Slashdot Mirror


Child Gets Nintendo 3DS Full of Porn For Christmas

dotarray writes "One Colorado family received more than they'd bargained for this Christmas when they gave five-year-old Braydon Giles a pre-owned Nintendo 3DS that apparently still contained 'graphic images' from a previous owner. From the article: 'Refurbishing is an art, as well as a craft. The whole point is to make a gadget feel pristine, even when it used to be owned by a cult leader, a scout leader or an exhibitionist. Sadly, someone in a Colorado GameStop stopped refurbishing before the job was complete. So much so that 5-year-old Braydon Giles opened his Xmas gift — a Nintendo 3DS — and discovered images of naked people doing less than pristine things. As Channel 9 News tells it, Braydon showed the 3DS to his brother Bryton. He wanted his help to remove these weird pictures. '"

76 of 370 comments (clear)

  1. Greatest present ever by atari2600a · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would totally risk sexual traumatization at the age of 5 if it meant a free 3DS. I swear I'm going through like Miyamoto withdraw or something ever since I accidentally my Wii's firmware before Super Mario Galaxy 2 came out.

    1. Re:Greatest present ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, children can be traumatized.

  2. Under Communism we won't have this problem by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because nobody will be named Braydon. Under Communism, people will all have awesome names that can only be expressed with Korean characters.

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
  3. That explains my present... by tbird81 · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I got was a bunch of simplistic children's games on my 3DS.

    1. Re:That explains my present... by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're not holding it right.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  4. "Quality Control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Best part of the article:
     
     

    GameStop is currently researching this situation. We have a rigorous quality control process in place

    As a former GameStop employee, I can personally attest to the fact that their "rigorous quality control process" consists of "Now don't get too stoned in the back room when you're on the clock."

    1. Re:"Quality Control" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on his coherent post, I'd say he wasn't getting stoned enough to put up with such a dead end job for long.

  5. Make love not war by NettiWelho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone care to do a cultural translation for an european why its okay for kids to play with tanks and guns(both seen in TFA video) yet them seeing naked people is like your kids life is ruined?

    1. Re:Make love not war by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Given that most European countries have laws against selling pornography to minors (albeit that exactly what is banned and what is not depends on the specific country and culture, ranging from more strict to more lax than the laws in the U.S.), perhaps you should consult with people closer to home?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pornography_by_region#Europe

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Make love not war by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still don't see why nakedness should be considered "wrong." The Fundies support it, even if not openly, when they hide or relocate a priest that diddles boys. And aren't Republicans caught, now and then, in peccadilloes involving Congressional pages, or airport bathroom sex? They're obviously not bastions of sexual purity. So, again, why is seeing naked people "bad"? Wait - is this one of those "hypocritical" things?

    3. Re:Make love not war by astro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think you miss the point of the question, or at least a very important point here. Nudity != pornography, at least in Europe. It is not at all rare to see nudity in commercials or programs in much of European TV, for example, even on, say, Viva, the German analogue to MTV. Which is of course watched by kids.

      Now this in itself may be off topic to the original post here, as it does sound that what the child found on the 3DS could be considered pornography most anywhere. I still think it is a very interesting set of questions: Where does the line between art, or documentary photography, and porn lie? How does this vary by country, or regionally? At what age is nudity ok for people to view? And what age pornography? What affect does viewing such "too early" have?

      Now, I'm ultra-liberal. I don't believe pornography should be regulated for adults, and I believe that education is the best defense, not regulation beyond reason (again, entirely subjective).

      So, apologies for being off-topic, but I think parent should think twice before dismissing the question of differing cultural and national attitudes toward nudity.

    4. Re:Make love not war by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 2

      "Do you like getting your dick sucked?
      Do you like sucking dick?
      If you don't like sucking dick you sir are a hypocrite."

    5. Re:Make love not war by Evtim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Poking silliness should never stop, otherwise the silly might decide they got it right...

    6. Re:Make love not war by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

      He, being a sheltered US child, has not seen porn. Therefore the trauma.

      What trauma?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    7. Re:Make love not war by GloomE · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He, being a sheltered US child, has not seen porn. Therefore the trauma.

      What trauma?

      The trauma where the parents run around yelling THE SKY IS FALLING!

    8. Re:Make love not war by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      I'm actually going to answer this stupid old argument: Because Gun Violence is not something that "tempting" or a kid could jump into thinking nothing bad would likely happen. Sex however is something any kid can do, and the chances of it destroying their lives is relatively low from their limit perspective. The chance that the kid will decide to have risky sex at a young age is well above 50% and the impact of viewing porn on that would be rather significant.

      The chance that a kid is going to kill someone is probably less than 1 in 100,000 and the affect violent videogames or images have on this is almost negligible.

      You let your kid watch 4hrs of porn a day, and I'll let mine play halflife. Lets see who ends up in prison first.

    9. Re:Make love not war by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, Americans do have some serious issues with nudity in non-sexual context but from TFA there's every indication that this was porn or at least erotic images and we don't let kids have that in Europe either. I wouldn't care at all if my kid got a half second nipple flash during the Superbowl, for all I care we could go to a nude beach but I would get pretty pissed if I bought a 3DS for my kid and it had porn on it. As for violence, there's degrees to everything - I don't remember exactly how old I was when we first started pointing plastic guns and saying "bang bang you're dead" but I wasn't that old yet it wasn't exactly like seeing Saving Private Ryan. I wouldn't worry one bit if my kid was laughing his ass off at the Road Runner tricking Wile E. Coyote to fall down a cliff, there will come a time and place where it's natural to talk about the difference between play violence and reality.

      I'm guessing a good time would be around the first time I find - or hear a wish for some semi-realistic FPS game, if you're old enough to pretend running around shooting people/monsters you're old enough for that talk too. About real people that don't respawn, that don't have magic medikits to fix them, that experience genuine fear and terror at gunpoint, that end up crippled or scarred for life or die bleeding out in the gutter, about widows and orphans, friends and family left behind. But there's a time and place for that talk, just like when your five year old want to play house with a mommy and a daddy it's still not time for the "okay, but remember to use a condom" talk. What next, are you going to point out the electric car track I had wasn't realistic because the car would be totaled and the driver dead if it crashed like that? Reality will get gritty enough in time.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Make love not war by azalin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Fundies support it, even if not openly, when they hide or relocate a priest that diddles boys.

      Thats one of the most retarded thoughts I've seen in ages.

      You think that hiding something you aren't proud of is the same as consenting? Wow, just wow. 'Fundies' don't 'support it' you idiot, otherwise they would be all about letting people know they do it. You typically hide things you don't want others knowing you do because you don't think its acceptable to be doing it. Your logic is about as ass backwards as it gets.

      If you think it's unacceptable, then why hide it and HELP the perpetrator? A criminal should be dragged to court and receive trial. Hiding his crime(s) so it doesn't make your community look bad is dishonest and hypocrite at best. If one claims morals to be important, one should follow them and set an example.
      In my opinion everyone involved in such hush ups should be arrested as an accessory. They are basically saying "Well this guy raped you, but it would be bad PR to call the police. He's probably sorry, so we'll just give him a new job in a place, where no one knows about his special interests. - Oh and don't tell anybody or we'll make your life even more miserably."
      If you hide evidence of a serious crime you are at the very least obstructing justice and have voided all authority to speak on morals.

    11. Re:Make love not war by Andtalath · · Score: 2

      Porn is a piece of media created with the intent of provoking sexual arousal.

    12. Re:Make love not war by Kergan · · Score: 2

      This is not insightful at all...

      European countries are, for the most part, exemplar in the way they legalized porn. Give an honest look into the list and consider the roaches:

      One is Azerbaijan. I say no. Not just no; Hell, no. Europe traditionally stops at the Caucus mountain. Look it up on a map: It has long border with oh-so-notoriously-porn-friendly Iran... The place doesn't even sound European. No game.

      There are then a couple of Central and Eastern European countries with stricter laws, namely Bulgaria, Poland, some Baltic and Balkan States, and Ukraine. They're still barely out of the Soviet block, which as you're keenly aware was a model in its forward thinking. I'd then stress that throughout history, new ideas in Europe have mostly come from the West, and then spread to the East; and that this here is no different. Lastly, and frankly, the law merely needs to catch up with society in most if not all of these countries.

      Amongst the latter group, Albania might stand out as more traditional, due to it being a Muslim country. I've admittedly never been there, so I cannot say for sure. But having observed bearded Muslims in Moroccan night clubs, I'm highly suspicious that it makes much difference.

      The last country worth a mention is Malta. Fwiw, the place is the most reactionary State that catholic Europe has to offer, bar the Vatican itself. The church is so influential that Malta legalized divorce a mere two years ago, and by a rather thin margin at that. Most locals go to church, but WO a caveat: my sampling is admittedly anecdotal, but the younger generations do so less and less. This is a 40-year process, really: the island has been changing at rapid pace since it became a tourist resort. The Maltese youth gets drunk and gets laid like in any other western country: in a gigantic feast of debaucheries and sex games. Methinks there too,, law needs to catch up with society.

      Anyway, yeah, there are a few traditional communities in Europe. Here's the thing, though: they're catching up, and not turning back. In contrast, the US features reasonably modern and sophisticated communities, some more traditional ones, and then there are openly backward ones -- some of which actively reject modernity to the point of regression. Of the latter, it seems to me that Europe has very, very few.

    13. Re:Make love not war by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I think the difference here is the definition of "pornography". Over here, the average tabloid sports a naked chick on page 3 (or was it 5? Maybe someone who reads that kinda paper can provide the details), which can be bought by any child of any age.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. Why is the human body so evil? by PoopMonkey · · Score: 2

    Seriously, if the dad thinks his kid is never gonna set tits, pussy, and/or cock, he's deluded.

    1. Re:Why is the human body so evil? by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      ...wow, really? Their bodies are already going nuts on hormones and yet you still don't think it's time to teach your kids about sex?

      You are the problem.

  7. Re:Why did the moron parents have to publicize thi by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 5, Funny

    What did you expect from the folks who named their kids Bryton and Braydon?

  8. Translation by matt-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rookie dad totally forgets that five year old life is highly focused on things interesting to a five year old and not at all focused on boring things like long speeches and naked people. Five year old is understandably interested at father figure whose freakout knob is set to 11. Later, five year old sees dad preening for the camera and thinks it looks like a good time, joins in.

    This kid would have totally forgotten it if not for his dad's reaction. I weep for the culture which has to deal with this guy's kids 15 years from now.

    1. Re:Translation by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I assure you, having seen my first porn at around age 6 or so, courtesy of another kid down the street whose Dad didn't hide his collection very well, that you don't actually forget that you saw it even if your parents have no idea you saw it. I can't remember for the life of me anything about it, but I knew it was porn.

    2. Re:Translation by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you don't forget it. But, honestly, did it "warp and twist" you? Did it "traumatize" you?

      I tell you what it was for me. It was a source of a lot of giggling together with my friend looking at the porn stash of his (then 19 year old) brother, it was a naughty and kinda-sorta forbidden experience, it was exciting, but not for its sexual content but more 'cause we both knew that we weren't supposed to sneak into his brother's room and go through his "naughty" magazines, it was more a thrill of the forbidden than anything sexual at all. Thinking back, the "thrill level" was pretty much on par with sneaking into my grandpa's tool shed and touching (not even using, just being there and "handling") his "adult" tools that we were not allowed to touch (for good reason, acetylene welding torches sure ain't for kids!).

      It was the thrill of the forbidden. But seriously, not the sexual content.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:Parents also to blame by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I also question the uproar over a kid seeing sex, but no such uproar about children seeing violence and death.

    Sure, the store should have wiped it, but why is this so much worse than, say, a violent movie parents will let kids watch? Unless it was rape or CP, I don't see why it should be singled out as heinous. Kids used to sleep in the same room as relatives having sex, and apparently that didn't explode their little minds.

  10. Forget video games ... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... buy the kid a Bible instead ....... No, wait. Forget that!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  11. Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    discovered images of naked people doing less than pristine things

    Sex act by itself is a part of nature.

    Without sex acts, many higher form animals have no way to procreate.

    When sex itself is deemed something that's not "pristine" something is very wrong - way beyond wrong .....

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well i dunno i've been on the internet a long time and i can tell you most of the stuff i've seen wouldn't result in procreation...especially the stuff involving animals, faeces or huge dildos.

    2. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Killing is a part of nature. Without it, animals would starve. Therefore, when people have a problem with murder, something is very wrong...

      Worst. Argument. Ever.

    3. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by froggymana · · Score: 4, Funny

      Killing is a part of nature. Without it, animals would starve. Therefore, when people have a problem with murder, something is very wrong...

      Worst. Argument. Ever.

      While your argument there is bad, I'm not sure I would call it the worst one ever.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    4. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by pwizard2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod++ (if I had the points).

      I swear, there's a bunch of goddamn prudes in this country (yet violence is ok for some reason). Sex is the most natural thing ever and nothing to be ashamed of.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    5. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless it's with Rosanne Barr or Rosie O'Donnell.

    6. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No it does not, guarding the privacy of sex does not reinforce monogamy which is certainly a natural practice but not the natural practice that humans evolved. Monogamy is an artificial practice in humans, reinforced by religious dogma, originating when hereditary inheritance of property necessitated early human civilization to come up with the only fool proof way of ensuring paternity of children could be known.
      Mans natural state is to beat lesser men into submission and then take as many mates as he can.

    7. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just as natural is the act of guarding the privacy of sex. It reinforces the advantages of the natural practice of monogamy in nature in general.

      You have never been to the park in spring and seen ducks fuck? Or looked out a city window to see pigeons fuck? They certainly don't hide it.

      And if you're of European descent, neither did your ancestors. The sleeping partition of typical houses was for everyone, both children and adults, and the adults fucked with the children present. It was no more interesting to the kids than watching the farm animals go at it.

      If anything, fucking in front of others strengthens monogamous relationships, because you make your claim on the partner where others of your gender can see it. And that's at least partially why couples kiss in public too.

    8. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If most of the things you've seen involve animals, feces, and huge dildos, I'm thinking this is more a problem with your tastes than of pornography's lack of procreative potential.

    9. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Jawcracker+Fuzz · · Score: 2

      When was goatse not deemed pristine? Are we not men? Is this not /.?

    10. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Jessified · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually it's a valid point...I mean if movies depicting gore and senseless killing are merely rated R, but movies depicting sex with genitals and penetration are X-Rated, what does that tell you about our priorities?

      Sex is more traumatizing that decapitation and evisceration, apparently. Think "Saw" vs pretty much any porno, even the lighter stuff.

    11. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by TFAFalcon · · Score: 2

      Why compare a fairly basic murder with 'extreme' porn (is that even still porn?)? If we're going for extremes, then I guess a person slowly being flayed for hours, then roasted over an open fire while their children are decapitated in front of them would be the equivalent to 2 girls 1 cup. And I'd pick the 2 girls if I had a choice, thank you very much.

    12. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some people can get off on Saw. It really straddles somewhere between extreme S&M and snuff. So our priorities are extreme S&M/snuff - rated R; normal porn however - rated X.

    13. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, titties are not for little kids...

      Seriously, though. I don't really get it. An act that is supposed to bring joy and fun is considered worse than an act that supposedly brings grief and pain? Is it me, or is something wrong with this?

      Or, in the immortal words of Mr. Jack Nicholson, "Kiss a pair of titties and the movie's X-Rated. Chop 'em off and it's PG13"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Natural practice of monogamy?

      Dude, you should write for stand-ups, others would have to ponder long and hard to come up with a punchline like that.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by ThePhilips · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When sex itself is deemed something that's not "pristine" something is very wrong - way beyond wrong .....

      And that IMO is the cause of the trauma. Modern parenting including feeding children piles of idealistic crap (too much TV I would say), at best useless for the real life.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    16. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      my reaction was "if that's sex... I guess I can do without".

      ...and here you are, years later, posting on slashdot.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure that what happens in porn can even be considered sex any more.

      Imagine if extraterrestrials had gotten that 3DS full of porn and that's the only thing they knew about humans. They'd think we reproduce by having the man ejaculate up the woman's nose.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Wrong. Some animals (basic "animals" - nematodes or something) can reproduce asexually in the absence of sexual reproduction.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    19. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if that works on human women??? anyone???

      Yes, during/after a war the conquerors kill the children, usually the males, and impregnate the women. It seems the natural thing to do. I don't know how that works now that we use use drones. Send in a 'cleanup' crew?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    20. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      yes, it's the autocorrect that's stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by fatphil · · Score: 3, Funny

      I for one religiously avoid ejaculating up my girlfriend's nose, and we've avoided pregnancy, or even scares. So there must be some truth to it!

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    22. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by fatphil · · Score: 2

      All part of a good rape and pillage.

      Having said that, if you rewind the clock a century and you're Turkish, then kidnapping the young children, brainwashing them into believing the enemy until they're fighting age, and then sending them, unbeknownst to them, back into their homeland in order to kill their own kin is a viable alternative. (a) you don't have to do all that messy and life-risking child-birthing phase; and (b) who gives a fuck if they die in battle, they were Greek anyway.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    23. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Well, Butters really seems to be enjoying his new Nintendo 3DS game!"

      "My precious!"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    24. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by Jawnn · · Score: 2

      You're already at 5, or I'd spend a point on this. Alas, our Puritan heritage still pervades our national psyche and renders pretty much anything other than heterosexual, missionary position coitus, between to people of the same race, with the intent of making a baby, as dirty and sinful. Not dirty and sinful enough to not do, mind you, but definitely dirty and sinful enough to fell guilty about, and to publicly decry those who admit to other acts as "perverts", of course. But movies and video games that show, in full HD detail, the violent destruction of human bodies, naughty parts and all, that's not a problem. I will never understand it, but there it is.

    25. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      Tubgirl, how can you forget tubgirl!

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    26. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      Yarp we sure do condone Donner party cannibalism, I mean what with them asking permission first and all.

      As for self defense well to each his own, if you are happy to let some whackjob hack up your family while you sit and do nothing then that is fine. Euthanasia and assisted suicide, well we put animals to sleep why not people, and assisted suicide, if the victim is the one wanting to die and the only one physically hurt what's the harm? This isn't the dark ages anymore.

      While you're at it why don't you lump in leukemia and cancer treatments in there, I mean they only delay the inevitable right?

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    27. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      Flatworms reproduce either sexually or asexually.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    28. Re:Why sex is deemed not "pristine"? by cavebison · · Score: 2

      An act that is supposed to bring joy and fun is considered worse than an act that supposedly brings grief and pain?

      Spread sexual imagery everywhere and you risk devaluing the act of lovemaking. I'm not being a wowser here, it is already being shown that many kids now think pubic hair is "gross" and boys want their first sexual experience to be like in porn movies.

      I'm not against porn. But porn is what it is - it's actors playing up to fantasies of the paying customer. It's never been an accurate representation of what loving sex in a normal relationship is all about. Yes, you can do all those things with your partner, but not when you're a kid just because you see actors doing anal all the time in videos. That's not a good introduction to sharing the experience of sex with a girl. It's not a good message to send to girls that their pubic hair is somehow undesirable and they should expect sex to be all about what they can do physically for a guy.

  12. Re:Parents also to blame by BitZtream · · Score: 2

    Considering they were giving an Nintendo product, not a Sony product, theres a good chance they considered the likelyhood of the kid seeing intense violence anyway. Nintendo has traditionally had a pretty strong stance towards keeping things kid friendly.

    I fully admit I haven't played a Nintendo game since I sold my Wii, but even then it was still pretty clear they target kid friendly.

    You don't really have any indication to assume the parents are letting the kid watch Saw based on the information given so why don't you climb off your high horse and stop making retarded assumptions, mmm'kay?

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  13. GameStop... by scottnix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Put the X *sun glasses* in X-mas Yeaaaahhhhhh!!

  14. Re:Parents also to blame by arth1 · · Score: 2

    You don't really have any indication to assume the parents are letting the kid watch Saw based on the information given so why don't you climb off your high horse and stop making retarded assumptions, mmm'kay?

    I know it's a lot to ask, but RTFA? GIving their kids access to violence was apparently no problem; only seeing sex was.

  15. The Dad is an idiot by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I would be pissed if this happened to me as well, lets look at a quote from the full article:

    "You can't un-see this. He's five years old. Maybe when he's 18 or 20 maybe he won't know anything about it but he's not going to forget about it tomorrow,"

    I'll bet a months pay that unless someone reminds him, he won't remember it in a week. He might not forget it tomorrow, but in a week he'll be long past it. By the time next christmas comes around he won't remember a thing that happened this christmas unless you bring it up to him and point it out, if you ask him what he got for christmas last year he'd probably have to put serious effort into thinking about it. His mind has far more important things to worry about ... like being a fucking 5 year old and playing video games themselves or playing with his friends/toys.

    On that same note however, when he's 18 or 20, he probably WILL remember it and picture it in his quest to satisfy himself when he can't get a date or some else to do it. Of course, at that point he'll be looking at any sexually arousing thing on the planet and wanting to bone its brains out so its really stupid to care.

    This guy is just trying to blow it out of proportion to extort some money from GameStop. Fucking leech.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  16. Talking snakes and rib women by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone care to do a cultural translation for an european why its okay for kids to play with tanks and guns(both seen in TFA video) yet them seeing naked people is like your kids life is ruined?

    Because the universe was created by an all-powerful all-knowing being who came down to us in the form of a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father who can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master.

    He can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.

    He has defined a category of behaviours which are biologically imperative but which we should not do, lest he judge us unworthy in his eyes and stick us in his personal torture chamber for all eternity.

    Showing naked people to children encourages them to have sex in ways which are not permitted, which will get them sent to the eternal torture chamber.

    Does this answer your question?

    1. Re:Talking snakes and rib women by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He has defined a category of behaviours which are biologically imperative but which we should not do, lest he judge us unworthy in his eyes and stick us in his personal torture chamber for all eternity.

      You forgot "but he loves us!"
      And he needs money.

  17. Gamestop Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I process returns at a retail store, this situation happened at the location I work at. It was with a digital camera instead of a 3ds, but otherwise the same. The parent complained, and a new policy was set of sending all returned electronics with internal memory back to the manufacturer for a reset. You can't expect someone working at minimum wage to know how to operate every electronic device the store sells, and how to do the factory reset (if it even has such a function). Many of the units are uncharged, which requires charging the battery beforehand in order to wipe it.

    TBH I saw this coming a mile away when I first heard of the DSi having a camera. I'm just waiting for the case of a refurbished 3ds with pics a teenager took of themselves nude.

  18. My daughter STILL remembers the PC... by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    My daughter, who has a hearing defect, was prescribed a listening program that only worked on - Windows 95.

    This was in the early days of Windows XP, so finding a Windows 95 machine (or a set of disks) was somewhat hard.

    I did manage to find one at a local electronics consignment store which claimed to have gone through and sanitized the system from the previous owner.

    My seven year old daughter looked at the "Videos" folder and found somebody's collection of something that we could only described as "Jamacian Dungeon Porn". To use the vernacular of the article, these videos were not "pristine" and really quite disturbing.

    She was pretty freaked out by them at the time and, ten years later, she still says she remembers the screams although she can't remember what was on the videos.

    As for the store caring? We got the impression they were most upset at the idea we didn't save a copy of the videos for them.

    I'm sure our story (and the one in the article) are pretty rare, but I can see the probability of something like this with "reconditioned" equipment is no where near approaching zero.

    myke

    1. Re:My daughter STILL remembers the PC... by isorox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the fact you didn't check the computer over before giving it to you daughter wasn't a problem?

    2. Re:My daughter STILL remembers the PC... by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the fact you didn't check the computer over before giving it to you daughter wasn't a problem?

      This is the part I don't get. What ever happened to parenting? Trusting gamestop or similar is like trusting Microsoft, why would you?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:My daughter STILL remembers the PC... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because the computer replaced TV as the babysitter, and, dammit, I want my computer to be as good as TV, where SOMEONE ELSE takes care that my kids don't get to see stuff.

      Shit, really, what's next? Me having to spend time with the brats?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Re:Human sentimentality. by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kids are violent from the moment they are born.

    They're also sexual from the moment they are born. Not to the same extent as when hitting puberty, but certainly not asexual cherubs.
    Some repress and deny that they themselves were sexual creatures even as children, quite possibly out of guilt, thinking it was themselves there was something wrong with.

    But pictures of grown-ups? Largely uninteresting to a five year old boy, I should think. To him, it would be a lemon party - something to say "yuck" at and delete.
    Which apparently he tried to do, and it was his father who blew a fuse, not the kid. Sure, the kid is probably traumatized now, by his father's behavior.
    And unless he changes his name, likely to be ridiculed in a few years in school, when classmates enter his name in a search engine. All thanks to dad, who wanted his fifteen minutes of fame, but apparently didn't give a flying fuck about causing his kids problems.

  20. Re:Parents also to blame by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Titties are not for little kids!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Re:Parents also to blame by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is the parents' own disposition towards sex, and their reluctance to having to talk with their kids about it.

    Scene A: Little Timmy sees a movie where a guy decapitates a woman.
    Timmy: Da ... daddy? What's that man doing to the woman?
    Dad: He's killing her, Timmy. Look away so you don't get nightmares, but try to relax, that's just a movie, that's not real.

    Scene B: Little Timmy sees a movie where a guy fucks a woman.
    Timmy: Da ... daddy? What's that man doing to the woman? (Note: The same question, asked with the same amount of innocence).
    Dad: He... he.... OH MY GOD! GO TO YOUR ROOM!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Re:Parents also to blame by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Just in case there is anyone wondering WHAT traumatized the kid in above story about Scene B more than Scene A could have: Not the scene itself, but his dad's reaction. In Scene A, he saw something horrible he didn't understand and his dad was there, by his side, comforting him and trying to rationalize it for him so he doesn't get upset. In Scene B, dad yells at him and Timmy thinks he did something bad, despite not knowing WHAT exactly he did wrong.

    What really traumatizes kids about porn is their parents' reaction.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Proof by Tom · · Score: 2

    Just another proof of what people with brains have been saying for years: The whole "think of the chiiiildren" agenda is stupid. Kids don't get traumatized by porn, they simply don't care about it. Older kids are where it gets interesting. Young kids? Disney is a ton more important to them than weird pictures of naked adults doing weird stuff.

    Like in TFA, it's the adults freaking out, not the kids. Maybe we should change the meme to "think of the paaarents".

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  24. Aww hey.. by malkavian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw porn as a kid initially because some blew into my Grandparents' back garden from a neighbour who'd had his stash ripped up.. Probably some domestic there, but I can remember wondering why the women were wearing pretend beards in strange places. I thought it was funny and an oddity.. Couldn't have been more than 6 at the time..
    Then a few years later (still sub 10), one of my friends uncovered his dad's stash.. There was the thrill of doing something I knew I wasn't meant to be doing, but nothing out of the ordinary. No ill effects, apart from the fallout from having my folks hit the roof when they found out about it..
    A few years later, I watched a horror movie (that would be considered tame by today's standards) and I didn't sleep properly for weeks, and I remember being so nervous and anxious for ages.. Hey, I got over that too.. But from my perspective and recall, being exposed to horror and violence is far more damaging to a young psyche than porn.. But being young, you get over it.
    Now for real problems, you just have to step over into a third world country where death is common and visible, people you know are abducted and killed. Disease is rife and a killer. And yet some of them are far more well adjusted than a lot of the people I've seen raised in 'safe' environments...

  25. Re:So her hearing defect is fixed? by orgelspieler · · Score: 2

    Hallelujah! It's a Jamaica dungeon porn MIRACLE!!!!!