Slashdot Mirror


Digital Pen Vibrates To Indicate Bad Spelling, Grammar and Penmanship

Zothecula writes "Use digital technology long enough and you start to become dependent upon it for such mundane tasks as spell checking. That means when you pick up a garden variety ballpoint pen you're back in dictionary and 'I before E except after C' territory. The creators of the Lernstiftdigital pen hope to bring handwriting into the 21st century by having the pen vibrate to indicate when the writer makes spelling and grammatical errors or exhibits poor penmanship."

144 comments

  1. Wrong feedback by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait, are they trying to discourage bad spelling and grammar, or encourage it?

    1. Re:Wrong feedback by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

      thy shoud makw a kwybd ta do tht

    2. Re:Wrong feedback by mjjochen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Depends on where/how you hold the pen. I tend to hold it with my critch, cratch, er cruth, crotch! Anyone gotta cigarette?

    3. Re:Wrong feedback by danomac · · Score: 2

      I was wondering if it would go back and autocorrect your work. It is strange to get a 'you are spelling this wrong' indicator but not have the proper spelling available. They need to put in a holographic projector in the pen and problem solved.

    4. Re:Wrong feedback by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wait, are they trying to discourage bad spelling and grammar, or encourage it?

      Neither, they're trying to sell you a pen.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:Wrong feedback by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Wait, are they trying to discourage bad spelling and grammar, or encourage it?

      No Kidding. An electric shock would make so much more sense. You could increase the voltage every time the user repeated a mistake. They'd either learn to spell, give up on writing, or to be really twitchy when they write.

    6. Re:Wrong feedback by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Informative

      As usual, the summary is click-baiting us a little bit.

      The pen is only supposed to vibrate if a little kid/toddler presses too hard with it. In that context, that kind of instant feedback could make sense. One could put a blinking light on it when it's pressed too hard, but that little light would hardly stop a little kid from continuing to press too hard.

    7. Re:Wrong feedback by shentino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's about the same as the difference between parity and ECC.

    8. Re:Wrong feedback by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      A pen that vibrates when it thinks you have bad penmanship. Sure, that makes sense!

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    9. Re:Wrong feedback by davester666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wouldn't making the pen vibrate make your penmanship even worse?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    10. Re:Wrong feedback by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      This is like a 'back massager'.

      It will go up the butts of the creators of the Lernstiftdigital pen and other grammarians.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:Wrong feedback by anagama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering the lifelong state of my penmanship, I'd have CTS from the constant vibration of the pen. I don't even attempt cursive and my printing looks like a third grader's. Somehow, I just never got good at that.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    12. Re:Wrong feedback by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      My Kindle has a very nice predictive typing thing.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    13. Re:Wrong feedback by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Yep. An electric char that shocked people every time they misused a possessive would do a lot more good than this.

      (It's useless anyway because it only vibrates when it's too late and there's already an indelible mark on the paper).

      --
      No sig today...
    14. Re:Wrong feedback by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      "Chair", dammit.

      (I meant to do that just to show how spelling checkers aren't magically going to make you write perfectly. No, really...)

      --
      No sig today...
    15. Re:Wrong feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your hand and wrist rigid and write with your arm.
      You're welcome.

    16. Re:Wrong feedback by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Prof Milgram, if you can hear us, knock once for yes and twice for no.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    17. Re:Wrong feedback by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I used to have good penmanship, but now? About the only time I use a pen is to write a check or sign a document. This tech is about twenty years too late.

    18. Re:Wrong feedback by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      You could have something like undiagnosed motor Disgraphia.

    19. Re:Wrong feedback by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      So, you expect that there's room for something else up there? How many grammarians do you know?

      (I kid. Poor grammar frustrates me, too.)

    20. Re:Wrong feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should certainly shock you or squirt ink at you instead.

    21. Re:Wrong feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chair", dammit.

      (I meant to do that just to show how spelling checkers aren't magically going to make you write perfectly. No, really...)

      If you meant to do it, then you are saying that "char" is the spelling you intended, and therefore must be correct. Hence, you are implying that spell checker isn't going to magically make you write imperfectly, not?

    22. Re:Wrong feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also seems bad for left-handed users. Lefties jam their writing instruments into the paper rather than dragging the pen with the direction of text. This will just vibrate constantly.

    23. Re:Wrong feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People tell me I should have been a doctor because my handwriting is so bad ...

    24. Re:Wrong feedback by MagdJTK · · Score: 1

      It's true. Most people who have been strapped to the electric chair never made another spelling mistake in their lives.

  2. I'm not sure that would help... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It seems your penmanship is slipping. I am sure that vibrating will only improve it.

  3. Poor penmanship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, a vibrating pen will surely help me with my poor penmanship.

  4. Bad Penmanship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So when your handwriting is bad... it makes it worse?

    That is almost as stupid as suspending a student for skipping school.

  5. Where was this all these years?! by eksith · · Score: 1

    For someone with atrocious spelling and grammar like me, this would have been a godsend. Some part of me thinks this may be a genuine psychological problem since I've always had trouble with both, including handwriting. I know it in my head, but by the time it comes out on paper, it's almost complete gibberish. This would have helped so much!

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    1. Re:Where was this all these years?! by chronokitsune3233 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my artistry. I can picture what I want to draw in my head, but it just doesn't turn out that way. In fact, the first line/curve I draw gets messed up, and it just gets worse with each passing second.

      --
      I have been a captive in America my entire life. Everybody and everything uses customary units instead of metric.
    2. Re:Where was this all these years?! by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      Your handwriting is bad but not utterly incomprehensible. Not a point of pride, I might add - you may as well be illiterate if you can't write. You should learn to write a clear hand of some sort when dealing with others. I have been known to resort to block print occasionally in order to ensure that anything I write is comprehensible to all.

    3. Re:Where was this all these years?! by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgraphia#Motor

      It's what I have and your handwriting looks very similar to mine, unless I write very, very slowly. There is no treatment, but sometimes it's useful to know the cause to work around it.

    4. Re:Where was this all these years?! by eksith · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear about this. That makes me very nervous.

      My handwriting, spelling and grammar weren't always this terrible and just recently I started to learn the guitar. It never occured to me this may be an issue with my motor skills. I'm a fairly OK typist, but then I don't type too much in plain English and typing code isn't normally that fast to begin with. I suppose I'd have to get myself checked just in case, but the "smart pen" seemed like a quick fix for everything.

      --
      If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    5. Re:Where was this all these years?! by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about it that much. In today's day and age, it's not at all a big deal if your handwriting is shit. With me, personally, I've never noticed any deficiency in any other area than handwriting. It's certainly possible your case is different as each brain is unique, but at the same time, there is a lot that's not understood about how we work.

      Maybe you read a while back about Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert. Well. He lost his ability to draw on paper due to a strange brain condition. Funny thing was, he had no problem drawing with a tablet. For some reason, the brain didn't interpret the actions the same way and he had no problem drawing. What i'm trying to get at is I wouldn't let a possibility of something that *might* affect you cause you to give up on guitar playing or other activities you enjoy because you feel somehow predisposed to fail.

  6. Awful Idea by archshark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, lets say this somehow actually works... you spell something wrong, while writing with a PEN... now what?

    1. Re:Awful Idea by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Ok, lets say this somehow actually works... you spell something wrong, while writing with a PEN... now what?

      For that, we has got the optionel blowtorch accesary, to burn that peice of paper you was writting on.

    2. Re:Awful Idea by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Ok, lets say this somehow actually works... you spell something wrong, while writing with a PEN... now what?

      Damn, that was actually funnier than what I was thinking would happen if it did it to me. See, I'd throw the damn thing across the room and get a Pilot Precise back out and write for real. Boy would e. e. cummings HATE that thing! As someone that thinks negative feedback is the best teacher, this has got to be the lamest idea for teaching children (or adults) how to remember proper spelling and grammar. How is it any different than auto correct? Actually, I think it would be worse because it doesn't actually show you the correction. So, again it would be hurled at a wall in short order!

    3. Re:Awful Idea by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      my Nixon branded model simply erases the last 20 minutes or so, when it sees an error it does not like.

      (GOML)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Awful Idea by Cute+and+Cuddly · · Score: 0

      You could always try one of these... http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/bf21/?srp=13

    5. Re:Awful Idea by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      Then, it vibrates and you end up writing all over the page.

      Yeah, this sounds great doesn't it?

    6. Re:Awful Idea by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Then you use the laser to burn out the word of course

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    7. Re:Awful Idea by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Boy would e. e. cummings HATE that thing!

      That guy was a good poet, but unfortunately 1) poetry is not prose, although good prose is poetic; 2) In art, the rules are guidelines rather than laws, but when one breaks a convention one should have a good artistic reason; 3) a lot of young folks don't realize that and think "If cummings can do it, so can I; 4) He only wrote POETRY like that -- his prose used caps and all the other normal writing conventions. Here is some of his prose:

      A locomotive cut the car in half, killing my father instantly. When two brakemen jumped from the halted train, they saw a woman standing â" dazed but erect â" beside a mangled machine; with blood spouting (as the older said to me) out of her head. One of her hands (the younger added) kept feeling her dress, as if trying to discover why it was wet. These men took my sixty-six year old mother by the arms and tried to lead her toward a nearby farmhouse; but she threw them off, strode straight to my father's body, and directed a group of scared spectators to cover him. When this had been done (and only then) she let them lead her away.

      Just throwing paint on a canvas doesn't make you Jackson Pollack. Unless there's a valid reason, all lowercase is as ignorant as all caps.

    8. Re:Awful Idea by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 0

      >> you spell something wrong, while writing with a PEN... now what?

      The Russians solved the same problem by sending their astronauts to space with a $0.10 pencil.

  7. Does it work with google glasses? by Cute+and+Cuddly · · Score: 0

    So you kan si de korrect speling

  8. So now... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    ...you're dependent on the magic vibrating pen.

    Yeah, that's a big improvement.

  9. Great, a slashdot grammar troll... by Osgeld · · Score: 3, Funny

    in my pocket, can't wait for that

    1. Re:Great, a slashdot grammar troll... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      It's Slashdot you buffoone. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Great, a slashdot grammar troll... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Great, a slashdot grammar troll in my pocket, can't wait for that...

      You write with your cock?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Great, a slashdot grammar troll... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Only in the snow.

    4. Re:Great, a slashdot grammar troll... by Billlagr · · Score: 1

      Tyrion Lannister, is that you?

    5. Re:Great, a slashdot grammar troll... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      In the farmer's daughter's handwriting?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Great, a slashdot grammar troll... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      You've seen my work!

  10. Nup. by gargleblast · · Score: 1

    Nup. No way. Not with the name 'Lernstift'.

    1. Re:Nup. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Nup. No way. Not with the name 'Lernstift'.

      Well, IKEA had beaten them to dershakenpen, so they had to go with that.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  11. Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your handwriting is bad, your pen will vibrate, because trying to write with a pen that's vibrating is sure to help handwriting?

  12. Good Vibes by cosm · · Score: 1

    So that explains the subtle grammatical and spelling errors your mom kept yelling, such as: "your doin grate dont stop dont stop keap go-ing, o ya i luv it more then n e thing"

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  13. It's like third grade, all over again by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    If the pen will punish me for bad penmanship it will just bring back bad memories of being taught (much against my will) how to write in cursive back in 3rd grade. Hell, I enjoyed memorizing multiplication tables but dreaded cursive writing tests. I still remember my teacher giving me extra pages of just the dreaded lower-cased letter "r".

    If this pen takes a similar approach I would just take the batteries out and go back to typing messages.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:It's like third grade, all over again by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're lucky, they just had me write lines to punish me and get me out of their hair. I didn't learn anything, except that they would still accept my sheets if I wrote the letters down instead of across. You know, I didn't have to write I WILL NOT LOOK AT THE OTHER CHILDREN, I could write I I I I I I W W W W W W W I I I I I I etc

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:It's like third grade, all over again by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      In elementary school they'd often send me to the library to get rid of me. We had "library passes" that teachers could issue to students, and they were issued to me quite often. I spent most of my time reading whatever scientific books I could find in our library (often not realizing how out of date they were - I remember in particular reading a book on how great skylab was going to be).

      However one time I looked up a profane word in the giant unabridged dictionary - and then showed it to my friends. The librarian was not amused.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  14. Vibrate? Naah. by cirby · · Score: 0

    Electric shock?

    Much better.

  15. Sensor accuracy by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since when were affordable motion sensors anywhere near accurate enough to track the movements of the end of a pen well enough to determine what was written? And if they are, why the hell are you using them for such a dumb idea? If the sensors really are that accurate, that means they're accurate enough to do complete finger tracking in three dimensions. Can you say VR interface glove? That's exactly what we need to go with an Oculus Rift. Sensors as accurate as these would have to be to do what they're claiming built into gloves, together with a Rift, would enable the world's best 3D modeling interface. Sculpt your model with your hands. This idea has been around since VR was first conceived. Are we finally getting there?

    1. Re:Sensor accuracy by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Something similar already exists and provides haptic feedback so you can "feel" the surface you are sculpting with your pen/tool. I have to say i'm not that impressed with the results (see their gallery), but that's not necessarily a comment on the product, rather the artists who use it. Seems people have been getting much better results with stuff like ZBrush anyway

    2. Re:Sensor accuracy by stuffeh · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_pen http://www.logitech.com/en-us/support/digital-pen I used one of these in my undergrad when it was cheaper and easier for me than lugging a laptop and books around everywhere on my motorcycle. Just because you haven't seen the tech doesn't mean it isn't there. Read the wiki article for various implementations on how they work.

    3. Re:Sensor accuracy by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I said two things: available and CHEAP. And I notice all but one of the pens listed at Wikipedia have been discontinued, so your assertion that the tech is there is mighty thin. The only one left is the IRISNotes, and it's a whopping $150. Presumably it contains exactly one sensor. At that price, making input gloves remains out of the question, no matter how accurate it is.

    4. Re:Sensor accuracy by stuffeh · · Score: 1

      To address your "concern" about the profitability of this product, this is a very obvious niche market targeted at the wallets of parents in attempts to improve their child's handwriting and spelling between the Christmas/birthday delivery of the newest iPads, iPhones and laptops take over their brains with auto correct.

      I'm sorry, I wasn't aware I was supposed to research all viable producers of digital pens for you. My mistake, here you go: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=digital+pen . Many of the options here are pens for tablets, but as you can see, there are many actual digital pens being sold here as well. Please do purchase and write at least 250 words review on the various implementations of the techniques to capture your handwriting. Also, create and build a post production prototype of your laughably inelegant glove contraption to monitor user's writing and compare this to the already established non-restrictive methods in capturing user's writing. Personally, I can attest that the accuracy of these devices to be very high.

      Which brings us to the fact that the perpetuation of smart devices throughout society today and a laptop in every student's bag has seen the decline in this market from a lack of interest. This doesn't mean the technology has gotten more expensive or harder to manufacture. Just that it would mean that the profit margin and feature sets for each pen would need to be balanced to make this a viable competitor to capture sales from the market. Before you comment on this, please do enlighten us exactly how much each costs in materials and production before any markups or profits.

    5. Re:Sensor accuracy by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      You read very little of what I wrote and understood none of it.

      The glove "contraption" has nothing whatsoever to do with handwriting. It's for a virtual reality user interface. VR presents any number of interface problems, and monitoring where your hands are and what they're doing would be invaluable for addressing many of them. A mouse cursor is of limited utility in an environment that has actual stereoscopic depth. Motion sensors aren't particularly useful for monitoring location, but they could potentially solve the what-they're-doing part of the problem, leaving location to cameras, which are bad at the what-they're-doing part. Handwriting is irrelevant. I don't CARE about the damn pens you're apparently enamored of, so don't get your panties in a twist. My comment was questioning the viability of using the same motion sensing technology for another purpose. Your post disabused me of the notion. Unless the markup on digital pens is so absurd it would make Apple blush, the sensors are obviously too expensive for the use I had in mind, since it takes far more than one of them to do the job of monitoring your fingers accurately and the multi-thousand-dollar pricetag of previous efforts in the field is one of the reasons why glove "contraptions" have enjoyed essentially no mass market success (the Nintendo Powerglove notwithstanding).

      Unless of course, the sensors in question are the same MEMS devices used in sundry mobile devices, in which case the markup on pens is indeed enough to make even Apple blush. But I find that hard to believe. I know I've seen plenty of people trying to use their motion-sensing gadgets and having to try two or three times before it noticed the motion. In that case, the sensitivity and accuracy of the MEMS devices used in digital pens must be a fairly dramatic and expensive improvement, or the pens wouldn't work. Presumably the sensor is embedded in the far upper end of a digital pen, to capture as much motion as possible. The vector changes the device has to capture come fast and furious while handwriting, so the sensors must be much better than the run of the mill phone sensor.

      And they're too expensive. Oh well.

  16. How real is it? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    There is a prototype, but the first generation is expected mid 2013. What is the prototype really able to do?

  17. vroom vroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next up on slashdot :

    "New grammar pen promotes bad grammar in underage schoolgirls"

  18. I'll pass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the most part I know how to spell and write grammatically correct sentences.

    When spell check recently tried to correct pommes frites into pommel trite I came within a millimeter of turning it off for good on every one of my devices.

  19. A great security tool. by lexsird · · Score: 1

    Set the damn thing to understand the writing patterns of a person and they can use it for a key. Wire it up if it's not you, barbs snap out and into your hand locking it to you and an amazingly powerful internal stun gun mechanism lights you up like a pinball machine. Also, if they can do that then they can set one up for espionage. Give one to your wife and see what she writes with it, when she uses it.

    I see acres of applications for something like this and helping school kiddies being just one.

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
  20. Penmanship by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    Penmanship? who can really defend good penmanship, some of the most educated people have the worst legible writing imaginable. How neat you write has nothing to do with the quality of the information. As for bad grammar and spelling I'm so pro for this pen it's insane. Growing up having a learning disability which makes it hard to spell and really hard to use grammar correctly, I can totally see the need for this. ( Of course on a side note any one who needs the grammar to read doesn't really know how to read in the first place, I can read books with out even needing to see or read a single grammar note )

    1. Re:Penmanship by Visserau · · Score: 1

      Reading teaches you grammar far moreso than vice versa (so I guess I agree with you). I never learnt (m)any grammar rules BECAUSE of reading. I started with adult books at a young age and consequently didn't pay a shred of attention in english classes. I'm far from perfect but I'd like to think I can outdo your average Joe for the most part.

    2. Re:Penmanship by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      The problem is we often have a quite large conceptual gap between what we say and what we think we say... and more often than not we write what we think we say, not what we say....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:Penmanship by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, when I read my brain puts in all the required puncuation for me before I even notice it. So in fact grammar to me, even growing up never played a big / any role. Now granted not everyone can work like I do but on some level you have to admit that your brain can put the facts together and in the end you don't really need to see things like commas, periods, question marks and etc...

  21. What is this pen and paper that you write of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Writing on paper with a pen? Why not a quill and parchment or papyrus? Or clay tablets and a stylus?

    I have a smart phone with apps that I can speak to. Writing with a pen and paper? How droll. And how very 20th century.

  22. Angry pen by ztexas · · Score: 0

    A shock would be better. Negative reinforcement. Think doggie training collar.

    1. Re:Angry pen by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      Where are the moderators? This is the third time I've seen this exact comment in this thread. It isn't exactly a unique nor profound thought.

      Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.

  23. Vibrates to indicate poor penmanship? by mosb1000 · · Score: 2

    Not only will it indicate poor penmanship, but it will exacerbate it as well! I guess it couldn't make my handwriting any worse.

  24. Slashdot Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we could all chip in and buy one if these for the slashdot editors?

  25. Did you say 'I before E except after C'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. "and Penmanship" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, it's gonna be vibrating the whole time.

  27. Eat up martin by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Eat up martin is what you get when you write beat up martin

  28. What useing this to make ups and store pads work by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    What useing this to make ups and store pads work a lot better then they do now.

  29. Internet Rule by abednegoyulo · · Score: 1

    #34

  30. So it's a dildo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, for some of us it's going to be vibrating all the damn time. Might as well use a vibrating dildo with a pen strapped to it. Much cheaper.

  31. What's a pen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cn u txt w it?

  32. If I were 6 and having to use this by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

    I'd pretty quickly throw it across the classroom at the wall. Kids are moving away from cursive handwriting and only printing. How long before we don't write much of anything ever? I don't know about you, but lost the ability to use a quill and ink well.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    1. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can speak from experience as one who teaches on the university level: an increasing number of students already cannot write by hand. When they ask me at the beginning of the semester whether they can use laptops to take notes, I allow them with a caution. Since departmental standards require that they complete a written final, I encourage them to use note-taking as an opportunity to practice penmanship (more importantly it also helps them to learn how to think and summarize rather than attempting to take down a transcript of a lecture they won't read later). For so many, the only time they write is when they sit down for a final in which case, being out of practice, the speed of writing inhibits them from being able to write a complete essay response. After two hours, many turn in 3-4 pages (in a half letter sized blue book) of either illegible scrawl or blocky letters that clearly attempt to replicate print. That they did not receive instruction earlier in life on quick, efficient, and legible handwriting was a disservice to them.

      You're quite right that we're moving away from handwriting, but we're not there yet. It remains a useful skill and offers a slight but real advantage over the run-of-the-mill, utilitarian job training one often receives in schools today.

      Incidentally, I think the batteries must be dead in your vibrating keyboard. I read your sig and the spelling is a mess.

    2. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I had to re-train myself when starting to go to university, because cursive is just plain unusable for any real work. It is slow, leads to cramps, takes too much space, is unreadable when you have to be fast, scales badly, is hard to read even if done well, etc. It had some justification when people had lots of time and writing was a valuable skill by itself and looks were more important than usability. Not so anymore, best abolish it completely as a fundamentally broken aberration.

      I also dropped using a fountain pen as soon as we were allowed to and switched to a modern ink-roller. Good work requires good tools, not some trash that that is completely obsolete and was invented to be used in vastly different circumstances in the first place. Teaching cursive to kids is just malicious.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised it's still like this to some degree. I was in law school from 94-97 and was one of the very first people to use a laptop for note taking (a 486sx20 with 32 shades of gray or some wildly good specs like that). Anyway, the state I live in had (I think still has) a 100% essay bar. The thing is though, at that time you could use a typewriter providing it had no more memory ability than a single line (for backspace and such) and you were required to keep spellcheck off. The pass rate of those who typed the bar was very high (although that could be due to the types of people who chose to type, or it could be due to the typing -- either way I wasn't taking any chances).

      So during law school I took notes with a computer and typed all my exams (typing was optional and typers were segregated in their own room so as not to disturb writers (same at the bar too)). My keyboarding rocked when I graduated. I typed the bar, I even took two typewriters with me in case one failed (and one actually did), and passed first time. I truly believe that typing everything helped me out a lot because it made the mechanical act of transferring ideas to paper effortless, at least in comparison to using a pencil and paper.

      That was all more than a decade and half ago (almost two if you count back to '94). I would have thought we'd be over this hand writing in blue books thing by now. Typing exams is the best way to go -- the product is legible, the speed is vastly superior to handwriting, and in most of the real world, if it won't fit on a post-it note you're going to type it out. 99% of what I write is on a computer and every penmanship class I had to suffer through, every hand written test I did poorly on because my hand was getting tired, every teacher who forced me to write in cursive, just held me back or wasted my time.

      Considering how writing is actually done these days, maybe you should allow your students to type exams and test them on their knowledge, not on their skill at pushing a pen around. If you balk at that idea, ask yourself this: would you require your students to shoot some hoops before each test, penalizing them 10 points for each miss -- say three shots so the max they could get would be a 70% if they suck at basketball? Penmanship is a mere physical skill just like throwing a ball, but poor penmanship can cause poor grades not because the ideas are bad, but because they aren't legible or the handwriting looks childish. Requiring tests to be written by hand, at least in the modern world, is an artificial PE type impediment and that only makes sense if you are teaching PE. If you are teaching anything else at all, at least give the notion that students should be able to type exams some consideration.

    4. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a joke, right? What are people who can't write by hand doing in any university? What's wrong with these people?

    5. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never write cursive, just print. With a mechanical pencil (Rotring 600) and use an eraser to correct mistakes. It 'just works'. It's old-skool.

    6. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I love people like you, I'm 60 and you make me think I should get off your lawn. I wish laptops had existed when I was in college; I can type faster than I could ever write longhand, but even then, rather than taking notes I'd just record the lecture with the laptop. Actually, that's what I did, only I used a cassette recorder.

      That they did not receive instruction earlier in life on quick, efficient, and legible handwriting was a disservice to them.

      That's an assumption on your part, and a bad one at that. When I was in school, computers were multimillion dollar building sized-pocket calculators, and they taught penmanship in grade school. But by the time I was in college my handwriting was terrible, mostly from taking notes in class during high school. The essays are timed and you expect good penmanship?? That's insane!

      You're quite right that we're moving away from handwriting, but we're not there yet.

      Thanks to people like you!

      Incidentally, I think the batteries must be dead in your vibrating keyboard. I read your sig and the spelling is a mess.

      Woosh to you, ma'am.

    7. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 2

      I love people like you...

      Why thank you. People like me love people like you too.

      ... only I used a cassette recorder.

      I know others who did and still do this. I was never a fan personally. There's always a risk of zoning out since you know you can go listen again later, which means you've wasted the hour or so in lecture. But, to each his own. I recommend note-taking, and certainly not just the handwriting aspects of it, because its a useful skill whether in lecture, when reading, or when writing.

      For the record, I actually mean it too when I say to each his own. I suggest handwritten notes; I do not require it. My students are welcome to bring their laptops and I know by allowing this half of the class will be tooling about on Facebook. They're doing themselves a disservice but they're adults and have to find their own way. The only time I come down on students for fooling about with their gadgets is when they're doing something that is distracting to other students. For much the same reason, I only require attendance in accordance with departmental requirements.

      That's an assumption on your part, and a bad one at that.

      Their classmates who have this skill have an advantage over them. How is it a bad assumption that their lack of instruction was a disservice? One might say that their time was betting spent learning something else, something more relevant to the modern age. Unfortunately, this often isn't the case. Primary and secondary schools receive instructions that computers ought to be a bigger part of the curriculum and the only practical consequence of this instruction seems to be that my freshmen cite Wikipedia and I still find myself having to explain what file types are. Such instruction only goes so far when the teachers themselves mostly think of computers as a messaging system.

      The essays are timed and you expect good penmanship??

      No. I said it's sad that their penmanship is an inhibition. I should much sooner they be able to write quickly and efficiently enough to get their ideas on paper. My penmanship sucks on a timed exam and, with a nod to the poster above, I'm quite familiar with a pen and ink well. Only in a few cases is the penmanship so bad that its a problem such that 'it doesn't meet my expectations.' Those instances are where I walk about the office, hand a test to colleagues, and have them hand the test back to me declaring that they, too, can't read the response. I don't require that they be able to write in Spencerian. I do wish that their primary and secondary school teachers had not allowed the ability to write words on paper to become an inhibition.

      Thanks to people like you!

      Did you miss the part where I said written exams were a departmental requirement? It has nothing to do with me. I suggest they take the opportunity in their notes to practice penmanship so they won't be struggling to write on the day of the exam. I teach other classes that aren't freshman general requirements courses and these do not require the written exams. In these classes, I only require typed assignments, chiefly essays.

      Handwriting is still a practical and useful skill in this age, and it has little to do with me or my carefully watched lawn. I'm from a poorer area of the country, where so many are raised to believe education a means of meeting employment requirements. This mentality also makes its way, unfortunately, into the universities. What it often misses is that there is more to being free and finding success than having a degree. Students who speak and write like people do where I'm from will, unfortunately, be looked down upon when they go out into the real world. This is a disadvantage and it is a disservice to them if they're not at least made aware of it.

      Woosh to you, ma'am

      Um, yeah. I got it. People don't typically change their sigs just for one article though. So his generally amusing sig became particularly amusing in this c

    8. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1
      I basically agree with you, but I don't make the rules.

      departmental standards require that they complete a written final

    9. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There's always a risk of zoning out since you know you can go listen again later

      I guess everybody's different, but humans aren't as good at multitasking as they think they are. I want to have my full attention on what the lecturer is saying. Of course, you have to copy anything that's written on the blackboard (now whiteboard).

      I know by allowing this half of the class will be tooling about on Facebook.

      Well, if they're doing that, 40 years ago they would have been passing notes to each other and still missing the lecture. There are a lot more distractions these days, though.

      Those instances are where I walk about the office, hand a test to colleagues, and have them hand the test back to me declaring that they, too, can't read the response.

      Ah, ok, I was under the impression that penmanship was part of the grade, but if it isn't legible it's the same as if they turned in a blank piece of paper.

      How is it a bad assumption that their lack of instruction was a disservice?

      The assumption is that they lacked instruction rather than that their skills had deteriorated. Of course, if it's a high school class your assumption would probably be valid.

      What it often misses is that there is more to being free and finding success than having a degree.

      Very true. In my case, the actual knowledge is worth more than the degree; I've always loved learning. That was unfortunately a detriment before I went to college, after about the third grade it's all rote memorization and no learning. And I was always terrible at memorization.

      Students who speak and write like people do where I'm from will, unfortunately, be looked down upon when they go out into the real world.

      Well, that's grammar. It's also sad but true. Some even look down on certain accents.

      "The tyrant fears the laugh more than the assassin's bullet."
      HA HA!

      No woosh there, it was a humorous story about police corruption and a sentient whirlwind.

    10. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agitate.

      Out of curiosity I looked at what the WA State Bar's current rules are. It looks like they've moved on from typewriters and allow people to use laptops with a certain exam taking program. Spell check still not allowed. If a stodgy bar association can get with the times, your department heads can too.

      http://www.wsba.org/Licensing-and-Lawyer-Conduct/Admissions/Bar-Exam-Admissions/Bar-Exam-Policies

    11. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      The assumption is that they lacked instruction rather than that their skills had deteriorated.

      Ah. I see what you're getting at. And if all I had to go by was the handwriting of students, you'd be quite right. In at least some cases, you likely are. Here's the thing though: I write in print on the board because my colleagues and I have been informed by students that they cannot read cursive. In so many words, students have told me that they were never taught. I, like many who've posted here, actually do not care for cursive as it was taught fifty years ago. It's slow and even slower when you try to make it legible. Nevertheless, that they cannot even read it is troubling.

      Some even look down on certain accents.

      This is especially true. I've known very intelligent people in the academic world who've been treated ill because of their accents. For better or worse, at a young age I "learned to talk like the man on the six o'clock news" and it has served me. It's a horrible thing though, because it makes it harder to go home.

    12. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I appreciate the idea of handwriting and penmanship but it is honestly a dying art.

      If the only time students need to hand write in their entire academic career is to complete your final then perhaps you need to re-evaluate your need for a handwritten final. Why should the students waste time practicing an art they will only use once, and will likely never use again? Nobody hand writes anymore. 99.9% of business communication is typed or voice. Hell, even the stylus is considered an anachronism in the computing world.

      I've always had terrible handwriting skills. No amount of drilling, practice, or tutoring has been able to elevate it above a 3rd grade scrawl. And trust me I did a fucking lot. My mother and father were teachers and were determined to help me get past it. I learned later that I probably suffer some form of something called Dysgraphia. Turns out, it really does not matter.

      I naturally took to PCs and keyboards at and early age and by the time I got in to the later grades typed assignments were not only encouraged but preferred. By the time I got in to college it was mandatory, and completely electronic submission was preferred. While many of my contemporaries were struggling to learn word processing skills I found myself exceptionally prepared.

      Further more, handwriting implies paper. Isn't paper something we're trying to use less of? You know, cutting down trees, waste, bulk, trash.
      I don't advocate getting rid of handwriting all together, but changing how we teach it. Abandon cursive all together. It's a confusing script that bares no resemblance to modern communication. You're wasting time teaching a dead language. Abandon the idea of using handwriting to compose long works. Relegate handwriting to what it's used for. Writing small messages, signage, and filling out forms. It SHOULD emulate and resemble printed text, because handwriting is a secondary mode of communication today, not a primary.

    13. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      ... perhaps you need to re-evaluate your need for a handwritten final.

      As I said in the post, departmental requirement. I encourage them to practice handwriting when they take notes because I want them to have every advantage they can to do well. If it were up to me, as it is in non-entry level courses, I'd have them write essays and turn them in electronically. Essays are far better at teaching the kinds of skills I want them to have. The only thing to recommend a timed final exam is the practical realities of teaching at a state university, where class sizes can number in the hundreds.

      You're wasting time teaching a dead language.

      In truth, most of my work involves dead languages. So I guess I'm just a sucker for lost causes.

      It SHOULD emulate and resemble printed text [...]

      The odd thing about this comment is that printed text was designed to resemble formal bookhands developed prior to the invention of the press. Talk about a dead language. As opposed to things like chancery hands, book hands prioritized consistency. This produces visually pleasing text, but it isn't best for those tasks to which you point. I'll readily grant that cursive as it has been taught over the past century is very inefficient and should be abandoned. But it's hardly the only chancery hand.

    14. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      One day I might. Right now, however, I'm not tenured. Truth be told, policies mostly change because the stodgy old folks retire out. Then we younger folks get to be stodgy in their place.

    15. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Good choice. Good mechanical pencils are almost on par with modern ink-rollers, but you get the ability to erase as well. I use them rarely, as I prefer to not be able to erase. I find it sharpens my concentration. But that is a matter of taste.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re:If I were 6 and having to use this by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I write in print on the board because my colleagues and I have been informed by students that they cannot read cursive. In so many words, students have told me that they were never taught.

      Wow, sad and amazing. I think my twentysomething daughters can read and write cursive. I'll have to ask the youngest.

  33. A vibrating pen I can live with by Turminder+Xuss · · Score: 1

    but its /facedesk if the paperclip starts second guessing what I'm doing.

    --
    You seem to regard science as some kind of dodge... or hustle.
  34. Cheaper alternative by russotto · · Score: 1

    I have a pen which indicates when it is being used to write with poor penmanship or to write spelling and grammatical errors. It indicates this by not vibrating, flashing, or making any noise whatsoever. They're cheap as dirt, too -- less than 10 cents a pen. And I've never had one fail to indicate a problem, nor indicate a problem where none exists.

    1. Re:Cheaper alternative by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Hehehehehehe, nice!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  35. Interesting lines by godrik · · Score: 1

    -Did you write with your ass?
    -Well, actually...

  36. the new body massager? by csumpi · · Score: 1

    Yeah right. First it was the "body massager", now it's the "vibrating pen". Nice try.

    But if they are really serious, they are a bit behind the times: how often do people write with a pen anymore? The only time I use a pen (sharpie, actually) is to mark where to cut the 2x4.

  37. just use another technology by retchdog · · Score: 2

    i'm skeptical about the spelling and grammar checker, but as for the pressure...

    pens have already been developed which don't require noticeable pressure in the first place.

    there are even some for children.

    aren't they messy? not if you use cartridges. also, blue fountain pen ink is usually easily washable, unless you specifically get a variety which isn't.

    won't the dumb kid lose his $20 fountain pen? well, i guess this might be a problem (although somehow we managed before), but i'm sure this accelerometer/vibrator pen would cost a lot more anyway.

    the ergonomics are another advantage. making the pen easier to hold can only improve handwriting.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    1. Re:just use another technology by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Wow, some people have bad penmanship even with a keyboard!

    2. Re:just use another technology by retchdog · · Score: 1

      apart from my conscious decision to eschew capitalization, could you point out what you mean?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    3. Re:just use another technology by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Capitalization improves readability, as does good penmanship when you're writing by hand. Why did you make that conscious decision? Are you sure it was a conscious decision? What is the purpose of eschewing capitalization?

    4. Re:just use another technology by retchdog · · Score: 1

      uh, yeah; since i've justified it about a dozen times, it's certainly a conscious decision by now even if it wasn't when i started, which it was.

      so, once again: the purpose is to emphasize that web forums, like slashdot, are more like chatting than they are like formal writing. in conversation, there is no capitalization. i don't want anything i write here to be taken as an authoritative written statement, so i demarcate by using a pseudonym and not capitalizing.

      though, i've got to admit, i'm getting tired of being slagged over this issue. just keep it up and i might capitulate.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    5. Re:just use another technology by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      the purpose is to emphasize that web forums, like slashdot, are more like chatting than they are like formal writing

      So is a snail mail letter to Grandma. I don't see why the fact that it's a web forum needs emphasis; everyone knows they're on a forum.

    6. Re:just use another technology by retchdog · · Score: 1

      no, my written letters (when i write them, which is none too often) are much deeper and more coherent and meaningful than the idle chatter on slashdot.

      and, yes, my casual notes are also uncapitalized.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  38. Better design: Make it explode! by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Then the perpetrator of bad penmanship cannot commit any more of that horrible, horrible crime!

    Side note: I nominate that for "most stupid idea of the week".

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  39. Lead acid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the amount of time it would be vibrating, I'd say it would need a pretty big battery.

  40. Jokes on the company by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I don't write anymore, I just type.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  41. I have a better idea by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

    My pen will carve the incorrectly spelled word into the back of your hand. Submitting a patent now, and will sue Rowling ASAP.

  42. EN-US / EN-UK Dictionary by CodeheadUK · · Score: 2

    I hope is has a better dictionary selection and retention than Word. Being constantly reprimanded by squiggly red lines that I the software thinks that I should use -ize on words that should be -ise is enough to make me gouge out my eyes with a vibrating pen.

    1. Re:EN-US / EN-UK Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Word, language is a character level property like bold or italic. Ensure that all your templates (including normal.dot) are in en-gb. This doesn't help with documents received from colleagues, so write a macro to convert the current document to en-gb. You can attach the macro to a hotkey or button, or use AutoOpen to run it every time you open a document.

    2. Re:EN-US / EN-UK Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -ize is not an Americanism. Check the Oxford, Cambridge and Collins dictionaries, where it is usually the preferred spelling. It derives directly from the Greek -izo, -izein. -ise is derived from the French version of these words. The preference for -ize in Oxbridge dictionaries is due their overall preference for classical etymology and it has existed since before the colonies were even founded. In short, you are not avoiding an Americanism but rather choosing a Frenchism.

      The same is true for the -or/-our dichotomy, but strangely there Oxbridge prefers the French derivation.

    3. Re:EN-US / EN-UK Dictionary by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Bottom bar. Next to EXT/OVR click on 'English-US' and change it to UK or whatever. Now you don't have to bitch and moan in public any more! Aren't you happy now?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:EN-US / EN-UK Dictionary by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Being constantly reprimanded by squiggly red lines that I the software thinks that [...] is enough to make me gouge out my eyes with a vibrating pen.

      Surely it would be more appropriate to gouge out the eyes of the programmer who wrote the code. Or even better, the manager and marketing morons who thought it would be a good idea.

      Though the programmers who make assumptions about the language and preferences of users without providing a way for users to change the configuration, do deserve ... well, a clue-by-four, if not an eye-gouging. That's just poor programming. Maybe just one eye gouged?

      My main question on the product ... the name sounds very Germanic ... And indeed, it is :

      The video in German below shows off the Lernstift prototype.

      So hopefully the process of producing English language versions should beat most of the translation and assumption problems out of the system.

      There will, of course, be a left-handed version? I think I'd better ask them ... email prepared, and will be getting a link to this message.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    5. Re:EN-US / EN-UK Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,
      I’m the founder of Lernstift. Aidan Karley writes a mail and points me to this nice discussion.
      We provide the pen in mid of this year. We start with English and German pens.
      Divide in mind the recognition of characters and the spelling.
      We use language catalogues (Dictionary). Lernstift can act in one language same time (naturally)...
      With the App on a iPhone, Android, PC you can switch the language of the Lernstift.

      The language catalogues are separated into "helping catalogues" for the handwriting recognition and "spelling catalogues".
      First we start with spelling of single words. Then we add step by step more intelligence to the spelling recognition up to grammar. But takes many months...
      (I am pragmatic and would like to go step by step. Rather "realistic small steps", as "impossible big steps" ...)

      The spelling language catalogues are differentiated into possibly many different catalogues per language.
      We will provide an open Platform for the Lernstift-Software. So everyone can add and optimize spelling catalogues.
      The handwriting recognition will come also with a learning mode. We can’t provide support for each handwrite style from scatch.
      But the Lernstift will learn the individual handwrite style by doing learning courses. (Write in block-writing, then same as hand-writing etc.)
      Divide in mind the Lernstift into the physical pen and the software. The software is network enabled and Lernstift will be up to date every time.

      We are in the process of product design. Yes. We plan left-handed and right-handed version as we plan a adult and child version too.
      Feel free to send me any questions to falk@lernstift.com !
      Take care. And keep "good vibrations" ;-)

    6. Re:EN-US / EN-UK Dictionary by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Happy to see such responsiveness from the designers.

      There is quite a building curve there for both software and hardware sides of the design. Building the basic machine with the symmetry to be able to handle left- and right-handed use in the the same chassis is going to be one thing (in terms of costs of parts and complexity of the chassis). The exterior moulding is going to be asymmetrical (which means 2 different SKUs ; 4 when you're looking at adult and child versions - though what do you need adult versions for? Most adults who're going to be able to learn to write are going to have ossified habits by the time of achieving adult size, surely?).

      The software is going to be challenging for both processing power requirements and battery power.

      It's an interesting project. But probably doomed to long-term irrelevance - speech recognition is "ha-ha, but serious", and the complete death of hand-writing is probably a couple of generations in the future. My industry is very likely to last longer (materials will be needed).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  43. Vibratior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dude, making the pen vibrate will not help my poor penmanship!

  44. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that bad grammar in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

  45. mandatory.. by thygate · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these... no .. no wait.. i got this ... In soviet Russia digital pen ... der.. ... ah fudge ...

  46. A vibrating pen is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mightieRrrRrrRrrRrrr

  47. Vibrating Pen .... Hmm..... by ami.one · · Score: 1

    Vibrating Pen .... Hmm.....

  48. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now everyone will think I'm writing with a dildo

  49. Version 2 by jimmetry · · Score: 1

    A pen that shocks you if you disrespect the Dear Leader

  50. Handwriting by Cyfun · · Score: 0

    I just wanna know how a pen can read my handwriting when no one else can!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, dot slashes YOU!
  51. Ineffective by Bad_Feeling · · Score: 1

    What they should do is design a pen that delivers an electrical shock to the user every time a word is misspelled.

    --
    Disclaimer: On the other hand, I am kind of a psycho...
  52. Kernel panic by futhermocker · · Score: 1

    Would occur instantly if I would use that pen.
    That is why I got a job with a keyboard.

    --
    KERNEL PANIC -SIGFAULT AT ADDRESS #51A54D07
  53. Bad penmanship = bad spelling by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Not that your bad penmanship is the cause of bad spelling, but if the pen can't discern what letters you're writing, it probably presumes you're just spelling the word wrong. It's more of a limitation on the device than a bug or a feature, but they've chosen to market it as the latter.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  54. I want the equivalent hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... that targets my thumb to alert me of not aiming squarely for the nail.

  55. how about zap the user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about zapping the user with minute jolts and increase as number of spelling errers increese....aaaawww..

  56. Dumb Blond Joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a Dumb Blond Joke waiting to be told .... Vibrating pens and a "dumb" woman. Some of this biz pens are rather large for pens... but could be a small...

  57. In other news... by gmyuriy · · Score: 1

    new Digital Pen electrocutes the holder until he/she gets the spelling/grammar right !

  58. A Tablet PC fixed my handwriting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To encourage good penmanship and spelling I found a tablet PC is invaluable. Let me explain:

    I spent the vast majority of primary school in pencil because teachers wouldn't "graduate me" to use pen due to my "messy writing". After high school and university my writing degraded further because 12 years of typing practically everything instead of writing. This brought me to the point where my writing was so bad I could probably have passed it off as MD scrawl.

    Then I started using a Windows Tablet PC. I found it so useful it became my preferred note taking system - it became essential for me in meetings and while doing a masters degree. The downside was the text recognition. The old recognition system in Windows Tablet PC Edition (before Windows 7 made handwriting recognition adaptive and more accurate) was so pedantic that my chicken scrawl had to change if I wanted to search my own writing. Consequently I made a concerted effort and now have a very legible style for the first time in my life.