fallout that it hurts.

    --
    I think Mauve has the most RAM. --PHB (Dilbert Comic)
    1. Re:Welcome to the Vault by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      Oh Gods, if I have to listen to that 50s music playing on and on in the background again for the rest of my life, I'll take my chances with the nuked people.

    2. Re:Welcome to the Vault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone that doesn't like Ella Fitzgerald or the Ink Spots must be a communist.

    3. Re:Welcome to the Vault by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      "Big Iron" and "Heartache by the Numbers" were pretty good too. However, that "Lets Ride into the Sunset Together " song was damn depressing when you're walking around in a hopeless post-apocalyptic wasteland.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    4. Re:Welcome to the Vault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pack'n whack'n smack'n"

    5. Re:Welcome to the Vault by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      You won't take me alive g-man *narrow eyes*

    6. Re:Welcome to the Vault by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      I liked the whole soundtrack, that was until I was getting my *** kicked by mutants and the soothing sounds of the 50s came rolling over the screaming and gunshots. The moment was just too surreal for me lol.

    7. Re:Welcome to the Vault by Calydor · · Score: 1

      Would it somehow have been more realistic of the music being played on the RADIO magically changed to reflect what you were doing at any given moment in time?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    8. Re:Welcome to the Vault by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      It's so similar that I'm actually surprised that Fallout wasn't mentioned in the article. Let's see what life is like in a vault:

      It's what he likes to call “life assurance”--mini underground cities, in effect, for people ride out the end of civilization in a community setting with good food, television, even a potential dating pool.

      Today, six underground complexes are underway in undisclosed locations around the country, including one in Nebraska, and another in the Rockies, respectively designed to accommodate 900 and 1,000 people. Another, designed to hold 2,000 people, is in the works, with “a ton of interest in Australia.” Only one, located somewhere in Western Indiana, is fully stocked and ready to go.

      Originally, the folks at Vivos thought it may be possible to build entirely new structures for their shelters. They quickly discovered that it was much cheaper and easier to appropriate one of the country’s many empty, underground shelter complexes already in existence, relics of the Cold War.

      Standard rooms in Indiana are outfitted with two bunk beds to hold four people, with access to shared bathrooms.

      From the looks of a video tour available on the group’s website, the Indiana location includes common area amenities like a home theater with leather recliners, dining rooms, multi-user kitchens, a Laundromat, and a very ominous soundtrack. (“Join us for the next Genesis,” it reads.)

      “What Vivos is, is a modern-day fortress or citadel, where our members are safe and secure, with all the supplies they need to ride it out. And we can defend the facilities. So if the rest of the world’s gone crazy, our people will at least be in a safe haven,” Vicino said. He wouldn’t elaborate on how, exactly, the fortresses were armed. But he emphasized that they're equipped for “not offensive, but defensive measures.”

        “I can tell you, you will never get into the compound. And if you do, once the shelter’s locked down, unless you’re in the military, you’re not getting through the door.”

      Yeah, that's a goddamn vault. Hell, even the second picture in the article, if you remove the guy in khakis, would look like a screenshot from Fallout.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    9. Re:Welcome to the Vault by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's a better idea than the Pulowski Preservation Shelters.

  9. For the right price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...I wouldn't mind investing in one of these things. Especially if I could take a vacation there, too. But I'm sure as hell not gonna buy before a very popular apocalyptic date.

    1. Re:For the right price... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bet there'll be a bunch listed on real estate sites at firesale prices starting Dec 22.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    2. Re:For the right price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beat the rush and list yours on Dec 21st.

    3. Re:For the right price... by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      Wait until Saturday, when somebody goes up to the 2k12 apocalypse-anticipators and says, "Hey, don't feel bad... it's not the end of the world"

      (...roflmao... "not the end of the world" *cough*, *cough*).

  10. Sounds strangely familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen this "powerful message" too.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iesXUFOlWC0

  11. Fools by PerformanceDude · · Score: 1

    Clearly fools and their money are easily parted. Can't fault the guy for seeing the opportunity though. I guess the question is: Is it immoral to make a buck from irrational fears when you didn't create the fears in the first place?

    --
    Meus subcriptio est nocens Latin quoniam bardus populus reputo is sanus callidus
    1. Re:Fools by Randomish · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh... isn't that what most mainstream religions do now?

    2. Re:Fools by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Not exactly--organized religion tells you that you have a problem and then offers the "solution" to it.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    3. Re:Fools by deimtee · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it is immoral.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
  12. GLaDOS next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Cave Johnson. All that needs is a crazed devotion to science and complete disregard for human life.

  13. Obligatory Dr. Strangelove quotes by stox · · Score: 5, Funny

    General "Buck" Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?

    Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

    Ambassador de Sadesky: I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Obligatory Dr. Strangelove quotes by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      "Wouldn't this nucleus of survivors be so grief-stricken and anguished that they'd, well, envy the dead?"

  14. You have an astonishingly good idea, Doctor! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    Naturally, they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time, and little to do. But with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within say, twenty years. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  15. Increased demand by jickerson · · Score: 1

    He says demand has increased 1,000 percent this year compared to last—itself a 1,000 percent increase over the year before."

    So they went from 1 person, to 10 people, to 100 people?

    1. Re:Increased demand by nanotera · · Score: 1

      No its 1 to 11 (10 increase = 1000% of 1 ) to 121 which is an increase of 110 over the 11 ie each year is last years number times 11 to give a 10x increase.

  16. Fallout 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, who's to say what will happen. It's not immoral if there's some possibility of an upcoming disaster coming. Since the probability is above zero, then he's not really ripping anyone off. Also, it means they aren't necessarily irrational fears. Now, the real question is if his vaults will really protect anyone and can they be maintained indefinitely? For example, does he have back up systems in case power is lost, the food source is compromised, walls cave in, the outer doors are breached by insane survivalists turned madmax gangland warriors, etc. Redundancy is a pretty big deal. Also, food that can be regrown and feed enough people regularly so they don't turn to cannibalism. You don't want to be trapped inside with starving survivalists, it would almost be as bad as being in the midst of a zombie swarm. I'm thinking fish farms, hydroponic farms, etc. Of course, the biodome projects have shown us that such closed-systems don't last forever. Meaning at some point you have to come out and deal with the post-apocalyptic world. They should also stick computers in there with offline copies of wikipedia, I imagine that would be wildly useful. You just kind of have to hope they thought of everything.

  17. An appropriate submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&type=submission&id=2409491 On the topic, perhaps

  18. Ahh the joys of internet truths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I heard Vivos is a single facility that's about 8K sqft and had 1 room leased to a friend. Mr Vicino has done little to correct anyone of this misinformation I suspect. Take the comments as you will, hearsay or not, but ya.. easy to have a cool website and say everything if you never show much of anything for proof.

    1. Re:Ahh the joys of internet truths by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Is he, by any chance, friends with the 'freedom ship' guys who manage to update the 3D rendering of the bitchin' bioshock libertarian aqua-paradise that they are totally going to be building real soon now every few years?

  19. They don't do much by Hentes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The business is basically buying up old government shelters for cheap, put some furniture in and then sell it for 100 times more. However much would this guy like to portray himself as a modern-day Noah, he is just a smart businessman preying on people's fears.

    1. Re:They don't do much by radtea · · Score: 1

      he is just a smart businessman preying on people's fears.

      You say that like it's a bad thing... at least he's doing this in a relatively harmless way, unlike the security/industrial complex.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    2. Re:They don't do much by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      The business is basically buying up old government shelters for cheap, put some furniture in and then sell it for 100 times more. However much would this guy like to portray himself as a modern-day Noah, he is just a smart businessman preying on people's fears.

      I don't have a problem with him "preying" on people's fears as long as he is really providing them what he claims. My fear with any bunker that stays locked up for decades after you buy it is who is maintaining this thing? How do you know that the food hasn't spoiled or wasn't simply removed as soon as they sold it out? After all the thing requires two of the residents to come open it up in order to see what is in there. For that matter how do you know that a couple of your co-residents haven't opened up and cleaned the place out? Anyway if he provides what he advertises then more power to him. People are free to buy or not buy and it isn't my place to tell them where to spend their money.

    3. Re:They don't do much by Hentes · · Score: 1

      I can't decide whether it's good or bad. On one hand, they get old unmaintained shelters into usable condition once again. On the other hand, in case of a gradual escalation, the government would've done the same, and then use it to shelter loads of people instead of just a bunch of millionaires.
      I couldn't care less what people spend their money on, or how rich this guy gets from it, I just don't buy that he does the whole business out of pure altruism.

    4. Re:They don't do much by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      So your objection is the inherent impurity of altruism itself ?

      Why shouldn't rich people pay big bucks to ride out the Apocalypse they're afraid of, the one they've helped bring about ?

      They should what, be able to do it for free ?

      Or would it be more "altruistic" to just give these shelters to the poor - oh, THAT would certainly go down really well...

  20. This smells like... by Cute+and+Cuddly · · Score: 0

    Advertising!

  21. Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalypse? by reubenavery · · Score: 2

    Never could understand that. If the Apocalypse is coming, let me and my family be its first victims. A good clean death would be much preferable to a pathetic existence on the brink of starvation in a devastated world.

  22. So this is the new Moore's Law by cvtan · · Score: 1

    Moore's Law for morons: Morons increase at the rate of 1000% per year.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  23. Strong message my ass. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

    This is the best:
    "Our people have a survivor mentality, but theyâ(TM)re not survivalists,â he said. âoeTheyâ(TM)re not hoarding food and guns and ammo and camo gear in their garage or their basement. Instead, they bought Vivos."

    My bet is he caters to overly paranoid people with too much money. So what happens when the dust settles and his clients crawl out of their little luxury caves to find the earth is a wasteland? Then what? Go back inside and commit suicide? Where will they find food? How do they adapt to a post apocalyptic world? Be sure to bring the entire family, I am sure the kids will love it!

    If the earth is about to end due to some event the last thing I would want to do is crawl inside a cave and emerge only to find a dead wasteland or a chaotic world in a downward spiral. I would rather Major Kong that event and ride it into oblivion.

    1. Re:Strong message my ass. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that if your response to a problem is "throw money at it, anything else is dreadfully downmarket.", you do not, in fact, have a 'survivor mentality'...

      In other news, buying a black, hard-anodized, aluminum flashlight makes you 'tactical'.

    2. Re:Strong message my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Where will they find food?"

      They will send their man out to the nearest mart to buy more, of course. Failing that, there will be the fall back of ordering over the internet.

    3. Re:Strong message my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well OBVIOUSLY they send one single person out to look for a GECK.

  24. Re:BYOB by Macrat · · Score: 1

    Bring Your Own Blonde

  25. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    There are probably a billion, maybe two, people that we could ask this question even without the downfall of civilization as we know it; but I'm not sure that they could tell us anything useful...

  26. Just leaving these here... by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

    this one's for the in crowd: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFUqh7uF1G4
    this one's for us roaches: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZWc4p5z-J0

    happy derpday everybody ^^

  27. Forget the underground bunkers by Scoldog · · Score: 1

    What happens when the other survivalists come a-knockin.

    What can you do? Run into the woods with your friends? Call yourselves The Wolverines? Put twigs in your hair and beat back the survivalists? No... You hightail it to Pastor Richards Salvation Statue and blast off into space!

    --
    This space for rent
  28. Not in the Simpsons but should be by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

    (In Homer voice) So it's fears you're selling, ay?I'd like a dozen fears please. That costs HOW MUCH??? I'd like one fear please. What? Can I get just a taste? Mmmmmmm.... fear.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  29. Welcome by Cryacin · · Score: 3, Funny

    To Vaultec's Vault 13. Please see the overseer on the way in.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  30. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the death of most people in an all out nuclear war or non-ELE asteroid hit will be neither clean nor quick. The majority that immediately die will be via burning to death (not ionizing radiation) in less than instant time, it will be painful. then burns on survivors further out will become infected. then hunger and thirst and disease will claim more. enjoy!

  31. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

    Many many many million people live on the brink of starvation in a devastated world (it's no use to them that *we* have it nice, is it, so to them the world is all fucked up already) as we speak and have for ages.

    Also, consider this -- not the situation as a whole, but between these two. And I totally don't mean this tongue in cheek.. it's easy to say "fuck it", but as long as someone you care about still wants to live, what will you do? There is no good clean death either, other than falling asleep and not waking up at ripe old age, which is not an option here. So... could you kill a loved one? Or leave them to do it themselves? What you say now would have to condense in some (in)action then, and I kinda doubt that, I hope you take it as a compliment :P

    I rather guess you and I and most everybody would try to survive for as long as we can. People adapt quickly, too. We survived the stone age, the dark ages, a lot of shit compared to which the apocalypse would still be kinda tame. It would be horrible to us, and compared to what we are used to, to our cozy little lives, but absolutely not on a total scale and to what is going on on this planet in general. Many people are enduring worse right now. We might not be among them, maybe we won't cut it, but we'd die trying, I would more or less bet on that.

  32. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    I look forward to eating your rations.

  33. One question by JasoninKS · · Score: 2

    One question...once the place is filled with apocalypse nuts, can we seal the door and just leave them in there for good?

  34. Slashdot! by PPH · · Score: 1

    You couldn't have posted this a bit sooner than the day before December 21, 2012?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by reubenavery · · Score: 1

    Vaporization in a nuclear blast? Not a bad way out. Instantaneous and blink it's over.

    Death by starvation or some fucking infection or some bullshit in a desolate world forced to fight mortally for cans of beans? No thanks, prefer the former. So, please, vaporization thanks. Even a bio/freak-virus attack which kills in a day or two time would suffice.

  36. Very trenchant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the greater problem is the growing number of people who feel they must abandon the world rather than try to save it.

    Rather than get involved and try to make things better, it is so much easier to let the stuff you don't like about the world just run amok and burn itself out, so long as the innocents it takes out with it aren't you and yours.

    But then again.......if what you dislike about the world is the rise of science, secular morality, freedom and responsibility....and your way of fixing it is to foist your crazy superstitions upon others while giving up all your freedom to the government so it can keep you safe.....well then I suppose I would prefer you tucked yourself away into your underground bunker sooner rather than later.

    1. Re: Very trenchant. by Rational · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you're posting from, but in the US at least there appears to be considerable overlap between those most *fearful* of the government and those most opposed to science and secular morality.

      --
      "Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
  37. Pets by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2

    Yes, but will he look after my pet?

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  38. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

    Awww come on, don't be like that.

  39. And in the end the danger was deeply ironic... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    ...when it turned out the event the Myans were warning about was an excessive outgassing of radon by rocks in underground mines.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  40. Let them eat Taggart by Pharmakeus+Ubik · · Score: 1

    Pack up your Galts in your old kit-bag, And smile, smile, smile, While you've a Lucifer to light your fag, Smile, boys, that's the style. What's the use of worrying? It never was worth while, so Pack up your Galts in your old kit-bag, And smile, smile, smile.

  41. Looks like an old Bell System facility by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Nebraska facility is almost certainly a former Bell System facility. It has a classic AT&T microwave tower and high bays for switching equipment. AT&T used to have underground centers across the country for survivable communications. Here's one that is for sale.

    There are a surprising number of bunkers for sale in the US. I see some on the market that were being offered a decade ago. The costs of refurbishing and operating a big military facility in the middle of nowhere are high, and few people bother. Some have done so, and then realized they don't really want to live there.

    1. Re:Looks like an old Bell System facility by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some have done so, and then realized they don't really want to live there.

      That one in particular has been for sale for a very long time, and they have revamped the site at least twice to try to draw more interest. So far, obviously, they have failed. Two million for some land in the middle of nowhere is a pretty hard sell. You could bury a bunch of shipping containers much cheaper.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Looks like an old Bell System facility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Two million for some land in the middle of nowhere is a pretty hard sell."

      Yeah, all that tacky marble effect finishes adds an extra touch of 'class'

    3. Re:Looks like an old Bell System facility by Animats · · Score: 1

      That one in particular has been for sale for a very long time, and they have revamped the site at least twice to try to draw more interest.

      I know. Yet it's one of the more useful sites. It has an airstrip, and it's reasonably close to major Eastern US cities. If there's an emergency, you have a reasonable chance of getting there. There's a useful house above ground, and a comfortable bunker. Even after a nuclear war, you only need to spend about two weeks in a fallout shelter before you can go outside. And there are lots of contingencies for which merely being in a solid house in an isolated area is enough.

  42. I always suspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rich were using all the money they stole from everyone else to build underground bunker fortresses to ride out whatever they have planned for the rest of us... now there's proof.

  43. Does nobody know anymore how to die with dignity? by gweihir · · Score: 1

    This is really, really pathetic, all this failed terror-management. These people are so afraid of death that they lose sight of what is important and miss out on life. Cowering in some hole in the underground delaying the inevitable for a while is not my idea of how to go. In fact is is pretty much a horror-vision.

    Really, my preparation for doomsday are a nice bottle of something alcoholic to take the edge off, but that is it. Nothing more required. Death comes for us all, nothing to be afraid of, except maybe dying badly because you are unable to face death.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  44. Re:Does nobody know anymore how to die with dignit by Nyder · · Score: 1

    This is really, really pathetic, all this failed terror-management. These people are so afraid of death that they lose sight of what is important and miss out on life. Cowering in some hole in the underground delaying the inevitable for a while is not my idea of how to go. In fact is is pretty much a horror-vision.

    Really, my preparation for doomsday are a nice bottle of something alcoholic to take the edge off, but that is it. Nothing more required. Death comes for us all, nothing to be afraid of, except maybe dying badly because you are unable to face death.

    Word, my plan is to just die. If i don't die right away i'm sure someone or something will kill me.

    I don't want to live if i can' t access slashdot.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  45. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never could understand that. If the Apocalypse is coming, let me and my family be its first victims. A good clean death would be much preferable to a pathetic existence on the brink of starvation in a devastated world.

    For me, it's because I value humanity beyond myself and those I immediately know. Humanity must live on. We're the only source of sentience we know of in the universe, and that is precious. This is why it's important that we reach out to the stars. I'll never see the dawn on another world, and neither will my children, but it is still vital that we struggle and strive towards it.

    Wiping out all of humanity without cosmic intervention (gamma ray burst, etc.) is pretty hard. But wiping out our civilization is not. I would want to survive (even in misery) if it meant that one day humanity could rebuild. If I ever get rich, I want to build vaults of knowledge that can survive an apocalypse for those who come after.

  46. Some of us aren't defeatists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is really, really pathetic, all this failed terror-management. These people are so afraid of death that they lose sight of what is important and miss out on life. Cowering in some hole in the underground delaying the inevitable for a while is not my idea of how to go. In fact is is pretty much a horror-vision.

    Giving up on life when it's still possible is the true cowardice, not waiting things out while there's still a chance. Our ancestors lived in much worse conditions. Labeling the struggle to survive as futile and death without achieving anything as "inevitable" smacks of laziness and entitlement. As long as humanity still exists, we much struggle and hope our distant descendants will learn from our mistakes.

    Death comes for us all, nothing to be afraid of, except maybe dying badly because you are unable to face death.

    Early death is a luxury you can afford when you're easily replaceable. When life becomes precious by rarity, indulging in it because you're too fearful of having to struggle to survive is just selfish and pathetic. Death will come for you eventually, but there's no need to rush it when future generations are counting on you.

    1. Re:Some of us aren't defeatists. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You are confused. Maybe a mental infection of the malevolent religious kind?

      Anyways, have a look at "terror management theory". I was not talking about speeding it along or anything. I am not suicidal. I was talking about clinging to life when it does not make any sense at all and in preparation for that actually screwing up your life. That is a terror-management fail.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Some of us aren't defeatists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree that excessive preparation and living in fear is harmful. However, you go too far in the other direction. There are a number of things in life which are inevitable but which are good to prepare for. Storms and power outages, getting sick, old age and inability to work, etc. Obsessing is hurtful, but a little preparation can give peace of mind -- the knowledge that you've got this taken care of and can pretty much safely ignore it gives as much peace of mind in the good times as just ignoring it and far better peace of mind in the bad ones, when you need it.

      I was talking about clinging to life when it does not make any sense at all and in preparation for that actually screwing up your life.

      I would vehemently disagree that when a terrible crisis is upon you that just liquoring up and giving up is the best way to go. I simply do not think that life is worth abandoning just because there's suffering in it, and I refuse to succumb to such nihilism and apathy. I wouldn't be here today if the values you embrace had taken our ancestors 70,000 years ago during the human population bottleneck.

    3. Re:Some of us aren't defeatists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't be here today if the values you embrace had taken our ancestors 70,000 years ago during the human population bottleneck.

      Our ancestors 70,000 years ago have not gone through anything harsher than people living in less fortunate countries go through today. And none of that is anywhere close to the result of a nuclear winter. In case of a true nuclear winter, every single human will die. The only question is whether you die in the blast, or die watching other humans abandon every single thing you consider to be their humanity as the survivors murder kids, the sick, and everyone who is weaker than them for a can of beans. When the can goods are gone, they'll start eating each other. Then they'll die themselves in their own filth.

    4. Re:Some of us aren't defeatists. by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      The only question is whether you die in the blast, or die watching other humans abandon every single thing you consider to be their humanity as the survivors murder kids, the sick, and everyone who is weaker than them for a can of beans. When the can goods are gone, they'll start eating each other. Then they'll die themselves in their own filth.

      Possibly, though there are tons of things that will kill off much of society that won't involve any of that. Where people who prepared, and many who didn't, will simply come out afterwards and go on with their lives. Odds are the people who prepared will come out of in better shape than those who didn't.

      I didn't see anything in that about having things like stocks of seeds to start farming, arms for defense / hunting, or any type of survival training of the occupants. The folks buying these bunkers are actually counting on society basically surviving. So realistically what they are planning for isn't the destruction of the world so much as some sort of major disruption of society. After which they will be able to come back out and find things restored by the folks who didn't go hide out. In essence they are counting on the rest of us to save civilization for them. Which if that is your thing go for it.

  47. Not thinking through the human element... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let me get this straight. This guy is going to have 1000 rather devoted survivalists ( == probably paranoid) cooped up in an underground cave somewhere? I give it 100 days, tops, before people start shooting each other or using whatever other tools are available. Granted, having a small but reasonably-functioning little village could be nice and robust, but with those kinds of numbers it's inevitable that you're going to have some pretty bitter and high-pressure politics going on, and it's only a matter of time before a lot of people snap, particularly if it really is the "end of the world".

    Unless I personally knew each and every person and knew something about their endurance, sanity, and skills in a high-pressure, low-resource situation, I'll take my chances on the surface, thanks.

  48. 5:11am central time came and went by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    very disappointed, hardly any zombies roamed the street and only a small fireball was looming over the horizon. aw heck, those were early commuters and the sun. what a ripoff

  49. Is it named... by khelms · · Score: 1

    Ember?

  50. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some friends and I are looking to buy a 100+ acres in the boondocks. Between 10 people, it's very affordable. Especially because some state governments give away land, if you agree to improve it (and pay taxes on the land and improvements). Free or cheap 100+ acres, a hundred grand for a hunting lodge, and you have a very nice vacation retreat. Folks in the pool can hunt on the land for free, folks that don't can have a comfy cabin in the woods, paranoid survivalists can build a bunker and stock it with ... whatever. Could cover capital improvements by renting out the property to hunters or folks wanting to vacation in the middle of nowhere but with modern convenience. Some of us really want a stocked pond, which would be nice.

    I'm quite sure some folks here will chide me for being a paranoid survivalist (I'm not), others will chide me for not being enough of a paranoid survivalist (fair enough). Reality, I'd just like a nice vacation spot for a reasonable cost that also serves as an offsite backup in case of whatever. If things did get interesting, I'd be happier being with 10+ good friends, being able to sleep at nice and having a nice ice cold beer in hand. Come what may.

  51. 1 guy and 999 virgins by any chance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Preferably female?

    Spooky captcha: godhead

  52. Hmm by DrXym · · Score: 1

    So I can ride out an "apocalypse" which was pulled out of some numerologists ass, or I can pay a lot of money to seal myself underground with a group of end-of-the-world whackjobs? Hmm, it's a tough call.

  53. Re:Why would anyone want to ride out the apocalyps by usuallylost · · Score: 1

    The will to survive is strong in people. There are a lot of "apocalyptic" scenarios that don't give you such a clean death. For example what if the crisis is in the form of a new plague that rips through the population like the black death. Under such a scenario people in an isolated facility like that may well actually survive into a world that isn't that much different, other than far fewer people and a harder life, than what they left. The really bad scenarios; such as a full out nuclear war, killer asteroid, or massive solar flare, will probably kill them as well. Whatever form it takes, no matter how hopeless the situation, there will be a lot of people who will try to survive. If that is your bent then being the most prepared guy can't hurt.

  54. George's Rock Emporium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every year you can purchase paper based calenders that end either 18 or 12 months from the time of purchase. Nobody thinks its the end of the world, they think its the end of the calendar.

    My guess is that Fred the Mayan calendar maker wanted to get into the Mayan equivalent of the Guiness Book of World Records. He went down to George's rock emporium and asked for the biggest rock available. It being the end of the year and everyone was renovating their temple the biggest rock George had wasn't quite big enough to do the whole perpetual calendar but it was big enough to get into Guiness so Fred took it.