The Mathematics of the Lifespan of Species
skade88 writes "NPR is reporting on a study in which the author claims to have found the formula to predict the average life span of members of a species. It does not apply to specific individuals of that species, only to the average life span of members of the species as a whole. From the article: 'It's hard to believe that creatures as different as jellyfish and cheetahs, daisies and bats, are governed by the same mathematical logic, but size seems to predict lifespan. The formula seems to be nature's way to preserve larger creatures who need time to grow and prosper, and it not only operates in all living things, but even in the cells of living things. It tells animals for example, that there's a universal limit to life, that though they come in different sizes, they have roughly a billion and a half heart beats; elephant hearts beat slowly, hummingbird hearts beat fast, but when your count is up, you are over.'"
Keep my heart rate to a minimum...
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
Isaac Asimov wrote an essay about this a long time ago (in the 1960's IIRC), and I doubt the idea originated with him.
I believe Asimov was talking about 3 billion heartbeats or so as the limit; 1.5 billion heartbeats is only about 60 years for a human, and we tend to live longer than that under good conditions.
Time passes faster when you're having fun. If we have a limited number of heartbeats, the trick is to stay as miserable as possible, so that the time will pass more slowly.
Gently reply
He plots lifetime in days to entity mass in grams on a log-log plot and slaps a line on it. Note that some of the scatter in the vertical axis is up to 3 *orders of magnitude*. Had this been plotted on linear scale it would have looked like Jackson Pollock sneezed on the page. All that can be extracted is that big critters tend to live longer than small critters. So what is new here?
Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!
Vote for Bernie in 2016!
The period is directly proportional to the loveliness of a summer's day, perchance?
Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
All life was designed by God.
---- GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
That thumping sound you hear in your chest?
That's your life beating away.
If that sounds worrying you shouldn't worry, the worrying only just makes your heart beat faster and brings your inevitable demise that much closer.
That worry is very dangerous, even if you stop now you've already shortened your lifespan, and for every second you worry longer you're losing more and more of your life. This worry and stress is literally killing you and it won't stop unless you stop getting stressed out.
Just some friendly advice.
I stole this Sig
I came up with a similar theory years ago as an excuse not to exercise, for exercising increases one's heart rate. I concluded that exercise would therefore shorten my life. My girlfriend at the time didn't buy my logic. As a step aerobics instructor and science graduate student, she assured me that exercising only temporarily increases one's heart rate and that people who exercise regularly have slower heart rates during the non-exercising parts of their lives. I hate it when people use my own logic against me.
There are so many exceptions to this "rule" that it is at best an interesting pattern. There are big turtles that live great long lives and big turtles that don't with little turtles being all over the place as well. There are birds of all kinds of sizes with small birds that live 80 years and big birds that live under 20. Some bacteria seem to be nearly immortal and others live days. Within dogs the big ones hardly outlast green bananas while the little ratty ones go on for decades. Poplar trees grow huge and die fast, oaks go on and on but some smaller trees are thousands of years old.
Even humming birds live a few years at crazy heartbeats as high as 1200 bpm (look it up if you don't buy that mind blowing number) yet other bigger birds with much slower heart beats live for the same length of time. So it isn't size or heartbeats.
If I had to suspect anything lifespan will be an evolutionary advantage like anything else. If you are surrounded by ever changing dangers a short fast life-cycle is probably best. But if you are fairly safe in steady environment a long life is probably safer. Turtles have slow metabolisms which allow them to survive long periods without food and are fairly safe from predictors so they don't have to worry about adapting too much. Rabbits are basically the forest's McNuggets so they need to continuously adapt in numbers and probably other things such as coloring; hence a fast short life cycle. We have created civilization where we are nearly 100% safe from predators and with things like food storage are not so buffeted by a changing nature; so we are getting longer an longer lived.
"Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing."
This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
But I have a Unix heart; the counter flips over to zero in 2038.
Table-ized A.I.
Exactly, and if I recall correctly (from at least a decade ago, if not more), it does not apply to humans.
Exactly, and if I recall correctly (from at least a decade ago, if not more), it does not apply to humans.
Humans get old which is extremely unusual in nature.
This was taught at Frances Slocum elementary school (Fort Wayne, IN, USA) circa 1968.
Verbum caro factum est
We have a much more accurate value than Asimov's in Genesis 6:3
"After that Jehovah said: 'My spirit shall not act toward man indefinitely in that he is also flesh. Accordingly his days shall amount to a hundred and twenty years.'" (Genesis 6:3, NWT) That verse could be referring to the fact that God was about to flood the inhabited parts of Earth 120 years later to wipe away the interference of the Nephilim, right after Lamech and Methuselah were about to die. Noah was born when Lamech was 182, Methuselah died when Lamech was 782, and Lamech died at 777. (Genesis 5:25-31) So both Methuselah and Lamech died fairly shortly before Noah turned 600 and the flood came. (Genesis 7:6) The parallel view of Genesis 6:3 suggests that the authors of some paraphrase translations, such as the New Living Translation, didn't consider this possibility, even despite Abraham's over 170-year life.--Genesis 25:7.
A tree's heart beats really slowly though, so it makes sense.
Trees work on the flow of water from the roots to the leaves through narrow tubes allow photosynthesis. There are different layers of food that have different functions. Basically the trunk of a tree is one giant artery. The inner core of the trunk, the heartwood is for strength, while it is the sapwood which transports water. The outer layer is for protection only.
Due to disease and old age, the sapwood will become damaged and no longer carry water.
Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
The outer layer transports sugars made from photosynthesis back down to the roots.
See this
The tree has no heart, the water is drawn up the tree by a process called transpiration.
Age doesn't really matter to water transport, since the cells that make up the tubes that carry water are dead.