Slashdot Mirror


CES: Jono Bacon Talks Up Ubuntu for Phones (Video)

One of the more interesting conversations Tim Lord had at CES this year was with Ubuntu Community Manager Jono Bacon, who was showing off the Ubuntu Phone that is supposed to be released later this year. According to the Ubuntu website, it "delivers a magical phone that is faster to run, faster to use and fits perfectly into the Ubuntu family." Big words, but if Ubuntu parent Canonical can live up to them, the mobile phone market may soon have an interesting new operating system competitor to shake things up.

15 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. But WHY? by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, geeks like us will like it.

    What benefit is it to mobile network operators to offer Ubuntu phones over, say, Android phones?

    What benefit is there for an end user to buy it instead of, say, an Android phone?

    What benefit is there for an OEM (eg, Samsung, HTC, etc) to manufacture an Ubuntu phone?

    It's like the game Blackberry and Microsoft are playing trying to get into a market with entrenched players. (Apple and Android) If there are apps and cool phones, users will buy. Developers will write apps if there are users. OEMs will build devices if users are going to buy. How do you get the ball rolling?

    If you have billions of dollars, you can try to buy your way into the market. Microsoft tried that with the Kin phone and failed. (Remember that one?) In the end, they didn't sell that many, so the loss per phone was only about $125,000 or somesuch. Microsoft is trying again, but things are not looking good.

    So given all that, WHY will Ubuntu phone be successful? For what business reason? What is the business case to OEMs, to mobile operators, to end users? What benefit does (or will) it have over existing ecosystems (iPhone, Android, etc)? Even if you can name one, is it a benefit the entrenched players cannot quickly replicate?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:But WHY? by Kethinov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What benefit is there for an end user to buy it instead of, say, an Android phone?

      The key value proposition to users is making your smartphone your primary (perhaps even only) computer by enabling you to to plug a monitor, keyboard, and mouse into it. And if they're really smart, they'll make a kick ass laptop dock for it so it can become a laptop too.

      If they do that, then I'll be able to replace my wife's Android phone and her aging MacBook Air at the same time with the same device. She's not interested in faster hardware, but she'd definitely like not having to worry about sync'ing data between her phone and her laptop anymore.

      If her phone and her laptop are physically the same device, then she can literally take her work with her at will in an effortless fashion without having to sync it with some clumsy cloud service first.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    2. Re:But WHY? by gshegosh · · Score: 2

      I like how you can plug the Ubuntu phone to a display and maybe a mouse and keyboard and it becomes a full desktop computer. I do believe that phone CPUs are getting performant enough to pull this off and for most people it will have enough computing power. Of course, there are drawbacks such as what happens when someone steals the phone with all your data or shitty battery life. It will probably not have enough public appeal to become mainstream. But the idea itself is quite nice IMO.

    3. Re:But WHY? by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      So if India / China market OEMs don't want to agree to Android license and therefore lose access to Google Play marketplace, what advantage does Ubuntu Phone, or FireFox OS have? Android development still has a lot of momentum behind it. Amazon has demonstrated that you can create your own new Android app marketplace. It seems that going with Android, but skipping Google has a lot of advantage over either Ubuntu Phone or FireFox OS. OEMs are already familiar with how to put Android on their phones.

      So I still don't see how Ubuntu Phone (or FireFox OS) can get any traction.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    4. Re:But WHY? by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      Android already works as a desktop OS, to some degree. If you've used a Google TV box, particularly the nice big keyboard / trackpad of the Logitech Revue, then you see how Android supports a mouse / trackpad and keyboard. Similarly if you have an Android tablet convertible like Asus Transformer.

      It seems like the major thing lacking is applications that work with the new touch input, and that replace existing non-touch applications from the desktop. The most obvious being "office" applications. I have seem some efforts already at porting LibreOffice to Android. When or how well it will work remains to be seen.

      What Android does not do is multi-window. Samsung has done some work on this on their Note phones where you can have two apps running side by side. So the potential is there.

      While I've heard of Wine on Android being worked on, it would seem that Windows Phone / tablets, etc have an advantage if you want legacy applications. But then it seems that the legacy applications only run on the tablet, and the expensive one at that. So if you're waiting for rewrites of legacy apps for Windows, then that's no different than waiting for rewrites for other platforms.

      So you could make a case that Ubuntu phone could run legacy apps, like Windows 8 Pro tablet, but why? And furthermore, unlike Windows, what Ubuntu apps would people be wanting? And wouldn't they want new apps designed for touch instead of the legacy apps anyway -- thus giving Ubuntu no advantage over Apple / Android / Windows / Blackberry?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re:But WHY? by Kethinov · · Score: 2

      Android just isn't there yet for this. Not many existing phones can transform into a mouse/keyboard driven PC experience competently, and even fewer have a laptop dock capability.

      And as you mentioned, the dearth of high quality desktop-caliber apps (like LibreOffice) is a huge problem that would need to be resolved as well along with the lack of a true window manager for a mouse-driven desktop experience.

      Not to mention the update woes. Unless you buy a Nexus device or are willing to tinker with custom ROMs, the vast majority of Android phones don't get OS updates either 1. at all or 2. in a timely manner.

      None of those problems are acceptable for a laptop/desktop OS experience.

      Something tells me Ubuntu can be frankensteined into a competent mobile OS more easily than Android can resolve the above problems.

      I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but I'm cynical.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    6. Re:But WHY? by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      I think you're right. I also think Ubuntu is much more of a dream for tinkerers. I just can't see it being successful.

      Thinking about a phone that is very close to a real Linux distribution, that I can get root access to, boggles the mind with the possibilities of what could be done. A lot of cool things have been done on Android, which is on Linux -- but it is a far cry from a real Linux distribution.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  2. Re:Sounds like WinPhone 8 by DickBreath · · Score: 2

    You make a good point. I would also add that an Android developer could make an app that puts widgets on the home screen, or bookmarks to urls that the app can recognize. Therefore, the mechanism exists to develop Android apps that can pin anything you want to the home screen.

    So what does Ubuntu phone offer that is compelling. Especially compelling to OEMs (eg, HTC, Sony, Samsung) and compelling to mobile operators (AT&T, Verizon, etc)? And what is compelling to end users that the competition cannot easily replicate?

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  3. Re:I see them in a strong 6th place... by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Informative

    While BB10 can use Android BB10 is also using QML, the same as this phone.
    QML is overall better doe mobile development, while Qt people work on bringing QML to iOS and android. Soon one runtime will run on them all, including Ubuntu Phone

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  4. Re:I doubt they will pull it off by scorp1us · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nokia pulled the plug on meego before the product even hit the market. The N9 was not released in any WP7 capable market. It was guarenteed to tank on business reasons due to the MS agreement, not due to lack of Nokia trying to make a new platform but failing.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  5. Re:Sounds like WinPhone 8 by unrtst · · Score: 2

    So what does Ubuntu phone offer that is compelling. Especially compelling to OEMs (eg, HTC, Sony, Samsung) and compelling to mobile operators (AT&T, Verizon, etc)? And what is compelling to end users that the competition cannot easily replicate?

    I rag on Unity just about any time there's a chance, but I'm actually excited about this.

    IMO, after you get the radios working, the apps out there for phones are really really simple. My phone (an HTC EVO Shift 4g) is often sluggish, and the OS and mandatory apps take up a ton of the available space. Something like this has the potential to provide a very full featured and light weight OS/apps that are nice and snappy. This matters a LOT in the mobile area. The less power you need, the less batter you use up. You can't simply keep throwing more power into the phones to accommodate things, because it comes at a big cost.

    What's the matter to OEMs? They'll (potentially) be able to produce a feature comparable device for less money, or tweak out more speed and free space and free ram from the same hardware.

    This is similar to what Meego and Symbian had going for them. The Nokia / MS thing killed much of that momentum. It *could* be picked back up (there is at least one company trying to do so), but so could this. IMO, something like this is a very very good thing.

    There are plenty of things i can NOT do with my android that I would (likely) be able to do with a phone that is more purely GNU. A bunch of that could be resolved by rooting my phone, but that still leaves things, and it's not as easy to port things to it.

    I think there's plenty of room in the market for this (or something very similar). The poor reception of Windows 8 phones is not an indicator that this will fail. There are also many other price, performance, market, control, customization ability, etc differences. This would be a better comparison to Nokia's previous phones, but more advanced, and those were profitable.

  6. Re:I doubt they will pull it off by loufoque · · Score: 2

    But Nokia didn't even try to make Meego fly.
    And it still was more successful than their Windows phones despite not having spent a single dollar on marketing.

  7. I'll be impressed when... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

    Advertisements for a cool new smartphone OS do not revolve around cloud, tweets, facebook, and slews of neatly bundled commercial services and integrated local/web search.

    A real OS would provide a packaging option that included coming installed with nothing not even a phone dialer or SMS app. It should just focus on providing facilities to allow secure, effective communication and integration between apps and the users workflow. It should NOT define what that will be apriori.

    The reason we don't have any good smartphone OS's is because too much value would be left on the table if one were to be designed where the user comes first and the value chain comes second. Ubuntu is being corrupted by its own success.

  8. Native Android! by slacka · · Score: 2

    As someone who suffered with a laggy HTML5 based WebOS Pre, then loved his silky smooth 3GS, but left the walled garden for a Galaxy S2, I am thrilled about this. My S2’s H/W by all accounts blows my old 3GS out of the water, yet I still find the experience more laggy than my 3 year old 3GS. I’m sure much of this is the Java VM holding Android back.

    Also, I really like the idea of a gesture based UI. So far the reviewers have loved the Blackberry gesture based UI.
    http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/02/review-blackberry-10-is-better-much-better-late-than-never/

    If there is a build for the S2, I will definitely flash it. The chance to have the open platform of Linux/Android with the native speed of IOS is worth at least trying out.

  9. Dock it! by emblemparade · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm surprised that the biggest deal about Ubuntu phone isn't mentioned!

    You'll be able to plug this phone into a dock (or otherwise connect it to a big monitor, keyboard and mouse) and use it essentially like Ubuntu desktop. There, you'll be able to run all your usual desktop applications as well as your phone applications, on a big screen with full resolution. (The do need to be built for ARM, but already most of the software in the Ubuntu Software Center has ARM versions.)

    Nobody does this yet. There are dockable Android phones, but Android is not a desktop OS, and the experience on a desktop is quite miserable, both in terms of UX (mouse support is awkward) and in terms of available applications.

    Phones are powerful computers! It's silly that we carry all that power around with us and yet can't apply it towards the usual desktop experience. I see the Ubuntu phone as finally being able to bridge this gap.

    Even more: I can imagine desktop applications that make use phone features. GPS is not something we usually have in laptops, but phones have it, and there can be cool desktop apps that make use of it. And there's tilt-control: I can imagine big desktop games making use of tilt: the phone will become something like a game "controller" (even though the entire computer is inside, too). And, of course, you have cellular internet built in. In a way, phones, as hardware, offer more features than desktops, and app developers will surely take advantage of it!

    I'm very excited about this feature, and hope to see it fronted more as one of the big advantages of Ubuntu phone!