Slashdot Mirror


Getting Better Transparency From Oil Refineries

Hugh Pickens writes "Gregg Laskoski reports in U.S. News and World Report that virtually all of the retail gasoline price volatility that Americans experienced this past year was connected to significant problems at refineries. It was those refineries' vulnerability that subjected U.S. consumers to the year's highest average price ever, $3.63 per gallon. February delivered the BP refinery fire in Cherry Point, Washington that led to gasoline price spikes all along the Pacific coast, refinery problems in the Great Lakes region pushed Chicago gas prices to an all-time high of $4.56 per gallon, and over the summer, west coast refineries incurred outages, and California saw record highs in most markets, with Los Angeles gasoline's average price peaking at $4.72/gallon in October. Finally after Reuters reported that some 7,700 gallons of fuel spilled from Phillips 66's Bayway refinery in Linden, NJ, after Hurricane Sandy, New Jersey environmental protection officials said they were not made aware of a major spill at the Bayway plant, and the refinery failed to respond to inquiries from Reuters reporters. 'Too many times, history has shown us, the Phillips 66 response or lack thereof characterizes the standard practice of the oil industry. Refineries often fail or are slow to communicate problems that create significant disruptions to fuel supplies and spikes in retail gasoline prices. More often than not, scant information is provided reluctantly, if at all,' writes Laskoski. 'When such things occur is silence from refineries acceptable? Or does our government and the electorate who put them there have a right to know what's really going on?'"

34 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. Speculators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speculators demand more transparency so they can jack the price of futures every time a breaker trips at a refinery.

    1. Re:Speculators by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

      Speculators demand more transparency so they can jack the price of futures every time a breaker trips at a refinery.

      RSS feeds like ASM's process safety incidents list are available and useful for keeping track of what's happening at refineries (of all types) around the world. That sort of transparency is valuable to far more people than just speculators.

      Reporting to a public-facing list like this should be mandatory for all significant process industries. Transparency should be the norm, not the exception.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  2. Blame Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Regulators (state & federal) have forced refineries to shut down or prevented them from being built in the first place.

    NIMBY'ism is also a factor.

    Then there is the problem of too many different fuel blends. Dozens across the US, with a small number of refineries servicing each area.

    The result of all this, combined, is that a single refinery going down causes huge issues.

    Reduce the number of fuel blends across the country. Dont make it take 10+ years just for the possibility to build a new refinery because of all the hoops. More supply == less volatility.

  3. Willfull ignorance certainly a factor by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They suffer from "political myopia." They can't really be bothered to notice occurrences in the physical world. Only politics is real to them. So, like the Roman emperors who couldn't be bothered to attend to their water systems or roads, our government can't be bothered to look at refineries, or how net energy from hydrocarbons is declining even as supplies increase, or what happens when the potash is all mined out, or what happens when a few more major aquifers are completely drained. They won't be in office by then, they figure. It'll be someone else's problem.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  4. Thin margins by Jungle+guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Contrary to what some might expect, not everycompany in the oil industry is making a lot of money these days. With the spike in the Brent crude price, the refineries have, in fact, seen their margins getting thinner every day. As some refineries are in the brink of losing money, dont expext much investment on security or enviroment from them. The only possible solution? The regulator could tighten security requirements, forcing the bad refineries out of business and making the others have a better security performance. The downside? Gasoline prices will go out, as the gasoline from the old refineries will no longer go to the market. I don't know if the american government is willing to pay this price.

    1. Re:Thin margins by peragrin · · Score: 2

      ah no
      only C and D. Not one part of it would stay in the USA. As it sits now the oil companies are exporting refined gasoline as they get better prices for it over seas instead of using it to lower prices in the states.

      Incase you weren't aware but CANADA is a foreign country. you have to IMPORT oil FROM Canada.

      Of course you realized that right?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Thin margins by Klaxton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry but the proposed pipeline would not reduce gasoline prices in any way, it would carry tar sand sludge to Texas refineries on the Gulf coast which will then produce fuels that go on the open international market. Yes I said sludge, it isn't even oil, it is a bitumen hydrocarbon 'product' called dilbit. A bizarre highly corrosive and sticky pipeline fluid that sinks in water. Want that pipeline pumping the stuff through your state at 1400 PSI?

    3. Re:Thin margins by pepty · · Score: 2

      The dirty little secret is that the big bad oil companies are not taking in oddles of tax payer subsidies... the big boys were exempted from many of the tax advantages which are being vilified... or are things which are available to nearly all companies in nearly all industries.

      "Among the top 10 most profitable companies, energy companies ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP), Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) and Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) were on the low end of the list, paying 8 percent, 4 percent and 2 percent, respectively, of their total earnings to the U.S. federal government."

      http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/news/2012/08/06/conocophillips-exxon-chevron-paid.html?page=all

      Doesn't look like they were exempted from much.

  5. Re:Yes, better transparency! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why don't fuel pumps mention the $0.18/gallon federal gasoline tax? Or the $0.38/gallon (California) state gasoline tax? Both are greater profit margin than the "greedy" store, the "greedy" refiner, or the "greedy" oil company.

    The state and federal gas tax pays for things like roads. You do like to drive on roads, yes? Well, they don't just pop up and maintain themselves...

    By the way, what where Exxon and BP's reported profits last year?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  6. Speculation is already in play ... by DavidClarkeHR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Speculators demand more transparency so they can jack the price of futures every time a breaker trips at a refinery.

    One of the reasons that gas prices fluctuate overnight is due to speculation - this is just another way of attempting to democratize the "open" market.

    As I understand it, the price of crude changes quicker due to speculation than to any other factors - can you think of another item where demand and/or supply will affect the prices on the same level (not due to speculation)?

    --
    - Nec Impar Pluribus, or so I'm told.
    1. Re:Speculation is already in play ... by jhoegl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I speculate I want more money.
      Now who is laughing all the way to the bank?
      Speculation is bullshit, it is simply a form of legalized gambling.

    2. Re:Speculation is already in play ... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      April 17, 2012
      http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/17/markets/obama-oil-speculators/index.htm

      The new proposals require oil traders to put up more of their own money for transactions, ask for more money for market enforcement and monitoring activities, and call for higher penalties for market manipulation.

      "None of these will bring gas prices down overnight," Obama said at a White House press. "But they will prevent market manipulation, and help protect consumers."

      I think we should just kick speculators out completely, but then again,
      I also think that fair, competitive, and transparent markets are better than "free" markets.

      The numbers I've seen quoted are that the oil market is 70% speculators and 30% producers/users.
      Historically, that number has been the opposite, with producers/users makeing up 70% of the market.

      I'm not disputing that refinery problems are responsible for localized price spikes, but overall prices have gone up because speculators are moving the market towards higher prices.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Speculation is already in play ... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      You can fix a broken game by playing the game? Nonsense. The game is broken, whether you happen to be a winner or a loser. The problem being pointed out is, currently everyone loses except those few players who happen to own a few congress critters.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  7. Too Much Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I spend 10 years working in the oil and gas refining industry, and I can say first hand that most of these problems and prolonged reductions in output are tied directly and wholly to excessive, brutal, inflexible, and sluggish government red tape.

    At one refinery we were doing a new control system for, the refiner discovered a bad gas overpressure valve that was leaking slightly. The process for handling such an event is to immediately scram the refinery, and file 12 different applications with EPA, OSHA, and other government agencies to beg for permission to fix it. In that particular case that whole section of the refinery was down for 9 weeks.

    Most people have no idea just how difficult it is to deal with the administration, and this one especially, when it comes to oil and gas production. This administration is not at all interested in a steady and cheap supply of oil and gas products - and I say that with firsthand experience.

  8. $3.63/gallon?!? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 5, Informative

    $3.63/gallon? $3.63/GALLON?!? If your northern neighbours saw those prices there would be a line up 3 blocks down the fucking road!!! We haven't seen prices that low since at least 2002. Americans need to stop bitching about having some of the lowest gas prices in the world.

    1. Re:$3.63/gallon?!? by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Funny

      They get free health care up north and other things we don't.

      No, we don't. We pay for it in taxes, and the next imbecile that says we get "free health care" will get smacked with Lake Erie....before it was cleaned up.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:$3.63/gallon?!? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 2

      The difference is most of what you pay is tax, that gives you a lot of benefits in return. In the US, it goes into the pockets of Big Oil, never be seen again.

    3. Re:$3.63/gallon?!? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      That's why I own oil company stocks. The dividends are nice.

    4. Re:$3.63/gallon?!? by Swampash · · Score: 2

      Here in Australia the other day I took my kid to the dentist. Kid spent half an hour in the chair while a dentist and a nurse hovered over him making sure everything was as it should be. Poking and prodding, a bit of plaque removal, fluoride gel, etc. When he got up they handed him a bag with toothbrushes and floss.

      Cost to me: zero. Walked out without paying a cent. Because socialism works.

      The USA can keep its cheap gas. I'll take a society that looks after its citizens every time.

  9. Major spill? by MavenW · · Score: 2

    7,700 gallons is a MAJOR spill? Isn't that about what one semi hauls?

  10. Re:You voted for it by sjames · · Score: 2

    There is nothing inherently hostile about demanding transparency.

  11. The Book by decora · · Score: 2

    Leah McGrath Goodman, a financial reporter, wrote a book about Nymex and the transition to electronic trading in the early 2000s. It's called "The Asylum" and verifies a lot of what you guys are saying.

    Except that the regulators in the government are kind of... on the 'same team' . . . the head of the CFTC left and to work for the New York Mercantile Exchange. She documented the whole thing. Hell of a story.

  12. Re:Capacity by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wrong. There is excess capacity.

    What really happens is that excess refinery capacity is either mothballed or used to manufacture products for export.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/21/valero-klesse-idUSWEN981620110321

    With the crappy worldwide economy and high prices of crude demand for gasoline is decreasing.

  13. How would it help? by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What you are talking about is fluctuation in supply caused by reasonable issue with capacity. If a freeze cause produce prices to skyrocket, there is a national day of mourning that produce costs more. No. We complain but we either choose to pay the price, perhaps buy canned or frozen, or do without. As participants in the free market, the choice is ours.

    The problem is that for the most part people did not respond appropriately to those price signals. Rather they went to the government to complain, went to their churches to hear conspiracy theories about how the liberals wanted to destroy the christian way of life, blaming regulation, speculators, evil oil people gouging the common people. All these are partly true, and gouging people who are too stupid to make adjustments so they don't get gouged is fun and profitable, but it does come down to choices.

    If a single shut down can raise prices, then we are at capacity and there are only two choices. The first is to raise the price of the commodity, i.e. refined petroleum, so the refiners will have an incentive to build more capacity. Regulation will raise this costs, but so will the need of refiners to pay the expected huge salaries(sometimes well over 100K to a college grad).

    The other is to use less so that current capacity is sufficient, reserves can be built, or older plants can be shut down and maybe updated.

    The problem is that neither of these are acceptable to the whiners who expect the government to give them everything for nothing. Who expect to live in suburbs and have the city people subsidies their lifestyle. For those that will not drive their cars so they can approach 30 mph instead os 20 mph

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:How would it help? by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      If a single shut down can raise prices, then we are at capacity

      Actually you're missing one very key market force. Time.

      There is an absolute glut worldwide in refining capacity. In many countries refineries are closing down. Margins are razor thin that many refineries are run at a loss and the profits are made up by retail sales. What would happen if Cherry Point burnt to the ground completely? Nothing different than what happened when they burnt through their crude unit and were taken offline for a month.

      Your problem is time. It takes about 12 weeks for oil to get from the ground to the bowser. Most of that time the products are in transit or in terminals. Refineries purchase crude oil months in advance to seal in contracts. The stuff is on ships many weeks before it gets used and gets blended in tanks thereafter. What happens when a refinery is suddenly taken offline is that for a period of 1-3 weeks there's a major upset in the supply chain. Not a lack of total production, but a lack of deliveries in a timely fashion. The only way to get around this is to ensure your entire country is a net exporter of petroleum products.

      Even then, if you're a net exporter, and you have a glut of capacity, all of your products are likely under a retail contract. The sudden loss of a refinery will still upset the market as one needs to weigh the possibility of being blacklisted as a supplier due to failure of meeting existing contracts in favour of handling a local emergency.

      We see very similar things in my country which a net importer of gasoline by a massive margin. The refineries are small but our net import shields us from such problems to some degree. When the only refinery in our city shutdown due to an explosion in their cracker it was down for 3 months, the price spiked for a week then returned to normal. The net import meant we had a lot of supply already on the way and didn't need to rely on local production.

      There's really no way to win this.

  14. Re:Yes, better transparency! by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

    Which subsidies are those? Surely you can point out some specific ones.

    Surely.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/29/us-obama-energy-idUSBRE82S11P20120329

  15. Re:Yes, better transparency! by wallsg · · Score: 5, Informative

    By the way, what where Exxon and BP's reported profits last year?

    Annual 2012 reports not out yet in most part so these are quarterlies.

    * signifies Dow Jones Industrial Average component.

    Apple's profit margin was 26.67%.
    Google's was 22.20%.
    *Intel's was 22.13%.
    *JPMorgan Chase's was 21.97%.
    *McDonald's was 19.85%.
    *Coca-Cola's was 18.48%.
    *Cisco's was 17.90%.
    *American Express' was 17.12%.
    *Pfizer's was 15.58%.
    *IBM's was 15.53%.
    *3M's was 14.89%
    *Microsoft's was 14.21%.
    *Walt Disney's was 13.44%.
    Ford's 3rd quarter profit margin was 13.35%.
    *Johnson & Johnson's was 12.90%.
    *Proctor & Gamble's was 12.72%.
    *Travelers' was 10.87%.
    *Chevron's was 10.70%.
    *Exxon's 3rd quarter profit margin was 10.40%.
    *Catapillar's was 9.74%.
    *GE's was 9.39%.
    *United Technologies Corp's was 7.57%.
    *Bank of America's was 6.75%.
    *Merck's was 6.58%.
    *DuPont's was 6.07%.
    *Home Depot's was 5.91%.
    *Boeing's 3rd quarter profit margin was 5.47%
    *UnitedHealth Group's was 5.14%.
    BP's 3rd quarter profit margin was 4.75%.
    *Wal-Mart's was 3.57%.
    Pulte Homes' was 3.57%.
    *AT&T's was 3.49%.
    *Verizon's was 2.70%.
    *Alcoa's was 0.81%.
    *Hewlett-Packards was -10.51%.

    This a long line because for some reason SlashDot is saying that "Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 20.4)" but I don't know the minimum and why is there a minimum require when a person may be wanting to report facts and I have to keep typing because now it's 25.7 per line which still isn't enough nor is 27.3 characters per line so I must keep typing yet more meaningless stuff here in an attempt to get even more characters per line because even 30.4 characters per line are not enough so even more typing typing typing (where are the infinite number of monkeys when you need them?) because 33.1 characters per line still isn't enough so row, row, row your boat while buying the stairway to heaven as 35.5 characters per line are still not enough and "you seem a decent fellow I hate to kill you" " you seem a decent fellow I hate to die" and 38.2 characters per line are still not enough "we'll never survive" "nonsense. you only say that because no one ever has" and finally

  16. Re:Did we nationalize the oil companies overnight? by c0lo · · Score: 2

    The oil industry was effectively nationalized decades ago. The industry operates under absolutely strangling regulation and government essentially dictates everything that happens at a refinery right down to when the workers take a leak.

    I agree oil industry and govt seem one and the same, but it doesn't quite look like the govt taking over the oil industry. On the contrary, it looks it is the oil industry privatized the government... the result is quite the same for consumers, though.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  17. Re:You voted for it by pepty · · Score: 2

    Build more refineries, bigger refineries, and we won't have this nonsense

    Er, by nonsense you mean higher profit margins every time a refinery goes down? Guess who goes "envirowacko" and lobbies against competitors building new refineries based on environmental grounds? Guess who reports their refineries are down and enjoys the spike in prices while their refineries are actually still producing and they are stockpiling gasoline?

  18. Re:Yes, better transparency! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    And you have "governmental" interference in MMO economies, too. Namely:

    - Artificial price supports by vendors offering to buy things, giving a floor to the minimum auction house price.

    - Artificial restriction by bind-on-pickup or equip, causing artificial scarcity to...prevent the capitalist market from finding the natural price, which would be significantly lower.

    - How hard would you grind if 30-50% of your stuff was taken and distributed to others who didn't grind?

    -
    -

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  19. Re:Did we nationalize the oil companies overnight? by pepty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The oil industry was effectively nationalized decades ago. The industry operates under absolutely strangling regulation and government essentially dictates everything that happens at a refinery right down to when the workers take a leak.

    Um, So The Fuck What?

    If you want to see tight regulation, try working in a pharmaceutical facility. Or maybe a nuclear plant. Guess what: if your workplace is likely to affect the health of LOTS and LOTS of people, I WANT it tightly regulated.

  20. Re:Yes, better transparency! by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are perfectly transparent. I can find the taxes on gasoline easily online. I can't find the details about the refinery's operations online.

  21. Refining capacity is also a problem by wakeboarder · · Score: 2

    If states like California would allow more refining capacity to be built, then the supply end of the market would have more of a 'buffer' to supply problems (if you have a refinery they build these large things called tanks to store petrol in, this boots your supply and you can crank up capacity if you need more). If you don't believe me you can read this: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2004/06/the_great_refinery_shortage.html
    There hasn't been one built in California for at least 30+ years because of environmental restrictions. I was talking to a VP of an oil distributing company, he said that 10 years ago they were trying to get additional capacity for their oil refinery, each time they were rejected because of these regulations and today it would be prohibitively expensive to add capacity. This is not just a problem for California either... just look at what has been built in the last 40 years and where http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=29&t=6 . We are all to ready to fill up our vehicles, but when you bite the hand that feeds you, it may have a hard time delivering.

  22. Re:Did we nationalize the oil companies overnight? by MartinSchou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, the best way to demonstrate what happens without any kind of regulation at all, is to look at what is going on in Nigeria:

    Almost 1.9 million barrels have have been spilled into the Niger river delta in the 20 years between 1976 and 1996 in close to 4,900 different incidents, and there doesn't seem to be any indication that this is going to reduce in the future.

    See, in Nigeria there seems to be absolutely no business consequences to any kind of oil spills or accidents, so when the expenses of fixing a problem is greater than the expenses of the losses of oil, there's no incentive to pay for a fix.

    After all, the only ones feeling the consequences is the local population, and they obviously aren't worth much to anyone.