Slashdot Mirror


LEGO Announces GNU/LInux-Powered Mindstorms EV3 Platform

First time accepted submitter Barryke writes "Today LEGO announces the new mohawk (NASA's turf) sporting MINDSTORMS EV3 platform (press release). And with details on its features and innards (in Dutch) which in short comes down to: 'Its intelligent brick sports an ARM9-soc running Linux on 64MB RAM and 16MB storage memory, and supports SD cards. There are also four ports, which allow four other 'Bricks' can be connected. The intelligent brick can be reached by WiFi, USB and Bluetooth, and supports control via Android and iOS devices. It comes with 3 servo's, two touch sensors and an IR sensor to track other robots at upto six meters. It also includes 17 build plans, shown in 3D using Adobe Inventor Publisher.'"

164 comments

  1. awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    mindstorms are too good for kids

    1. Re:awesome by ikaruga · · Score: 2

      Lego are the best adult toys.

    2. Re:awesome by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lego are the best adult toys.

      Just wait until you discover marital aids.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:awesome by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

      Lego are the best adult toys.

      Just wait until you discover marital aids.

      Just don't combine the two :S

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    4. Re:awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      antiintellectualism +1

    5. Re:awesome by volxdragon · · Score: 1

      Okay, I think I'm going to be scarred for life now, I just had a REALLY BAD mental image reading that line...

    6. Re:awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Challenge accepted!

    7. Re: awesome by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Rule 34!

  2. Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by tepples · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the two English articles, I see a Linux kernel. I don't see any evidence that the user space on top of it is GNU. More likely is BusyBox/Linux.

    1. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But... but they told me that I can't call Linux Linux but I must call it GNU/Linux instead. Are you saying this is wrong now!?

    2. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Informative

      GNU and Linux can be separated.

      GNU is all the core utilities and libraries typically associated with a Linux system.
      Linux is the kernel.
      Put them together you get GNU/Linux.
      BusyBox is not GNU although can be built using GNU libc, so has some GNU.

      Android is not dependent on GNU at all although uses the C library.

      Many non-GNU projects use the GPL.

    3. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...If so, that is bad news.
      Not only is busybox just incompatible enough to be dangerous, but like RIAA, the busybox copyright holders think it's a great idea to sue its users when they infringe.

      I think they just sue cheap-ass companies that ripoff their code with no attribution and use it in commercial products without complying with the license. You know the parasite companies - they use and abuse but never give back to the community.

    4. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by tibit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not that there's much need for generic userspace. It'd probably be something custom anyway, on such a small system. It's not a general purpose setup.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    5. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by IVI4573R · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What he said. They sue people distributing their code without source. For instance, Linksys routers. If it wasn't for them standing up for their copyright and the GPL we wouldn't have all the nice alternate firmwares like DD-WRT, Tomato, etc. I've never hear of Busybox ever suing an end user.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    6. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you realize that the Linux copyright owners also sue people for infringing? If they didn't, they wouldn't bother with copyrights and licensing agreements--they would just make it public domain.

    7. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never hear of Busybox ever suing an end user.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusyBox#GPL_lawsuits

    8. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by __aablib8664 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      was that link to reinforce the comment, or counter it? looks like it was an attempt at countering....if so re-read the wiki article

      SPOILER: link gives no mention of end-users being sued, only companies that failed to adhere to the terms. clarification that companies are not end-users.

    9. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by petman · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can sue for copyright for something other than infringing. I've seen them sue for failing to distribute source in violation of the license, but that's not infringing.

      Infringing: 1. Actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "infringe a copyright".

    10. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Whoosh!

    11. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BusyBox is not GNU although can be built using GNU libc, so has some GNU.

      Why would you want to do that?
      uClibc is hosted on the same page as BusyBox. It's smaller and has less bloat.

      If you opt to go the GNU libc, why wouldn't you go all the way and use the entire GNU toolkit?

    12. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you didn't understand that, then maybe slashdot isn't the site for you. ;)

    13. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're free to call Linux Linux (in fact, you should do so), but what most people refer to as Linux is a whole lot more than just Linux.

    14. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by jcdr · · Score: 1

      uClibc is hosted on the same page as BusyBox. It's smaller and has less bloat.

      Less bloat, ok but at the expense of less compatibility with existing code and more strange behavior or bugs that make existing code taking unexpected action. I use uClibc since 10 years now and I have not a single project where I don't have to fix a bug, add a support, or patch the application code to get the expected result.

      Today memory is very cheap and the economy in size of the uClbc is not enough anymore to justify the lost in development time to use it, unless you maybe playing with very large quantity. Many system I see have applications binaries, libraries binaries, and user data, at least 10x bigger than the size of the uClibc. In addition, build system like Buildroot provides now the choice to use crosstool-ng and thus other libc than the uClibc.

      The only good reason to use uClibc is for noMMU processor (Cortex-M3, Blackfin, etc...) to run few user space process. Using many process without a MMU will eat a lot of SDRAM and will quickly cost more than upgrading to a cheap MMU core like the venerable ARM-926EJ-S used in a lot of processors.

    15. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no link to GPL source code on Lego site, not even in "Legal Matters" link url.
      Will there be Linux software similar to Windows release? I doubt it. Linux is everywhere in commercial products, except in the desktop. What will it take? I would prefer these companies to have to shell out for closed source, actually, instead of adding freeloading injury to insult.

    16. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GPL requires code for code. There's exchange of value. I'm surprised the IRS isn't on free software developers yet.

    17. Re: Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2

      First, they haven't distributed these yet.

      Second, they only have to make source code available to those who they distribute binaries to... Not joe public.

      I'm very sure when this gets shipping in the Summer Lego will have a portal up with all the goodies.

    18. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by richlv · · Score: 1

      i just skimmed the articles, but it also just said "linux based". busybox would still be great... but it could easily be as closed platform as android and friends.
      if it would be truly open... i think i have some plans to waste a bit of money and time then ;)

      and looks like their online designer still has no linux support, so they don't seem to be very interested in that area :>
      http://ldd.lego.com/

      --
      Rich
    19. Re:Linux, not necessarily GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're distributing without (or in violation of) a license, you're infringing.

  3. Autodesk, not Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Man, I bet Autodesk will be pissed to learn that Adobe released a product with the same name as their Inventor Publisher.

    1. Re:Autodesk, not Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How did this get +5 informative??? It's Microsoft Publisher, it's not even an Adobe program!

    2. Re:Autodesk, not Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a post from the future, after Adobe bought Microsoft.

    3. Re:Autodesk, not Adobe by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Inventor Publisher is an Autodesk program. The summary says Adobe. The OP was making a joke. Microsoft has nothing to do with it.

    4. Re:Autodesk, not Adobe by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Adobe bought Autodesk.

  4. Would have loved this... by docmordin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would have loved this when I was growing up, considering that programmable robots at that time were limited to industry and research labs at universities.

    In any event, the asking price seems a bit too high for what LEGO are offering and with what's now available today; touching on just one facet, after a cursory glance on Mouser/DigiKey, PCB manufacturing companies, and 3D printing shops, the so-called intelligent brick, along with its circuitry innards, could easily be fabricated on a one-off basis for under $75-100 USD. For $350 USD, they should have at least thrown in a decent CMOS camera and more servos.

    1. Re:Would have loved this... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      That $350 also includes a bunch of LEGO technic, which isn't exactly cheap.

    2. Re:Would have loved this... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Informative

      Plastic may be inexpensive. LEGO isn't... for the amount of plastic that you actually get anyways, It's actually pretty pricey.

      Of course, some would argue that it's worth it, because LEGO has considerably higher quality building bricks than any of its competitors.

    3. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Plastic generally isn't, no. Plastic made to LEGO's tolerances? Yes. Their tolerance is as little as 0.002 millimeters!

    4. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And all of the software that comes with it would take you a significant amount of money on a "one-off basis." Also, you're getting servos, sensors, instructions, and other parts. For $350, that's pretty fucking good.

      Why do people always say, "I could build it myself far cheaper?" This is fucking obvious - you can build it with cheaper parts all on your own, assuming the value of your time is (or approaches) zero for the effort of building and coding everything to work properly. together. It's PHB syndrome - I haven't really considered what I'm getting in the box, I'm just shouting about how expensive it is, because it's not as cheap as the 100-brick lego sets I used to have as a kid.

      If you can do it cheaper, then you should open a business and compete with Lego - these are popular kits, and they make good money off them. If, however, you can't... then maybe you should stop crying about the price.

    5. Re:Would have loved this... by tibit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try molding those bricks like they do and see how inexpensive that is :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:Would have loved this... by tibit · · Score: 1

      $350 is actually a pretty good price, IMHO.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re:Would have loved this... by dbc · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've got that right. Lego molds are extremely precise -- the jewelry of the machinists' art, and hand cleaned and polished periodically. And they use only top quality resins -- there is ABS, and then there is ABS -- better resins cost more. That is why Lego is expensive.

    8. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Economics 101 - it's expensive because consumers are willing to pay the expensive price. LEGO's prices are not based on costs

    9. Re:Would have loved this... by countach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a top quality product, sure. But it is still just moulded plastic. They could sell it a LOT cheaper if they wanted.

    10. Re:Would have loved this... by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      Agreed. It's less that the video card I'm about to buy and I can pretend that the lego is 'educational' if my wife inquires.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    11. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Plastic generally isn't, no. Plastic made to LEGO's tolerances? Yes. Their tolerance is as little as 0.002 millimeters!

      Sure you're not off by one or two orders of magnitude there? 0.002" I can believe, 2um not,

      And - Lego is for kids. The real jewels were fischertechnik : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischertechnik .

    12. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he is almost right : "The machines that make Lego bricks have tolerances as small as 10 micrometres." (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego#Design)

    13. Re:Would have loved this... by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Silicon is cheap, too, but people seem to pay hundreds of dollars for it after someone puts a little metal and dopant on it...

    14. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Economics 102 - Consumers are willing to pay the expensive price because of high perceived quality, which tends to be due to high quality, which tends to cost more to produce.

    15. Re:Would have loved this... by dbc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Three words for you: Do The Math.

      I'm pretty sure you have no idea what it takes to create a mold for injection molding. I have made molds and shot plastic. Crappy molds, because I'm an amateur machinist, but I have shot ABS in molds I made myself using a 20 ton Morgan Press manual injection molding machine, and taught others how to do it. Come back and tell me "it's just plastic" after you have made a mold in hardened tool steel, with tolerances spec'ed in hundreths of millimeters, and a high-polish surface specification, and shot millions of parts while keeping the dimensions and surface finish within spec. You can show me your math then. Until then, stop talking out of your ass.

    16. Re:Would have loved this... by PiMuNu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed. There is a lego clone called megabloks - that uses the same interface as lego but much cheaper. If you mix lego with megabloks, it is clear that the megabloks build quality is far inferior, leading to crap buildings that fall over. lego is actually decent stuff.

    17. Re:Would have loved this... by gsslay · · Score: 2

      You are making a common error in consumer understanding of retail economics. Cost of production is only the start in determining price.

      Lego is expensive because that's the optimal price for the company to maximize its profits. It's expensive because enough people are prepared to buy it at that price. It wouldn't matter if a lego brick cost 0.01 to produce, if they can get enough people to buy it for 10 then that's the price they'll sell it at.

    18. Re:Would have loved this... by FlyveHest · · Score: 2

      0.002 millimeters is what they told us when I visited the LEGO factory last year, of course, its impossible to verify for a layman like me, but the machinist was very adamant about the microscopic precision they use in the production process

    19. Re:Would have loved this... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      10 micrometers = 0.01 millimeters

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    20. Re:Would have loved this... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Economics 103 - From 101 and 102 some would conclude that apparently the entire manufacture / market / consumer cycle is a rational process

    21. Re:Would have loved this... by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Informative

      Two different tolerances:

        - 0.002 millimeters for the molds and tooling
        - 0.01 millimeters for the finished bricks

      The variance on the product is always larger than that for the tooling, w/ each step of the process slightly magnifying any inaccuracy before it.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    22. Re:Would have loved this... by WillAdams · · Score: 2

      ``There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.''
      -- John Ruskin, English Writer and Critic of art, architecture, and society, 1819-1900

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    23. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could build some simple rack gear programmable robot. Had the 8888 ideas book which had the instructions to build a robot crane with six track instructions (track #1 = feed, track #2 = left, track #3 = right, track #4 = lower hook, track #5 = raise hook). There were also pictures of pen plotters, but no instructions.

    24. Re:Would have loved this... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Yup. I don't even think that all injection molding companies could produce to LEGO's tolerances and quality requirements. As in: you've got professionals who don't know enough to pull it off, yet they otherwise do OK in their business. I live in an area with overabundance of automotive suppliers, many of them doing plastic injection molding and what they can do is mostly nowhere near what you'd need for LEGO bricks.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    25. Re:Would have loved this... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      to bring this down to the streets a grandkid can be playing with his Grandfathers lego and his own and not have to worry about stuff not fitting. (I have Lego Bricks older than you so shut it!)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    26. Re:Would have loved this... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Agreed. There is a lego clone called megabloks - that uses the same interface as lego but much cheaper. If you mix lego with megabloks, it is clear that the megabloks build quality is far inferior, leading to crap buildings that fall over. lego is actually decent stuff.

      Long before Mega Bloks, TYCO was making Lego knock-off blocks. They sucked too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:Would have loved this... by Inda · · Score: 2

      hmmm. I have qualifications in moulding.

      The moulds, once cast, are machined on the same CNC machines as every other mould in the world. Getting the feeler gauges out, with the vernier tools, and checking tolerances, is no different to any other job. I produced models of parts, that eventually were injection moulded, and I could meet a tolerance of 0.05mm using hand tools alone.

      They are polished, by hand, by people with lower skills as myself. It's not hard; itâ€(TM)s semi-skilled.

      I've seen the Lego moulds on YouTube. They aren't large enough to have complex cooling.

      I've heard the company tell its audience about how hard it is to make the bricks. If I was charging stupid prices for them, I'd tell the world how hard it was too. Sure, if you have no training, those bricks will be hard to produce. For the rest of us, no problem.

      In my opinion, the high price of the bricks comes from the packing and packaging, the movie licences, the instruction booklets, maybe the higher quality material, but not the manufacturing of the plastic bricks.

      But, Iâ€(TM)m also more than willing to be wrong about all of this. Itâ€(TM)s been a long time..., but the bricks were made before I was born, with old technology, that I learnt fully.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    28. Re:Would have loved this... by thoromyr · · Score: 1

      to which megabloks are you referring? There's the "first builders" line which is not comparable to legos, but to duplos (another product of the lego company). I have seen nothing to indicate that duplos are superior to megabloks. My children love their legos, but they also love the megabloks. Because the tolerances are looser (which works due to the significantly larger scale) the megabloks are *much* easier to work with than legos. Brand new lego bricks are hard to snap together and snap apart (even an adult will feel some discomfort in the fingers after awhile).

      in my household we routinely build "barns" out of megabloks. the 1 and 4 year old both love it. And I challenge you to build as tall a tower out of legos as megabloks. It can certainly be done though it will take much longer and the only additional stability is from being denser. When I can build a tower of megabloks (using the 1x1 block) that is as tall as I am I have to seriously question what makes your megablok buildings fall over. Maybe it isn't the blocks that are crap, but the builder.

      Yeah, prior to having kids and actually using megabloks I was biased myself. But we got a box of used (and well worn) megabloks donated and it was an eye opener. Sure, my grandchildren won't be playing with these same blocks (35+ year old lego pieces are loose, but mostly still snap together whereas megabloks show the same amount of wear after a few years), but that doesn't make them crap. And, due to the larger size, they aren't as sensitive to loose fits.

      (And in case it isn't clear, yeah, the one year old *does* play with legos. Sure, that goes against the age ratings. No, building sets doesn't happen, mostly it is playing with minifigs and constructed items. The biggest age issue is swallowing and parenting/supervision solves that.)

    29. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to comment, recently I went out and was curious so I got one of the latest Mega Blocks sets (something Halo-ish) and also a set from Kre-O (another clone, this was a Transformer model) and I was impressed with the quality. It really was very hard to distinguish either type from Lego bricks, purely on quality.

      Since then I have seen some of the older Mega Blocks stuff (a whole line of Dragon themed stuff? not sure) and it is totally different - looks and feels far inferior to Lego. So at least some of the clone manufacturers have improved.

    30. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is this 'legos' to which you are referring. It was Lego (no 's') last time I looked.

    31. Re:Would have loved this... by pbhj · · Score: 1

      But "There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a _the_same_quality_ and sell a little cheaper" causing only a slight depreciation in wealth for some very rich people who don't need all they have already.

    32. Re:Would have loved this... by tibit · · Score: 1

      You must be great at your job, then, because there have been a couple of vendors that I worked with that were nowhere as good...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    33. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fairly sure GP isn't talking about their Duplo-equivalent. The Megabloks equivalent of standard Lego is what I mostly played with as a child because it was considerably cheaper than the real thing. I also had a few Lego sets. The difference was extremely noticeable. Megabloks don't fit together as securely, and can be somewhat off in size. You'd have megablok bricks that didn't fit in whatever you were building (too large or small), some that didn't even stick, and some that only stuck after considerable manual effort. The Lego sets always needed less reinforcement than anything built with Megabloks.

    34. Re:Would have loved this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm. I have qualifications in moulding. ... I produced models of parts, that eventually were injection moulded, and I could meet a tolerance of 0.05mm using hand tools alone.

      Their molds are 0.002, their cast parts are 0.05 precision. So they mass produce millions of bricks at a tighter tolerance than you get by hand on your mold. What's the tolerance on your finished part before hand polishing? What about the thousand'th copy? The millionth?

      If your time is worthless, few doubt you can hand make an equivalent hand carving and machining it as many times as it takes. We doubt your ability to scale that to millions cheaper than LEGO does.

    35. Re:Would have loved this... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      And in case it isn't clear, yeah, the one year old *does* play with legos.

      That's ill-advised, unless you actually *like* paying large hospital bills.

    36. Re: Would have loved this... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Lego sells just the NXT "brick" for about $125-$150. Sensors and motors are $20-$50 each. (6 accessories is another $150-$200) So they are in line with what you think they should charge..

      LEGO isn't an electronics company, so they're probably not getting a great deal wholesale given how picky they are and the volume.

    37. Re:Would have loved this... by luisdom · · Score: 1

      In automotive industry, it's ~20.000€ for a decent mold. Not very big.

    38. Re:Would have loved this... by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Lego is not however one of the very rich corporations --- wasn't that long ago that there was concern that they'd go bankrupt and out of business.

      Most of the good quality stuff isn't made by fabulously wealthy people either. Bridge City Tools would be the poster child for this, w/ a blog post on it:

      https://www.bridgecitytools.com/blog/2012/02/21/we-are-what-we-celebrate/

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    39. Re:Would have loved this... by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Economics 104 - Whatever you thought you knew was wrong. a.k.a. Intro to banking & international finance.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    40. Re:Would have loved this... by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      This is why Lego costs more.

      I have Lego bricks kicking round that i found outdoors in odd places, living in Australia plenty of them were heavily UV exposed. Got bored & did some destructive load testing on one once, the dye may fade the shine may dull and the corners may blunt, but that plastic lasts really really well. I wonder if there's any way to do more advanced stuff like molecular analysis or radiocarbon dating to determine the exact age of the Lego. Shame there's no place i can just mail a chip of the plastic as sample to for it to be analysed and get a report back... well any that don't ask which fortune 500 company/research university pays the bill and charge appropriately.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  5. Two questions by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    1. Do current Mindstorm devices (servos, sensors) work with it? Or am I going to have to buy all new ones?

    2. On-brick programming is cute for toys and whatnot, but I had to build an entire communicative framework to do live remote programming control with my PC being the brains, sending and receiving signals over Bluetooth, basically running a processing stub on the brick, but the AI was live running on the PC.

    I need to do that for real AI work, kthxbie.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Two questions by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      1. Do current Mindstorm devices (servos, sensors) work with it? Or am I going to have to buy all new ones?

      That's what I want to know. I had the original Mindstorm, and when the v2 came out, it was incompatible to the first one. The other issue is will they start keeping their software up to date? The software for even v2 only runs on XP. This is way to expensive of a toy to have it go obsolete because of an OS upgrade.

    2. Re:Two questions by azipsun · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a longer article on CNET about this that says that the new system will be backwards compatible with existing NXT robots.

    3. Re:Two questions by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It looks like it's still a NXT brick, so the same electronics can connect to it.

    4. Re:Two questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If it's Linux, you can probably make them work with it, even if they're not designed to.

    5. Re:Two questions by similar_name · · Score: 1

      What was your second question?

    6. Re:Two questions by afidel · · Score: 2

      LOL, back not too many years ago when I was in college those were workstation class specs. In fact I knew a group that did realtime American Sign Language interpretation in only twice as much ram and about 50% more storage on an Indigo2 workstation. If you can't make a robot without realtime video processing work in those specs you're doing something wrong.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Two questions by samkass · · Score: 1

      Since most of the NXT sensors are just packaged up I2C sensors they should be electrically compatible even if they change the wires. For that matter, they'd be electrically compatible with a $35 Raspberry Pi's I2C bus if they could handle 3.3V or had a 3V3-5V circuit between them.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    8. Re:Two questions by clonmult · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not true; bought my son the NXT2.0 kit for christmas - the software works fine on Windows 7 (but not Win7 SE). As far as I understood it, the sensors are completely compatible between versions.

    9. Re:Two questions by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      There may be some confusion here - version 2 of RCX is XP only. NXT and NXT 2.0 came out later. I think (could be wrong of course) that op is talking about v1 and v2 of RCX - which are xp only and it took some hacks to get the usb ir tower to work on xp. If you have a 64 bit machine with 7 it's a no go. Found that out last year when I dug up my v2 RCX kit to mess around. I didn't have time to dig further - I'm guessing to get it to work I'd need to build out a VM maybe that would let me run the old software.

      The $350 price is not bad. I bought my RCX kit in the late 90s for $250 I think - or something close to it. The price only going up $100 in that time is impressive I think.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    10. Re:Two questions by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      most of the NXT sensors are just packaged up I2C sensors

      Actually that is not really true at least for the lego sensors (third party sensors are another matter).

      The touch sensor is a simple switch
      I think the temperature sensor (not included in any kits but available for purchase seperately) is a simple thermister but i'm not positive on that.
      The light and sound sensors are analog sensors with some internal electronics.
      The ultrasound sensor is I2C.
      I think the color sensor included in the newer NXT kits is also an analog sensor with some electronics but i'm not postive on that (note that the lego color sensor is NOT the same as the hitechnic one).

      For that matter, they'd be electrically compatible with a $35 Raspberry Pi's I2C bus if they could handle 3.3V or had a 3V3-5V circuit between them.

      Any one of the NXTs sensors could be easilly interfaced to a raspberry Pi. Making an interface that works with all of them is somewhat trickier. Making it work with the RCX powered sensors too is trickier still. Also I heard somewhere that lego had patents on the tricks used in the RCX powered sensor interface which may make a commerical interface that supports those sensors difficult to pull off.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:Two questions by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      If you can't make a robot without realtime video processing work in those specs you're doing something wrong.

      I am a computer vision scientist and my day job involves writing computer vision algorithms, often realtime ones. Back when I started I was working on an SGI O2, which at the time was a decent machine because while it was slower than a PC in raw FLOPS, it had zero copy video I/O and more memory bandwidth than Jesus.

      I love your dismissiveness of "you're doing something wrong".

      It's possible to get a realtime system running on MicroVAX 3400, which can't even memcpy a live video feed in real time (see RAPID, Harris and Stennett, 1990), but it is very hard and works with few algorithms.

      Doing anything full frame is hard. Sure ASL interpretation was possible a while back (600MHz PIII, http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/publications/2002/Lockton02/lockton02.pdf) which would be comparable to this SoC, but it wasn't easy. It also has quite serious restrictions on things like background sleeves and watches. Making it better will require more advanced algorithms and more computation.

      It's still not possible to do "real" SIFT in realtime on a CPU, though simplified versions can run "reasonably" fast on a phone. Still the realtime phone based systems use all sorts of faster, complex algorithms, often involving heavy doses of machine learning (like FERNS) in order to save runtime computation.

      Systems like PTAM can now run in realtime in an OKish way on a high spec phone, with lots of very careful engineering by experts. More recent, advanced ones like DTAM require a PC with a decent GPU.

      So if you think wanting a PC to do vision means "you're doing something wrong." than you're talking out of your ass.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:Two questions by afidel · · Score: 1

      Reread what I said:
      If you can't make a robot without realtime video processing

      I was commenting on the fact that these robots are working without vision systems, since it's possible to do some form of realtime video processing in the given specs it should be trivial to make a system that's only working on a handful of non-video inputs work in the resources provided.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:Two questions by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Reread what I said:

      D'oh!

      Rant first, read later!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:Two questions by richlv · · Score: 1

      do they sell the software ? i wouldn't expect them to, i guess the business is in selling the kits, instructions, brand etc :)
      if so, opensourcing that software should bring in lots of interest from more advanced crowd and make mindstorms approach the longevity of standard lego set. sure, usually longevity is fought against, but lego owes part of it's existence people having real old sets, seeing how they still fit in with new ones and getting more for their kids (well, or themselves =) )

      --
      Rich
  6. Brick your Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder whether they can brick their brick? Turn a lego into a brick? Get it? Ah forget it.

    1. Re:Brick your Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brick by brick, tock by tick, no matter how thin, no matter how thick....

    2. Re:Brick your Brick? by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now, not only can you brick your phone, but you can phone your brick.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Brick your Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn facebook... I actually looked for the "like" button on your comment.

    4. Re:Brick your Brick? by godrik · · Score: 2

      in soviet russia, brick phone YOU!

    5. Re:Brick your Brick? by cultiv8 · · Score: 1

      and your car, house, space ship, and tower. Or so says my 3 year old.

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    6. Re:Brick your Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's only available for those with an account and mod points.

    7. Re:Brick your Brick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you'll not only have to deal with high phone bills from your children talking endlessly with their friends, but also with even higher phone bills from your children talking endlessly with their Lego bricks!

  7. But can it run NetBSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:But can it run NetBSD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't know.

  8. Ubuntu was made to talk to NXT by eksith · · Score: 2

    Demonstrated last year as a matter of fact, so I guess this wasn't too far off.

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    1. Re:Ubuntu was made to talk to NXT by eksith · · Score: 1

      Oops, I meant year before. My brain is still stuck in 2012.

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
  9. Geek-gasm by inode_buddha · · Score: 2

    ...coming in 3...2...1...

    --
    C|N>K
  10. Still a NXT brick at its core, it seems. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Although that's a good thing for people who already have stuff, because it means its compatible with NXT sensors and motors, at the same time I'm a bit disappointed because the NXT only has 7 I/O ports, and to control more devices you need another NXT brick.

    What would be nice is if you control more than just the 7 devices that you can plug into the brick without having to add another programmable brick to the system... say, by separating things like device power supply from device control, and using a separate battery box (or boxes) to supply power to as many devices as you want, and the cpu simply addresses them in a not entirely dissimilar way to how many USB devices are addressed on a single bus.

    Of course, this brick has USB connectivity, so it may at least possible to add this sort of functionality to this device.

    1. Re:Still a NXT brick at its core, it seems. by sdsucks · · Score: 5, Informative

      What would be nice is if you control more than just the 7 devices that you can plug into the brick without having to add another programmable brick to the system... say, by separating things like device power supply from device control, and using a separate battery box (or boxes) to supply power to as many devices as you want, and the cpu simply addresses them in a not entirely dissimilar way to how many USB devices are addressed on a single bus.

      The functionality you want is already available on existing NXT bricks.

      The sensor ports on NXT bricks use I2C for communication, allowing "sensors" to be daisy chained and referred to by address. Since the communication across the bus can be bi-directional (though half duplex), you can easily add I2C controlled motor controllers with external power supplies. There is also the RS485 port, for higher speed bi-directional communication.

      Want more sensors? Simply daisy chain them on an I2C port. (I usually custom make cables for specific purposes, but there are also multiplexers available which could potentially allow for over 128 i2c addressed devices on a single port). An example of a commercially available daisy chain splitter - http://www.mindsensors.com/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=79. Multiplexer? http://www.hitechnic.com/cgi-bin/commerce.cgi?preadd=action&key=NSX2020.

      Want to control more motors? Simply add a I2C controlled motor controller - a simple circuit to make yourself, or buy one of the commercially available options. In most cases you would use these with an external power supply (i.e. battery box).

      Separating "things like device power supply from device control" is as simple as making your own cables... or use some of the commercially available motor controllers. For example this motor controller (a simple i2c based DC motor controller, with lego RCX plugs in the PCB) requires an external 9v power supply - http://www.mindsensors.com/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=58.

      Using USB for these purposes rather than I2C would be far more complex. I2C is very simple to use, and is fast enough for most motor and sensor IO.

    2. Re:Still a NXT brick at its core, it seems. by jcdr · · Score: 1

      For there intended audience, the I2C bus is still a very good choice, since there only have to deal with a very limited quantity of low speed sensors and actuators.

      But I agree with you, there is probably a business opportunity to setup a standard based on USB for less toys oriented robotic. Something that make straightforward to add a new feature in a robot:
      - Can be compatible across many manufactures (including your own hacking).
      - Driver code contributed into a common open source project.
      - Auto detection of devices instances, with driver loading and necessary user space application.
      - Easy to use programming API for every sensors and actuators.

      Something a bit like the Arduino community but instead of the shields, using the USB to communicate with parts. I there anything like that already ?

    3. Re:Still a NXT brick at its core, it seems. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Separating "things like device power supply from device control" is as simple as making your own cables... or use some of the commercially available motor controllers. For example this motor controller (a simple i2c based DC motor controller, with lego RCX plugs in the PCB) requires an external 9v power supply

      Cool, but an exposed pcb is not as convenient as something built to LEGO specs, both in terms of dimensions and connectivity.

      I know I might just sound like I only want to bitch and complain about stuff, but that's not my point.... I'm sincerely disappointed that there aren't any official solutions like the above from LEGO themselves.

    4. Re:Still a NXT brick at its core, it seems. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The sensor ports on NXT bricks use I2C for communication, allowing "sensors" to be daisy chained and referred to by address.

      Third party sensors generally yes, lego sensors no. Most of the lego sensors don't use I2C and the only one i'm aware of that does (the ultrasound sensor) is not readdressable.

      That is why you need a device like the hitechnic sensor mux (which you admittedly did link) that can deal with all the different types of lego sensor and then present the results as an I2C device. Not cheap though.

      Want to control more motors? Simply add a I2C controlled motor controller - a simple circuit to make yourself, or buy one of the commercially available options. In most cases you would use these with an external power supply (i.e. battery box).

      Indeed you have to use an external battery box.

      Separating "things like device power supply from device control" is as simple as making your own cables...

      Not really, the NXT has no external power connection* so you can't really run it off an external battery and you can't really run your external devices off the battery in the NXT either (there is a tiny ammount of power available on the sensor ports but it's only enough for small sensors)

      Using USB for these purposes rather than I2C would be far more complex. I2C is very simple to use, and is fast enough for most motor and sensor IO.

      Agreed.

      Overall it's nice that lego lets this third party stuff exist but you can tell it's third party hacks not a design feature of the system and the cost adds up pretty damn quick.

      * The recharable battery accessory does have a charging port which can be used to supply the NXT but you wouldn't really want to use that to supply the NXT off another battery in a mobile model. I guess you could hack up a NXT battery pack to add an external power connection but that is going beyond "just making cables"

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Still a NXT brick at its core, it seems. by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      That is why you need a device like the hitechnic sensor mux (which you admittedly did link) that can deal with all the different types of lego sensor and then present the results as an I2C device. Not cheap though.

      You can however very easily use a pcf8591 to create your own i2c interface for analog sensors... Simple circuit, good for learning & experimenting, and the necessary parts are easily and very cheaply available.

    6. Re:Still a NXT brick at its core, it seems. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The disadvantage of these third party sensors and attachments is that it's difficult to find outside inspiration for new LEGO ideas that use them. Generally speaking, LEGO idea compilations tend to restrict themselves to standard LEGO only.

      Because I get most of my ideas for LEGO models from other LEGO models I've seen people build, or by browsing through LEGO idea books, 3rd party lego connectors aren't likely to find much use by me. It's not so much that I copy other people's ideas, but I will mentally note the way things are used when I've never seen a particular LEGO design pattern before, and can often find myself inspired by it to use the pattern on something completely different.

      I've seen, sometimes, ideas that use 3 or 4 programmable bricks... when the only reason for that number of cpu's is only because there aren't enough i/o ports on a single brick.

  11. Wait... what? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    64MB RAM and 16MB storage ???

    That can't be right...

    Seriously... it makes no sense. When is storage capacity *smaller* than ram?

    The article either has it backwards, or else they meant 16gb of storage.

    1. Re:Wait... what? by aedil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It would actually make quite a lot of sense for a custom system where the control software (essentially the OS) is provided in the srtorage component (16MB), and things like actual programs are loaded into RAM. Since typically (as far as I recall) mindstorm programs are loaded into the brick at runtime, it makes perfect sense that no storage is used for this, other than perhaps a ramdisk.

    2. Re:Wait... what? by Bill+Currie · · Score: 1

      With support for sd cards, who needs storage other than for the OS itself?

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    3. Re:Wait... what? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Look at every SOHO router released in the last 10 years, small flash for OS+base programs and some ram to run code. Boot from a bzip2 image to ram drive and execute from there.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Wait... what? by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      "Since typically (as far as I recall) mindstorm programs are loaded into the brick at runtime"

          -- FYI, that is not the case. The NXT's have 256KB of flash which is used for user (and OS) storage.

    5. Re:Wait... what? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      why?
      try programming anything?

      (besides it's moot since your code would be sitting on the sd card.. but it's not unfeasible to think of plenty of things where you'd se 64mbytes and more of memory but which would take much less than 16mbytes of space in executable form).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Wait... what? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Since typically (as far as I recall) mindstorm programs are loaded into the brick at runtime

      You are kind of out of date. The RCX kept almost everything in ram (which was a PITA, take the batteries out and you had to redownload the firmware before you could program it again) but the NXT uses flash for user programs and updatable firmware.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:Wait... what? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If you are wanting to reuse the same program over and over agin, I can imagine that having to reupload several megabytes each time you turn it on would get pretty annoying. Of course you could also store it on an sd card, so that might nt be an issue

  12. Sweet. by adolf · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that I can finally retire my venerable WRT54G?

    1. Re:Sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unless you have an external managed switch, an Ethernet access on the Brick probably via USB.

  13. More info on the EV3 by pbr · · Score: 4, Informative

    https://www.quora.com/lego_tidbits/Lego-Mindstorms-EV3-More-Info

    --
    -PBR
    1. Re:More info on the EV3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but does it run Li... Oh, wait. It does. Never mind.

  14. next time on legoland by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling that Legos are going to beat most of the private companies into space. They'll probably outdo them on satellite launches too.

    1. Re:next time on legoland by mark-t · · Score: 1

      yup

  15. Why was it in Dutch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or maybe the question should. Be: why do Americans think Danes speak Dutch, when they infact speak Danish?

    1. Re:Why was it in Dutch? by zeptic · · Score: 1

      There is one really easy answer to that question: The article is in Dutch.

    2. Re:Why was it in Dutch? by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Fun fact: Denmark itself is listed as one of the emerging markets which will finally have a native language release, in addition to the already supported languages which includes Dutch.

    3. Re:Why was it in Dutch? by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Every Dane I ever met spoke excellent English, so it wouldn't matter to them. Better than most Americans, for that matter.

    4. Re:Why was it in Dutch? by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      True. To the point it's annoying. I try to do my best speaking danish to them (which I'm still learning), and they answer in English. Uh, okay, so my Danish isn't good enough for you? I guess they just enjoy speaking English whenever the get the chance :)

      The funniest thing is getting corrected by my kids, whom have less problems with pronunciation than I do. I'm dutch myself, and while not interchangeable, the languages are somewhat compatible (more so than danish vs german and dutch vs german, in my opinion). But their soft 'd' isn't easy.

  16. Which ARM9 SoC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A quick search shows no info on which SoC is used under the hood. Are there any better googler than I up to the challenge?

  17. !adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think they meant Autodesk Inventor Publisher, right?

  18. Could they? Lego is not Apple by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We know Apple could sell the iPhone cheaper because Apple makes massive profits. Does Lego make massive profits? No, in fact before it re-invented itself, it was like Apple in serious trouble of going the way of Meccano. Which still exists but only as a perversion of its former self.

    People often seem to think all there is to a product is its physical production. THAT is easy, although Lego is a bit more accurate in its production then most plastic factories, it can be easily replicated to produce a machine to produce simple bricks. BUT that is NOT Lego. Lego is ALL the models, which in box form have often to be in stores for a year or more before hopefully being sold, constantly having to keep up with trends like hot movies because the OLD business model of outdated non-current models wasn't working. And developing Mindstorms wouldn't have been cheap either.

    Lego suffers from the high cost of mass production of an INSANE number of parts that all have to be combined, they can't just let one machine run indefinite pushing out one type of brick, it is lots of different pieces in lots of colors that all have to come together in production runs from which only tiny amounts are sent out and the rest has to be stored.

    It is a logistacal nightmare and quite different from how other plastic producers like say plastic bottles work, most plastic bottles arrive at the bottling plant in granular form, one machine makes a test tube and another blows it up JUST before it is filled in an constant single item production run. THAT is cheap. Lego's method is not. In fact, lego's method of selling LOTS and LOTS of different models is EXACTLY what Apple is NOT doing. Even Samsung isn't. If Lego was a phone maker, there would be 2000 current models, ALL of them with instructions how alter them completely, combine them and turn them into complex robots.

    That is why Lego is expensive. Look at their profits, there is no excessive fat there. You can make cheap clones of a few boxes of lego easily but the entire product range? No. Proof? NOBODY ELSE IS DOING IT! Oh you can buy 1 or 2 lego like models from China but NOT the constantly updated catalog lego catalog. You PAY for that.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Could they? Lego is not Apple by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      keep up with trends like hot movies because the OLD business model of outdated non-current models wasn't working

      It wasn't working because the Legos were too expensive. Few people care about the models. It's a building toy. You get a shoebox of them and build.

      The models and cross-licensing lets them sell fewer legos for more money, but they have to pay royalties, so I don't know what the point is.

    2. Re:Could they? Lego is not Apple by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The models and cross-licensing lets them sell fewer legos for more money, but they have to pay royalties, so I don't know what the point is.

      The point is that some kids are going to point and say HARRY POTTER MOMMY HARRY POTTER or well, that's over now, but you get the idea.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Could they? Lego is not Apple by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of Lego clones on the market, Mega Bloks being the easiest one to find in the USA. They are often cheaper than Lego products, both in cost and quality. If all that you care about is cost, go with the them.

      The cross-licensing deals are what keeps the products on store shelves (as they do sell very well) at major retailers instead of just hobby shops. If you think that Lego products are expensive now, you really wouldn't like the price if they didn't have the licensed sets.

      So everyone, enjoy your Mindstorms. I know I will! But know that these wouldn't exist without Lego also producing licensed stuff, average video games, and other geek reviled products (Bionicle/Hero Factory, Lego Friends, etc.)

    4. Re:Could they? Lego is not Apple by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Unless it's the other way around...

      Maybe adults say "Jimmy likes Harry Potter", and then buy him the set?

    5. Re:Could they? Lego is not Apple by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I think it's more along the lines of advertising tells the parent that all the other children have Harry Potter themed lego but their own child is sad because they don't and that the only way to be a half decent parent is to work more hours away from their child in order to afford Harry Potter themed lego ...

    6. Re:Could they? Lego is not Apple by ButchDeLoria · · Score: 1

      Average? A lot of them are good, if not great.

    7. Re:Could they? Lego is not Apple by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe adults say "Jimmy likes Harry Potter", and then buy him the set?

      That may be, but I know that I expressed opinions when I was a kid. They were summarily ignored, but I did express them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. "servos", NOT "servo's" by Fleetie · · Score: 3, Informative

    For goodness sake, I wish whoever wrote that would learn written English. Also, it's "videos", "photos", and so on.

    --
    "Absorbing your worst..."
    1. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      For goodness sake

      Shouldn't that be "For goodness's sake"? ;)

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For goodness sake

      Shouldn't that be "For goodness's sake"? ;)

      Shouldn't that be "For goodness' sake" ? ;-)

      http://grammarist.com/usage/for-goodness-sake/

    3. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by stefpe · · Score: 1

      For goodness sake

      Shouldn't that be "For goodness's sake"? ;)

      Goodness' ;)

    4. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1
      According to the very page you've linked to:

      We’d probably use for goodness’s sake

      Now, should it be "neener neener" or "neener-neener"?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Why? It's not plural.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    6. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From that very sentence you quote on that very page "the consensus among English grammar and usage authorities is in favor of for goodness’ sake."

      "Neener-neener with nobs on".

    7. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contraction of goodness's, posessive.

    8. Re:"servos", NOT "servo's" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammarist.com is written by morons. Just as you shouldn't stick an apostrophe before every s, you also shouldn't take off every s after s'. If it ain't plural, then the possessive is 's.

  20. raspberry pi anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like a job for a raspberry pi. The problem is to get mit's Scratch to play with it. I've been thinking about a way to do this for a few weeks. I

    1. Re:raspberry pi anyone? by lahvak · · Score: 2

      If you are talking about Scratch playing with Lego NXT, take a look at this: http://enchanting.robotclub.ab.ca/tiki-index.php

      If you are talking about Scratch on the pi, that should work out of the box.

      Finally, if you want to use the Lego motors and sensors with the pi, I am not aware of any existing project, but I know that they have been used with an arduino, so it should be possible to drive them from the pi. It would be more powerful and probably cheaper than the new NXT brick, although I suspect that most of the cost of the Lego kit is due to the motors and sensors, rather than the brick itself.

      --
      AccountKiller
  21. battery life by MoreDruid · · Score: 2

    I hope they truly address battery life. I understand that making motors turn and sensory input costs energy but boy the NXT 2.0 eats through a pack of batteries like a pothead with munchies. In the RC world there are lots of energy efficient battery types, and for the price I think Lego should have included a decent rechargeable battery pack (NiMh, if not LiPo).

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    1. Re:battery life by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It would be better if the brick would simply accept these new 3.7v Lithium batteries in the AA format. It's better to be able to swap batteries, to be able to buy the batteries at your supermarket, etc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We did FLL this year, and the killer was that not only did you have to buy lots of batteries, but they had to be high-quality alkalines and you had to buy vast quantities of exactly the same battery. There's a rechargeable battery pack, but it's super expensive and the affiliated transformer is a one-off (and also not included with the battery).

  22. New advertising technique? by SigmundFloyd · · Score: 1

    1. post critical article about $product (make sure the article also contains rebuttals);
    2. followup 2 weeks later with new $product announcement that proves previous criticism wrong;
    3. profit!

    Not necessarily carried out consciously by news aggregation sites such as this one, but possibly still orchestrated by $product's marketing dept.

    --
    Knowledge is power; knowledge shared is power lost.
  23. New paranoia technique? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's hard to link a product announcement from Lego with an unrelated article from NY Times two weeks earlier. The idea that Lego stores up product announcements and then releases them two weeks after some guy somewhere writes an article about them is pretty much ridiculous.

  24. tweakers.not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linking to an article on a website that most people can't read is bad enough. That the article contains no more information than the various English sources is just plain stupid. Tweakers, apart from being drug addicts, is a advertisement outlet for big iron and the copyright industry.

  25. Wait until you discover girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe that ship has sailed

    1. Re:Wait until you discover girls by psithurism · · Score: 2

      Been there, done that: Legos are cheaper, and they haven't thrown my girlfriend out the window because I spent too much time with her rather than them.

      I could go on forever with this: they don't invite their mother over to take their side in disagreements; they don't not want to play for one week out of the month...

  26. Just a matter of time until Lego SkyNet by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    With WiFi and BlueTooth it's just a matter of time until our Lego SkyNet overlord is replicating itself to take over.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)