Slashdot Mirror


EFF Looks At How Blasphemy Laws Have Stifled Speech in 2012

As part of their 2012 in review series, the EFF takes a look at how blasphemy laws have chilled online speech this year. A "dishonorable mention" goes to YouTube this year: "A dishonorable mention goes to YouTube, which blocked access to the controversial 'Innocence of Muslims' video in Egypt and Libya without government prompting. The Arabic Network for Human Rights Information, a group based in Egypt, condemned YouTube's decision."

5 of 278 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Don't Hide Behind "Blasphemy" by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are 2 reasons I can see for the EFF using the more general term:
    1. One of the winners was Greece, going after someone who was satirizing a Greek Orthodox monk. It's not always about Muslims.
    2. The organization opposes all attempts to censor online speech, not just religiously motivated attempts.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  2. Re:A real shame by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not saying something for fear of some group of asshats using it as an excuse to kill people is being a coward. These people would have killed even if the film hadn't been made. It was nothing but a convenient excuse.

  3. Re:Don't Hide Behind "Blasphemy" by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Problem with most laws over here, they are based on the fear and not some sense. In some airports over here carrying a water bottle carries a torture sentence.

    Every government tries to enact laws that mold its citizens to fit one particular morality, regardless of whether it's led by religion, hivemind democracy, or dictatorship. For localized groups that face communal problems, this has usually been perfectly fine. The real problem comes from applying one group's morality (and therefore its laws) to another group. The Internet lets everyone see everyone else's actions immediately, so what's perfectly fine to an irreverent filmmaker with poor taste in comedy can quickly spread as outrage among people with a stricter sense of decency.

    To the people who enact and support the religious laws "over there", they make perfect sense, just as the people who support anti-terrorist or gun control laws in America think those laws make sense.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  4. Re:Saving lives by dugancent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't have the right to not be offended.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  5. Re:Not all "blasphemy" is religious in nature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obviously, nobody gets fired for "right leaning views". But you can find a cause to fire anybody if you look just hard enough. Academia is generally a pretty hostile environment to either social or fiscal conservatives. Most conservatives I know just don't talk about their political views in such environments at all, but sadly still have to listen to the endless left-wing chatter of their colleagues.