Slashdot Mirror


A Chat With USENIX Community Manager Rikki Endsley (Video)

Rikki Endsley has been Community Manager for USENIX since September, 2011. She also edits their magazine, ;login:, writes for publications ranging from Linux.com to Network World, and is a long-distance runner to boot. But this interview concentrates on USENIX, a worthy organization that does a great job of helping its members (and the entire Unix/Linux community) stay up to date technically and, with its job board, keep USENIX members employed. Toward the end of the conversation, Rikki mentions some of the intangible but valuable benefits people get when they attend USENIX events. (Remember: If you don't have time to watch the video, can't see the video or just don't like video, you can click on the "Show/Hide Transcript" link and read a text version of the video.)

40 comments

  1. 0x7fffffff by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1, Funny

    Rikki, don't lose that number
    It's the only one you own
    You might use it if you feel better
    When you get home

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:0x7fffffff by jones_supa · · Score: 0

      Steely Dan, one of the best bands in the world...

    2. Re:0x7fffffff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heard that song today. Listening to the oldies station in the truck like I often do. I shut off the radio because I couldn't bare it any more, that song really sucks.

    3. Re:0x7fffffff by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0
      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    4. Re:0x7fffffff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor reaction Jeremiah Cornelius posting as ac this time instead of yourself as you have before on that material http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3386633&cid=42622423 that you can't seem to disprove in its points. FBI? There's no law against hosts files. You should be tracked by them for admittedly stalking others online (calling it trolling doesn't make it any better, that's just word manipulation) http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2238996&cid=36457426 as your own profile states about controlling words, along with your buddy webmistressrachel http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3373637&cid=42570685 along with you. Give us a break, learn to spell what you did for a job correctly. You might still be doing it if you could actually spell it right.

  2. Re:Another day, another video by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

    Don't click the link.
    If you must, don't install flash.
    If you must do both, install flashblock.

  3. Sort of past its sell date by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I went to Usenix conferences in 1981 when they were really the only conferences about this technology. These days there are many conferences covering that sort of system, and many of them have a better focus.

    1. Re:Sort of past its sell date by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Informative

      I respectfully disagree. I've been to four LISA conferences (sysadmin conference run by USENIX) since 2006, and I see very little that is comparable; there are the various LOPSA conferences (LOPSA-EAST, Cascadia IT Conference), but they're simply not at LISA's scale. Want to hang out with a thousand other sysadmins? Get training from Ted T'so on recovering borked disks? See what Google is up to -- or the small IT shop at the university down the coast with 1/20000th the budget? There's simply nothing else out there that matches it.

      As for the rest of the conferences, all I know is the summaries I've read in ;login: and the material that I've watched/listened to on their website. (And btw, HUGE kudos to USENIX to opening access to their proceedings, talks and papers.) But at the very least, they make damned interesting reading, and have made me very curious about things that are going on outside my narrow focus.

      I don't have the breadth of experience you do; I concentrate on system administration because I love it, and I've been doing it less than ten years. I'm definitely an interested amateur (at best) when it comes to topics like security, or file systems, or OS design. But I'm always surprised how much of USENIX conference material touches on areas of interest or direct relevance to me, and at the very least browsing their papers is a wonderful introduction to some research and work I'd miss otherwise. I'm sure (with the exception of LISA) there are more focused conferences, or better known ones (DefCon is one that springs to mind). But I can't agree that USENIX is "past its sell date".

      (And in passing, thanks very kindly for all the work you've done for the Open Source/Free Software community. Kinda boggles my mind that I'm debating you...)

  4. Re:Production Values by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This just in: the Slashdot staff is incomptent in more ways than just the editing of stories.

  5. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ummm, no.

  6. Re:Question by Hatta · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Ummm, yes.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Re:Production Values by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Is this a laptop camera on the desk? Whose idea was it to shoot up the poor woman's nose?

    Why is the video such poor quality and out of focus? Decent HD cameras are not expensive - even GoPro videos shot from the head of a mountain biker look better than this. How about a little front lighting - why is the background lit better than her face?

    And is it *really* neccessary to make us sit through a 30 second commercial (with no relevance at all to technology) before we can see the video?

  8. Usenix is not that great... by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    Sure, it's fun to slag off for a few days, fly to some tourist-infested "destination" and sit around mentally masturbating with other geeks for a while, but at a Usenix event? Pfffffffft, don't make me puke.

    These days any such event is merely presentation natter presentation of marketing jazz Fromm one or another of the event sponsors. Sadly almost every conference is turning out to be this way, but hey, gotta make a sheckel right?

  9. Re:Production Values by swb · · Score: 2

    It looks like it was recorded from a skype type video conference. She was probably using the video camera in her laptop.

  10. Re:Production Values by maeglin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is this a laptop camera on the desk? Whose idea was it to shoot up the poor woman's nose?

    I would assume it was hers as it appears to be a recording of her side of a video call with some crappy transitions sprinkled in. If she wants to look more glamorous in these things in the future (which she may be interested in if the glasses are any indication) then she should do her interviews in person or pony up for a decent USB / IP camera.

  11. Interesting, learned something by water-and-sewer · · Score: 3

    Nothing but hate comments posted so far, as far as I can tell. I'm not a big fan of the Slashdot video articles, but this was better than most. And I learned something about Usenix, which is a bit more alive and dynamic than I'd thought. It's a tough time to be trying to build a community around paid membership and printed/epub journals though. The young generation wants free blogging articles and no membership fee. I wish them luck and might try subscribing to their journal, since I see they offer epub and I no longer care to collect and manage paper magazines/journals.

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
    1. Re:Interesting, learned something by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      It was informative, and described USENIX well. It's diverse, and you have to pay real dues. That alone, will separate the audience into the tiers as well.

      The remarks will probably sift into similar categories.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  12. Re:Production Values by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Is this a laptop camera on the desk? Whose idea was it to shoot up the poor woman's nose?

    People today have the weirdest ideas, such as that (web)cams with wide-angle lenses are good for shooting people's faces etc., so I'm not surprised in the least.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  13. Re:Question by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Does anyone in the IT field know how to speak without using "ummm" after every other word?

    It's called protocol padding.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  14. I'm a USENIX Blogger at LISA12 by Bandman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would suggest to anyone who thinks that USENIX conferences are solely for graybeards who walk around wearing suspenders, flipping nickels at people, then you should take a few minutes to read through the training program from LISA12. Not only is there the old standard Linux stuff, there are also great classes on building AWS infrastructures, cloudstack, PowerShell, and tons more. It's really pretty great.

  15. anyone else read that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    as UNISEX ?

  16. Re:I am disappointed in no one saying it yet... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    Her looks are riveting. Come on guys, this is what we always do when there's a woman in a video! Stop being scared of -1 Troll.

    Seriously? You need to get out more.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  17. Re:Production Values by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    Yeah, everyone knows the Smith and Wesson model 29 is the best for shooting people's faces

  18. Re:Production Values by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

    If she wants to look more glamorous in these things in the future..

    The 60's called. It wants your attitudes back.

  19. Who is the interviewer? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

    Roblimo? He sounds drunk.

  20. Helloooooooo Nurse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hit dat like the enter key on a "shutdown -h now" command.

  21. Re:Production Values by maeglin · · Score: 1

    The 60's called. It wants your attitudes back.

    Holy crap! It also wants your knee jerk howls of misogyny back, too.
    1. The video is clearly not flattering. 2. Her selection of eye wear certainly gives the appearance that she has at least a passing interest in being fashionable. Therefore: 3. If she wants to look more glamorous in these things in the future she should pony up for a better camera. Drop a trendy male in the situation and I'd say the same thing. Why go out of your way to make specific statement about how you present yourself and then ruin it with poor technology? This seems particularly bad for someone who's supposed to be a spokesperson for technology. Oh, I'm sorry, we can't talk about appearances anymore can we? If I just stop wearing pants any more at least I'll still get the blue participation ribbon for showing up to work.