Google Releases Chrome 25 With Voice Recognition Support
An anonymous reader writes "Google on Thursday released Chrome version 25 for Windows, Mac, and Linux. While Chrome 24 was largely a stability release, Chrome 25 is all about features, including voice recognition support via the newly added Web Speech API and the blocking of silent extension installation. You can update to the latest release now using the browser's built-in silent updater, or download it directly from google.com/chrome." But if you're more interested in the growing raft of Google-branded hardware than running Google OSes, some good news (via Liliputing) about the newly released Pixel: Bill Richardson of Google posted on Thursday that the Pixel can boot Linux Mint, and explained how users can follow his example, by taking advantage of new support for a user-provided bootloader.
I see what you did there, this is social engineering. Who is going to shout at their monitor "Natalie Portman grits petrified porn"?
Fappist: "Natalie Portman grits petrified porn"
Chrome: "Madly norman sits petrified corn"
Fappist: "NATALIE PORTMAN GRITS PETRIFIED PORN"
Chrome: "Actually foreman knits electrified morn"
FAPPIST: "GRRRRR! NATALIE PORTMAN GRITS PETRIFIED PORN!!!!"
One of these days, I'll have a supported version of Chrome which can address more than 4GB of memory in my !Linux boxen...
"In the end, there is simply no weapon more devastating than the truth, delivered in just the right way." - tnk1
It looks like they're making a marketing mistake: they make it sound as if they added recognition of arbitrary text.
There are only two things voice recognition is useful for:
* taking a small number of distinct commands
* producing nonsense poetry that keeps rhythm and rhyme with input voice
A small corpus of words can be distinguished between pretty easily -- as long as no two are similar to each other. In a real language, with many thousands of words, even a human has a hard time without understanding the subject matter and filling the gaps from context. In fact, what you hear is mostly gaps -- just try to transcribe a series of random words with any real speed. Or, for another example: in a written text, randomly permute all letters except the first and last in every word -- it will still be pretty understandable if you recognize its sense or not at all if you don't. And recognizing the sense is an AI-hard task.
The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
The proposed API itself is agnostic, it just provides a way for a page to ask for mic access and a 'plz speech-to-text-this-audio' mechanism.
Google's implementation, unshockingly enough, phones right back home to the mothership for speech recognition services. I would assume that(if this proposal makes it out of the cradle) implementations will vary: Google will phone home, Apple will 'siri' home, Microsoft might be awfully tempted to phone home on consumer SKUs, but not on enterprise ones; copies of Dragon NaturallySpeaking will probably include a browser plugin that brings your existing recognition training over to web text-to-speech, etc.
It's explained in this video
Since Google is an ad company, you are going to sleep for a looong time dude.
Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
I'm 31 and I am the current generation of consumerists...I can type faster than I can talk (I am special because I was taught to type when I was 7). I was in high school before computers where common. kids now have been typing as long as they have been writing. I don't see speech recognition as being to terribly important, but it does have its use cases.
sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
What is wrong with a third-party ad-blocking extension?
Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
https://www.google.com/search?q=adblock+chrome
https://www.google.com/search?q=cross+domain+request+filter
https://www.google.com/search?q=notscripts
Youre welcome. Dont let that stop you from trotting that out every few releases, even tho these have existed for, oh, a few years now.
I prefer Chrome's adblock to Firefox's. What's the problem?
This space intentionally left blank
That was what my thoughts were... Why does everyone wet themselves like a puppy with a new chew toy when Google and Apple announce "something new and innovative" when it has been on the market by other companies for so long already?!? Weird.....