Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Inexpensive SOHO Crime Deterrence and Monitoring?

First time accepted submitter trellz writes "My sister and brother-in-law are self employed, and run a small business with a storefront. It was broken into about a year ago, and since then they have reinforced physical security; bars on the doors and windows, better locks, etc. Unfortunately, their store was broken into and vandalized again last week, in spite of the added security measures. Being technically savvy, I'm trying to come up with inexpensive ways to add deterrence, monitoring, and alerting to their business. They run an extremely lean lifestyle and profit margin, so the solution needs to be almost free. They do have an internet connection at the store, so motion detection, web cameras, Arduino devices, and the like are certainly an option. Ideally I would like a rock-solid alerting method. Something like an email or text to a laptop at home, or a dedicated prepaid phone, but without the pitfalls of such a solution (i.e. random wrong numbers, solicitors, email spam, etc). I'd also prefer not to poke holes in their firewall at the shop if at all possible. I was considering an email with some sort of long code or hash in the body, and then could white list that on the receiving end to key off of. The goal is to never have a false alarm based on the transmission/reception method." What advice, beyond ZoneMinder?

55 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. How was it broken into again? by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bars on the doors and windows suggests someone was pretty aggressive about getting in there - or your physical security upgrades are just insufficient. If people can still get in, and if what they take is relatively lightweight, a sophisticated alarm isn't really going to help you all that much compared to just something which makes a lot of noise.

    1. Re:How was it broken into again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, a good bar system should take longer to get through than anyone would be willing to commit. My first question was, "what do they have in there? Guns or drugs?" and the second is "what are the bars made of, rubber?"

      My vote is for a cheap $50 (or less) motion detector tied to a loud speaker. Nobody wants to rob a place so loud it hurts. You could set it up to send an email when triggered or such, but that's not going to make a huge difference in the robber's response. Unless the plan is to get a $200 cheap PVR/camera security combo so that they can catch people, rather than scare them off after they've done $1000 damage to windows and bars before running off.

    2. Re:How was it broken into again? by Barsteward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And also set up a camera on the building opposite so it records everything as teh camera on the violated property will probably get trashed if seen

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    3. Re:How was it broken into again? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Right, could be insider threat.

      Good point. There's so much here that isn't made clear. Some questions to answer before deciding what to do:

      • is this one shop in a big area that gets picked on?
      • what are other surrounding shops doing different?
      • does this look like a personal vendetta or just two random coincidental crimes? Is there anything to link the two incidents?
      • are there surrounding shops that might work together?
      • did the guys get something of value?
      • did they likely come in masks?
      • if you alert the police are they likely to react quickly?
      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    4. Re:How was it broken into again? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2

      And also set up a camera on the building opposite so it records everything as teh camera on the violated property will probably get trashed if seen

      I'd assume that all the cameras should send out to an off-premises server. In this case they should be recorded before they trash them.

      The idea to get cameras opposite is good though. At that point getting together with all the shops in the area and setting up a system together might help. Scary and anti-freedom though this is, nobody will care or try to stop you. This will be much cheaper than paying for everything yourself.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    5. Re:How was it broken into again? by Bazman · · Score: 2

      Myth... busted!

      Mythbusters tried to yank the axle of a car using a fixed cable but every time either their cable failed or their anchor failed. They busted the rear axle up pretty bad, but never yanked it off as seen in American Graffiti.

    6. Re:How was it broken into again? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      Myth... busted!

      Mythbusters tried to yank the axle of a car using a fixed cable but every time either their cable failed or their anchor failed. They busted the rear axle up pretty bad, but never yanked it off as seen in American Graffiti.

      that depends on the car.... rusted up lada and think again what happens.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:How was it broken into again? by TheLink · · Score: 2

      If a loud alarm isn't enough add some smoke (as long as it doesn't trigger sprinklers or similar ;) ).
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOgKti335tQ
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFWe-sAsAIA

      --
    8. Re:How was it broken into again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Myth... busted!

      Say it with me, Mythbusters is not science. You're busted. Stop citing mythbusters, especially when hilariously trying to prove a negative.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:How was it broken into again? by SimonInOz · · Score: 2

      Obvious solution - get a dog.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    10. Re:How was it broken into again? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      I've seen a number of "barred windows" in my time. I didn't exactly count them, but roughly 35 or 40% of them can be bypassed with nothing more than a screwdriver and/or small pry bar. Taking some wrought iron, and screwing it into the storefront's facade does NOT constitute "barred windows", IMHO. Maybe for legal purposes, such a setup helps to demonstrate intent and determination, but most of us live in the physical world, subject to the laws of physics. A teenage girl with a bad case of PMS could rip down some of those bars - without any tools!

      Good, solid bars that are incorporated sturdily into the building's structure are both time consuming and expensive to install. Unless, of course, the bars were part of the architect's plans. Building a new building with really good security is always easier and cheaper than trying to retrofit.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:How was it broken into again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In what way? Mythbusters use the scientific method to test claims. They measure, experiment, collect data on a variety of scenarios - controlling and testing different variables on each pass - and report on their findings.

      Some of their findings have been challenged by members of the public, and repeat experiments have been conducted - some confirming the initial assessment and some forcing a revision. Their experiments and their results are available to anyone and are testable, repeatable, and refutable all the same, with further experiments refining the hypotheses under test.

      That's called "science".

      I'm afraid you've been poorly educated on the subject if you don't think so.

    12. Re:How was it broken into again? by flyneye · · Score: 2

      My suggestion would be a modified version of this sentry system http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uetmdJJkpdQ
      Mod it with a .410 shotgun for use with anything from rock salt to birdshot to deer slugs, dependent on the damage you want to inflict.
      Stun gun? Flame thrower? I'd fool around with marking them up w/paintball, but these guys sound aggressive enough that putting them down would be best for all.
      Just a judgement call, but you know your situation better than me.

                Heres a bit about the open source software used to run it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECa4lUD-WFs
      Open Vision Control.

      It's better to PWN than be PWND.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    13. Re:How was it broken into again? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dogs work well. But, housing and caring for dogs in a downtown business district can create a lot of headaches, too. Not to mention, that well trained security dogs are expensive, and poorly trained dogs are a liability. Be prepared to spend not less than twelve hours per week with a pair of dogs - time that many businessmen don't have.

      In short, I wouldn't recommend dogs to anyone who didn't
      A: think of it themselves
      B: actually likes dogs (preferably loves dogs)
      C: have a close by exercise yard
      D: have plenty of time to work with the dogs

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:How was it broken into again? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Because random youtube clips are a more reliable source.... Right?

      If all it takes is some youtube clips to prove them wrong, then they're clearly full of shit. And indeed, that is the case.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:How was it broken into again? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Informative

      My friend, you just suggested a shotgun trap, which is illegal. Like premeditated-homicide illegal. Sure, the criminals were breaking into the store, but the difference between a trap pulling the trigger and a human is all it takes for the store owner to go to jail.

    16. Re:How was it broken into again? by tibit · · Score: 3, Informative

      A camera? Now stop being silly. Go to a location that has presumedly similar layout to the one in question. Take a pic with your digital camera. Scale it down to NTSC resolution. That's the best case image you're going to get -- stuff from usual cameras used for monitoring looks much worse. Most security cameras are completely useless. You can barely tell between a human and a gorilla on most of the feeds that catch large areas. A small storefront may leave you with a bit better image than most, but it's still way too large area of an to cover if you want to see any faces. Other than recognizing faces, what's the point? I mean, you know there was a break-in, there's no reason to look at a video recording to confirm what's obvious. Either you get faces that are recognizable, or it's mostly useless.

      You've basically fallen for the security monitoring scam: people love it until they actually need to see the images and realize they are useless.

      To get good monitoring you need HD cameras, and plenty of them. For a small storefront monitoring, you may need coverage from two 1080p webcams. They are not exactly the most inexpensive of things. Alternatively, if you believe in a bit of luck, a digital photo camera taking timelapse pictures every second may also be likely to catch the faces. I'd go for one of the Canons where you can replace stock firmware with CHDK. You can then make it delete old pictures and keep new ones in round-robin fashion.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    17. Re:How was it broken into again? by phoebusQ · · Score: 2

      What you don't seem to understand is that these sorts of traps are specifically illegal in most jurisdictions. It's not a question, you WILL be charged with murder if you kill someone with one, or attempted murder/assault if you don't quite do the job. It's not the same as actually being there in a self-defense situation.

    18. Re:How was it broken into again? by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2

      >Maybe they should move their office to a safer neighborhood.
      > They run an extremely lean lifestyle and profit margin

      Maybe you don't understand something here. Rent. In the neighborhood you want them to move to rents can be double and triple the cost of the ghetto. If they are not making huge profits as it is, they simply can't afford to.

      Locking up all the items is fine, but the problem stated was vandalism. That is a different problem then theft. A vandal may not take anything, but instead just smash stuff up. Some people are assholes.

      The dogs not a bad idea, most of the gang member type i've seen seem to have a healthy fear of dogs.

       

    19. Re:How was it broken into again? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Well, obviously, you don't have to exercise a night watchman. Now, stop giggling, and go get the watchman some more donuts, please. He's due for a coronary, and we've got to help him! ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    20. Re:How was it broken into again? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked in a movie theater and we got robbed. It was less than two weeks after we had new cameras installed. Turns out they were all aimed to catch employee theft, and there was no camera that got a decent view of someone robbing the place. But there was a great view of my hands taking the money from the till and handing it over. Or of me on the phone with 911. I could tell it was me.

      The police and manager were in the office reviewing the tapes, and they had to call me in to point out the robery, as from the tapes, they couldn't find the one wide-angle that caught it all (put in to see how long the ticket lines were).

    21. Re:How was it broken into again? by trellz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll try and answer some of the general questions I've seen here. It is a tattoo studio, they used bolt cutters to open the locked rear gate to the courtyard, bolt cutters on the back security door, and then battered the metal door down. They stole thousands in tattoo equipment and inks, and even his portfolio, but left the computer. This is a similar MO to last time, and it does seem personal(though I have no idea as to why). It's in a small town, so that area is just vacant during the nights, and the back courtyard is hidden completely. Other measures to secure things will be taken, like a safe, etc. This is family, so I'm just trying to do whatever I can to help. They've been in business for 15+ years and enjoy being self employed. The alerting them at home would be the last preferred method. In my opinion it's best to deter (through visible security means), prevent (through physical security and restricted access), to alarm (loud audible), and then finally alert (through some means), so that at the very least they could hop in their car and drive past.

    22. Re:How was it broken into again? by vux984 · · Score: 2

      In what way? Mythbusters use the scientific method to test claims. They measure, experiment, collect data on a variety of scenarios - controlling and testing different variables on each pass - and report on their findings.

      The main issue is that failing to replicate something is not evidence that something did not happen.

      When they confirm a myth there is usually no issue. But busting a myth by failing to confirm it is not really valid science.

      They make assumptions about the environment the claim takes place in. Usually the assumptions are quite reasonable, but the real world is not a reasonable place. Improbable things happen, and it can be argued that anything one calls a "myth" is out of the ordinary enough that if it occurred that it probably took place under extenuating circumstances.

    23. Re:How was it broken into again? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2

      Parrot to burglar: "God is watching you".
      Burglar, bemused: "Who would teach a parrot to say that?"
      Parrot to burglar: "The same person who would name a Rottweiler "God".

      Seriously, raise a good dog and let him sleep in the shop. If he lets his territory be violated by a burglar, then it's someone the dog already knows.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  2. Dog by MobyDobie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about getting a dog? It's both a deterrent and an alarm.

    1. Re:Dog by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is a property in my home town whose walls are painted (outside the concertina-lined fence) with the message "DANGER: GUARD DOG WILL KILL". And several skull-and-crossbones for the illiterate. Game over, man, game over.

    2. Re:Dog by u38cg · · Score: 2

      A dog is pretty defenceless against a piece of meat with some horse tranquilliser in it. And to be really honest, they're not much against a steady nerve and a hefty crowbar either. And we're talking about a storefront here, not a private residence.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:Dog by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      And to be really honest, they're not much against a steady nerve and a hefty crowbar either.

      Dogs or headcrabs?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  3. Already Solved by Johnny+Doughnuts · · Score: 2

    The software is available for surveillance already. You can setup a threshold of changed pixels in a time window (outside of business hours) and if it is exceeded it sends an e-mail, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_(surveillance_software)

  4. REVO DVR by vinn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I put in a small Revo DVR unit with webcams last year for a small business. It was $800 and I think it was a lot of bang for the buck. It had alarm inputs, whick are simple enough that if you're on a budget you could set up on entryways. The cameras were motion detecters, IR, etc. I definitely recommend it.

    --
    ----- obSig
  5. Almost free? by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They run an extremely lean lifestyle and profit margin, so the solution needs to be almost free.

    Doing nothing has a cost too... possibly more break-ins = more lost profit. There is a potentially high risk cost of doing nothing; depending on what it is, they might be able to budget a lot of money, and the net cost could be zero: assuming the break ins are actually causing damage and hurting their business revenue.

    The idea that you run a business, and you are not willing to spend any money on security is absolutely ridiculous. You should be willing to spend an appropriate amount of money to manage the risk.

    The most important mitigation is probably to have insurance, but again... the premium may increase, the more breakins.

    This may be a matter that a security consulting firm should be hired to look at.

    Hidden cameras with a DVR may be useful to help catch the perps.... however, there is a problem: this is only useful, if responders become aware of the breakin and get there, before the thief can locate the DVR associated with the cameras and destroy it.

    Visible cameras, may be used as a deterrent; however, they are subject to vandalism.

    One of the best deterrents which should not be overlooked is a professionally Monitored security alarm system with External sounders, Internal motion detectors, Door sensors, Glass break detectors, perimeter coverage, and an alarm loop and cellular backup to a central monitoring station, that will dispatch authorities in the event of an alarm.

    1. Re:Almost free? by davester666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Um, this is 100% a waste of money. A monitored security alarm gets rid of nobody but the dumbest B&E'ers. Even if the alarm company is listening, and verifies that a person is physically inside the premises, and phones the cops, the response time is still ridiculous [in downtown Vancouver BC, it was like 20-30 minutes]. And the thieves know it.

      $5 for stickers saying you have a monitored alarm works just as good.

      DVR's need to be fairly good to be able to positively identify somebody, nevermind at night in the dark. And that assumes the police put much effort into looking at it [it usually amounts to the detective on the case looks at the video, and either recognizes the guy or doesn't...end of video]. And does catching the guy make a difference to your business [as in, how fast does the guy have to be caught for him to still have the stuff so you get it back, as once he has passed it along, the likelyhood of ever seeing it again goes WAY down].

      And your insurance rates go up the same amount whether or not the guy gets caught [unless of course, you recover enough stuff to not bother making a claim, which is very rare].

      In general, your best bang for your buck is loss prevention. As in, preventing the stuff from exiting the store prematurely.

      For ground-level shops, try roll-shutters over the windows and doors. As a bonus, they also prevent vandalism like window-smashing.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Almost free? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Get a proper one. [...] The cost is miniscule.

      Moreover, it's a cost which absolutely should have been planned for up front. If you can't afford security, you can't afford to be in business.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Don't bother. by FireballX301 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy business insurance, do what the insurance adjuster wants you to do, and don't do anything more.

    If you don't have or can't afford business insurance, then you should question whether your business is viable or not, especially if a poorly timed robbery can put you under.

    1. Re:Don't bother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy business insurance, do what the insurance adjuster wants you to do, and don't do anything more.

      This. Hacking together some "security system" won't do shit for you. Even if you manage to get some clear video, even if you manage to get the police to look at it, even if you avoid having some half-asleep public defender obliterate you in court because you can't actually prove the timestamp on the video is accurate, even if you manage to get a conviction...how the fuck does help your friends? They still need to take that conviction and use it as leverage in a civil case against the perp, and even if they get a judgement....there is no cash register at the court house! Your friends aren't going to see a dime from some broke-ass criminal deadbeat.

      This is what insurance is for...to insure assets against risk and let you move on with life.

  7. webcamd on UNIX by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi, what you need is webcamd for a low powered machine with a cheap USB webcam (best to check the chipset compatibility before buying, just in case).

    There'll be a bit of manual page reading, setting the motion detection thresholds and areas, configuring it to start on boot, archive/FTP images taken, add timestamps to the images, etc, and writing the scripts that will get run when motion is detected, but it'll be cheap, customizable and it'll work.

    I've used this setup in a local maritime simulator where there was a breakin attempt (lots of projectors and electronics naturally), and they wanted a bit of extra security on the cheap.

    HTH,

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  8. Re:Chloroform by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember: Anesthesiology pays relatively well because knocking people out is easy; but knocking them out such that you can wake them back up is hard.

    Also, murder charges are a real hassle, and even jurisdictions that allow you to shot people for little more than trespassing tend to frown on lethal traps...

  9. Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by wonkavader · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This does nothing. But it completely stops break-ins and it's cheap.

    https://spygear4u.com/ds_proddetail.asp?prod=GS-LS-131

    Watch the videos you can find of it around. It's very scary. Does nothing, of course, but it's VERY scary. And that will keep your family's store safe.

    1. Re:Whatever seems reasonable... plus this by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's all fun and games until your cat dies of exhaustion.

  10. Re:Live there by amiga3D · · Score: 2

    Messy though. Not an elegant solution.

  11. Monitored Alarm System by rhook · · Score: 2

    If they cannot afford the less than $100/month for this service they're not going to be in business long since they obviously aren't turning a profit.

  12. My alarm system by slashmydots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At my repair shop, I have a $1 contact-break alarm system on my back door. As soon as it goes off, 100 dB alarm in your face and it's rather difficult to disable without knowing how it works. Not many people would say "well, that alarm is blasting but let's keep robbing it." They just run.

    I can't believe modern people are still stupider than medieval people. This is pure castle theory. You don't build tons and tons and tons of defense like walls and locks and moats and then just leave it. Persistent threats will find a way in. What did rich people and kings do? Set traps. Make it look somewhat secure but then oops, you stepped on the wrong rock. Now there's spikes in your face. Or you pick a lock on the treasure chest and it released poison gas because the treasure chest is actually backwards and the real lock is on the back.

    Bars on the windows are nothing. They'll just bring a crow bar. The "low hanging fruit" theory about which stores get robbed do not apply here. But add traps aka window break alarms and make sure the "Protected by alarms" and red blinking lights are showing and a thief would have no idea what trap they're about to fall into and would stay away.

    1. Re:My alarm system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A friend had a remote shop (sop easy to break in without detection and difficult to respond to quickly) which he wired with a simple intrusion alarm system, but also included a fog machine like the kind you buy at Halloween. When the alam is tripped the sirens beging and the lights are switched off and the fog macine starts and the thief assumes he started a fire and leaves. It's worked twice so far with no loss of property, just replacing the busted door.

  13. Security should be "in depth" by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm seeing a lot of partial solutions here. Both in what has been done, and in what is being proposed. The first thing you should be doing though has been mentioned, and that's talk with your insurance adjuster. At the very least you can find out what your liabilities are for various security measures, and possibly what measures will reduce your insurance rates.

    Start by looking at what a thief is going to see as they look at how to enter the property. You may find the TV series from a few years back "it takes a thief" (or something like that) helpful in looking at the entire place for security problems. The doors and windows may be barred, but is it possible to gain access through the floor, or ceiling? Even a good barred door may be a problem if it's sheltered in such a way that you can't see if someone is working on the lock.

    Part of that should also be looking at what you can do to improve deterrence. Signs, visible (if non-functional) alarm panels, even a steadily blinking light next to a sign labeled 'Alarm System' can be a deterrent.

    And finally look for ways to monitor the approaches to the property both front and back, and if the building is stand alone, all around the building. You may want to use PIR along with IR Lighting to capture movement around the building.

    If you are presuming that someone will break in after you've identified (and hopefully fixed) the issues from outside, then you're to the detect and defend internal options. High resolution cameras, covering the access points. Motion detection, door and window open sensors, glass break detectors, etc. These are intended to generate alerts and set up a means to capture what information you can about the thief. Tip, mark the door frame on either side of likely entrances with contrasting tape to form a crude (half foot or 20 cm increment) tape measure to give you a quick estimate of how tall someone passing by the entrance is.

    Obviously you will need to decide for yourself how critical it is to secure different parts of your store. High value gem dealers usually place their entire stock in a vault of some sort overnight. If you know what the reason is behind the break-ins in the area (paying for drugs being common) you may be able to protect high value items by making it easier to steel a few low value items that you are less concerned about loosing.

    Understand what the thief is working with. Unless you've been cased for a professional theft, in which case you're insurance carrier may have other suggestions for you, Most thefts are a snatch and grab variety, the thief is looking to get in, get something and get out. Be gone before the cops show up. If you know the cops will be there within 20 min, (talk with other businesses in the area that have experienced break-ins to find out if that estimate is even in the balpark) then you know how hard you have to make it for a thief to get at the valuables.

    Also set policies (and follow them) for how to deal with elements of the store that are critical for operating. Assume that a thief can get the cash register, all cash within the store, and possibly your computers in the store. Does someone have a spare cash register, and operating cash for the day that they can bring in at the start of the day if you need to get going while making repairs? Is there sufficient spare stock in an off-site storage to get up and running the next business day, or are you going to be waiting a week for your suppliers to restock? Is the customer information on your systems at work in a secure system? Do you have off site backups of your inventory and books? Have you a policy of depositing all cash over and above what you absolutely have to have for daily operations on a nightly basis? Do you have multiple known locations where you can make those deposits so that if construction makes your usual after hours depository unavailable you can still make your deposit. Have you tested your off site backup solution to confirm that if your systems up and left, or a vandal cam in and drove a pick-ax

    --
    You never know...
  14. Re:Chloroform by demonlapin · · Score: 2

    As one business owner in my hometown did, paint the phrase "GUARD DOG WILL KILL" on the walls. I don't even know if he had a dog, but it worked...

  15. Is your time free? by houghi · · Score: 2

    Are you working for free? That means that you are paying for their security. Great if you are willing to do that, but it also means that if you are out of town on a holiday with no cell reception and there is an issue, who are they going to call?

    And although this might be a fun project to work on, this is their livelihood you are experimenting with. And it is experimenting. Otherwise you would not ask the questions.

    tell them this before that you will do a best effort, but that there are no guarantees that things either break down or that things do not go as you imagined they would happen. People are not recognizable because the camera was too high and not enough light in the place where the thief was. Too much light. Too low, so the staff filed a complaint about privacy invasion.

    What happens if the internet connection is out? What if the power is out? What if the phone dies? What if the phone company kills the number, because they forgot to pay for the next installment in 5 years time?

    The first thing you need to figure out why they broke into that store and not the one next door. Then you can start looking for ways to not want them to break in. Security camera's don't do anything and neither do motion detectors, unless they contact a security company.

    The cheapest way to help them is to tell them to contact an expert who knows not only the technical stuff, but the rest as well. Where to put the camera's. Then propose them that you are there to ask all the technical questions to see if he knows what he is talking about and if you find any loopholes.

    That way they can contact another small business owner and help the community as well as defend themselves. That person will be able what the advantages and disadvantages are, because of his experience.

    Sure, not free, but cheaper then having not thought of one thing and closing the business because of it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  16. What about insurance? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Often your insurance will demand certain CERTIFIED minimum requirements with your insurance premium going down the more you meet their requirements.

    And those requirements don't have to make sense or be best practice but they are the difference between your insurance company paying out and not paying out.

    If requirements made sense, we would LONG since have had HD camera's recording to HD's rather then very very very poor camera's recording to low quality tape. But your own 4k mug shot and tricorder scan of the perps DNA and entire social history will see your insurance claim thrown out with a scornful laugh while a certified wobbly 320x200 etcha sketch will get you fully re-imbursed.

    So: First check with your insurance company.

    Next: Crime prevention is about denying criminals what they want:

    1 Fast

    2 Easy

    3 Cheap

    4 Low risk

    5 Money

    So do stop criminals make their crime be

    1 Slow

    2 Hard

    3 Expensive

    4 High risk

    5 Non paying.

    Your shop needs a door and to be inviting it needs to be airy and this is done by making it out of glass. But a glass door is easily shattered. A wooden door with two large glass panes separated by a wood bar in the middle is ALMOST as inviting but now the burglar either needs to remove the door, open it or climb in through ONE of the smashed panels. This is slower. He will still get in but be able to steal less in the same amount of time. This makes it less profitable.

    Shutter I mean one of those rollup "fences" that drop out ofthe celing, no idea what their english name is.

    One thing you could do for instance is leave your display window open but install a shutter inside the store itself as an additional barrier to overcome. Barely visible during the day, at night an extra barrier. Many people place them infront of doors but this just requires you to lift the shutter, then bust in the doors that tend to open inwards.

    Place an electrically lowered shutter BEHIND inwards opening doors, how do you open that one without a key? You can't push the doors in because the shutter is blocking that and you can't lift the shutter because the doors are in the way. Remember, theft prevention is like preventing being eaten by a lion, you don't need to be able to outrun the lion, you just need to outrun your neighbor.

    Hard is similar to slow of course in that you make the burglars work just that little bit harder. Just one more lock, just one more barrier to overcome. One thing we as consumers hate is those plastic wraps around products but they have a simple reason. They are very large meaning it is hard to conceal for shop lifters or at least conceal as many. And they are hard to open to make it hard to open them and take their contents. We know this works because well, we all bitch about how hard they are to open. Most of the large plastic containers are pure theft prevention and contain a fully serviciable selling/display package inside for shops that don't need to fear shoplifters.

    Do you NEED to store all your most valuable products in handy to carry containers right near the entrance to the warehouse? Or could you place your most expensive products on the highest shelf in the furthest corners? And lock up the ladder? And add some barbed wire to the shelves for those trying to climb it?

    Think of shoe stores, if they are smart, they one have either the left or right shoe on display. Putting both the right and left shoe in the same size outside is asking for it but how many shoe thieves are interested in only left side shoes? I don't know if this was purely accidental but I did once notice that all the shoe shops in one area all had only the left shoes on display.

    Expensive might be a little less clear but while you might think that a prepared thief can cut through any chain in any case you might as well get the cheapest available, the simple fact is that not all locks/chains etc are the same. And the better ones require mo

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  17. Re:Live there by TheLink · · Score: 3, Funny

    Elegant? What do you want? Lightsabers?

    --
  18. Re:Simplicity... by Joce640k · · Score: 2

    No, that's far too simple. He's after a high-tech solution.

    I still want to know how sending an email will prevent the burglars. Is he going to put up a sign: "Warning! This shop protected by email!" ?

    I'm not sure I'd hire him as a security consultant. I might do something crazy like ask a local cop what to do. Somebody who knows the area and knows what sort of people break into shops. That's just me though...YMMV.

    --
    No sig today...
  19. Re:Simplicity... by crutchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i bought a really nice bike years ago when i started university and it was stolen (locked up in an open public place within the university grounds)... talking to campus security revealed that it was commonplace and that the solution was to use a cheap shitty looking bike because they aren't targeted

    in other words... make your store appear less of a target; if you have massive steel bars on the windows and security cameras everywhere, crims will think you are protecting something of value. i dunno what the store sells, but you may want to look at what measures are used by other similar stores in the area.

    there are a bunch of possible reasons why your store could have been targeted:
    - what sort of neighborhood is it in? (maybe shift to somewhere with lower crime)
    - do you have any enemies? (think outside the box here a bit, such as does your wife have nasty spats on facebook? women can be as vindictive as men)
    - how do you get on with your competitors? (you're not competing with the mafia are you?)
    - are the police offering any advice? if so, maybe consider following it

    at the end of the day, you need to analyze how it is affecting your business overall. i'm guessing you're not in the security business so having bars on the windows and alarms and cameras probably is costing a lot and not contributing to increased sales. the decisions you make should be sound business decisions, as well as consideration of your personal or family situation if you think there is any risk (what happens if someone comes in while you are in the store?). for the business, add it to your threats column and see how it all stacks up. if you are spending more on security to the point where you're not making enough to pay your bills then the viability of your business in on the line. continuing an unviable business out of spite for the criminals is stupid obviously (that's how government's think, not small busininesses).

    trying to shape the problem to suit a solution that an IT specialist can help with is putting the cart before the horse; more security may not be the right solution.

    there isn't really enough info provided to give much more of a story but its a fairly common problem with shop fronts so there should be a lot of folks out there with ideas.

  20. Re:Simplicity... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 2

    put up a sign: "Warning! This shop protected by email!" ?

    Warning! This shop protected by attack email.

    That way they would-be perps know that they'll have to deal with malicious payloads, instead of just phishing and 419 like you get from the usual sleepy bone-chewing guard emails.

  21. Re:Live there by flyneye · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "An initial period of several months of intense training in marksmanship and urban combat followed up with weekly practice and regular refresher training will be needed."

    What a load of shit. A good gun safety course takes a few afternoons on the weekend. The urge to return to the range and practice is natural.
    Most gunplay with handguns occurs at less than 50 feet and the majority of that at less than 25 feet. Train intensely if you are shooting for the Olympics, train realistically if you want to hit a human size target effectively. Choose an adequate weapon for the task at hand. A .45 cal is just about perfect for personal protection.
      a .40 will go through walls, cars easily, a .38 couldn't bring down an aged Pope with a whole clip, a 9mm is just a Euro .38. .357,.44 and .50 are fine for disabling freight trains and semi-trucks .22 and .32 will protect you from rabbits.

    Mostly, get gun advise from someone involved with weapons and training. Getting a bunch of anti-gun-nut propaganda from some pacifist hippie on the internet is useless as the one giving it.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  22. Watch again - Mythbusters yanked axles by raymorris · · Score: 2

    Watch the Mythbusters episode again. What they considered "busted" was the part in the movie where the car rose up over the rear wheels and kept going. Instead, the rear axle broke loose of the suspension, but the wheel wells kept it from being left behind. AFTER trashing the suspension and the underside of trunk, the cable broke. Mythbusters said "this car will not be driving any further". The Mythbusters test can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRHMNc5WyB4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

  23. Re:Go ballistic on them by wvmarle · · Score: 2

    It is powerful enough for this:

    The skin of his hands was white and black due to the burns.

    But:

    Nah it wasn't powerful enough to kill somebody, made sure of that.

    That is totally contradictory.

    A quick look at some web sites gives me answers of 15 mA across the heart to be the minimum lethal current, while burns can be expected at currents of 200 mA and above. That are huge currents to run through one's body, and if any vital organs are in the way (e.g. hand to foot - drawer to ground) it's simply lethal.

    Cattle fences give nasty shocks, yet work at far lower voltages than 170 kV (2-10 kV usually), and give pulses of just microseconds in length instead of being constant on like you do.

    Lightning strikes produce burns while victims often actually survive, thanks to this being a very short pulse and the current is usually running mostly along the skin, and not through the body. Of course we all know lightning can very well be lethal. High voltages are just not something to fool around with.

  24. Re:Chinese no-names to the rescue by Above · · Score: 2

    I've evaluated a ton of IP cameras, from low end $49 units to high end $2000 PTZ night vision units. In my experience, cameras like the ones you linked to are 100% useless, and a waste of time and money. Why? Imagine quality.

    Security cameras serve three purposes. The deterrence is just the crook being able to see them. A working camera isn't even required for that purpose, and fakes are sold for as cheap as $10. The second purpose is to identify the criminal. For that you need a VERY clear picture. Getting one is tricky during daytime, and requires careful camera placement and relatively unsophisticated criminals. Getting one at night requires a high quality camera, and a high quality IR illuminator. I have yet to see a sub $250 camera that's worth even considering, and really good imagines start in the $500 range. The lowest end line I would recommend are Y-Cam (www.y-cam.com), their Bullet line is acceptable in many outdoor situations, and their Knight line can be ok indoors, at short range. Axis makes plenty of great options, but probably starting in the $800 and up range. The thing to remember though, is even if you get a perfect image of the criminal the police have to be willing to take it, find the person, and prosecute; and 9 times out of 10 you will get nothing back as they have destroyed the merchandise and have no money to pay restitution.

    The third reason? Insurance. Several people have already said on here business insurance is the best option, and do what they recommend. That's true, however they may question your claims, wondering if an intruder really did the damage. Here a camera showing an overview of the shop and the damage the intruder causes inside can be quite valuable in getting insurance to pay out more of the claim. Image quality is not quite as critical, but night vision still is. 1-3 Y-Cam bullets inside should get the job done.

    On the Y-Cam products, here's why I like them. They are solidly made, and have decent sensors and IR illuminators. They all take a MicroSD card and can record locally, meaning no-DVR is required for a basic setup. For an advanced setup, software like SecuritySpy can be used for a central DVR, which combined with the onboard MicroSD means two copies of everything. Destroy the DVR, get images from the camera. Destroy the camera, get images from the DVR. Y-cam and SecuritySpy are both also very DIY friendly companies, designed for SOHO use.

    But, don't rely on cameras. Make the business look like less of a target. Basic low-key security. Have good insurance. Make sure cash and untraceable valuable are in a safe or off premises every night. Cameras don't prevent crime, they just make catching the criminal and getting an insurance payout more likely.