Slashdot Mirror


Give Us Your Personal Data Or Pay Full Fare

ebh writes "Noted in an AP story about how fees make it difficult to compare air travel costs, is how the airline industry is moving toward tailoring offer packages (and presumably, fares) for individuals based on their personal information. Worse, 'The airline association said consumers who choose not to supply personal information would still be able to see fares and purchase tickets, though consumer advocates said those fares would probably be at the "rack rate" — the travel industry's term for full price, before any discounts.'"

16 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We've established the nature of the relationship, we're now just haggling over the cost...

    Or, principles are expensive...

      How many data mining tokens er loyalty cards are in your wallet?

    1. Re:so... by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it wasn't being used for something, it wouldn't be the price to get less expensive groceries.

      Also, do you want to be the house showing up in a database as always ordering lots of "middle eastern" food? Or the house always buying lots of food that your insurer may not like you consuming, like chips and soda? Or the house buying lots of alcohol that your car insurer might like to know about? I mean, what -- do you really think they're keeping all your data just to mail you the weekly flyer that they're going to send to every house *anyway*, as "current resident"?

    2. Re:so... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:so... by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it wasn't being used for something, it wouldn't be the price to get less expensive groceries.

      I thought it was mostly used to put the things you buy at opposite ends of the store so you have to walk past all the other stuff every time you go there.

      --
      No sig today...
  2. In Australia this has been handled legislatively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Australia this has been mostly fixed legislatively under the 'component pricing' laws.

    Component pricing is advertising a price in its component parts rather than as a single figure, and can create an impression that a product is being offered for sale at a lower price than it actually is. The [legislation requires] that if you choose to use component pricing in advertisements, you must also provide consumers with a prominent single total price for goods and services, as they are able to be quantified at that time.

    The single price means the minimum total cost that is able to be quantified (or calculated) at the time of making the representation.

    You must include in the single price any:

    • * charges of any desciption payable by a consumer to purchase the good or service (e.g. administration fees, compulsory services charges, booking fees)
    • * taxes, duties, fees, levies or charges payable by the consumer for the supply of the good or service (e.g. goods and services tax or sales tax).
  3. Illegal cartel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Amazon do personal pricing. They won't give you a price for some things unless you login. Then they give you a price that is the maximum they think you will pay. Other people see lower prices.

    The aim of personal pricing is to milk you for more money to maximize profit, not for some kind of altruism. It's all about 'how much can this customer pay right now for that item'.

    Now when companies get together to implement this, this is known as a price fixing cartel. It DOES NOT require them to have a fixed price, the mere act of agreeing to deceive customers on the price, is enough to be a crime under cartel acts. So if they're doing this because they've agreed to, then you look at price fixing cartel laws to see how to fix it.

    But make no mistake, when they won't tell you the price for something, its not for your benefit.

    1. Re:Illegal cartel by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a previous poster has already stated, Australia has managed this under consumer protection laws. All new cars and motorcycles must list the full on-road cost of the vehicle.

  4. Warm and fuzzy by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I always get a warm and fuzzy feeling about any company/industry, when I see notes like this:

    Airlines also have been cracking down on websites that help travelers manage their frequent flier accounts. The sites use travelers' frequent flier passwords to obtain balances and mileage expiration dates, and then display the information in a way that makes it easier for travelers to figure out when it makes more sense to buy a ticket or to use miles.

    There is not even a quote from airlines about "making it safer for passengers" or "providing the best service". I guess there is simply no way to spin this as a good thing for customers. A rare event indeed.

  5. Yes Amazon do this *currently* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I first noticed when I did a search for a media player, I clicked through and it refused to give me a price unless I logged in. I click the 'why we ask you to login' link and it made some kind of BS claim about customer service. I got my price.

    Then I then logged out, tried to create a new account, and tried again and got that *same* price (same IP, I think they're smarter about covering their tracks), so I then used a works proxy with a different IP address, and created a new account and was offered a cheaper price.

    They're still up to their old games, just better at hiding them.

    That was only a few months ago.

  6. Once they see the contents of your wallet... by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once they see the contents of your wallet... they can adjust the prices they offer to you to maximize their intake of your cash and minimize those aforementioned contents of your wallet. That's the real key to profitability with personal pricing: find out how MUCH they are willing to pay for what they want. So it's only to their benefit to know how much money you're playing with (how good your credit is, how many other expensive things you've bought before, whether you're a customer they'd like to take on or someone they want to go away).
    .
    There is NO benefit for customers from this at all that I can see.

  7. I don't now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well of course having detected I was being ripped off I stopped using Amazon. Most people won't be able to see alternate prices for an item, so they'll never know the reason they were required to log-in was to be offered an inflated price compared to others.

    I think the same is true of this airline scam. HOWEVER, the main difference here, is the airlines via it's association are showing clear signs of cooperation on this, which is a strong indicator of cartel activity.

    It's not like one of them has just decided to go alone on this, it's that their airline association is declaring this.

    That has CARTEL written all over it.

  8. Re:What worries me by purpledinoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Europe, the price tag you see is what you pay. It makes so much sense. I don't care what the before tax price is. Hidden fees are illegal. This includes buying airline tickets. The North American system where you see some price, then have to guess what you will have to pay is arcane, bordering fraudulent. If you go to aircanada.com, I have to click through to the last step before actually purchasing the ticket to see what the real price is. Often the final price is double what was initially quoted. If I go to lufthansa.com, the fees are already included in the price, so easy. I remember getting a mobile phone contract in Canada, where I was surprised to discover that the actual monthly price was significantly higher than what I was quoted, even though I specifically asked exactly what the final price after all fees was. I eventually switch to prepaid, because I hated the idea that the phone company can dictate what I have to pay, regardless of what I agreed to.

  9. Or, to look at it the other way... by Shag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Airlines are (and have been, and will continue to be) giving preferential treatment to their better customers. How this is even news, I don't know - frequent flyer programs have been around for what, thirty years now? And you don't have to fly to see all the advertising about how getting the airline's affinity credit card saves you from paying for that first checked bag every time you fly with them, and so on, and so forth. Flying 25,000 miles a year with them gets you that too, plus bonus miles, plus free upgrades when available, and the perks only go up from there.

    Earlier this millennium, I spent a few years as a top-tier frequent flyer on an airline that has since merged into one of the remaining behemoths. I was in my 30's at the time, and had some "work" that involved a lot of international flights. (Thanks for paying your taxes, if you live in any of the twenty-odd countries whose governments were funding it.) It was even worthwhile for me to buy a membership in their lounges. Their back-end system had a formula for determining "high-value customers," and based partly on how many years I was expected to be their customer before retiring, it decided they were going to make some bucks off me, even though I always flew on the cheapest available fares.

    The airline that borged them didn't have this generous of a nature, but said "wow, look at this great data-mining system!" and adopted it, not fully understanding what they were getting. A year or so after the merger, I used some miles for a free, non-upgradable ticket to meet up with my fiancée in Paris for a weekend. I got to the hub airport for the trans-Atlantic flight to Paris, the gate agent paged me, looked me up and down (yeah, t-shirt and sandals), asked if I was in fact me, looked more than a little distressed, then dragged me off to the side away from the counter and said in hushed tones, "We're not allowed to do this - but the computer says to upgrade you!"

    As far as I know, this airline's computer still thinks I am a god among men, and unless they deliberately go in and tweak the algorithms, it may think that forever. I'm... okay with this. :)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  10. Yet Another Reason Not To Fly by rally2xs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They just keep piling it on, adding reasons not to have anything to do with air travel.

    Having to pay big $$$ for parking at a lot that is still a 10 minute bus ride from the terminal
    Having to wait maybe 15 minutes for that bus
    Having to wait maybe 15 minutes for that bus at 24 degrees or 105 degrees
    Overpriced food at terminals
    TSA stealing stuff from your luggage
    TSA thinking they have the right to lay hands on you
    TSA thinking they have the right to x-ray you (only my Dr. and dentist...)
    Late planes
    Late planes when you have to catch a connection
    1/2 hr sprints thru big airports 'cuz your plane was late for the connection
    Lost luggage
    45 minutes to retrieve luggage after plane lands
    Arriving 2 hrs early 'cuz of TSA
    Narrow airplane seats
    Fees for blankets
    Fees for pillows
    Fees for food
    Fees for checked baggage
    Fees for carry on baggage
    Having to rent a car when you get there
    Paying for wi-fi in the airport

    Have given up flying for anyplace I can get to with my car. About the only good thing left about flying and airports is Cinnabon.

  11. They never said real personal information.... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So I am a 7'2" 120 pound jewish black man with a medical condition that makes me look like I am a short fat balding white guy that eats bacon.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  12. Re:The rich can afford privacy, while poor get scr by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The rich can ride in private jets, while the poor (if they can afford to fly at all) have to put up with flying coach and submitting to invasive security theater and now to having to give up personal information because they can't afford the rates charged for not revealing that information (rates which the rich can easily afford).

    You know, there's a huge business opportunity here for someone with some resources and the balls to upset the airline industry and the government.

    How about a website that acts sort of like a travel/booking site and an auction site, sort of like a cross between Amazon, Orbitz, and Ebay, only the "goods" up for auction will be air-charter services. Get these small and medium charter services competing for bookings. The more that bid on a flight, the lower the price, as a charter service can charge less per passenger if they can be reasonably sure of packed flights. The more that use the service, the lower the prices for everyone.

    Once businesses start using it, the game would be all but over except for the death-spasms for the current airline industry (and the TSA...hard to justify spending billions for agents to sit cooling their heels in increasingly-empty commercial terminals).

    Eventually, unless government stepped in to prevent individuals from organizing together to book private flights (which would be a bugger in the details to try to prevent), the charter services would grow until they replaced the old airlines.

    If the airlines and government can't or won't make air travel reasonable in price, service quality, or "junk-groping", then treat the airlines and government like censorship on the 'net, and route around the greedy, pompous, megalomaniacal, corrupt bastards.

    If they won't fix the air travel industry, build a new air travel industry the way that people on the 'net are funding and creating all sorts of other things from open source software projects.to business startups.

    Although it's likely the government would step in to somehow halt any such movement towards grass-roots air travel, maybe forcing it to have to do so would at least bring the topic "above the fold", to use an old newspaper term, and the popular public pressure generated would have some mitigating effect on the horrible state of commercial air travel in the US.

    Or, everybody can bitch and moan on internet forums and blogs and do the same things they've been doing, and fighting the fight on their terms. That's worked well so far.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.