Slashdot Mirror


Parcel Sensor Knows When Your Delivery Has Been Dropped

First time accepted submitter Hamsterdan writes "If you're tired of finding that your stuff has been smashed during shipping after opening your package, this device is for you. 'Called DropTag, the gadget combines a battery, a low-energy Bluetooth transmitter, an accelerometer and a memory chip. Stuck on a parcel as it leaves an e-commerce warehouse, it logs any g-forces above a set risky shock level that it experiences. The idea is that when the courier puts it in your hands, you turn on Bluetooth on a smartphone running a DropTag app and scan it before you sign for it.'"

145 comments

  1. Existing non-electronic variant by EdZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just use a shockwatch and stick it on the outside? That's what they're for, and having one obviously visible is certainyl more of a deterrant to mistreatment than a normal 'handle with care' sticker.

    1. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by p0p0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly this, So much simpler and easier since you need to get the sender to apply it, and they are more likely to attack the shock stickers apposed to hacking together a wireless g-sensor. Unnecessarily high-tech solution to a low-tech problem.

    2. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the outside ones can easily be replaced by a fresh one by an unscrupulous shipper

    3. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by p0p0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      *attack=attach.
      Ugh. Though I gave myself a funny image of a UPS man mauling a shock sticker.

    4. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by davidbrit2 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I thought of. This is a solution in search of a problem, one which ShockWatch already solved. (No, I don't work for ShockWatch, and I don't even know if my employer uses them. I've never seen them in our warehouse.)

    5. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by SomePgmr · · Score: 2

      That's fraudulent and potentially lawsuit worthy. Ain't gunna happen over a regular package.

      Maybe a bigger problem is shockwatch patches can cost $3 each. It makes sense for expensive packages,but not your $10 amazon.com order with free shipping.

      Though to be fair, now figure out what a bluetooth dongle is going to cost.

    6. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by hduff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not just use a shockwatch and stick it on the outside?

      If they really worked reliably, they would be in wider use. I would gladly pay the small premium for these things as would many people.

      But I suspect that it would not ameliorate the problem since damage and returns are built into the cost of doing business and the shippers have no incentive to correct the problem any moer than they have..

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    7. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

      By including it inside the product packaging (or building it into the product itself B-) ), a manufacturer can record, not just shipping shocks in the last hop, but all shocks from the time the device was packaged at the factory. He can defend himself (and the customer) against failures (and warranty repair costs) generated by mishandling by a wholesaler, retailer, or what-have-you, not just the final shipper.

      The device would report significant events with time stamps, so the final shipper wouldn't get blamed for mishandling further up the chain.

      With integrated accelerometers and the like, the silicon-with-MEMS product would be a rather tiny chip attached to a battery - which (with modern battery tech) could power it for the shelf life of the product's design. Given Moore's law the prices for the electronic versions might come out lower than those of the mechanical version.

      Main downside might be that the battery might make the device unsuited for air freight. B-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    8. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or how about a label that just says "Yes, this packaged was dropped" applied to every package prior to delivery?

      Based on my experience, that would have near-perfect accuracy. Also it's cheaper than an electronic solution.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    9. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      man, that takes me back. I first saw those SW indicators on DEC disk packs (rp06, rm05, the old school vax/vms disk platters on a spindle). fun times.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Funny

      this is actually how UPS, the shipping company got its name.

      it was a phonetic spelling mistake: they meant to call the company "oops!".

      (the more you know...)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Shoten · · Score: 2

      Maybe a bigger problem is shockwatch patches can cost $3 each. It makes sense for expensive packages,but not your $10 amazon.com order with free shipping.

      Though to be fair, now figure out what a bluetooth dongle is going to cost.

      From the article, the device is $2. BUT...they don't include the "coin battery" that it runs on...I'm guessing a 2032 or 2025, which will cost close to as much as the rest of the device. I do wonder how they get the cost of the unit that low, though...

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    12. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but this new way has an App! Surely that makes it better, no?

    13. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      This Popular Mechanics article definitely proves this point. Its not just for the customer, but probably of more use for the manufacturer to do QA as far as who they have ship their product. Ditto for the shipping companies themselves. Stuff leaves factory unbroken and gets to warehouses A and B ok, but somewhere between shipping hub C and D... Uh oh! Also if keeping tabs on impacts and such over time, it would even allow the shipping company to find out if some particular employee is dinging their packages by keeping tabs on shift hours and such.

      It's nice to have it, but the recipient isn't the only customer of this particular tracking service. It would only make sense if the cell phone app to read the tag also reports all the data back home to a database where this info can be of greater use. Also not to mention everyone going through a similar supply line benefits despite not having these tags, provided problems in shipping are corrected promptly.

    14. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the battery is a few pennies.

      the out-of-date ones from china (ie, all of them from china) are good enough for a week's worth of travel time or more.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    15. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But I suspect that it would not ameliorate the problem since damage and returns are built into the cost of doing business and the shippers have no incentive to correct the problem any moer than they have..

      The problem is that the guys loading the trucks can only go so fast.
      BUT, since time is money, the shippers run the sorting machines at highspeed, and the loaders are forced to treat your package like a football in order to meet their quotas and keep boxes from piling up.

      So it isn't that the damages and returns are built into the cost of doing business, it's that (for the shipper) the damages and returns cost less than the profits from destroying every N-th package.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    16. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by 1729 · · Score: 2

      From the article, the device is $2. BUT...they don't include the "coin battery" that it runs on...I'm guessing a 2032 or 2025, which will cost close to as much as the rest of the device. I do wonder how they get the cost of the unit that low, though...

      Sure, if you're buying them one-at-a-time at Target, but you can get 50 CR2032 batteries for $10 on Amazon. Buying in bulk, they'd be even cheaper. (I go through a lot of button batteries, mostly LR44s, keeping my kids' toys running.)

    17. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by markxz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shockwatch labels that release sarin (or equivelent) gas when broken would incentivise good handling of the item.

      Otherwise couriers will continue to smash the items up.

    18. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yes, I bought about 150 of them once for about $60. Gave them to friends, still have a bunch left. They're Chinese but seem to have the same capacity / quality as the branded versions. Bought them from Mouser or Digi-Key, I think...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    19. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats funny your watches get on all flights.

    20. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So put it on a USB device and incorporate it into the product registration process. I'm betting the package recipient would like know why the box is all beat up when it was delivered. "Insert USB to see how well your product was handled by United Parcel Smashers".

      Hell, the CIA may even fund the whole thing for your company just as long as you're willing to ship your products internationally so they can get FLAME or whatever the latest variant of the Iranian centrifuge killing software deployed.

      Sounds like a WIN WIN to me.

    21. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought UPS stood for United Package Smashers.

    22. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by quenda · · Score: 1

      BUT...they don't include the "coin battery" that it runs on...I'm guessing a 2032 or 2025, which will cost close to as much as the rest of the device.

      They don't buy them individually from the local 7/11 . More like under 10c each in bulk from Alibaba .

    23. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who knows the UPS system way, way too well. I can say with certainty that the people who work there always are regretful and say "oops!" just before drop[kick]ing your package into a trailer or over your fence.

    24. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Spamalope · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I thought UPS stood for United Package Smashers.

      I know they offer throw it at the ground shipping. We shipped about a dozen computers and at least half literally had the metal case warped. One had a fork lift tine driven through the box. One of our branch employees saw the UPS delivery driver throwing packages out of the truck onto the concrete. In all cases (include the fork-lift smashed one) UPS denied insurance claims because we didn't pack it well enough.

    25. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Ant2 · · Score: 2

      I ordered a box of 10 of these, but they were all activated by the time they arrived. Crap, now what?

    26. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      Couriers have figured out that the best way of dealing with a Shockwatch is to rip the filament off the box.

    27. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, the problem is companies like UPS will hire any scumbag off of the street. I had a friend who was a package handler for UPS in Oakland he told me about all of the ex-cons, druggies and thugs they had tossing packages around. He said that if the package had "Fragile" or "Handle with Care" printed on it, they would purposely damage it. They hire people who don't give a fuck about their own lives, let alone a job. No labels or shock sensors are going to stop them from destroying your packages.

    28. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      How is this easier than assuming that everyone who takes delivery of said package just rejects it at the acceptance stage if the shock detector has gone off? No need for anything fancy like USBs/wireless data connections to databases etc (see below). "It's broken - I don't sign for it". Done.

    29. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Between seeing a FedEx guy tossing one smallish Dell-labeled box after another on to the ground from hip height as he sorted them in his truck, and watching baggage handlers at the airport tossing bags a dozen feet on to a pile, I now just assume anyone paid to move my things around is going to beat the living fuck out of them, and they probably don't even care if anyone sees it.

    30. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Maybe a bigger problem is shockwatch patches can cost $3 each. It makes sense for expensive packages,but not your $10 amazon.com order with free shipping.

      You don't usually need a shockwatch patch for your $10 amazon.com order. And for the times you do, $3 is a small price to pay.

    31. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shockwatch labels that release sarin (or equivelent) gas when broken would incentivise good handling of the item.

      No need to kill anyone. Some thioacetone would work just as well.

    32. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by rok3 · · Score: 1

      FFS... Situation A) Blame automatically applied to manufacturer : They send out another unit and sell the 'defective' unit as a refirb or B) They have the data from 'smart' sensor bitch and moan with shipper's lawyers over who is responsible for the damaged product after spending time review logs. The only people who win with situation B) are the Goddamn lawyers. This just seems like an instance of a coming up with a solution that costs more than the initial problem.

    33. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      But that's so low tech for slashdot. It's much better to use a lot of toxic chemicals to create non recyclable components that make use of technology that most people don't have access to. Besides, mom is going to sign for the package anyway, I can't really make it up the basement stairs anymore.

    34. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by sjames · · Score: 1

      Don't be so sure. I once got back a 1U server that I shipped. The back was smashed into a nice V shape in a way that only a forklift could have accomplished. The verdict (drum roll please)....inadequate packing!

      In another case, the recipient watched as the delivery guy (different shipping company) dropped the package causing it to roll down 4 flights of stairs. Again, the claim was inadequate packaging. They denied the package drop.

    35. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to Captan. My father used to install pipelines in Alberta and they used it to test for leaks. The farmers could smell that stuff from a mile away (literally). If you splashed it on your clothes, you BURN them!

    36. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I know they offer throw it at the ground shipping. We shipped about a dozen computers and at least half literally had the metal case warped. One had a fork lift tine driven through the box. One of our branch employees saw the UPS delivery driver throwing packages out of the truck onto the concrete. In all cases (include the fork-lift smashed one) UPS denied insurance claims because we didn't pack it well enough.

      Yeah, the only real suggestion I've seen for packaging is that it must survive repeated 8 foot falls. Certainly I've not seen "must survive forklift stabbings" on the packaging guide. Though given how many times I've heard it (and probably seen it on various unboxings), makes you wonder if it's done on purpose or UPS is also a forklift driver training ground, except instead of practice pallets, they use real packages in real shipments.

    37. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      have you ever taken a sticker off a cardboard box without taking some of the cardboard/paper with it?

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    38. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      it would even allow the shipping company to find out if some particular employee is dinging their packages

      Why do you think the shipping company cares? The security cameras on our loading dock recorded a UPS driver tossing boxes out of the back of his truck, and dropping about eight feet onto concrete. The contents were severely damaged. When we showed the video to a UPS manager, the driver was just shifted to a different route. Apparently they can't just fire unionized employees, especially Teamsters.

    39. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use a shipping company that doesn't play football with your precious packages? I assume you must have them in the US as well? Their usual customers are people who have to ship valuable paintings, art items, really valuable electronic measurement devices etc. If you are actually sending something that is valuable do not use the usuall mass courier services. They'll just smash it for you and laugh at your face. Yes, getting your packages handled properly costs more. Yes, it's worth it in many cases. You can also get your packages shipped in some specific humidity if you want.

    40. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Waccoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work for a medical distributor. Our standards for shipping quality are supposed to be much higher than companies like UPS. However, the quality of our operation suffers tremendously from the massive volume we are expected to ship every day.

      All of our packages travel on a conveyor belt system without being placed in a tote. Smaller, expensive items are repacked into larger boxes, but these then also go directly on to the belt. Needless to say, belt jams and other mishaps result in considerable damage to product, ranging from scrapes, shavings, and rips (which go to the customer) to holes being punched into the sides (which may be inspected and repacked into other boxes before being shipped, but are usually just taped). So long as the customers accept delivery, that's the quality we continue to deliver. Despite damages and returns processing, we make a decent profit, so the only thing that matters is that line A is larger than line B.

      I was surprised to see what the inside of the NewEgg warehouse looks like. All product goes down the conveyor belt in plastic totes, preventing damage. It puts our filthy operation to shame, and I'd bet those $300 video cards aren't much more expensive than the medical devices we deliver. If damages occur regularly, the blame should go to penny-pinching management for providing such a destructive work environment, not the employees.

      BTW, I also worked for the USPS in one of their central hubs during the holiday season. Their operation didn't involve a conveyor belt, but it did involve literally throwing boxes into large cardboard tubs sitting on pallets, which were then driven into delivery trucks. The speed we were expected to maintain was the problem, not minimum wage druggies or thugs.

      I can't comment on UPS. I've never worked for them, and from what I hear, I don't want to because their operation is even more hectic than ours.

    41. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by cffrost · · Score: 1

      In my area, I've often seen Chinese LR44 alkaline button cells priced around US$3+tax for a package of six, three of which are stored in a combination laser/flashlight/key-chain/battery-tote.

      While on the topic of LR44s, here's a pertinent article regarding batteries for users of cheap digital calipers (e.g., General, Pittsburgh):

      Buying Button Cells for Digital Calipers

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    42. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

      I'd expect that shockwatch makes still a nice profit with 3$ per patch, while the profit margin for the bluetooth device is probably quite small. Therefore I guess shockwatch could easily reduce their price if the competition with the other devices becomes theatening.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    43. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      ShockWatch make a specific product, DropSpot, that have serial numbers printed on them. They explicitly designed for attached to transported items.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    44. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you did that then the carriers would just start carrying atropine and pralidoxime with them.

    45. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I know a guy who used to work for UPS in Santa Cruz and has the scars to prove it. Packages go/went down a metal chute with big exposed bolts sticking out of the top wall of the chute for no reason whatsoever. Sometimes packages would get caught on a bolt and he would have to run up the chute and dig them out and sometimes got his back gouged open by one of them instead. Now he's a programmer at Microsoft.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You overpaid like a mad bastard. Try buying them direct-from-china next time. They're all made in China. Even dealextreme can beat the crap out of that price and has been able to for years.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by cffrost · · Score: 1

      I know a guy who used to work for UPS in Santa Cruz and has the scars to prove it. [...] Now he's a programmer at Microsoft.

      Has he got the mental scars to prove it? ;o)

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    48. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Postal workers already have a bad enough rap with "going postal". With cutbacks and losing Saturday deliveries, do we REALLY want to give then another weapon?

    49. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different AC than the other, but I suggest selenophenol for all your somewhat-malicious odor generation needs.

    50. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Kazin · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a former FedEx handler, I can confirm your suspicions - many of the handlers would intentionally smack the shock stickers.

      People need to just pack better. Your package WILL be thrown if small, and likely hit the wall of a shipping can. Your package WILL be dropped if large, probably pushed off the side of a conveyor belt. Working there completely changed how I pack stuff, for the better.

    51. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might not be able to fire them, but the job is sufficiently miserable that UPS has a year-over-year staff turnover rate higher than 100%. And yeah, they're Teamsters, so that's all coming from people quitting when they can find a job that doesn't suck as bad, such as flipping burgers. So if they find someone dumb enough to want to stay, they wouldn't fire them even if they could. (Former UPSer here)

    52. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      LR44, 2032, 2025... ...all available at my dollar store in multi-packs.

      100 LR44 batteries are $10 on Amazon. That's retail. I have to assume that they're 2-3 CENTS to make, tops.
      100 2032 battieres are $17 on Amazon. I assume much the same about them.

    53. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! People need to stop trying to get couriers fired and take some responsibility for their packages and such. Just because they are miserable doesn't mean they have to pass that poison around.

      Also these meter maids really get on my nerves. Ok so they have NOTHING better to do than ruin people's day with parking tickets? Leave us the F! alone, I say dammit.

    54. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Or, maybe the shipping companies need to be held liable for damage that happens during shipping. Nobody expects that a package will make it all the way without possibility of being dropped, but being thrown around and such isn't something which the shippers ought to expect.

    55. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The only problem there is that unless you're individually tagging packages by handler, it's of limited use int he warehouse. Still, it's not completely worthless, it would help the shipping company know which shifts to pay closer attention to and that they can ignore shifts that aren't damaging boxes. Or at least stop worrying about damage to the boxes.

    56. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Because the delivery people don't typically have time to wait around for you to unbox the item you've bought and verify that it wasn't broken in transit. Often times they don't even wait around to see if anybody responds to the knock at the door.

    57. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as the customers accept delivery, that's the quality we continue to deliver.

      That's the bottom line. People need to understand the limitations of the market system. When the cost of improving exceeds the return, improvement stops. That's how it's supposed to work. By accepting poorly-packaged and damaged packages consumers signal that further improvements are not needed.

    58. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      Totally agreed about packing properly! However, I've had certain high value items delivered that had a second shockwatch somewhere inside the package, so we could tell if the package was truly damaged - falls and knocks do happen. OTOH, if I were a supervisor and saw a handler deliberately setting the sticker off, thereby potentially exposing the company to a damage claim, that person would be looking for other employment.

    59. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Kazin · · Score: 1

      Oh I totally agree, we shouldn't have to worry that our packages will be abused, but in reality, we do, because they *are* abused.

    60. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Under $2 when buying a roll of 200. Probably far less in larger quantities.
      http://www.google.com/search?q=shock+watch+sticker&tbm=shop

    61. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but being quick doesn't mean you have to be reckless. If you can't handle the pace with care, then you should quit. There is absolutely NEVER a time when you should be throwing other peoples' packages around.

    62. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a federal offense to tamper with or open packages not specifically addressed to you. Even if you receive a package with your address on it, if it doesn't have your name, you are committing a crime by opening it.

    63. Re:Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the mercaptan unit. You could always revive the synthesis of dimethylaminomercaptan if you feel something stronger than ethylmercaptan is desirable. Or just buy methyl or butyl-mercaptan from a refinery looking to get rid of unwanted byproducts. Your ethylmercaptan is not the strongest in it's class at a detection threshold of 2.8ppb and has the disadvantage of confusion with gas leaks. Said thioacetone above is firmly in this class with the added benefit of violent nausea.

    64. Re: Existing non-electronic variant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow this suddenly brings to mind the thousands of dollars of damaged goods I've received through different postal services over the las few years. Lately I've taken to avoiding them all together if I can by shopping locally if possible. I think that transport firms should be held liable for all damages they inflict on other peoples property.

  2. Sooo by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many of the things I have ordered lately have been so grossly over packaged that you could nearly smash the entire package before actually hurting the contents (I'm looking at you Amazon). I can see how this would be really useful for ordering overly fragile things, but if it costs more than shipping insurance is it really going to be worth it?

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
    1. Re:Sooo by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, because people want what they ordered within a few days of ordering it. They do not want to make insurance claims even if they eventually get made whole.

      So getting it to the customer right the first time has value.

    2. Re:Sooo by p0p0 · · Score: 1

      I ordered a MicroSD card and a mini Wireless N adapter from TigerDirect and the box was huge and full of several feet of brown paper packaging it's ridiculous. Like, 10 feet of paper. Same thing when I ordered speakers from Amazon. The warehouse is only a couple of towns away and the box was 3-4 times bigger than the item and full of paper.

      On the opposite side of it I received an HDD from eBay which only had one layer of bubble wrap and an envelope. Worked fine, but the contrast was amusing.

    3. Re:Sooo by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

      YOU paid for shipping. Returns cost them money. Think about that for about 6 seconds and the world will make more sense to you.

    4. Re:Sooo by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      It costs money to stock different sizes of boxes and to pick the right one the first time. Or pick the wrong one the first time, I mean. Repacking takes time. Their automated warehouse may also not be set up for tiny boxes ...

      While the ebay shipper is usually doing things on a small scale by hand to start with.

    5. Re:Sooo by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Not to mention figuring out shipping costs in the first place. The shipper charges you based on the size of the box and the weight of the box. If you don't know the size of the box, you can't give an accurate shipping amount. So you oversize all your boxes to make sure you don't lose money on the shipping.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:Sooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm told Amazon's overpackaging of small things is basically a way to prevent warehouse employees from covertly slipping your new SD card order into their pocket, as an 8x8x2 box doesn't fit well in those pockets.

    7. Re:Sooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon and Walmart's packing abilities has a lot to be desired. Amazon often uses paper for padding and only to fill empty space and not to pack a item so that is cushioned on all sides. Walmart, just ships items to people how they are in the store, no extra box or padding and hopes that the maker of the item packed it well enough ( most items were not packaged in a way that was designed for shipping UPS, FedEx, or USPS ). FedEx and UPS claim that an item needs to have at least 2 inches of padding all around, paper is not valid padding, and that if you drop a item from 5 feet in the area it should land without damage.

    8. Re:Sooo by The1stImmortal · · Score: 1

      Our distributor for most stuff at work (one of the big guys in AU) has the irritating tendency to send an oversized box... with no packing material.

      For example, I have literally opened boxes with a single sheet of paper in them - that are on the order of a cubic metre.

      Not so big a deal for paper of course (just bewildering) but when you get components shipped the same way (often with one, completely insufficient, plastic airbag pack in the box too, rattling around with the part) it makes you wonder what they guys in the warehouse are thinking, and whether their management is happy with what that must be costing in unnecessary shipping and return costs (we pay the same in shipping for a given item regardless of the size of the box it was packed in, but if the boxes are oversized, then less fit on a truck and that has to affect the pricing or contract with their logistics company)

    9. Re:Sooo by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      For many shipping companies in the US they charge you by weight, not size, so they use very light, bulky shipping material and lots of it.

    10. Re:Sooo by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      When I order at amazon.co.uk the order is packed in cardboard. A simple box filled to the brim with what I ordered (usually books and blu-rays) if they could. If they couldn't it's filled with some brown paper (probably recycled).
      Paper and cardboard have very good recycle processes (although the fibers tend to shorten during recycling).
      I wouldn't call it over packaging, I call it perfect packaging.
      But then again, I haven't had a package that was dented. Not a scratch on the outside box, and I get a lot of boxes. Amazon knows they are sending to the Netherlands, so maybe they know the packages get treated properly here.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    11. Re:Sooo by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      I guess you'd have to do situational CBA to find out if you'd want to pay for something like this on a case by case basis.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
  3. These already exist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These things already exist. Tip'n'tells, shockwatch, and drop'n'tell. Damage indicators

    The only thing new about this is it's electronic

    1. Re:These already exist by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      These things already exist. Tip'n'tells, shockwatch, and drop'n'tell. Damage indicators

      Yep they not only already exist, but have for a long time.

      I've seen a lot of those used on crates that were used to transport
      expensive electronics and specialized computers to the job site.

    2. Re:These already exist by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the people gently handling your packages can see them too. If a shockwatch or tip-n-tell trips, they just rip them off and claim it didn't have one. A bluetooth transmitter isn't visible.

    3. Re:These already exist by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the people gently handling your packages can see them too. If a shockwatch or tip-n-tell trips, they just rip them off and claim it didn't have one. A bluetooth transmitter isn't visible.

      If the shipper doesn't tell you that there's one on the package, then they aren't doing their job. If something is ripped off the package (obvious when you get it) then don't accept it, as clearly it was abused in shipment.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:These already exist by bws111 · · Score: 1

      I guess that is why when we ship something that is sensitive enough to require a shockwatch there is a giant 'check shockwatch before accepting' printed on the box. Seems a hell of a lot easier than some bluetooth device. Plus, has the added benefit that every point in the delivery chain can make sure they are getting an undamaged package, and the presence of the shockwatch and warning will probably cause handlers to be more careful.

      If you are just trying to see if handlers have abused your package (not sure what value that would be) a device hidden inside the package makes sense. If you are more concerned about your package being delivered undamaged, a device and warning on the outside makes more sense.

  4. Over-complicating things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could just use a far less expensive, simpler ShockWatch sticker.

  5. For business's? by t3hfr3ak · · Score: 1

    If customer's are willing to pay a bit more for this feature, would it not be viable for online retailers? Especially those of the technology scale...

    1. Re:For business's? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      If people's are willing to pay extra for apostrophe's, you will make fortune's.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    2. Re:For business's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to bad no one will pay for being a douche, professor...

    3. Re:For business's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's OK, we'll never run out of douches. They do it for nothing.

  6. g-forces? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please stop using the term g-force. It's a force coming from hitting something else. This force causes uneven acceleration which can be measured in multiples of gravity.

    1. Re:g-forces? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "acceleration which can be measured in multiples of gravity."
      and gravity is a force, not a unit of force. The "acceleration due to gravity" is a local variable. It is different in different locations - just ask the crew of the ISS

    2. Re:g-forces? by vux984 · · Score: 2

      It is different in different locations - just ask the crew of the ISS

      That's why we have standard gravity

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_gravity

      and even a (non-SI) unit for it, the g

    3. Re:g-forces? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're at it, be sure and tell the airframe manufacturers they are designing for accelerative forces, not g-forces. And tell the air force and the navy those suits they outfit fighter pilots with are acceleration-suits, not g-suits. Or you could just can the language OCD; you'll probably feel better for it.

    4. Re:g-forces? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Please stop using the term g-force.

      Please stop using idiotic requests as a segway into self serving displays of technical prowess.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:g-forces? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      you meant segue.

      although the segway was, itself, a self-serving display of technical prowess.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  7. And for people who... by Nutria · · Score: 1

    don't have Bluetooth-enabled smart phones?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:And for people who... by Slugster · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you don't have a Bluetooth phone, you can order one online. Just don't accept the package unless you make sure they didn't ........ well f*ck.

  8. Can be done mechanically, cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good idea, but there are simpler, and probably cheaper, external mechanical plastic tags that record shock (at least in one plane, so you'd
    need two of them...) above a threshold, and are visible at the time you receive the package. Don't know how much they cost, but it
    can't be much more than a buck or two...

    1. Re:Can be done mechanically, cheaper... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Shockwatch labels are between $1 and $5 depending on type and where you buy them.

  9. ShockWatch by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, kind of like the ShockWatch labels we used all the time on shipments then?

    1. Re:ShockWatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those ShockWatch things must be good, you're the fourth person to suggest one!

    2. Re:ShockWatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mythbuster

  10. No Way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want my fine china opened by a bomb squad.

  11. Does this mean that Schrödinger... by patmandu · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...can finally know if he should sign for that mail-order cat?

    1. Re:Does this mean that Schrödinger... by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      Does that mean that Schrödinger can finally know if he should sign for that mail-order cat?

      No, it's going to be bloody furious either way.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:Does this mean that Schrödinger... by muphin · · Score: 1

      but how will you know if the cat is dead or alive, without looking in the box.... Schrodinger had the same issue

      --
      It's not a typo if you understood the meaning!
    3. Re:Does this mean that Schrödinger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... Imagine this:

      The ordered cat, after being deprived of food and water during transportation, travelling in complete darkness, contrained to the minimal volume for it to fit inside, with its fur impregnated with its own fetid mixed paste of urine and feces...

      And that while being subjected to mechanical/thermal/other abuse...

      If the cat did not die all its 9 lives and some few more it got on credit... You sure don't want to open that box.

  12. Who will recycle the sensors? by rminsk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who will recycle the sensors? All we need is more electronics and batteries ending up in the landfill.

    1. Re:Who will recycle the sensors? by alostpacket · · Score: 1

      This is an excellent point. If I had mod points, they would be yours.

      I keep trying to imagine a situation in which these things could be bulk-recycled but don't know enough about the materials/science.

      --
      PocketPermissions Android Permission Guide
    2. Re:Who will recycle the sensors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who will recycle the sensors? All we need is more electronics and batteries ending up in the landfill.

      Waste Management.

    3. Re:Who will recycle the sensors? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      After you have received a number of packages, you can send them back to the retailer. You'll need to include in the parcel some kind of sensor to make sure your sensors don't get dropped in transit.

    4. Re:Who will recycle the sensors? by equex · · Score: 1

      i wonder if this is a scenario for small vibration powered devices, it should be possible to charge a small capacitor to power an RFID chip, storing the G-forces at work when the device is powered on by said vibration.

      --
      Can I light a sig ?
  13. Doesn't matter, at best they refund the sender by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Doesn't matter, at best they refund the sender and you have to hope the broken bits are insured - you're not getting anything from the shipper no matter how it happened.
    Been there, done that, had an obvious fork tyne hole through a box containing a server with a bent chassis. In the face of that evidence FedEx refunded the shipping to the guys that sent the server but I was left with a bent server. It still ran for a couple of years but it's resale value was zero.

    1. Re:Doesn't matter, at best they refund the sender by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In the face of that evidence FedEx refunded the shipping to the guys that sent the server but I was left with a bent server. It still ran for a couple of years but it's resale value was zero

      You did it wrong. See, you tell the sender "You sent me a bent server" and they tell you "well we sent it correctly but the shipper broke it" and you say "I don't care, I will sue you if you don't send me a non-bent server, if the shipper destroyed the object that's your problem" and then you're done.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Doesn't matter, at best they refund the sender by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Then the sender says - "fuck you, we don't even have a branch in your country any more, we are not the ones that broke it, and international legal action is going to take years and cost more than a couple of dozen servers".
      This "just sue" shit is naive and implies you never think of budgets or consequences. I'm sure you can do better than that if you actually think before posting.
      It was cheaper to just stop dealing with them and find a vendor that would keep their promises - besides, why buy a server from the USA when it's assembled elsewhere, you can cut out the middleman and have repair turnaround times that are under a month?

    3. Re:Doesn't matter, at best they refund the sender by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Then the sender says - "fuck you, we don't even have a branch in your country any more, we are not the ones that broke it, and international legal action is going to take years and cost more than a couple of dozen servers".

      Oh, so you're outsourcing to another country, and now you want sympathy. None is available.

      This "just sue" shit is naive and implies you never think of budgets or consequences. I'm sure you can do better than that if you actually think before posting. It was cheaper to just stop dealing with them and find a vendor that would keep their promises

      It would have been cheaper not to buy from some disreputable dirtbags in the first place.

      why buy a server from the USA when it's assembled elsewhere, you can cut out the middleman and have repair turnaround times that are under a month?

      There's a whole lot of reasons. I'm sure you can do better than that if you actually think before posting.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Doesn't matter, at best they refund the sender by dbIII · · Score: 1

      They became disreputable dirtbags after a takeover, then started selling outsourced Asian designed and built hardware via the USA - and I'm not in the USA so don't see the point of paying extra shipping just to get a badge stuck on the front.
      Thus your criticism is misplaced so please jump on something you can really criticise instead of just shooting a messenger.
      Making shit up to try to simplify reality to squeeze in your naive view is really strange when corresponding with the person that saw the reality, so I hope you were drunk or something when you posted.

  14. then install shockwatch on the inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inside of the package. Same idea with the bluetooth, no? Catch the negligent bastard behind his back?

    1. Re:then install shockwatch on the inside by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1
      Defeats the idea of checking before signing, doesn't it?

      But the shockwatch stickers have a unique ID each to avoid tempering, so unless the transport agency finds some supplyer for fake patches and buys them with the exact same idea, his tempering will be detected.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
    2. Re:then install shockwatch on the inside by lxs · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure that if a package has been tempered, you'd notice without a fancy sensor.

    3. Re:then install shockwatch on the inside by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

      Ok, tamper. Since English is not my first language, please forgive me :-) BTW: I wrote about "tempering" with the patch, not the package.

      --
      Trolling is a art!
  15. assume the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    UPS says that they might drop your package from a height of three feet onto a concrete floor, on a corner.

    You are supposed to secure the contents so that they can withstand this without damage.

    I bet a lot of people are going to find that the package was in fact not mishandled, but inadequately packaged.

    Don't get me started about newegg and how they package their drives

    1. Re:assume the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is they package it for a 3 foot fall and this thing tattles if the box undergoes a 6 or 12 foot fall or a collision of the truck.

  16. Video of Device by sexconker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Highly informative video.
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q6_9A90cUk

    1. Re:Video of Device by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      lol, even the ad was perfect, it's the mcdonald's one where a package goes down an conveyor belt and ends up falling off the end :)

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  17. Assume it will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I worked loading and unloading parcels on a plane years back. If it isn't dropped it will be thrown (or passed), squished, kicked and cushion heavier items guaranteed. Marking fragile means nothing as every package is marked that way. If those involved in the transportation of your package, treated every package as fragile our parcel delivery system would slow to a crawl. These guys deal with literally tens of thousands of packages daily. Most companies have figured this out and package products to absorb a few bumps and bruises. If people actually used this product they would never accept a package again.

  18. Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much does the sensor cost and would it be less expensive to just use better packing materials to absorb the impacts?

  19. What's old is new again? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure why they are talking as if this is a new thing.

    I remember receiving a large box at work ten years ago; it was something very expensive, I believe from IBM. There was an electronic shock sensor in the package, with a clock and everything that would log the time of any excessive shock or tipping.

    This was between 2001 and 2003. In fact I STILL HAVE the thing, it's in a desk drawer somewhere at work.

    So yeah, nothing new to see here, move along.

    1. Re:What's old is new again? by BillX · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I was under the impression many such systems existed for shipment monitoring. Most include temperature in addition to shock logging, e.g. for transporting fruits and other perishables ("cold-chain certification"). Heck, I was on a team that designed such a device for the Tomahawk missile canisters back in the day, 10 years' logging of shocks, temperature, humidity, pressure (the canisters were filled with an inert gas) and fluid intrusion. The only thing missing was an RF reader (RF doesn't travel well thru a missile canister, and there are concerns with RF devices operating near ordnance anyhow) - it was read out by a handheld IR receiver. I'm curious what makes this different from the existing devices, except for the specific choice of BLE as the readout mechanism (it's a fairly new protocol).

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    2. Re:What's old is new again? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well.. the new angle is the bluetooth angle.. so you don't sign off on the package if it's been mishandled.

      not sure how it'll help with you not getting sticked at least for the price of shipping though.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  20. its called efficiency by decora · · Score: 4, Interesting

    if you ever have a job where you have to sling around heavy rectangular objects all day, you will eventually realize that 'over packaging' is really the solution to most of the problems in the cycle.

    it helps machines that auto-sort work faster and better

    it helps people who handle stuff work faster

    it helps the seller

    it helps the buyer

    if the industry had to 'coddle' every package it would slow down the entire line - from the machinery based roller setups to the people packing stuff in trucks to the people leaving stuff at your door.

    it would almost make more sense for a shipping company to auto-matically 'repack' flimsily packaged items with the identical address and only ship them after doing so, just to avoid the hassle of people who dont understand how the system works.

    1. Re:its called efficiency by Leuf · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't really tell if something has been adequately packed unless you either open it or it already shows damage (lack of packing material allows the box to crush). UPS and Fedex would be more than happy to slap you with a reboxing fee* if they could.

      *plus fuel surcharge on the fee, because everything gets a fuel surcharge. This notice about the fuel surcharge gets a fuel surcharge.

    2. Re:its called efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the industry had to 'coddle' every package without spending any more money it would slow down the entire line - from the machinery based roller setups to the people packing stuff in trucks to the people leaving stuff at your door.

      FTFY

  21. Smart toillet knows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When your delivery has been dropped

  22. That was me by maxbash · · Score: 2

    Sorry about that, it was the best packaging I could find at the moment and I was a little peeved that the drive auctioned for so little.

  23. And what is your threshold for damage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These things (shock/impact recorders) already exist and aren't all that expensive in comparison to truly high value products. A few things to bear in mind..
    1) What shock level should you trip at? 10g? 100g? "delicate optical equipment" often has a 10g rating which is quite gentle. Most electronics can see 50-100g without too much trouble. (Compare: drop something 1 meter, and if it takes 1cm to stop, that's 100g. More likely, it takes 1mm to stop (due to case deformation) and that's 1000g). A "shockwatch" set to 50g on the outside of the box is almost useless.
    I'll bet most people have NO idea just how sensitive the thing they are shipping is. The real purpose of a shockwatch (or a logger) is to know "did it break".

    2) You should be packaging things to tolerate "normal shipping" which is pretty rough. You use the shock sensor (on the inside, attached to the thing being protected) to tell you whether your packing material failed, or there was some unusual event, in which case inspection and/or test is called for. Most shipping companies go by a "visible damage to the packaging" sort of standard. They do NOT care what your packaging is, or whether you have enough.. that's your problem.

    3) Do you attach the sensor to the outside (which sees high loads, aforementioned 1000g) or to the thing your protecting? As noted above, attaching to the outside is useless in a practical sense. On the inside it actually tells you something.

    4) packaging design is hard. It's not just a matter of "put 6" of foam around it". How dense is the foam, how much does your thing weigh, etc. You want the foam to compress under the load of the box accelerating/decelerating, but not bottom out. Ideally, it just fully compresses as you hit the peak load:

    5) Peak shock often isn't the important thing. Often it's the integrated load over time that's important. In the shock world, you talk about a Mass Acceleration Curve...

    6) A logger is a great thing for *testing* your packaging. You make up a structural mass model that is like whatever you are shipping, attach your accelerometers to it, package it up, then ship it. Then, look at the log when you get it to see what kinds of loads it actually saw.

    BTW, an iPhone makes a lousy shock logger.. power consumption is high, and max g is ridiculously low (a few g).

  24. Ass seen on QDB: by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    "I ship my pillows via UPS so they arrive all pre-pounded and fluffy"

    --
    C|N>K
  25. What do they do though? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    My UPS guy is super nice so if a package looks like it went through a war, he says "That looks damaged. You might want to open it and check it out before signing for it." So if it's demolished, and I don't sign for it, then what? My senders don't insure stuff. I don't think UPS even offers insurance. What do they actually do? Just drive off with my package?

    1. Re:What do they do though? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I don't think UPS even offers insurance.

      See that line on the shipping form that asks for the item's value? That's the insurance. I think it's something like $.35/$100 declared value. If your items shipped are under $100, they are automatically covered for up to that.

  26. The simplest device by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

    The simplest device is a sticker that shows "TRUE". I never saw any transporting firm that had any respect for the parcels.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  27. "Puts It In Your Hands"? by ios+and+web+coder · · Score: 2

    What is this "puts it in your hands" of which you speak?

    I haven't had a courier service have me sign for anything in a couple of years, even if the package is clearly labeled as such. I have lost sleep, trying to make sure that someone would be home to sign for valuable packets, only to have the courier plonk it down on our stoop, and, quite literally, RUN AWAY without even ringing the doorbell. I have video surveillance of both doors of my house, and I sometimes amuse myself by comparing the running styles of UPS and FedEx deliverygoblins.

    --

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

    -H. L. Mencken

  28. Whose problem are you solving here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have pointed out, for the receivers perspective, shock watch stickers are a perfectly good alternative - I don't care when it was dropped, or who dropped it. I just care if it was dropped. I don't need telemetry across time to decide whether to sign for the package.

    If you're looking at this as the shipper's way of determining "who broke it?" In the case of a return, then a short-wave Bluetooth device being read by the receiver doesn't really get me anything - I'm the one who needs the data. Which means I need the package, including the device, sent back to me. And if I have the device back, do I need Bluetooth? A USB port is probably cheaper, and unless I'm amazon.com, I'm really hoping my "returned-damaged" rate is awfully low...

    That said, there's a question whose problem ANY solution to this solves. Why would a shipper do this? I suppose it's a nice courtesy to a customer to be able to "prove" something like an HDD wasn't dropped. But if the sticker is tripped, I get a return before the package is even signed for. Without it, it gets signed for, plugged in, and returned only if its DOA, and it might fire up even if dropped. Where's my incentive to increase my return rate as a manufacturer? I can see the receiver wanting this, but it seems like they're not seeing it as enough of a strategic differentiator to insist on it today. And it's not like "shockwatch didnt trip" is a guarantee against DOA - while its a convenient excuse, in my experience broken items are broken before shipping more often than they get broke in transit. So it seems like an expensive nice-to-have that customers don't deman and shippers don't really want.

  29. Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just won't work in most areas. UPS in my area just drops the package on the porch, knocks on the door, and then runs for their vehicle (even if the package is clearly marked "Adult signature required"). They'll be a block down the street before you can even open the door.

  30. BLE? HAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that $2 sensor comes with an iPad or iPhone.

    http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=33371

  31. Sounds like Chuck's Systems Design project by talexb · · Score: 1

    Sounds pretty cool .. and my classmate Chuck developed something like this for a workshop project of his .. in 1982.

  32. Don't make me sign for it... by maharvey · · Score: 1

    This idea is fine and good, but if they make you sign for it, then the customer ends up taking responsibility and eating the loss. Not at first but it could easily move in that direction. Why else go to the expense of putting it in there? They just want a way to shift the blame. Either force the customer to take responsibility by signing, or force the delivery company to take responsibility due to jostling. Either way the seller no longer has to eat the cost of damaged merchandise.

    Do you sign if it took several medium bumps? Do you EVER sign? What if it was defective, or only took a mild jostle to break?
    If you don't sign and send it back, but it turns out it wasn't broken, do you still have to pay the shipping?

    This will lead to having to insure every shipment, or take your chances.

  33. Requisite Ace Ventura clip... by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Ace Ventura package delivery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q6_9A90cUk