Slashdot Mirror


That Link You Just Posted Could Cost You 300 Euros

Nate the greatest writes "Do you like to tweet or share links to interesting news articles? According to a coalition of Irish newspapers, that makes you a pirate. The National Newspapers of Ireland has adopted a new policy. Any website which links to one of the 15 NNI member newspapers will have to pay a minimum of 300 Euros, with the license fee going up if you post more links. Note that this is not a fee to post an excerpt or some punitive measure for the copying of an entire article. No, the NNI wants to charge for links alone. It's almost as if this organization has no idea how the web works. Or maybe they have found an elaborate way to commit suicide."

13 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. ha haw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hahaha. ha. hahah. lol. haha hahaahahahahahhahhahhahhhahahahahhahahahahahahsahahahahhahahhahhahah

  2. Well that's easy by Lorens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google won't want to pay, so Google won't post a link to their sites. Ever. Anywhere.

    1. Re:Well that's easy by eth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there some law that would force Google to pay? Otherwise, if they don't have an existing agreement, I would think they'd just file the bills in the circular filing cabinet under the desk. And maybe report them for some kind of fraud for sending out bogus bills?

      Or is this just another case of "pay our 'fee' or we sue" extortion?

  3. Re:Here's a link for all of them by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The notion is that the owner of the website would have to pay for such links... It would be up to the website to extract payment from its users... Which, in the case if one that permits anonymous comments, is not possible, and the website would assume liability.

    it's absurd, and can't be enforced outside of their own jurisdiction.

  4. Re:Too bad.. by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Company policy isn't law.

    Maybe in Ireland. Wait till the Americans get the same idea.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  5. Re:Here's a link for all of them by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, they can say what they like on their web site's terms and conditions, like:

    "Hypertext links to this website by other users and websites are permitted provided that the link to this website is in a simple list of companies by pointing to Goreyguardian.ie's home page http://www.goreyguardian.ie./ This limited licence entitles other users and websites to link to Goreyguardian.ie's home page only, and linking to other content on or information in this website is prohibited without Goreyguardian.ie's express written consent. "

    That doesn't make it enforceable law, though.

  6. Car analogy by Andrio · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's like a car dealership sueing anyone that shares the street address of the car dealership.

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
  7. Re:Here's a link for all of them by pclminion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are you posting links to these jackasses? If they want to vanish into obscurity because nobody is permitted to link to (a.k.a. mention) them, why not let them die?

  8. Re:Here's a link for all of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://www.nni.ie/v2/broad/index.php
    And yes, I'm truly an anonymous coward.

    Best look out for email from one of these addresses (from nni.ie):
    NNI People

    Matt Dempsey - Chairman
    - no email provided -

    Frank Cullen - Co-Ordinating Director
    fcullen@cullencommunications.ie

    Ann Marie Lenihan - Communications and Public Affairs Manager
    amlenihan@cullencommunications.ie

    Anna Clarke - Advertising and Marketing Manager
    aclarke@cullencommunications.ie

    Enda Buckley - Environment Officer
    ebuckley@cullencommunications.ie

  9. NNI should be the liable party by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they don't want people linking to them, the should set up an Apache Redirect Rule for all Get Requests that have a Foreign site as the Referrer.

    Silencing free speech and expression with lawsuits when you can easily curtail that behavior on your own should be seen as unconscionable and any such lawsuit dismissed, with any fees associated in the defense against those claims rewarded to the defendant.

  10. Re:Here's a link for all of them by Cederic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not least because I haven't read their terms and conditions, and can link to their site without doing so.

    If they don't want it linked, they shouldn't respond to HTTP requests.

  11. Re:Here's a link for all of them by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, the solution is to tell them to go fuck themselves. They haven't got a leg to stand on.

  12. Re:Here's a link for all of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A better solution is to not link to them at all. That goes for everyone who links to them, including Google, Microsoft and all other search engines. If they want to live in a vacuum with no visitors and therefore no revenue, let them.