Slashdot Mirror
Ask Slashdot: How To Gently Keep Management From Wrecking a Project?
New submitter miserly_content writes "I work in a large, hierarchical technology company. I have been developing technical specs for a new strategic and challenging software project, and the project is slowly gathering steam and support. This is already a career building success for me, and everyone acknowledges my technical capabilities. But the program manager is an MBA-type, and wants to bring in new multiple team leaders and consultants. This is not really a surprise, but I feel we are sliding towards a too-many-chiefs-too-few-indians scenario, especially at this early stage. How can I pitch upper management about this issue, without appearing selfish or disruptive? What positive approach can I try with the PM, with whom I have a good working relationship?"
In these situations, I think you have to solve this problem as small as possible, with the program manager themselves. Figure out what that person feels isn't being delivered or executed on, and make sure you address that manager's needs.
Escalating around the chain of command doesn't usually work in these scenarios, especially if you're relatively new.
More data, damnit!
Your manager is covering his ass. Inserting layers of management between you and him so when/if things to go wrong, he can scapegoat consultants and team leaders.
ot at the very least very little. Have a water cooler chat to the MBA type. Explain what you want.
I know it is your baby and you don't want to lose it, but business is business. It will either work or it won't. No point making too much noise.
Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
One of the problems with taking your position is you might be wrong. I know it's popular on /. to trash anyone with a business degree as a know nothing douchebag, but sometimes perspective outside of the core engineering effort can pay dividends. Instead of trashing the guy and trying to go over his head to torpedo his job, try working with him. You might be surprised what happens if you take a constructive tone.
I feel a large part of my job is to stay out of the way of my developers.
However, we are part of a much larger, ISO-9001 process machine, so it is very difficult to remove the process overhead.
I try to take on as much as I can, so the engineers don't have to weather it, but the process demands that they all have their part checking boxes and attending meetings.
The good thing about a process-driven organization, is that everyone knows exactly who will be sticking their nose in, where, and when. You can't just stuff extra clowns into the car whenever you feel like it.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
-H. L. Mencken
This is right on point. Who cares as long as management is happy? One of the biggest mistakes developers can make is being too idealistic about a project. It's easy to get caught up in something you're developing but unless it's your company or you own the project, sometimes it's best just to do what is asked. If you know it will fail, just make sure you have a solution readily available when it does.
Whatever you do, do NOT go above your manager. It never ends well. And don't ask me how many times I've learned this lesson, but at the time I didn't care. Bosses are usually more clever, savvy, political, and better at justifying their tenuous position. They will always crucify you, no matter how good you are. Unless the boss is doing something literally criminal or otherwise worthy of employment termination, just don't do it.
Constructively find out what your PM wants from these other types. You don't hire new people unless you're getting rid of the old ones or there's more work to do. If he won't tell you with a straight up question you have a problem. Whether you face it right then or not is up to you. So, Is it something that you're supposed to be doing? IF you're not , fix that. If that's not it & it's something you didn't think of, find out how you're supposed to play with these new players.
MBA programs are full of pseudoscience and hard-science envy. Most of that social science crap is about dumbing-down things so that they nicely fit into a simpleton math theory. Worker qualification and experience cannot be "measured", so it is ignored. Workers are slaves who must be replaceable any time just like capital goods. MBA theory hates every expert who cannot be replaced quickly and cheaply, because it threatens the power position of the social science people.
See the sorry state of the nation that invented "MBA". Compare that to a nation led by engineers which propelled itself from crapbin to #2 in 30 years time. See the sorry state of M$ and compare that to Google or Apple. A unique person like Steve Jobs does not fit in their dumb-down pseudo-science theories. "A good manager can manage anything" is their motto, because that is the basis of POWER. And that is what they want - power at all cost for THEM.
Let's wait and see how the dominance of the social science crappers works out for the western world. So far, the future looks very dark with pitchforks, Guillotines and more on the horizon.
Put all of the project management records in a tool or data set they're not using. Give them only aggregate data.
Stop inviting them to meetings.
Don't use corporate e-mail.
Three good ways to get fired.
I am a Program Manager that's worked for a number of leading global companies delivering multi-million $ global IT projects over the last 15 years.
Part of my role is building relationships and facilitating collaboration to achieve success - not just of the projects but also of the individuals on my projects. Both are very important to me and usually the companies I work for and with e.g. suppliers, SIs, customers, etc.
Have a good conversation with your PM, I'd suggest go for lunch/coffee so you've longer to talk. I've used 'him' below so apologies if its a 'her' ;-)
Tell him;
How much the project means to you and what you've put in personally so far.
What the possible successes are - not just of this project but what it could lead to for your company, your customers, etc.
Show him your plan for what the tasks are, when they will be done and who will do them. If you can build a basic time line/table in a spreadsheet showing what will happen by day/week/month. If your using Agile then show the sprints, etc. If you know/learn how to build a basic Gannt chart in MS Project or a spreadsheet - you'll probably blow him away!
Talk about resources - you might not need more generals but most projects can deliver better with more soldiers. Work with him to identify what resources you need. Also don't be afraid of bringing in outside help e.g. expert contractors, professional services, data processors, etc.
Tell him what the key blocks are - what Issues need to be resolved now.
Tell him what your concerns are for the rest of the project - what Risks have you identified.
For both the above - always consider the people issues, who are you concerned about? (the customer changing requirements, senior management killing the project, etc.). This is one massive area where PMs are there to help you - this is their key skill.
If you've done any financials on what the project is/will cost - definitely include these too.
If you talk through these things - any PM worth anything should be very impressed by your commitment and understanding of what's required to make the project a success. You should also be on a great start to your relationship - basically because you've given him all the tools he will need to do his job.
If things are going well, tell him you really want to be the architect/technical lead/head of development - what ever job title your looking for on the project. And if you need resources then ask if they can be report to you in some way (that includes contractors and SI resources, etc.)
Also ask if he can show you what a project or program manager does, learn the skills and perhaps get to attend some of his meetings with senior management.
You never know - you might like it and decide you want to be a project or program manager one day!
If you start something like this then you have every chance of both being very successful and delivering a great project for which you'll both be well recognised by your company, your customers and your suppliers.
Perhaps your PM will then move to another bigger project at the same or bigger & better company - then who do you think will be the 1st person he calls when he needs development help?
I've seen this many times in my career - not just on my own projects and programs but every successful project I've ever seen.
And finally, as PM - seeing your junior team members be successful is far, far, far more personally rewarding than delivering projects.
Good luck for your discussion with your PM and your project
Pretend you don't understand and ask him questions. "I need to work with this team leader, can you explain his role please?" "I need to know what I can and can't ask of this consultant, can you clarify his mandate?"
He'll either give rational logical answers - in which case you can accept them or counter with more questions - or by trying to answer your questions he'll realize his reasons for doing all those things weren't as great as they first seemed to him - in which case you win - or he's a politician and changing his mind is flip flopping, so he'll dig in and defend himself at all costs - in which case you're screwed, but if that's the case you're screwed regardless.
Refocus on requirements, refine the ' engine' core to the technology and relaunch when it won't matter how badly a PM fucks up the implementation, rollout and rampup......the core engine is defined, stable and sufficiently abstracted to weather the educated PM who's fancy certification and cadre of developers are deadset on changing the world.
Stars will shine......black holes will consume huge quantities of both manpower and resources but the core technology remains to power through...you will be vindicated, recognized and rewarded.
PM's then will do whatever you want.....you GURU WARRIOR you
This is what killed our company.
When we were a bunch of cowboy coders, it was chaotic, but we knew what individuals could get things done, and what interactions had to take place to get shit out the door.
Then we hired a bunch of agilistas, and in order to make sure that the "individuals and interactions" were properly reflected on the burndown charts, the MBA types demanded that we spend more time tracking our work than doing it. They called it being responsive to change, the agilistas lapped it up (and continued to work in spite of the MBA types), and the rest of us ended up quitting.
Print copies of this fable for the break room and make sure your boss and the project manager read it.
http://www.slideshare.net/faisalkhadia/the-ant-fable
This is gold!
lucm, indeed.
Your program manager probably wants this project to succeed as much as you do. Keep that in mind.
Be mature and communicate with them. Tell them your concerns, something like "This project is very important professionally and personally to me, and I want to work with you to make sure that it succeeds. However, I'm concerned that bringing in new team leads and consultants be done in a way that most improves the project. We've all heard the stories of new people being added to a project and causing problems . So how can we work together to make sure that this is a success."
Keep away from phrasing that is too accusatory, stay more neutral like I have above. For example, I said that I was concerned about new team members being the most successful, rather than saying "I am concerned about the new people you are bringing in will cause problems". Also, try to work with the program manager rather than being sure that they're just going to wreck things and you are the only hope.
If your program manager is any good, you can almost certainly accomplish more together than either of you can apart. Remember that and work together.
Sean
I wish I had my mid points beach that I used yesterday because this is far more useful than any other comment. Until you understand his reasoning, not just hear it but understand it, the PM is probably doing the right thing. In other words, the OP is most likely wrong. Of two people disagree, there is a 50/50 chance each is wrong. Except here we have a programmer disagreeing with a project manager about project management. Most likely, the PM knows their job better than you do. (Just as the programmer knows their own job.) Until you truly understand what they are doing and why, and can then with full understanding disagree, you're just bring arrogant. Go talk to them. First understand them, then make your concerns clear.
No, Steve Jobs was no engineer - but he had vision, and knew how to get his engineers to buy into that vision.
He was a lousy manager from Apple's inception, and it bit him in the ass. He had to learn how to manage effectively to get the results he wanted. And get them he did, so don't dismiss him lightly. He had qualities that were unique, valuable, and unquantifiable.
The problem is, managers are not there to pull wheat from the chaff and elevate people to positions of power. They are there to keep people in line while shining up their own resumes.
If the project has momentum then the absolute worst thing that you can do is resist adding additional people to the project. If you do not understand how additional people can increase project velocity and add value then you are not experienced enough to make that decision and it will show to all of management. What you need to do is be strategic about how the team grows.
First you need to think deeply about what you do not know. What are the organizational hurdles you are likely to face? At what stages of the project will you be over-allocated as a resource? How many presentations and one-on-one conversation will be necessary keep momentum? How will this project be monetized? How will the end product integrated into an existing offering? Or how will the end product be marketed and sold?
Once you have a good inventory of what you will need, sit down with management and talk about how to address these needs--this alone will earn you a lot of respect. Ask who will likely be assigned to the project. Start taking these people out to lunch to discuss the project. If they are more senior they will generally offer to pay. Don't hesitate to pay even if out of your own pocket. It will show how committed you are to the project and organization. During these lunches ask questions about the process other successful projects have gone through and the types of problems your project is likely to face. NOTE, it is critical to not be defensive or offer too many pre-baked solutions during these meetings--it will come of arrogant, dismissive and impulsive. It is much better to say things such as, "I have some thoughts around this, but need to vet the ideas with people who can really help shape them." You will have opportunities to solve the problem in due time, or even better to have other people "solve the problems" with your solutions.
Ask if you can be a part of the decision making process for attaching additional people to the project. If you are included, be very judicious using any perceived veto power. It is better to raise concerns and shape involvement than to try to establish a front. Of course, there are always cases where lines should be drawn, but if you have voiced realistic concerns then you can keep management up to date if you seen things going awry. If you are not included, accept that decision maturely and remain engage in the process. You will likely have more influence on the side lines than you realize.
As the project grows you will need to find an exit from your technical role. You will need to own the vision, but you will not have time to execute all the technical details. Mentor people to take over the details and build as many documented repeatable processes as possible.
Learn how to present your ideas. You will likely be invited to more presentations. Know your place in these presentations. You have more to lose than gain if you say too much. Be there as the "guru with upside" instead of being the "one-hit wonder" or the "wild card."
Good luck! I hope you do well. Don't be afraid of not knowing something. Nobody knows everything. Embrace other people's capabilities especially when you don't understand what they do or who they can help. These are generally the people you really need.
-rd
This hat might not fit, but I am compelled to present you with this anti-pattern.
I've work for 8 years with a visionary guy who could come up with incredible prototypes in 3-6 months. And you know how prototypes become the product. We started working on a 2-3 years project and he would feed us tasks as needed. It worked well the first year.
Then the team grew to 5ish and he couldn't feed us enough: he could not develop his architectural ideas without delving in and thinking code. Documentation, comments, planning were anathema to him and he never mastered the art of leading large teams.
Now we're going through this prototype, implementing modules which work just enough to show what should be there but there's no intent visible, no idea if it was a first draft or if that way was necessary for some other reason. At least what is done is well done, which is an improvement to the other lone-wolves that I worked with in my carrer.
That might be what the manager rightly fears. Just as you have to brainstorm with him what will be the role of everyone in the team he's building, you need others to brainstorm, and document, and plan, how the pieces of your software will work together. I know they're consultants, but try to learn from them how to do more than code rather than fear the loss of control.
ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
I'll say you had a good first phrase that can be useful.
Managers rely on the tech team to know what not to do. The mistake in "don't do that, it's idiotic" is that the last word suddenly makes it Ad Hominem. It stops being informative and becomes an attack. "Don't do that, it (making up something here, don't hurt me) interferes with the nightly backup integrity which means you might not be able log onto the system at all if any other glitch happens" is informative. With a few minutes to think they can realize that's a Bad Thing. Bad Things cost money. So maybe a rule of thumb is to avoid Adverbs. If you find a sentence about to end in an Adverb, maybe replace it with an extended noun clause. I know, all fancy English grammar, but a Factoid is what it is, that's what the techies do. Adverbs are judgemental.
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
1) people must be made to do the work that everyone hates.
And that's exactly the problem with MBA types. They see jobs that they have to force people to do. .So they have to find ways of enslaving people without calling it slavery. ( Cause we know slavery is bad, so if we engage in it we can't call it that.) Furthermore they have to make people who will do it-- ie a social class to enslave.
Of course once they create the social class they have to find ways to keep the jobs around to employ these people they created to do the job in the first place!
The economist or engineer would look at it differently and the toilet cleaning example is a perfect example. Without creating a social class to do this jobs, you would have to find some people to do the work. Most likely younger people because they are hungrier. If the job is really distasteful then the salaries will be high.
To the MBA, keeping salaries low is a reason to create a slave class, as I detailed above. To an economist or engineer, it will create pressure to create easier to clean toilets and machines to that can do most of the work of cleaning toilets. Probably be a ex-toilet-cleaners and their supervisors.
To sum up the MBA sees toilet cleaning as an opportunity to hire people to build up his little fiefdom. The intelligent part of society sees it as a place where inovation is needed to improve the quality of life.