Slashdot Mirror


VIA Unveils $79 Rock and $99 Paper ARM PCs

Don't yet have one of those million Raspberry Pis, but you're in the market for a tiny, cheap ARM computer? An anonymous reader writes with this snippet from geek.com: "VIA has decided it's time to update the APC (ARM PC) board with new components and the choice of two configurations. The new systems are called APC Rock and APC Paper. The hardware spec for both boards is exactly the same except for the fact the Rock ships with a VGA port whereas the Paper doesn't. The Rock also costs $20 less at $79, whereas the Paper is $99. The reason for the price difference is the fact that the Paper ships with a rather novel case whereas the Rock is a bare board. The Paper's case is made from recycled cardboard attached to an aluminum chassis to help with strength, meaning it will keep the dust off the components and make it easier to carry while keeping weight to a minimum."

103 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. What about by Dishwasha · · Score: 5, Funny

    scissors?

    1. Re:What about by siddesu · · Score: 1

      They are available separately for $50, or in the "liberate your chips" kit, which sells for $120.

    2. Re:What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The APC Scissors will have superior specs and and be priced above the APC Paper's cost of $99, although it will also be inferior to and priced below Rock's cost of $79.

    3. Re:What about by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Yes. Scissors, $119.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    4. Re:What about by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...yeah an' an' don't forget about Spock and lizard!

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    5. Re:What about by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      That would be the Raspberry Pi, which underCUTs them by half. Or you might wait for Dell's hopefully not vaporware $50 PC (http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/13/01/16/2317205/meet-ophelia-dells-plan-to-reinvent-itself)

    6. Re:What about by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Informative

      RasPi has very close specs, this one adds just a tiny 4GB flash card, which is obviously not worth the $44 price difference.

      You'd want this one instead: more than 10x the performance, 2GB memory, $89 w/o disk.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    7. Re:What about by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem is, you can't run with Scissors.

    8. Re:What about by Above · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The biggest problem with the Pi is the packaging. It was clearly designed to be cheap and thus use the smallest board area possible, but that makes it strange to put into cases and use in practical ways.

      Part of what VIA brings to the table here is packaging experience. Yes, the board is a bit bigger, but it was designed to go in a proper case. Depending on the application that may be important and worth the extra bucks.

    9. Re:What about by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Funny

      The APC Scissors will have superior specs and and be priced above the APC Paper's cost of $99, although it will also be inferior to and priced below Rock's cost of $79.

      How is this possible? The answer is that they'll push it out at $119 dollars and then have to cut the price to $49 due to the Rock crushing it in sales.

      I think that about wraps it up.

    10. Re:What about by cjameshuff · · Score: 1

      Actually, it has a significantly better CPU. The Raspberry Pi CPU is an ARM11 (like the original APC) that, among other lacks, doesn't have hardware division. The Cortex A9 used in this thing is rather more sophisticated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_Cortex-A9_MPCore#Features

    11. Re:What about by Cryacin · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about Lizard and Spock?

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    12. Re:What about by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Double whoosh

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    13. Re:What about by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict that is a dumb design flaw in a kernel-userspace interface not a flaw in the hardware itself.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:What about by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason that the Pi board is so small is that it's a 6-layer design. Lots of internal space to route traces.

    15. Re:What about by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To me the biggest question is the software support, andriod is ok for phones/tablets but for desktop and embedded uses I want decent support for regular linux and I want complete kernel source so that there is a chance of support in the long term.

      The Pi has that, last I checked the APC did not.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    16. Re:What about by wmac1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why not Buy one of those Chinese A9 tablets for less than $60? They come with LCD, battery, USB and SD card extension. You can remove the case if you like.

    17. Re:What about by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Which strikes me as sort of an odd omission on VIA's part: competing on pure price with the seething morass of anonymous and ill-supported(I'm not talking about 'slow to update', I'm talking about things like "the firmware flashed on the unit when you got it is the only known firmware for the unit" and "The amount of RAM quoted on the package is a total fiction" stuff) is a sucker's game. That morass is risky, and a certain amount of willingness to shop around is needed; but damn is it cheap...

      VIA, by contrast, isn't exactly god's gift to OEM support; but they do at least know how to do it, and that's the only aspect of their offering that could make them a more interesting comparison to the hordes of chinese cheapies.

    18. Re:What about by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't care about the price, as long as it is cutting edge.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    19. Re: What about by logoszoe · · Score: 1

      You could always go for dynamite - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMa1i3ITBbo

    20. Re:What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd want this one instead: more than 10x the performance, 2GB memory, $89 w/o disk.

      There are many boards coming out beating this one in both price and performance. The wandboard is another one. Cubieboard probably too.

    21. Re:What about by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      And I thought a large part of the attractive of the Pi is that it is so damn small, so you can much easier build it into something to do whatever useful tasks you can think of it to do.

    22. Re:What about by siddesu · · Score: 1

      one of them is fictional, the other - superfluous

    23. Re:What about by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      VIA have been useless with support in the past. Their older CPUs has hardware video decoding acceleration but only an ancient hacked version of mplayer they released actually supported it. No proper patch submitted, and absolutely no Windows support at all.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:What about by mirix · · Score: 1

      You say that like 6+ layer motherboards aren't the norm.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    25. Re:What about by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant, you won be putting windows there.

      So Linux users never use the divide instruction. Interesting.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    26. Re:What about by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Correct. HOWEVER, keep in mind that the Hardkernel U2 is marketed as a "development board" but comes with source code that is vastly outdated (more than a year behind what is found in Exynos 4412 handsets) despite being released in late 2012.

      The current major release of Android is 4.2. TI and Qualcomm released reference source for their platforms within weeks of 4.2's release. Reference source for Exynos4 dates back to Gingerbread (2.3). They have minimal hacks to allow them to function with ICS (4.0), but it is at its core a Gingerbread BSP. (Exynos4 hasn't used a FIMC1 memory pool for video buffers since Gingerbread, except for in Hardkernel and Insignal's outdated reference source - All ICS implementations for Exynos4 except for Hardkernel and Insignal's source use ION memory for all video buffers.)

      Dev boards don't have to deal with carrier approvals or any sort of wireless certification (hell none of them even have a cellular baseband), so there's no excuse for them being a year BEHIND handsets in terms of software support.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    27. Re:What about by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Do they have video out? It seems that a lot of these tiny Android "PC's" are going after traditional desktop PC's by bringing tablet software to the desktop form factor.

      I'll personally admit that while it wouldn't be my first choice, a small Android device attached to a 23" monitor, keyboard, and mouse really wouldn't hinder my day to day (home) use that much.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    28. Re:What about by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Oh, compared to a real company, VIA's "support" isn't worth shit. However, they do at least have a 'support' apparatus that exists enough to mostly fail, and they have actually managed to work with other companies from time to time(a great many HP thin clients were or are VIA based, for instance, after Transmeta died and before Atom hit the scene). I'm not optimistic that they will; but if they actually want their fairly middling hardware to stand out against the cheaper fairly middling hardware that now infests the low-end-ARM-'n-Android scene, it would seem like 'support that isn't totally nonexistent' might be a good place to start.

    29. Re:What about by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      The best wandboard has half the cores, half the memory, and half the clockage, for the same price. Oh, and you can't actually buy it yet.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    30. Re:What about by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Double whoosh

      I hope that was the rock and scissors; leaving X0563511 to be plastered by the paper.

  2. Overpriced by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2

    this seems a far better product.

    1. Re:Overpriced by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      That thread didn't mention the price anywhere. Any idea what it goes for approx? Amazon didn't have any idea and some online sites seemed to suggest around $75 but that's not for sure.

    2. Re:Overpriced by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 1

      Yep that is one cool tiny gizmo. I know that it is an over used meme but what if you did have a Beowulf cluster of these? Strip away the packaging and fill a rack with these tiny machines and set up a cluster. Or for that matter a room full of them, how would these scale?

    3. Re:Overpriced by polyp2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      why do none of these RPi alternatives have Sata? -- sure there are some high end - expensive ones - but is there something about SATA that add significantly to the price to make uneconomical ?

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    4. Re:Overpriced by makomk · · Score: 1

      Guess there's not much of a market for it. Some of the A10-based boards do have SATA, including the Cubieboard, but not all of them and boards based on other SoC are harder to add SATA support to because there's no support for it on the SoC. (Most of them don't have PCIe support so there's not even anywhere to connect a SATA controller to.)

    5. Re:Overpriced by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      When it is in stock, the cubieboard is only $49. That's more than the R-Pi but the same price as the original VIA APC and with more RAM and CPU, and substantially less than these new VIA APCs.

      If you don't need video the best buy I know of is the Pogoplug Series 4. The Series 4 pogoplug is $40 and has 1xUSB2, 2xUSB3, and SATA along with 1xGigE. I run Debian on my Dockstar, which has 4xUSB2 &one is a male mini plug but that's not useless.

      However, IMO there is little reason for most devices that dinky to have disk that fast. I can hardly use data faster than I can get it across USB2. So for my money, the best buy is the Dockstar; they're $13 new on Amazon and even cheaper if you scrounge, they have poor memory but a decent processor, you can have JTAG if you need it, they run Debian Lenny or Squeeze nicely, and they have 4xUSB2 and 1xGigE. I believe you can even get a small amount of GPIO if you strain. In terms of price-performance ratio, I don't know of anything better than a dockstar, which is tiny even in its case.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Re:What's up with that giant capacitor? by radiumsoup · · Score: 2

    you mean the CMOS battery?

  4. Raspberry Pi by ACluk90 · · Score: 1

    So this is better Raspberry Pi at three times the price? They just added a twice-as-powerful CPU and 4 GB of flash. Or am I missing something?

    1. Re:Raspberry Pi by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      well its 3x as much as the stripped down pi, not quite as big of a difference for the 512 meg pi

  5. What does it say by mark-t · · Score: 1, Troll

    when 60% or more of the posts so far attempt to make an extremely obvious joke about scissors? This article even says its from the what-no-scissors? department, so the joke isn't even that inventive.

    For crying out loud... you guys call yourselves nerds?

    What I want to know is what about the lizard and spock PC's.

    1. Re:What does it say by TechnoLuddite · · Score: 1

      Spock finds your suggestion that scissors are too predictable, but that he and the lizard are not, highly illogical.

      Besides, I thought that everybody wanted a Rock to wind a multi-threaded string around.

    2. Re:What does it say by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      My post's font was larger. Do you really expect people to be able to read that tiny print in the title?

    3. Re:What does it say by aiht · · Score: 1

      Spock finds your suggestion that scissors are too predictable, but that he and the lizard are not, highly illogical.

      Besides, I thought that everybody wanted a Rock to wind a multi-threaded string around.

      Hah! Finally, a non-obvious joke in response to this article! Thank you, Sir or Madam!

      *Goes back to winding string around rock*

  6. Re:Remember Netbooks? by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    Oh hai. I'm posting this from an EEE PC netbook, about 4 years old, running Mint... something. I dunno, it Just Works. I ruse it regularly for intardtubes, watching things and also stuff, and even some casual programmorzing. Pew, pew.

    Small, cheap general purpose devices - especially with real keyboards - do have a point, and that point is to make it easy to debunk your "spunked from my iPad" chucklehead rant, kthnxbye.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  7. Re:Remember Netbooks? by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

    Gee...I guess my RaspberryPi in my kitchen linked up to an old touchscreen and custom recipe software is trash and pointless. Or the RaspberryPi in my truck hooked up to a bumper-cam and 1TB hard drive is something my safety conscious family doesn't care about. Just because you lack the creativity and imagination to put these amazing contraptions to good use doesn't mean that there aren't people out there who don't. Idiot.

    --
    "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
  8. Have they fixed the memory controller yet? by tlambert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have they fixed the memory controller yet?

    The biggest performance bottleneck for graphics on ARM systems has not been the GPU; I've used Mali-400 systems (like this one is supposed to be), and I've used the nVidia system. Graphics performance sucked on both.

    Part of this has to do with the fact that the graphics architecture in standard Linux penalizes you for not GPL'ing your drivers, but the Android graphics stack gets around this by duplicating some kernel interfaces with slightly non-GPL'ed versions - yet the performance is still terrible.

    The blame rests squarely on the memory copy speeds, which comes down to the memory controller. Apple has completely addressed this in their ARM chips (but are not sharing), and Samsung has partially addressed this in their ARM chips (and are also not sharing). Has VIA addressed the memory controller bandwidth issues in the WonderMedia, or does "WonderMedia" actually mean "I wonder when they will get media support in their ARM chips"?

    1. Re:Have they fixed the memory controller yet? by Microlith · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's referring to a point made recently to some kernel-internal DMA interfaces that are marked as GPL only and Nvidia wanted them to be something else so they could use them with their proprietary module.

      Alan Cox resisted, and as a result a small performance boost can't be had by proprietary graphics drivers.

      http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0ODE

    2. Re:Have they fixed the memory controller yet? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      This.

      Tho elaborate: It's a small boost on Intel architecture systems to avoid the hoops, but somewhat more substantial on ARM systems, where avoiding the hoops requires using a particularly poor part of the hardware implementation, which amplifies the costs.

  9. Re:What's up with that giant capacitor? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    If its a capacitor from Japan, it might come with enough free MOX to give you a lab quality flux capacitor.
    With the right code you could be sending particles back and forth in time from your basement.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. Re:Remember Netbooks? by am+2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I haven't read so much focused hate in a single post in a while on Slashdot. Did a netbook run over your kitten or something?

  11. Re:Remember Netbooks? by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    "Or the RaspberryPi in my truck hooked up to a bumper-cam and 1TB hard drive is something my safety conscious family doesn't care about."

    yikes, a safety system cobbled together by a hobbyist running on a platform that was designed by people who seemed to learn a EDA during the pi's development all running open source software?

    sign me up

  12. Re:Remember Netbooks? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Your forgetting the over 30 something PhD's from a top US universities who recall their 16-32 bit games from the mid 1990's.
    With skill, many years of coding and open source software they will get that old game up on a 1080p TV in all its 2.5D shader and fader glory.
    Irc is has a few tiny groups of people with the code, skill and cult like leader who will get their pointless project up on that big TV.
    ppc, arm, intel - no real gpu - just makes them code more for boasting rights after their day jobs at telcos, engineering companies, or US gov crypto work.
    What amazed me about a handful of nerds on irc was the time spent with their inner game group every night, weekends - while married :)

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Whjch OS? by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Which OS are they running on it? Chromium? Any other Linux? Windows 8? PC-BSD? Minix? Which one? Unless they can put together a box that has at least a proper Office suite on top of the usual browser & e-mail, I doubt this will go far.

  14. Re:Rock, Paper... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

    Shortly before the malpractice lawsuit.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  15. Why is this good? by countach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I keep seeing on eBay these days you can get an Android tablet for about $40. And it has a screen, a touch screen at that. Presumably internally it is some kind of ARM PC with storage and everything. So why is a bare bones ARM PC, especially at these prices good? And what can you realistically do with the damned thing anyway?

    1. Re:Why is this good? by dido · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interfaces. Flexibility. You can plug it into a 1080p TV and get video output that way. If you need more storage, a multi-terabyte USB hard drive is easy to plug in. Software is also your responsibility, and that means you can make it run just about anything with more or less effort depending on that. You'd be lucky if the $40 Android tablet even has an HDMI port, much less a USB port, and good luck getting it to run anything but the version of Android it came with. I managed to build a working HTPC with a Raspberry Pi within a few hours of it getting to me in the mail, and the only reason why I haven't yet turned it into a file server/torrent box as well is that I'm reorganising the several external drives I have, so I can repurpose one of them.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    2. Re:Why is this good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You didn't click though, did you? It's running a keyboard and mouse optimized version of Android 4.0 and ships with a basic suite of apps - browser, mail, file system, etc. by using standard peripherals, you can recycle an old monitor, mouse and keyboard. Out of the box, it's enough computer for 80% of the population. As for the $40 Android tablets on ebay - they absolutely suck.

    3. Re:Why is this good? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      You can get durable and reliable ARM systems, but they aren't cheap.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  16. Re:The VIA story- a day late and a dollar short by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    PS potential purchasers, with an interest in video playback, may well want to ensure that the 'theoretical' support of 1080P is matched by available drivers that prove this ability. Video playback on ARM SoC parts tends to be through 'binary blobs', so you either have proper support from the company making the MB, or you are stuffed UNLESS the CPU has enough grunt for software decoding, and one A9 core won't (for HD).

    Not to worry: anybody who has had the...pleasure... of VIA's totally bitchin' and definitely not unstable at all "Unichrome" graphics on the x86 side won't come in to this expecting much more than a serial console...

  17. Re:Remember Netbooks? by anagama · · Score: 1

    Well, I don't know if I'd go that far. This is a bit roundabout but ... I have a white macbook connected to my TV for watching netflix or iTunes movies/TV. It's getting pretty tired, stutters with high def content etc. Last time I wanted to watch a movie netflix didn't have, I rented it through iTunes and downloaded it to my macbook pro because I wanted to watch the hidef version. But it refused to play on my TV because I'm connecting via DVI -- it would only play on the laptop's built in monitor. Then, because it was a rental, I couldn't move it to my old stuttering macbook, or at least by a straightforward method. I was pissed. So I "pirated" it, guilt free mind you as I did pay my $4 to see it, and watched it full screen with VLC.

    Anyway, if you could rent movies/vids through google play, and it would play them in hidef over the VGA output, I could definitely see a use for this as a basic TV "tuner" (i.e., great for streaming content -- basically the only way I get TV except for the occasional DVD).

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  18. What about RFI? by steveha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These boards don't seem to be worried about emitting radio frequency interference (RFI). That "paper" system case is slick but I don't think it effectively shields RFI.

    Is RFI somehow not a problem with these? Is it because they are very low-power, or is it because they are somehow not regulated by the FCC for RFI, or what?

    Would operating one of these make the amateur radio enthusiasts down the block from you curse you?

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:What about RFI? by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some of those that are purely development boards may not worry about it but anything that is going to be sold as an end user product and where the company cares about the possibilty of lawsuits in the west* will need to pass FCC and CE RFI requirements (note: the requirements have two levels, one for "domestic" and one for "commercial", afaict manufacturers only have to comply with the "commercial" requirements provided they put a couple of lines of warnings about possible interference in a domestic environment in the manual).

      AIUI the RFI is kept down through a combination of careful PCB design, slew rate/drive strength control and avoiding having too much high speed stuff on the board at all. Still it can be a close shave sometimes, the rpf were put in a tight spot after their distributors decided that given the volume and demographics of the preorders it was too risky to try and claim it was not an end user product. Fortunately they got the board to pass with only minor firmware tweaks.

      * Some chinese vendors simply don't give a fuck :(

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:What about RFI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not to mention a electronic device partially made of kindling; what could go wrong?

    3. Re:What about RFI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You either have poor equipment or it was installed poorly without adequate attention being paid to RF immunity and so it gets affected by perfectly legal and in-spec amateur radio transmissions. And you want to blame who?

    4. Re:What about RFI? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Would operating one of these make the amateur radio enthusiasts down the block from you curse you?

      He'll be a lot more pissed about your unshielded kitchen appliances than about your minuscule, low-power unshielded ARM. They don't have to care what they emit because they're not radio transmitters.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. Re:Remember Netbooks? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Gee...I guess my RaspberryPi in my kitchen linked up to an old touchscreen and custom recipe software is trash and pointless. Or the RaspberryPi in my truck hooked up to a bumper-cam and 1TB hard drive is something my safety conscious family doesn't care about. Just because you lack the creativity and imagination to put these amazing contraptions to good use doesn't mean that there aren't people out there who don't. Idiot.

    How do you handle gracefully shutting down when you turn your truck off? How do you interface your camera to the Pi?

    I've been thinking about building a Pi based "dash cam" since I haven't been impressed with the existing dash cams. Though I'd probably write my video to an SD card or USB Memory stick rather than hard drive. I'm just not sure how to get a graceful shutdown after I turn off the car - maybe a supercapacitor with enough stored power to let it shut down when it senses loss of 12V power?

  20. Re:What's up with that giant capacitor? by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    Looks like a vibration motor actually?

  21. Re:Remember Netbooks? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Custom recipe software? Puhlease.
    Look up recipe online.
    Read recipe.
    Cook recipe.

    If you want a gadget to hold your hand through that process get a DS / 3DS and the Americas Test Kitchen software. Infinitely superior to whatever you've cobbled together.

    I see Osgeld has already covered your camera system. Your solution is bulkier, more of a hassle than, and less reliable than dozens of different off-the-shelf products. But I guess if your time is worth nothing and you don't care how your truck looks it could be worth it since you maybe saved tens of dollars.

    Many of the cheap off-the-shelf products that are in the price range of a Pi + cheap camera have a habit of temporarily freezing or losing video while they switch files and/or when they lose power. So it's entirely possible that his solution works better than others in the price range. And given that he's added a 1TB drive to it, his solution probably meets his needs better than other solutions out there since few have the ability to add a hard drive.

  22. usability by stenvar · · Score: 2

    Sometimes less is more. I have a tablet hooked up to a monitor, but Android constantly gets confused about the two screens and their resolutions. That means you keep having to fiddle with the touch screen. A dedicated device like this always uses the connected monitor for its output, and the mouse and keyboard for its input. Also, this has better specs than low-end tablets; in different words, at the same price, you get better performance for not paying for a screen.

  23. Re:Why all the fuss? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    Do companies really have to design these project platforms when there are android cell phones that can be had for under $50? They come built in with a small touchscreen, wifi, a low res camera, battery, accelerometer, vibrator, mic, a weak speaker, and possibly a small physical keyboard. Virgin Mobile almost always has a no contract phone for $30-$50.

    There is also an overabundance of bad ESN phones on ebay for $15-$30. While there are issues with supporting thievery, not all bad ESN phones have been stolen, some are really just lost and found by others. Either way, the phones have been branded bad and unless re-purposed, represent a waste on society. Do companies really need to design/build these platforms when there are so many used phones that already litter the world?

    Most of what I'd use the Pi for doesn't need a screen, but does need I/O ports, so I'd choose the PI just for the GPIO ports (and I2C, SPI, CSI, etc). Plus there's already a large developer community around the platform and they are all using the exact same hardware, while if I buy a random phone off eBay, it would be harder to find help.

  24. Re:Remember Netbooks? by flimflammer · · Score: 2

    You're kidding, right? Are you actually trying to imply a mere bumper-cam can't be cobbled together by a hobbyist?

    I guess you're the reason we need to warn everyone that pencils are sharp, coffee is hot, and every building contains chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer.

  25. Re:Remember Netbooks? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

    By all means, fellow consumerist. Don't ever bother doing anything yourself even if it may happen to be a hobby of yours. It's always better to buy everything premade. Otherwise you might not have the very best products in every category of your life! We wouldn't want that now would we?

  26. Re:Remember Netbooks? by Osgeld · · Score: 2

    Thats not it at all, its a combination of poor everything that honestly can be accomplished with a composite video signal and a monitor, but knock yourself out, just hope grandpa or whatever mistakes a frozen image for live and backs over the dog

  27. Re:Remember Netbooks? by MattR83 · · Score: 1

    Considering the 1TB hard drive, I'm pretty sure he's talking about the equivalent of a dash cam (only mounted to the bumper instead of dash) not a back up camera.

  28. Re:The VIA story- a day late and a dollar short by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Not to worry: anybody who has had the...pleasure... of VIA's totally bitchin' and definitely not unstable at all "Unichrome" graphics on the x86 side won't come in to this expecting much more than a serial console...

    And do you walk around the VA going, "boom!" too? I thought I'd put Unichrome behind me.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  29. Re:Remember Netbooks? by LiENUS · · Score: 1

    Why shut it down? it draws ~1amp surely your car battery can supply that for several days without issue

  30. Re:Remember Netbooks? by mjwx · · Score: 1

    "Or the RaspberryPi in my truck hooked up to a bumper-cam and 1TB hard drive is something my safety conscious family doesn't care about."

    yikes, a safety system cobbled together by a hobbyist running on a platform that was designed by people who seemed to learn a EDA during the pi's development all running open source software?

    sign me up

    Would be more reliable than most of the commercial dash cams and even if you paid someone to build it, cheaper than buying a Blackvue.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  31. VGA not HDMI out? by jjsimp · · Score: 1

    What is it still the 90's. I haven't used a VGA cable, for personal uses, for a few years now. Not even sure if my TV even has a VGA port. Do people use these device for Media PC's? I can't imagine they can run 720p content let alone 1080p. My apologies for sounding like I am a troll, but I just don't see any use for these devices.

    1. Re:VGA not HDMI out? by mjrauhal · · Score: 1

      The difference is that only one has VGA, the other does not. Both have HDMI. Get a clue before spouting nonsense.

    2. Re:VGA not HDMI out? by mjrauhal · · Score: 1

      It has both, and yes you can run 1080p over VGA, albeit poorly.

      You can actually run it quite well, though the quality of both the signal source and the display's A/D conversion have to be good. When I ran two identical 1920x1200 Samsung 244T LCDs from a Radeon x800xl, one over DVI, one over VGA, I couldn't tell the difference at all.

      Wouldn't count on a random cheap ARM box's VGA output to be top-notch, of course, especially these days when the VGA output is just mostly for legacy support. Digital is the more sensible option, with its consistent quality.

    3. Re:VGA not HDMI out? by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      To be fair, some of us still have a lot of VGA equipment. For example, all my monitors, and my TV, have VGA ports (and I still use them). The quality is good enough for me.

      My RasPi has the issue that I don't actually have anything with HDMI to plug it into, so have had to use the composite output to my TV (no ideal by any measure). I wish it had a VGA header at least.

    4. Re:VGA not HDMI out? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I run a perfectly good VGA monitor and all my available spare displays are VGA. Nothing wrong with running a decade old monitor if that's what you have.
      While so far I only run PCs this thing could be cool for some uses and VGA + HDMI actually covers most everything pretty nice (what if you borrow a projector and only have readily available VGA cables)

      Over the Pi, you get a much better CPU, more USB and a real ethernet. The main weakness is probably the 512MB ddr3, without swapping. Easy to fill the memory with web browsing alone.

    5. Re:VGA not HDMI out? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It has both, and yes you can run 1080p over VGA, albeit poorly.

      You can actually run it quite well, though the quality of both the signal source and the display's A/D conversion have to be good. When I ran two identical 1920x1200 Samsung 244T LCDs from a Radeon x800xl, one over DVI, one over VGA, I couldn't tell the difference at all.

      I've hooked several monitors with both types of connector up to my PC, which has both types of output, and switched between them on mirror. You can't tell the difference that way, if at all, on the same monitor at the same temperature, etc etc. I did use a nice fat VGA cable, though. And there we have the advantage of the digital signals: You need a $15 VGA cable to transmit a high-resolution signal to your monitor — a cheap one might be of good quality, but without testing the only way to know is to buy a reputable one. But I can use a literally $1 HDMI cable to transmit 1080p video to my TV and have it work fine. Amusingly I am actually using a Monster DVI cable to carry video to my 25.5" IPS display, but that's only because it was at the Grocery Outlet for seven bucks and I thought it would look snazzy behind my computer. It does, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. One thing though by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    My RasPi cost me a total of $35. Has HDMI and Composite. It's designed to work with a television set.

  33. Re:Remember Netbooks? by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I had a 25MHz, x486 netbook with about 100MBytes of HDD, built by compaq in the mid 90s. I upgraded it to 20MBytes of RAM and a big fast hard drive in the early 2000s, and added a PCMCIA WiFi card along-side my 100BaseTx card.

    It ran quite nicely with Linux or FreeBSD. Of course I would put the HDD in a modern computer to install the OS, mainly because I had nothing else to boot from in there. I didn't keep it as a paperweight, either... It had serial ports, which made it perfect for console connections to Cisco routers, switches, Unix servers, and whatnot. SSH was cpu-hungry, but plenty fast enough, which was how the netBook got most of its use. Links was pretty good for web browsing, before the world switched to CSS and nobody told Links how to render it (like Dillo as well). It could run X, even old Gnome from Slackware 3.3, but that was painful. X was to low-res to be particularly useful to me, and screen was a fine substitute.

    It was a great system because of its size, alone. So easy to carry around, a perfectly good keyboard, and so worthless I never feared dropping it, or leaving it out where it might be stolen. And in some ways better than anything you can buy today, at any price... Namely, it had a trackball for the pointer, which is vastly superior to the pointing devices found on any laptop today. Not to mention built-in RS-232 port that worked with devices that won't talk to USB converters.

    In the mid 00's I bought a real laptop from Sotec/Averatec. It was heavy, hot, un-ergonomic, trackpads are a nightmare, and had no end of trouble with it. Not worth jack, yet set me back a grand. I actually threw the nice new laptop in a drawer, and went back to using the 486!

    Around the same time I was experimenting with PDAs. Psion's 5MX with full keyboard had an amazing form-factor, and let me write-up entire documents with full formatting and embedded graphs, and print directly with IRDA to a nearby laserjet. I so wanted it to be a workable replacement, but the screen resolution was a bit too low, the terminal emulators weren't good enough, the CPU was on the slow side even for text, no good SSH clients existed for the platform, and they never sold ethernet or wifi adapters for the device, so it was a non-starter. Still, the month of life on 2xAAs, servicable keyboard, and pocket-size were very compelling.

    My 486 netbook didn't stop being used until Asus repeated history, and gave me something cheap, with a decent keyboard, ethernet, wifi, light weight and compact size. I have two of them, so I'm set for quite a while.

    Tablets aren't going to cut it, nor are smartphones. They don't have the basic expansion ports I've needed for the past two decades, and getting the basic utils going is more effort than it should be.

    However, I'd really like to see ARM netBooks... Longer battery life, lower weight, cost, etc., so long as they have basic expansion options. Since Linux/BSD is open source, compiling for different CPUs is pretty easy... I just have to wait for a worthwhile device to come along.

    Netbooks aren't a fad... they just outgrew their target market, and then crashed on the glut of supply with minimal demand. I'll keep buying, as will many others, if any company out there keeps making them, with reasonable specs.

    That said... BRING BACK THE TRACKBALL ON NETBOOKS!!!

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  34. Re:Remember Netbooks? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the 40 somethings who grew up on the 6502 based machines and Heathkits, or the 50 somethings who built their own homebrew machines by soldering chips together.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  35. Re:Remember Netbooks? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Why shut it down? it draws ~1amp surely your car battery can supply that for several days without issue

    Here's specs from an Optima car battery (an AGM battery that handles deep discharge much better than standard lead plate batteries):

    http://jci_media.s3.amazonaws.com/9613/4583/5078/REDTOP_Full_Specs_Sheet.pdf
    Open Circuit Voltage (Fully charged): 12.8 volts
    Internal Resistance (Fully charged): .0030 ohms
    Capacity: 44 Ah (C/20)
    Reserve Capacity: BCI: 90 minutes

    So it can supply one amp for 44 hours...so in less than 2 days, the battery will be dead. My car often sits for 2 days or longer without starting it.

    Even if I could keep the power consumption below 0.5 amps, that's still enough power draw to drain the battery in less than a week and I don't want to have to remember to switch the camera off when I leave the car at the airport for 5 days.

  36. Re:What's up with that giant capacitor? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    If you read it closely you'll see something like:
    kts
    C#2032 3.0V
    The energizer CR2032 3.0V battery has about that size.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  37. Re:Remember Netbooks? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    No, think it serves 3 purposes quite nicely:
    1. Having the license plate of the guy that rear ended him and drove off.
    2. A second rear view mirror to see kids when you are backing up.
    3. The fun of creating such a contraption.
    4. ...
    5. Profit

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  38. Re:Remember Netbooks? by Patch86 · · Score: 2

    I'm posting this from a 1.5 year old EEE PC, which replaced my previous EEE PC of 4 years ago (which met an unfortunate end).

    I say this to highlight that not only are we netbook users still happily out here, but they're still available in the shops and we're still buying them. I have a Kindle Fire tablet, and I barely use it compared to my trusty netbook; there's no contest between a flippy laptop form factor with real buttons and a little slate which I need to jab at the screen with my finger. I also have "real" full-sized laptops, and my netbook still comfortably fills the niche it was bought for- light, portable, long battery life, low cost so I don't worry about it being lost or broken.

  39. Re:What's up with that giant capacitor? by mirix · · Score: 1

    All CR2032's do, brand is irrelevant... 20mm dia x 3.2mm thick. hence 2032.

    Lots of embedded boards, laptops, use them like this - heatshrunk and on wires - as opposed to socketed as on a normal motherboard. (presumably to save board space...)

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  40. Re:Why all the fuss? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    I found this on ebay http://www.ebay.ie/itm/USB-8-RELAY-CARD-BOARD-MODULE-DIGITAL-INPUTS-ANALOG-INPUTS-DS1820-INPUT-/260881091798?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3cbdb98cd6

    for $57 you get 6 DIGITAL INPUTS, 3 ANALOG INPUTS AND 1 THERMOMETER INPUT. and 8 Relay outputs.
    connects by usb.

    An old phone would be almost ideal for the USB Host but for a couple of issues. USB host mode is not universal with android phones. The USB driver will probably not be available for the android kernel (although since source is available it probably could be compiled). And the final issue I don't think you could charge a phone and use the host mode at the same time.

    The positive side you have a full colour display wifi bluetooth and a connection to the cellphone network which you could call (maybe automating your central heating system for example). you could wall mount it couple of screws in the back of the case. The power requirements are very small.

    Raspberry PI could do the job too but no display and no cell network, Although some USB stick modems might be able to send and receive text messages. I like the idea of re-purposing an old cheap android phone to do the job.

    You could compromise and use the Raspberry PI as the controller and an Android Phone as the display on the Lan. No reason the devices couldn't talk to each other. Maybe the compromise would be better in some ways. Anyway i'm sure other people have much better idea's. .

  41. unimpressive specs by ssam · · Score: 1

    for $99 id expect a dual-core A9, 1GB of RAM, Gigabit ethernet, a FPGA and a well documented 16core coprocessor. http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/adapteva/parallella-a-supercomputer-for-everyone

    If cpu power was not an issue i'd just use a raspberry pi.

    1. Re:unimpressive specs by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      For some reason, VIA thinks that they have a good name.

      This is absurd, because to me they are still known as the company that made all those chipsets that made me cry for so many years. And cheap IEEE1394 chipsets that don't work worth a crap.

      Consequently they overprice themselves right out of the market at every opportunity, then wonder what happened. It's a miracle they still exist. Well, an anti-miracle. I can only assume that it is because they somehow manage to still get their chips bundled onboard many things.

      I was super-excited about the original VIA APC. Then when they announced them to the pre-registration would-be customers like myself, they sold them for $50 plus $30 shipping because they decided to put it in a massive box with some accessories which cost about a buck shipped from China.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  42. Cardboard by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    That aluminum-cardboard fusion is kind of silly. If you made the sides of aluminum, why not throw a top and bottom cover from aluminum too. Or, then make the whole box out of cardboard.

    However I think the use of cardboard is possibly quite smart idea (ecologically). I assume this is much harder cardboard than what you would find from typical cardboard boxes. Computers have relatively short use age anyway and do not get beaten much, so they do not need cases that last forever.

    1. Re:Cardboard by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's a crap idea because humidity makes cardboard warp and sag. When the cardboard cover fails the user is just going to be left wanting another case. They're probably not going to buy it from VIA, but they may buy one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. Re:Remember Netbooks? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    Actually, I am using a netbook to post this as well. It works quite well.

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  44. Re:Remember Netbooks? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember netbooks? I don't. Because they were trash and pointless.

    I've got an EEE 701SD, an Acer Aspire One, and a Gateway LT. I use the former and the latter on a regular basis, and my lady uses the middle machine when traveling. I took the 701 and she took the Aspire when we went to Panama. We made a fairly hilarious picture in cafes and such with her using the full-size keys and me pecking out on the mini keyboard but I actually managed to upgrade my website and such while we were out, upload images and so on, on a machine that will fit in the pocket of some cargo pants. And it had *gasp* a keyboard on it!

    MOD ME DOWN AND MOD DOWN THE TRUTH

    It was the truth, from a certain point of view. Unfortunately, that point of view involves rectal-cranial inversion.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  45. Re:Why all the fuss? by petteyg359 · · Score: 1

    And the final issue I don't think you could charge a phone and use the host mode at the same time.

    Sure you could. Power is power. It doesn't care whether a device is the host or not. All it does is follow the wire. Just splice a 5V DC brick into the USB cable and plug it in to the wall. The power doesn't care that it is starting in the middle of the cable. It'll just go towards both ends.

  46. Re:Why all the fuss? by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    it's a definite maybe.
    From a thread on XDA developers, it was a maybe on a nexus7 If the kernel was patched it could be done but without it it wouldn't work apparently for charging the nexus7 likes the 2 data line shorted which means no data while charging.

    So it depends on the Android device, some can and some can't and some can with the right kernel.

    on the other hand no reason any android device couldn't recieve and send data via wifi. thus avoiding the problem.

         

  47. Re:Remember Netbooks? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Bah, you had chips to solder together?

    Hey! It was because of these people's discoveries that we now have the Pringles CAN antenna.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  48. Pi userbase is key by TheSync · · Score: 1

    One reason I am pro-Raspberry Pi is that is has a huge user base. When you are dealing with trying to get Linux stuff to run on ARM and the lower system capabilities of an embedded system, it is nice to have 100,000 friends who are messing with the same system and already worked out the issues.