Slashdot Mirror


DARPA's Headless Robotic Mule Takes Load Off Warfighters

Hugh Pickens writes writes "If robots are ever really going to carry the equipment of US soldiers and Marines, they're going to have to act more like pack animals. Now Terri Moon Cronk reports that DARPA's semiautonomous Legged Squad Support System — also known as the LS3 — will carry 400 pounds of warfighter equipment and walk 20 miles at a time also acting as an auxiliary power source for troops to recharge batteries for radios and handheld devices while on patrol. 'It's about solving a real military problem: the incredible load of equipment our soldiers and Marines carry in Afghanistan today,' says Army Lt. Col. Joseph K. Hitt, program manager in DARPA's tactical technology office. The robot's sensors allow it to navigate around obstacles at night, maneuver in urban settings, respond to voice commands, and gauge distances and directions. The LS3 can also distinguish different forms of vegetation when walking through fields and around bushes and avoid logs and rocks with intelligent foot placement on rough terrain (video). The robot's squad leader can issue 10 basic commands to tell the robot to do such things as stop, sit, follow him tightly, follow him on the corridor, and go to specific coordinates. Darpa figures that it's illogical to make a soldier hand over her rucksack to a robotic beast of burden if she's then got to be preoccupied with 'joysticks and computer screens' to guide it forward. 'That adds to the cognitive burden of the soldier,' Hitt explains. 'We need to make sure that the robot also is smart, like a trained animal.'"

26 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. A Jingoistic Sentiment by resistant · · Score: 3, Funny

    Many of the the superstitious, ill-educated tribesmen that U.S. ground troops regularly encounter already think the Americans are witches. A headless donkey scampering along with supplies will really mess with the heads of the rag-heads. Maybe some of them will flee in terror instead of shooting at our soldiers. Really, what's not to like? You'll excuse me for a moment whilst I cackle in wicked laughter and stroke my black cat with the unnaturally intelligent glow in its eyes. ^_^

    --
    A truly excellent pizza parlor is a delight unto the heavens. Treasure the sauce and the toppings!
    1. Re:A Jingoistic Sentiment by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Many of the the superstitious, ill-educated tribesmen that U.S. ground troops regularly encounter already think the Americans are witches.

      Given that the US is about the most superstitious, ill-educated nation on the face of the Earth, that's a bit ripe. But then, of course, you famously don't do irony.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    2. Re:A Jingoistic Sentiment by dywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh look, another troll fishing for an insightful mod.

      Seriously. If we're so damn superstition and ill educated, why does everyone still come to our schools from around the world, particularly china and india? Why are we the country that gave the world computers, space flight, airplace, nuclear physics, .... you know what, theres too many things to list.

      Lets cut to the chase: You are a moron and a troll who has engaged his "must bash USA" autopilot and not worthy of any more of my time.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  2. Re:The first war-bot... by DeTech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Have you seen this platform? Most Harley's are quieter, most rock concerts are too. You could avoid this thing like a ghost avoids Mrs. Pacman after she swallows a power pellet.

  3. Beast of burden by micromoog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like a very expensive donkey/mule replacement. Why not just use real animals?

    1. Re:Beast of burden by macraig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two syllables: bul-lets.

    2. Re:Beast of burden by Saija · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also the live thing could be used as a meat source ...
      Hmmmmm donkey ribs....

      --
      Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
    3. Re:Beast of burden by plaukas+pyragely · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know it's pricey and not perfect, but some cons of a mule compared to this machine:

      • You can't chuck a mule into storage to wait until it's required
      • You can't ship a mule in a, say, container
      • You can't (at least easily) airdrop a mule
      • You can't temporary hide a mule for couple days in a forest or under snow
      • You cannot remotely controll a mule
      • Mules might have difficulties in staying calm when bullets and bombs start flying arround
      • In case of injury the whole mule must be replaced, no spares

      Disclaimer: neither military, nor mule specialist ... Based on very general understandment about military

    4. Re:Beast of burden by dywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not bullets. The real reason is two fold:
      -animals get tired
      -animals get scared

      robots do neither.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  4. Random questions by Ginger_Chris · · Score: 3, Informative

    How much can a donkey carry?
    How far can a donkey travel for before "recharging"?
    How quiet is a donkey? Would the donkey sounds draw as much unwanted attention?
    How much money would it cost to pick up a donkey in a local market and then feed it?

    1. Re:Random questions by DeTech · · Score: 3, Funny

      Quick! to the patent office, WAR DONKEY.

    2. Re:Random questions by Ginger_Chris · · Score: 5, Funny

      1. Yes, you start with at least two donkeys of opposite sex...
      2. Depends on how much you like donkeys.
      3. Yes, but it would be a tad mean.

  5. One you forgot by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many bullets can a donkey take (or even near misses) before all your equipment is leaving you at a rapid pace?

    Robots don't startle (or die) easy.

    An animal has common sense, which makes it a poor companion for military use without a ton of training and even then it's pretty vulnerable.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:One you forgot by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does the LS3 work after being shot up? Silly comparison.

      The kinds of animals that locals use can be used locally, by definition. It would make the US troops seem more human, and caring for actual animals may reduce the dehumanisation/PTSD of those troops after a decade+ at war.

      And troops can periodically donate animals to villages. Good for hearts'n'minds. (Particularly if the US breeding program selects only the most combat-trainable animals, leaving you with some excess each year, but also as the animal age too much for heavily loaded mountain patrols but are still okay for farm-work on flatter ground.)

      But, the key is that if there was a need for LS3, then the US would already be using pack animals. They aren't, so there probably isn't.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    2. Re:One you forgot by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But, the key is that if there was a need for LS3, then the US would already be using pack animals. They aren't, so there probably isn't.

      Don't think of it as a robotized donkey, think of it as a jeep that can move in really rought terrain. Also, there's obvious future benefits to supporting this kind of thing, since walking is far superior to wheels anywhere except roads - and nothing stops you from attaching wheels on the bottoms of a walking robot's feet.

      Just imagine it: a two-ton walking, climbing, rollerblading autonomous spider tank armed with lasers, capable of dodging rockets, never sleeping, never resting, tirelessly prowling the night looking for its intended targets... And just to go that extra mile, we could equip it with a glucose-burning fuel cell and have it suck its victims dry with its titanium mandibles. And if you do get a lucky hit, the thing will release a horde of flying robotized killer bees that attack everything in sight.

      The possibilities are endless.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  6. Well done DARPA! by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is perfect for me. I love sports, so long as I'm the one watching them and not playing them. I hate exercise. I love TV, eating and shopping, but carrying my purchases around the shopping center is hard work. Oh yeah I can use a push trolley, but they don't always go all the way out to the car park. And even if they do, how am I supposed to lift them into the trunk and get them out again? Do I look like Superman? So it's great to see DARPA producing technology with civilian applications, and just in time for Xmas! But I want it smaller, with speed stripes and a spoiler, so back to the drawing board I am afraid. But perhaps these civilian versions can pave the way for a later military version? America will be grateful. signed, Grateful taxpayer.

  7. So the Big Dog is deployed... by dbc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Boston Dynamics has been working on this (and posting YouTube videos) for years. That this exists isn't news. That it is finally deployed, OK, a little newsy, but nobody that follows robotics is unaware of Big Dog.

    BTW -- here is a hilarious spoof video:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXI4WWhPn-U
    but search for 'big dog' and watch some of the real ones first. Then the spoof - it's a crack up.

  8. M.U.L.E. by Jookey · · Score: 4, Funny

    The competing agency FARPA is developing competitor to the LS3 technology. The name for this project is the Military Utility Logistics Engine. The stats are about the same except:
    MULE has a payload of only 200lbs
    MULE is quieter
    MULE is capable of in situ resource utilization simplifying logistics
    MULE is capable of doubling as a food source.
    MULE's per unit cost is .01% of LS3 technology.

    FARPA is also working on a more advanced project known as DONKEY, that will have self replicating abilities. Unfortunately this project is still in the early development stages.

    When asked about the cost discrepancy between the $5,000,000,000 LS3 project vs the much more cost effective $500 MULE project, Congressmen Porkbarrel, R, MA replied: "I'm sorry I cant hear you over the sound of all this bribe money"

    Here is a link to an early prototype of LS3:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?hl=en-GB&gl=NZ&v=VXJZVZFRFJc

  9. Politically Correct is Incorrect in Summary by estitabarnak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Darpa figures that it's illogical to make a soldier hand over her rucksack to a robotic beast of burden if she's then got to be preoccupied with 'joysticks and computer screens' to guide it forward." (Emphasis mine.)

    I know that people love sounding politically correct by arbitrarily changing "he" to "she," but in this particular case, it's not only silly but probably wrong. We've been hearing a fair amount lately about how female soldiers aren't allowed in designated combat zones, such as in this piece http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=166303415 In other words, "she" is statistically unlikely compared to "he," here.

    It's a funny time when we start to trade in /actual/ correctness for political correctness.

  10. Re:Impractical by Ryanrule · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These new-fangled cars will never catch on. I could just ride my horse where I need to go.

  11. Re:Impractical by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative

    Donkeys have problems. They need constant food and water (who's going to carry that?) Donkeys need veterinary care. Donkeys freak out if anyone fires a weapon nearby (guns are really loud, in case you didn't know...and you probably don't). Donkeys are intentionally targeted by the enemy and must be protected. This robot has all the advantages of the Terminator. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until the batteries run out.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  12. Re:What advantage does it have over by Celeritas+5k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has several advantages-- gasoline is more energy dense than the food you'd have to carry for a mule, it doesn't get tired, no animal rights issues that would surely result from bringing a mule into a combat zone, and I'm not sure how much your average mule can carry but I don't think it's 400 lbs. The biggest thing is that it's a basis to be improved upon. The next model will be lighter, more reliable, quieter, have more capacity, etc. Give it a few years and I wouldn't be surprised to see civilian applications as well.

  13. All you nay-sayers... by udoschuermann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What all you nay-sayers forget is that this is only the very beginning of (debatable) usefulness. What comes out of this research over the next 10, 30 or 50 years, however, may prove surprising, and not just for how far this "mule" has come, but what other technologies it throws off along the way.

    --
    --Udo.
  14. Re:The first war-bot... by craigminah · · Score: 3, Informative

    Boston Dynamics made Big Dog a few years ago...probably the same thing with a different name (e.g. Boston Dynamics worked on it for DARPA) but it's pretty cool. I especially like the video where it's slipping on ice but never falls. http://www.bostondynamics.com/robot_bigdog.html

  15. Re:What advantage does it have over by Dekker3D · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd say the biggest advantage is that this one listens to your commands. Normal mules are well-known for doing anything -but- listen.

  16. Re:wheels by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those legs work in more situations than wheels do.