Slashdot Mirror


DARPA Wants Distributed Network of Deep Sea Storage Units

Zothecula writes "DARPA has seen the future of naval warfare and it's falling upward. As part of an effort to reduce the logistics of sending equipment into trouble areas, the agency's Upward Falling Payloads project is aimed at developing storage capsules capable of remaining on the deep seabed for years. These would contain non-lethal military assets that could be deployed on the spot years in advance and rise to the surface as needed." Possible side benefit: they need to research communications systems reliable enough to command the deep sea capsules when needed.

47 of 81 comments (clear)

  1. Use Concrete .... by pollarda · · Score: 2

    Concrete becomes stronger under compression. There was some experimentation among the smaller nations of the world a few years ago to build inexpensive submarines using concrete hulls since concrete has such good compressive strength. There is no reason why concrete wouldn't make an excellent storage container.

    1. Re:Use Concrete .... by cslibby · · Score: 1

      Except it is too porous to protect anything from corrosion.

    2. Re:Use Concrete .... by Antipater · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That was my first thought too, but wp says otherwise.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    3. Re:Use Concrete .... by Copper+Nikus · · Score: 1

      Concrete has a very poor compressive strength compared to many metals.

    4. Re:Use Concrete .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was my first thought too, but wp [wikipedia.org] says otherwise

      Not anymore it doesn't.

    5. Re:Use Concrete .... by specific · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too, but wp [wikipedia.org] says otherwise

      Not anymore it doesn't.

      LMAO

      --
      If you lend someone $20 and never see that person again, it was probably worth it.
  2. Let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    DARPA wants to invent robots that are designed to "rise up"? Sounds like a pretty dangerous precedent to me.

    1. Re:Let me get this straight by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      RELEASE THE KRAKEN!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  3. Does this mean... by Virtucon · · Score: 2

    That Ricky and Bubba will be bidding on the storage units if the government doesn't pay the rent?

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Does this mean... by fotoflojoe · · Score: 2

      Yuuup!

    2. Re:Does this mean... by azadrozny · · Score: 1

      Only if TLC gets to plant stuff in them first.

  4. my first thought was underwater raid by Megor1 · · Score: 1

    Since this Slashdot the title should really be storage containers as the obvious assumption is a storage unit stores data!

    --
    Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
    1. Re:my first thought was underwater raid by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      you should write underwater RAID

      because an underwater raid of a different sort is also an issue with this concept

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:my first thought was underwater raid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, instead of storing all your data in the cloud, you can now store it in the drink too.

    3. Re:my first thought was underwater raid by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since this Slashdot the title should really be storage containers as the obvious assumption is a storage unit stores data!

      RAID: Reconnaissance Assets Invisibly Drowned?

      This is old news, the story was posted on slashdot last week. Same story, same request, same misinterpretation of what is actually sought.

      The request is for pre-positioned military assets (non lethal) for surveillance and intelligence which remain inert on the sea floor until needed, and then become buoyant, rise to the surface and release aerial surveillance equipment, (short life drones or balloons), or merely float and gather signal intelligence.
      These could be used for search and rescue as well as intelligence gathering in trouble spots.

      This avoids having to find some way to fly a plane or a manned drone to some remote location in a hurry. Since its not a munition, its not considered an aggressive act to seed the ocean floor (4000 feet down, in international waters) with something that you can later instruct to become active.

      It is thought that being down 4000 feet would be enough protection to make them unlikely to be messed with. (Wishful thinking if you ask me, once you abandon anything on the ocean bottom without support of international treaty, its pretty much fair game for salvage or state sponsored retrieval via ROVs.).

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  5. All this effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All this effort just so a dysfunctional, rag-tag group of strangers can find the armament they need to outfit the rebel military and take back Tampa in 2027.

  6. dup by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you need karma go back to when this ran 4 days ago and grab some high rated comments.

    tagging a story dup in the 'mysterious future' should flag it for review so this doesn't happen.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  7. Meanwhile, 25 years from now... by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 4, Funny

    When the current cryotograghic algorithms which secure these cracker-jack prizes become easily crackable by script-kiddies, and with future long-range private drones weilding live HD cams, I see a new form of geocaching game on the horizon.

    I'll look forward to watching the reruns on Youtube.

    Thanks US Military!

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
    1. Re:Meanwhile, 25 years from now... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Yup, this will be so cool. Imagine your own personal armoury. Finally a modern version of the battleships game.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Meanwhile, 25 years from now... by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      Don't we do this with stuff from WWII out in the desert already?

    3. Re:Meanwhile, 25 years from now... by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My real question is how they're going to make it strong enough to unstick itself.

      Easily done with burn-wires dropping weights, or compressed air cylinders de-flooding chambers or inflating sacks. All of this technology already exists in the commercial market place. The navy already has deep sea (slow speed) com systems to submarines.

      The intent is to store surveillance assets (drones, balloons or sonobuoys) that can be called into action from 4000 feet down after long term storage on the bottom. .

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  8. Slashdot leads the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I recommend they look into Slashdot's Upward Falling Stories, which tend to drop off the front page and then float back up again as a repost.

  9. Proof of time travel by presspass · · Score: 1

    If this isn't proof that time traveling aliens are running the government, I don't know what is.

  10. Re:Why do they explicitly mention non-lethal asset by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Informative

    From TFA:

    Because of the difficulty of retrieving the capsules, DARPA is concentrating on non-lethal assets, so there’s no conflict with treaties involving munitions and their disposal.

    I think DARPA is concerned about the politics of potentially leaving dangerous weapons just lying around. They obviously could be used for anything that can be stored for long period of time, if they manage to get them working.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
  11. Re:Why do they explicitly mention non-lethal asset by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 2

    Because some people might think it a bad idea to leave storage units full of the latest and greatest instruments of death lying around unguarded on the ocean floor. Those people might not have a problem with a bunch of helmets and first-aid kits being treated that way though.

  12. Meanwhile, 12,000 years from now... by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ocean explorers recover a remarkably well-preserved, ancient artifact from the deep mud of the ocean floor.

    "What the hell is it??"

    "I don't really know. It must be newer than the geological data indicate. We have no record of any prior advanced civilizations."

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  13. obsolete by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    "deployed years later" .. isn't there a risk that the equipment would be obsolete? Field equipment is changing rather rapidly in this day and age, especially electronics.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:obsolete by vlm · · Score: 2

      "deployed years later" .. isn't there a risk that the equipment would be obsolete? Field equipment is changing rather rapidly in this day and age, especially electronics.

      Clearly not been in .mil. Some high tech stuff, lots thats not...

      Sterile bags of saline solution, IV stuff, band aids, field dressings, pioneer tools, food...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:obsolete by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      We are resting on a pretty solid plateau right now. Solar power(PV) is reaching an apex, we have cheap, powerful and plentiful SoCs for plenty of grunt work. What we lack mostly is the legion of programmers we are going to need to tie all this stuff together.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:obsolete by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      "deployed years later" .. isn't there a risk that the equipment would be obsolete? Field equipment is changing rather rapidly in this day and age, especially electronics.

      Depends. It could be stuff like supplies (fuel/oil/grease, food, ammo) which while having a shelf life, can be stored for a bit and unlikely to be obsoleted quickly. This is the most likely case as having pre-positioned supplies at the ready gives you a strong advantage out of the gate by being able to resupply without having a nearby resupply vessel.

      Less likely are general equipment - since it often depends on the mission and can be obsolete.

      Supplies generally are the most desirable to preposition - after all, cutitng off supply lines is a very common military tactic, and battles have been lost (or won, depending on which side) when a cut off group runs out of supplies.

    4. Re:obsolete by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      "deployed years later" .. isn't there a risk that the equipment would be obsolete? Field equipment is changing rather rapidly in this day and age, especially electronics.

      Clearly not been in .mil. Some high tech stuff, lots thats not...

      Sterile bags of saline solution, IV stuff, band aids, field dressings, pioneer tools, food...

      Oh, but I have. Military contractor, seven years, electronics. And yes, a lot of the stuff still in use is of elderly pedegree, but just recently there's been some decent advances (probably spurred by new types of warfare, necessity being the mother etc.) and more on the way. More than any other time since *I* was involved, existing gear can be mooted by new countermeasures. So as someone else said, the value appears to be staples like food, clothing. *maybe* small arms ammunition, although there's been some changes recently in that area as well. (five-seven, P90 etc starting to supplant older NATO weapons and rounds) and even medical supplies are undergoing changes (CLEOX, etc).

      I'm not saying that at some future time supplies from several years ago would be of *no* value, but it seems like choice of supplies and strategic usage might be tricky. For instance, if small arms ammunition, I'd want to be included something to shoot it with, as that particular round may not be in general use anymore.

      But hey, this just begs to be used in a dystopian near-future story, maybe the second sequel to Palmer's Emergence. (If he ever gets around to publishing.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  14. Re:Why do they explicitly mention non-lethal asset by vlm · · Score: 2

    At least theoretically, if they put a giant red cross on a submarine full of band-aids, other nations wouldn't depth charge it?

    Although "obviously" if the US were about to invade a country they'd be out there trying to blow up the storage boxes, wasting time and ammo?

    Non-lethal = when a fishing trawler hauls it off the seabed they can't claim insurance costs etc for their ship blowing up? Also if "everyone knows" subsea storage is all non-lethal (yeah like thats gonna happen long term) then the US is somewhat less liable for EOD costs. Hauling up a net of fish, lobsters... and a mine... is kinda scary to the crew.

    So the CIA will trade arms to the afgahani's for heroin, who will sell it to the italians for cash to pay for black ops or wtf the CIA does with all its money. So, "obviously" if you accidentally capture a container and its full of AK47s, we "never" put lethal arms in one, so it was all a plant to make the USA look bad, or all a fake. In other words practically all of them are going to be full of non-domestic arms with the serial numbers filed off or whatever, but we'll pretend none are.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  15. Really? by NEDHead · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just how long can a Marine Division wait on the ocean floor and still be effective?

  16. This is overkill... by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Shaggy Man's body is indestrucible.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  17. "trouble areas" by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    If we can't find any, we'll create some...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  18. sonic transudcer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had an idea like that a while back, as a way to stash personal stuff out of sight for long periods. Seal (e.g. weld) the stuff in a box with a microphone, piezo beeper, low powered microprocessor, and lithium battery pack inside. There are lithium chloride batteries (e.g. Tadiran) that can supply small amounts of current for decades, and an 8-bit CMOS processor uses just a few microamps at low speed (think of digital watches). The box would just sit quietly on the bottom listening for a certain 128-bit series of beeps. When it heard the beeps it would start beeping itself, making it easy to find with scuba gear (sound carries well under water). You'd get within a few hundred yards of it using GPS or a sextant, start sending out the secret beep code til it started chirping back at you, then retrieve it.

    I never seriously tried to build such a thing (too James Bondish and I don't have anything warranting such measures) but it seemed like a cute idea at the time. I might as well write about it now.

  19. ELF by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Possible side benefit: they need to research communications systems reliable enough to command the deep sea capsules when needed.

    The navy has had this ability for quite some time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_low_frequency

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  20. war of the worlds by The-Blue-Clown · · Score: 1

    isn't this how the aliens "invaded" in the latest 'War of the Worlds' movie with Tom Cruise?

  21. Dear America, by dave69 · · Score: 2

    Dear America, Please don't mine the entire ocean with giant non-robotic sea mines, just because you can, signed, the rest of the world. Also, didn't we have this conversation last week?

  22. Throw in some time-capsule stuff by mbstone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Like buying presents for children, there's really no way of knowing whether the DoD will in the future be able to make use of whatever they stash away, or whether it will still be edible, nonobsolete, or even free of rust and bilgewater.

    So along with the Great Northern beans and networking nodes with 10,000-day vulnerabilities, let's add some historical memorabilia. Copies of current Navy regulations and 12 year old scotch for example.

    Another possibility is that DARPA could plant stuff designed to be found by the enemy. Trick black soap. Bogus ciphers that will cause the enemy to spend years or decades fruitlessly attempting to decode. Bogus mine-defusing instructions that will make them go boom.

  23. As a long-time RTS fan, I love this idea. Ok, grudgingly, no guns in it.

    Still, "if you find yourself in a fair fight, you haven't done your homework." Given history, I'm fine with the US spending as much as the next 20 nations combined. It's freaking cheap compared to a real war.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  24. Meanwhile, on the beach in Pakistan: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Police officer: Kareem, where did you get that RPG and the bazooka?

    Fisherman: Sir, I found them just floating in the water, sir

    Police officer: Kareem, you know me. Don't make me break your jaw bone. Tell me did you get them from the ashram-e-talbi group?

    Fisherman: Sir, no sir. I was just fishing sir. My net got trapped in something on the seabed sir. I jumped down and dived in, and saw it was caught in some kind of handle sir. I twisted the handle, released the net, came up for air, I was floating in the middle of so many bazookas and rifles and RPGs etc etc, Sir, Honest sir. That is what happened sir.

    Police officer: Not even asham group is going to coach this story. It is too dumb. You must be getting it from the stupid zulficar-e-islami group. They are the really weird ones. Now have a nice conversation with my billy club and after you pick your teeth from the floor, you will tell me exactly where you got it all from. OK?

    Fisherman: Sir, no sir, yes sir, no sir. it is the truth sir.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  25. In Other Words by Tirian · · Score: 1

    In other words:

    "We are famously over-stocked on items that we are not actually using because of huge budget allocations. We don't want to lose those budget numbers and the goverment is saying we need to buy their defense contractor friends' goods. The plan is to just purchase a billion dollars of equipment and just sink it never to be seen again. Everybody wins, except maybe the taxpayers."

    --Tirian

  26. Um, tell me again.... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    what "assets" won't be obsolete in 10 years maybe, and definitely 20? Gloves? Shoes? Certainly not weapons or electronics. Sounds like the military needs a reason to bury something on a regular basis, but it's not equipment.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  27. half there already by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Prior Art, just need to work on the sinking, rising on command part.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  28. Deep Sea Storage Urchins by tdelaney · · Score: 1

    Haven't fully woken up yet, waiting for caffeine to kick in. Read the title as "Deep Sea Storage Urchins" ...

  29. I'm stoked by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    When can we put Bruce Willis into storage?