Annual "Worst CEO" List Released
angry tapir writes "Zynga's Mark Pincus made the annual 'Worst CEOs' list compiled by Dartmouth College professor Sydney Finkelstein. Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook and Andrew Mason of Groupon received dishonorable mentions. Zuckerberg earned his dishonorable mention on the list partly due to his 'hoodie mentality.'"
The methodology behind the list combines three factors: the firms' financial performance including stock returns and cash flow; the extent to which the CEO has behaved responsibly; and strategic leadership and corporate governance.
Also, the CEO of Best Buy got the #1 worst ranking.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Meg Whitman...
http://www.businessworld.in/en/storypage/-/bw/who-are-the-worst-ceos-of-2012/679612.37489/page/-1
Where the hell is Elop? I would have thought that cratering the company you're running would count something towards being a bad CEO.
And shouldn't Ballmer at least rate a dishonorable mention?
:-P
"What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
"A four-foot prune."
My top three are all social media related. Imagine that.
1. Microsoft buys Yammer for $1.2 Billion
"Enterprise social network" -- a solution looking for a problem. This is almost as bad an idea as Ballmer's Skype acquisition in 2011.
2. Facebook buys Instagram for $715 Million
Zuckerman didn't even ask the board. Meanwhile users are leaving Instagram like someone set the company on fire. And they're still not profitable.
3. Zynga buys OMGPOP for $180 Million
Pincus thinks he's the next EA, while the entire company rots away under him.
There are a lot more (thinking rather pointedly of AMD, Apple, Samsung, Nokia), perhaps we can compile them all here.
And shouldn't Ballmer at least rate a dishonorable mention?
You won't see Balmer in the main annual lists, he is up for the Lifetime Achievement award...
HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
I feel there have to be worse things than what is mentioned in the story. Things like demotivating your entire company by firing people the day before their promised stock vests, actually killing the company you're running, stealing a significant chunk of money or other assets, keeping the company alive only because of a massive bail-out, those are things I would expect to make the list.
What's actually on the list seems comparatively tame. Hoodie mentality, seriously? Do we really still value complying with dress codes that were set in a different era higher than actually creating a multi-billion dollar company?
Disclaimer: I work for Facebook, however, I imagine my opinion would be much the same if I didn't. Also, this is my personal opinion; not necessarily that of my employer.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Or in this case, follow the ideology of the "Professor" in question. We like to think people who think themselves smart are above having agenda's. But are they?
I wonder how this guy DOES views Elop. Or indeed Nobuyuki Idei, the man who killed Sony. A managers manager, a man who had the shareholder firmly in mind. Who followed the tree factors that determined this list... AND ruined the company with it.
This "professor" dislikes the "hoodie" mentality, dislikes companies thinking their engineers are important when they should be worried about this quarters stock performance. So... it isn't that much of a leap to conclude this professor is of the Wallstreet business school, you know, the guys who gave us this wonderful robuust economy.
Are the mentioned CEO's bad leaders for their company OR did they just upset Wallstreet to much? ALWAYS question the source of a message, it tells you a lot about the message and how you should treat it. This list? Make up your own mind.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/the-five-worst-ceos-of-2012/2012/12/18/0f353f14-4940-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html