Homeland Security Stole Michael Arrington's Boat
An anonymous reader writes "Michael Arrington, founder of TechCrunch, lives near Seattle and bought a boat there. He ordered it from a company based near him, but across the border in Canada. Yesterday, the company tried to deliver it to him, and it had to clear customs. An agent for the Department of Homeland Security asked him to sign a form. The form contained information about the boat, including its cost. The price was correct, but it was in U.S. dollars rather than Canadian dollars. Since the form contained legal warnings about making sure everything on it is true and accurate, Arrington suggested to the agent that they correct the error. She responded by seizing the boat. 'As in, demanded that we get off the boat, demanded the keys and took physical control of it. What struck me the most about the situation is how excited she got about seizing the boat. Like she was just itching for something like this to happen. This was a very happy day for her. ... A person with a gun and a government badge asked me to swear in writing that a lie was true today. And when I didn't do what she wanted she simply took my boat and asked me to leave.'"
Rich people problems.
A person in a position of power abused that power? Well color me surprised! I'm sure this has everything to do with DHS and nothing at all to do with the fact that every imaginable authority organization has had people who abuse their power since the dawn of time. Why is this news? Pursue your problem, get it resolved... But this is not "news for nerds" by any reasonable stretch of the imagination.
I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
Wow, your blaming this on Romney.. What a blind sheep you are.
If I got stopped by the police and they said "we won't give you a speeding ticket if you just sign this piece of paper saying you admit you were doing 10 mph over the limit" I would sign the piece of paper, not make a big deal about it if I had in fact been going 12 mph over the limit.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
This is what happens when you give anyone power without having balance and checks to keep them in line.
There are balances and checks. It's called the "legal system". It's why 2nd Amendment ideologues are so deluded.
When the government infringes your rights... you are not within your rights to start shooting them in response. And even if you are "within your rights" they'll just shoot and kill you since being alive and sued is better than dead.
There are plenty of checks and balances. At this point you file a claim that the government has illegally seized your property. And if they did then the courts will give you back your property. If they didn't then there was no need for balances and checks since you did something wrong.