Wikimedia Moving Main Data Center To Ashburn, Virginia
hydrofix writes "The Wikimedia Foundation is preparing for the transition of its main technical operations to a new data center in Ashburn, Virginia. This is intended to improve the technical performance and reliability of all Wikimedia sites, including Wikipedia. The current target windows for the migration are January 22nd, 23rd and 24th, 2013, from 17:00 to 01:00 UTC. Since 2004, Wikimedia sites have been hosted in the main data center in Tampa, Florida, a location chosen for its proximity to Jimmy Wales at the time. In 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation's Technical Operations team started to look for other locations with better network connectivity and more clement weather. Located in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, Ashburn offers faster and more reliable connectivity than Tampa, and usually fewer hurricanes."
Wow. Talk about tempting fate....... some things you just shouldn't say out loud.
Three Squirrels
DC will get hit this year and there data center will go down they are just asking for it.
Remember when electrical storms in Virginia knocked out Amazon's east coast data center multiple times?
Actually, it'll be Congress's provoking the WRATH of the ALMIGHTY.
The only question is which particular thing will be blamed.
I'll put 50 bucks on violent video games and tolerating homosexuals, with a rider on Social Security Reform.
Tampa hasn't been directly hit by a hurricane since 1921. Not to say it couldn't happen, but I just don't get the 'weather' argument. I remember the reassurances from Amazon Web Services last year when the 'Frankenstorm' headed for Virginia.
Virginia, huh? Hmm... What else could be in Virginia, I wonder...?
Also most of Ashburn is fairly new construction compared to other locations nearby and most of its power lines are buried... that probably contributes to it keeping power on when older communities in Fairfax and Maryland don't. I suspect also the choice of location may have something to do with proximity to others. UUNET (or whatever they are these days), AOL, Verizon, etc., etc.
No one location is safe from natural or human disasters. So, I'd rather hear that they were going to a more distributed architecture and that they'd be able to sustain a complete loss of one data center.
Bruce Perens.
I haven't done much Googling, but it appears that Wikimedia's data centers are all located in the US. Is this still correct? Shouldn't Wikimedia be thinking of expanding its essential operations to other relatively "free" countries like Sweden, as a safeguard against possible natural disasters or human-induced server shutdowns?
...I have absolutely no idea why anybody outside of the Federal Sector would want their data center in this area. We get Severe Weather (Tropical Storms and Snow Storms) on a semi-regular basis, and traffic tends to jam with a slight dusting of snow or a moderate rain to the point where it can take 3 hours to drive 2 miles, and the Utility Companies are not always the greatest at keeping the power running during these times. Neither of these things can be good for maximizing uptime and minimizing downtime.
A lot of Wikimedia wikis' policies are based on United States law. The applicable laws differ from country to country. Case in point: Copyright terms for some works are longer in Sweden than in the United States. For example, copyright in any work published before 1978 and more than 25 years before the author's death expires in the United States before Sweden or other EU countries. Putting a datacenter in Sweden would affect which images could be declared public domain on Commons based on its practice of using the later of copyright expiry in the datacenter's country and in the country of the work's first publication.
Since I moved down to NoVA over 2 years ago, I've seen a hurricane larger than Floyd and an earthquake and just missed a massive snow storm. The trees decided to have a massive orgy leading to one of the worse allergy seasons ever and now we've got a pretty bad flu season. Nothing surprises me anymore.
You forgot the plague of stink bugs.
Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
Ashburn is within the blast zone of DC. Most government operations centers have moved out past Martinsburg WV to be out of the blast zone.
The rest of the world is trying to get redundancy and resilience, and working to that goal through geodiversity, content-distribution-networks, clouds of their own or others (AMZ, Google, etc.). And yet, Wikimedia is moving from data center A to data center B.
The rest of the world is moving away from being in one country's borders, including Google, Amazon, Mega. And yet Wikimedia is moving to the burbs of our nation's capitol.
Has the US Government starting running Wikimedia so they can get a headstart on future Wikileaks, or is it just that Wikimedia really really wants ONLY ONE DATACENTER!!! Because, what's all that stuff about redundancy, resiliency, geodiversity, and reliability REALLY worth.
M
And the normal infestation of douchebags.
I recommend Quincy Washington. There are a few data centers here already. The power is cheap. The thermal management is good. http://www.coloandcloud.com/editorial/quincy-wa-big-data-centers-leverage-abundant-inexpensive-renewable-energy/
Move it more inland
just sayin, as it stands they are about the same distance from the cost that gets hit the most
Indiana on the other hand ... but I dont know about connectivity
A surprisingly large number of key data centers and control points have been relocated to locations in Northern Virginia near CIA HQ. AOL is there. The Iridium satellite control center is there. (It used to be in Schaumburg, IL, near Motorola HQ) Ashburn alone has four Equnix colo facilities, two AT&T data centers, two Net2EZ facilities, and a few other major centers.
A few miles away in Vienna, VA, even closer to CIA HQ in McLean and less than a mile from "Liberty Crossing" (Homeland Security HQ) there are six more big data centers.
I think they do replicate DBs to Florida (the former main data center), because they wrote it's a hot failover. The other data centers are just caches, because that's most of the requests.
Virginia has had 90% of all requests anyway already, they are serving bits.wikimedia.org (JS, CSS, ...), upload.wikimedia.org (images and media) and I guess also Squid+Varnish. The "only" thing missing is the actual mediawiki software, databases and things like memcached. Here's the checklist
For those familiar with downtown Tampa, it's the building with the gecko on the side, 10th floor, second cage on the left as you come in. I spent 3 weeks working a few cages down and got to chat with the Wikipedia tech.
So yes, I have gone to Wikipedia.
-- I have a private email server in my basement.
personally, I'd like to get an offline copy, just in case. how big is the current image (head of all revisions)?