Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Emoji Project Wants Money For Icons

Kagetsuki writes "There's a project on KickStarter for a Free and Open set of emoji [the graphical emoticon glyph set which has a block reserved in Unicode]. Currently there are no full sets of Emoji that are completely free (as in beer and and freedom), so if this project gets funded it will be the first and only set of emoji that can, say, be distributed with FLOSS Linux/BSD/GNU systems. Not to mention anyone will be able to incorporate them into any project without any restrictive conditions." And lest you think emoji devoid of literary value, reader coondoggie points out that the Library of Congress has just welcomed (or at least allowed) onto its vaunted shelves an all-emoji version of Melville's Moby Dick, created with the help of translators working through Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

156 comments

  1. I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I pay money so that they don't do this project.

    F**king emoticons.

    1. Re:I have another idea by cgimusic · · Score: 1

      xD

    2. Re:I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      U+1F4A9 PILE OF POO

    3. Re:I have another idea by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Funny

      F**king emoticons.

      On the other hand, if you'd paid money for them to do this project, then you'd have more expressive emoticons than * to represent your abject fear and loathing of this whole emoticon nonsense.

    4. Re:I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other, other hand, the chances I'll like this particular set of icons enough to pay for it is pretty slim. However, if it gains wide adoption I'll use them all the time. So I have no incentive whatever to pay for it, but they'll get the advertising if they release a free set.

    5. Re:I have another idea by greggman · · Score: 0

      Fucking racist! You realize that much of the world uses emoji. Maybe you should consider the world doesn't revolve around your tiny limited use

    6. Re:I have another idea by Cerium · · Score: 1

      Uhh... So I'm really hoping this is a joke that sailed over my head, but...

      How, exactly, is he a racist for not liking emoji and/or not seeing the same significance you do? Do you always react this way when someone doesn't like something you do? Your whole response confuses me.

    7. Re:I have another idea by c0lo · · Score: 2

      F**king emoticons.

      On the other hand, if you'd paid money for them to do this project, then you'd have more expressive emoticons than * to represent your abject fear and loathing of this whole emoticon nonsense.

      Fat chance with /.'s UNICODE support - I lost hopes to see it in this life.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is perhaps the most inane argument I have ever read on Slashdot. You deserve some type of reward. Not only have you misquoted the GP, you have somehow linked emoticons--something everybody in the fucking world uses--with racism. Emoji is as much a part of Japanese and Korean culture as Wingdings is part of Western culture. And if someone started railing against Wingdings (which happens), nobody in their right mind would instantly say "that person hates Westerners". You are apparently not in your right mind. Get help.

    9. Re:I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is over-sensitive bullshit. You are looking for racism the same way a drunk redneck is looking for a bar fight. Grow the fuck up.

    10. Re:I have another idea by albacrankie · · Score: 1

      So how come my Japanese father-in-law shouts the equivalent of 'f**king emoji' in Japanese (along with other rants about 'f**king kids', 'f**king politicians', and 'my f**king driveway' - he doesn't have a lawn).

    11. Re:I have another idea by aliquis · · Score: 1

      They was also ugly. I for sure don't want them to become standard in anything I use. Too bad it will happen :(

    12. Re:I have another idea by greggman · · Score: 1, Troll

      Learn to have some cultural sensitivity. You do realize that Japanese input systems all insert these characters right? You don't have to go to some special menu or select some special option. Type in the sound for "house" (because that's how you enter Japanese, by sound) and press "convert" (to get the various characters that fit that sound) and along with the various kanji for house the emoji appear as well. Same for cake, lightning, strawberry, watermelon, birthday, gift, smile, beer, drink, food, etc., etc. Not only does this work on every cellphone in Japan it even happens on OSX. The point is IT'S PART OF THEIR EVERYDAY USE OF LANGUAGE. Telling them they're second class citizens of the net because their culture has been using these things for > 10 years but in your opinion they shouldn't be included sounds pretty racist to me.

    13. Re:I have another idea by Molt · · Score: 2

      Txt speak and emoticons are part of the everyday use of language where I live, does my dislike of those make me racist against them too? You do realise people can dislike something that someone, or even a nation, commonly does without disliking the nation or it's population?

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    14. Re:I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      racism is hating a person or group of people because of their race. It is not hating some *thing* that happens to be used by an entire race of people. That's a bit like calling someone a racist because they don't like cowboy hats.

    15. Re: I have another idea by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's not racism. Second, Japanese people input by a) Hiragana (if it's a cell phone) or by using b) romaji (if it's a smartphone using ATOK or a PC). They don't input by "sounds". They input letters. Or maybe me and my near native Japanese fluency is wrong. Emoji are just fucking doodles in mails.

    16. Re:I have another idea by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Looks like 17bits. Sorry, but won't work in chrome's V8. Seriously, V8 uses UCS-2 instead of UTF-8? WTF Man?

    17. Re: I have another idea by greggman · · Score: 0

      Well, I wrote a big long reply in Japanese but racist slashdot deletes all non ASCII :-(

      Maybe you should read Japan's own description of Hiragara (http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%B2%E3%82%89%E3%81%8C%E3%81%AA) where the first sentence says, "Hiragana are the the characters used to write Japanese language sound parts."

      Type in "maru" into any Japanese IME and it will produce several types of circles. Type "shikaku" and you'll get a few types of squares. In modern IMEs (Windows 8, OSX 10.7+, iOS) type "beeru" and they'll bring up the unicode symbols for beer. "keiki" will produce the unicode symbol for cake etc..

      The point is emoji are fully integrated into their culture. It's not some special software they have to install. They don't have to go to some special emoji input mode to use it. Every phone and every computer already input emoji directly in their standard input mode. Some older PC IMEs support a few less. Modern IMEs support them all. It's time they were supported everywhere.

    18. Re: I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously mentally disturbed to care this much about such an inane topic. Again, get help. Seriously.

    19. Re:I have another idea by jrumney · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Japanese input systems all insert these characters right? You don't have to go to some special menu or select some special option. Type in the sound for "house" (because that's how you enter Japanese, by sound) and press "convert" (to get the various characters that fit that sound) and along with the various kanji for house the emoji appear as well.

      I predict illiteracy becoming a big problem in Japan in the near future. It has already happened to an extent with the movement from paper to keyboard input, but as emoji start to supplant kanji in everyday use, more and more teenagers are going to start forgetting which kanji is which. Do they really want to be making this movement back to writing with pictograms as a society?

    20. Re: I have another idea by greggman · · Score: 1

      And you're obviously racist to dismiss 140million Japanese people's daily computer usage. Hopefully some day you'll stop being racist. In the meantime I'll keep pointing these kinds of things out for clueless people like yourself.

    21. Re:I have another idea by greggman · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you said the same thing when they added Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Sanskrit, Thai and other non English characters. If it was up to you they'd have frozen language at English only.

    22. Re:I have another idea by aliquis · · Score: 1

      No.

      And these are still ugly and it would be sad to see them in anything.

      Also they are all white / red heads.

    23. Re:I have another idea by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      And that matters how, exactly? Much like UTF8, UCS-2 is just an encoded version of UCS-4 so it really doesn't make any difference other than memory usage.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    24. Re:I have another idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is perhaps the most inane argument I have ever read on Slashdot. You deserve some type of reward. Not only have you misquoted the GP, you have somehow linked emoticons--something everybody in the fucking world uses--with racism. Emoji is as much a part of Japanese and Korean culture as Wingdings is part of Western culture. And if someone started railing against Wingdings (which happens), nobody in their right mind would instantly say "that person hates Westerners". You are apparently not in your right mind. Get help.

      I was really hoping for a "Whoosh" in there somewhere.

  2. i dont know WTF is this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..therefore, it sounds entirely supportable.

    1. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Michael Cooney (coondoggie) trolling for clicks again.

    2. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by cgimusic · · Score: 1

      It is basically a copyright free set of all the "official" emoticons.

    3. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Are you shitting me? Are you telling me I'm not supposed to be using :D without a license? Or :P ?

      Also, there are 800 "official" emoticons?

    4. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I never realized that was his name. I honestly always just thought it was some racist user handle.

    5. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (same AC)
      He pops up every once in a while with a flurry of submissions to his posts at NetworkWorld. I think of him as the logical Roland Piquapaille. Can't be bothered to check spelling of Roland's last name.

    6. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you shitting me? Are you telling me I'm not supposed to be using :D without a license? Or :P ?

      No, you can type :D all you want. You can even print and publish it in a typeface which you own the rights to use.

      There are fonts that contain prettified versions of emoticons as single characters. None of them are free. This project wants to create a free typeface containing such glyphs.

      Not impressed? Well, then that makes two of us.

    7. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Ah. Okay, so this isn't simply some images that are embedded in a client or wherever you want them to be, based on an interpretation of your typing an emoticon in actual ASCII -- this is an *actual font*. So . . . it's a variant of wingdings, but aimed at chatting?

    8. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by cgimusic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kind of. It goes beyond the scope of a usual font because the emoticons are actually images that can be displayed in full color but they can be manipulated like a character in regular text because they are stored as a Unicode character.

    9. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you shitting me? Are you telling me I'm not supposed to be using :D without a license? Or :P ?

      Yes. Please send us a check for $699 for a single-CPU license. Make checks payable to "Darl McBride".

    10. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This project wants to create a free typeface containing such glyphs.

      Aw jeez. Maybe should pitch in and find these guys some jobs.

      You want to support the free exchange of information online? Give your money to the EFF instead where it can do something worthwhile.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by Nikker · · Score: 1

      I actually agree that this is a bit dumb but then I think, if we don't do this then some douche bag corporation will and find an equally dumb way to screw with everyone. I can just imagine Unicode font sets coming under fire because they come with some home brew Emoji that is similar to a Copyrighted one and they follow to sue everyone.

      For this price it could just be a necessary evil to fund this.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    12. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      So we finally have a lower case smiling cat and an upper case smiling cat?

      Now where is the "Shut up and take my money" Unicode glyph?

    13. Re:i dont know WTF is this.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      For this price it could just be a necessary evil to fund this.

      You're probably right, friend.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  3. Emoticons are already free and open source. by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, I understand that I'm old and grumpy, but . . .

    The point of emoticons are that they are simple ASCII text that convey basic emotional context. Emoji are not "emoticons". They're just tiny pictures. Are you seriously telling me that a tiny picture of a whale is in any way related to an emoticon? You know how you can tell these have no relation to emoticons? Because their ultimate stretch goal in the kickstarter is to create more than 800 of the little images and I'm pretty sure there aren't 800 emotions on which to base emoticons. Let's just call them "tiny little pictures for children to use on their phones and in forum messages to be obnoxious".

    I'll help fund a kickstarter that aims to eradicate every form of chat of these annoying things. I used to have forums where people would use these constantly. Since I didn't include them by default, they used these idiotic services that let them embed emoticons on any website forum, as long as you also spammed their banner while you were doing it. I quickly wrote some code to filter all of that out, too.

    1. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I cannot possibly believe that there are not already free emoji, every chat program I've installed in ages has had them and many of those have been open source, GPL, etc. Where'd they get theirs? Also, there's no reason why this should cost money. It should definitely be crowdsourceable for free.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      rabid anime fanboy + brony + valley girl with a severe squint + manic pixie dream girl = emoji ?

      (All I know is that whenever I see an emoji, I automatically start to read the person's words with a strong valley girl accent in my mind.)

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    3. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Ozoner · · Score: 3, Informative

      > The point of emoticons are that they are simple ASCII text

      And they date back even further. The Ascii ones were derived from the various Teleprinter emoticons (Baudot code, etc),
      which in turn came from the Morse equivalents ("HI" for hilarity, 73, 88, etc).

      The "boom boom" used in comedy shows, possibly came from the "dit dit" used by Morse operators for exactly the same purpose.

      No doubt bored Semaphore operators invented their own variations as well.

    4. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      Your previous comments indicate you didn't even know what Emoji is before this article, but yet now it is "annoying" to you? And you've resorted to ad hominem attacks against those that use them? "Children to use on their phones and in forum messages to be obnoxious"?

      A picture can be worth a thousand words, and emoji is handy. I use it all the time and have a couple emoji domains registered that will someday make me filthy rich ;) (oh shit, does my emoticon annoy you? I suppose I should have added more sarcasm and ignored the wink to please you). Anyone who communicates with others via text frequently can appreciate the value of emoticons in trying to add emotion to a conversation. Surely you don't think all communication is verbal or read? Emoticons and Emoji are a great supplement to text based communication.

      Okay, I understand that I'm old and grumpy, but . . .

      Yeah, basically, and you seem to have spent a lot of time in this article complaining complaining about something "annoying" that you'd never even heard of before. Having a bad day are we?

      I guess if Linux doesn't support Emoji and there is no free (libre) version of them, this is a good project. I very much appreciate the Emoji support that OSX and iOS have.

    5. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      I am also surprised that there are no libre emoji images available. But there is nothing wrong with paying towards this.

      Sure it *can* be crowdsourced, but what can't? Paying for things is okay sometimes too...

    6. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sure it *can* be crowdsourced, but what can't? Paying for things is okay sometimes too...

      It's okay for you, and that's fine with me, but it's not okay for me unless there's a reason for it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      Well, as a Kickstarter project it's optional and you don't need to support it. :) Nor will I be.

    8. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rabid anime fanboy + brony + valley girl with a severe squint + manic pixie dream girl = emoji ?

      (All I know is that whenever I see an emoji, I automatically start to read the person's words with a strong valley girl accent in my mind.)

      I was about to ask someone to explain to me at what point "emoticon" became corrupted into "emoji", and explain it in a way that DOESN'T boil down to "lol its japan so its better ne", but your description seems to both A) be most accurate description possible, and B) serve to dash my hopes of my request ever possibly being fulfilled.

    9. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      You've kind of touched on the whole point of Kickstarter, now haven't you? You aren't forced to back something you have no interest in.

    10. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Why bother with emoji, though? Just use Chinese ideographs. They're the natural final progression of this idea, after all. Moreover, if you're just after basic emoticons, there's a Unicode range from 1F600 to 1F64F.

    11. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by lxs · · Score: 1

      :sadclown: :hug:

    12. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2

      You're talking about emoticons, not emoji. BTW the full emoji set includes just under 830 images, not 20 some yellow smiley faces.

    13. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Emoji is just from Japanese cell phone mail software. To save on space they gave each image a character code and stored the images on the device. This became a standard in a block of Unicode. Emoji are not just translations of symbols like ":)" to a smiley face, they each have their own character code like a font.

    14. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      As linked and explained in the kickstarter there is a block of unicode specifically defined for emoji as transferred from the original emoji sets. Here's the list and the mapping: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode6.0%E3%81%AE%E6%90%BA%E5%B8%AF%E9%9B%BB%E8%A9%B1%E3%81%AE%E7%B5%B5%E6%96%87%E5%AD%97%E3%81%AE%E4%B8%80%E8%A6%A7

    15. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Which is, of course, why this is great. Like a lot of crowd-funded projects, I think this is dumb. Most of that is probably just because I'm old and set in my ways and scared of everything new -- especially if it's something people under the age of thirty enjoy doing. It's probably evil and involves deviant sex and communism.

      But as long as enough people do see enough value in it to chip in, it becomes a thing. Value for value and all that other Ayn Rand stuff. I don't see the point in this thing at all, but if enough other people dig it, there ya go. Hell, I'm going to go kick in a couple bucks right now, even though I will never use it and won't even ever check the kickstarter page about it again. Just because, well, why not? . . . (okay, I'm back -- just went and kicked in $5 as backer #29).

    16. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      The descriptions of emoji as I've just read (in the submission and elsewhere) basically say that they're graphical emoticons ("graphical emoticon glyph"). Emoticons, as far as I understand, are a purely textual representation of faces to convey emotion in the context of writing (and date back more than a century). It sounds like referring to them as emoticons (as everything I've read just after this article -- and including it) does may be very inaccurate.

      Looking at some of the examples out there, it sounds like emoji are "tiny images", period? I mean, a coffee cup or a squid don't represent emotion or anything of any sort, so . . . they seem like a thing unto themselves.

      Anyway, I don't see myself ever being in a situation where I would use this, but I kicked five bucks into your project out of respect. I'm easily pessimistic and critical of things, but I'm not against helping out a tiny bit even if I don't get them. :)

      Good luck!

    17. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      As should be clear from my comment (I think), I said I was familiar with graphical faces representing the underlying emoticon, but had no idea they were called "emoji". Or that they (as I've since learned) apparently don't have much to do with emoticons at all (but unfortunately everything I've read this evening mentions them in relation to emoticons in the first sentence) and are really just lots of graphical glyphs of all kinds of things.

      It'd be a bit like saying how dumb and annoying you think photos of people flat on their stomach on objects and in weird places is and then someone telling you "that's called planking" and then you responding "oh, then yeah -- playing is dumb and annoying".

      I thought a thing was dumb and annoying, from my exposure to it over the last decade or more online. I found out it had a name. I then stated that the thing I've always thought was annoying is still annoying, but used the (I think) proper name for the thing which I found annoying.

      And no, your emoticon doesn't annoy me, because it's an emoticon. If Slashdot had converted it into a giant animated winking smiling GIF, I would have been annoyed as fuck.

    18. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      By referring to it as ASCII text, I was just describing what they are now and that they're essentially unadorned regular text sets (and certainly not images). Maybe using ASCII was a little misleading in my comment. My understanding of emoticons, themselves, is that they're almost as old as the printing press.

    19. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      As should be clear from my comment (I think), I said I was familiar with graphical faces representing the underlying emoticon, but had no idea they were called "emoji". Or that they (as I've since learned) apparently don't have much to do with emoticons at all (but unfortunately everything I've read this evening mentions them in relation to emoticons in the first sentence) and are really just lots of graphical glyphs of all kinds of things.

      It'd be a bit like saying how dumb and annoying you think photos of people flat on their stomach on objects and in weird places is and then someone telling you "that's called planking" and then you responding "oh, then yeah -- playing is dumb and annoying".

      I thought a thing was dumb and annoying, from my exposure to it over the last decade or more online. I found out it had a name. I then stated that the thing I've always thought was annoying is still annoying, but used the (I think) proper name for the thing which I found annoying.

      And no, your emoticon doesn't annoy me, because it's an emoticon. If Slashdot had converted it into a giant animated winking smiling GIF, I would have been annoyed as fuck.

      As should be clear from my comment (I think), I said I was familiar with graphical faces representing the underlying emoticon, but had no idea they were called "emoji".

      Sorry, re-reading you comment I do agree. But most graphical emoticons are not Emoji, simply graphical emoticons. (IMO) The term Emoji explicitly refers to the standardized (somewhat) character set. As far as the whale & other non-emotional graphics go, who cares? It's a little fun. Text based communication is difficult, and anything that can improve that is great.

      And no, your emoticon doesn't annoy me, because it's an emoticon. If Slashdot had converted it into a giant animated winking smiling GIF, I would have been annoyed as fuck.

      Fair enough. If Slashdot supported Emoji I would have posted a flaming pile of shit. ;)

    20. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    21. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      I completely understand where you're coming. I chose to describe them relating to emoticons because that's what most people are familiar with and that's also basically what they were borne from. I'll try to clean up the description a bit - sorry for the confusion.

    22. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Think of them as macros. Due to the way Japanese and Chinese work it can take a lot of typing on a numberpad phone to write stuff out, even with very advanced prediction software that can do entire sentences. Emoji are a handy way of expressing ideas and emotions with minimal effort.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by aliquis · · Score: 1

      You're talking about emoticons, not emoji. BTW the full emoji set includes just under 830 images, not 20 some yellow smiley faces.

      Turns out we don't know what emoji is, care, have a need for it and in many cases likely don't want it.

    24. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Those "pictures" are just pictures and not characters from the unjcodechar set.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I see, I was confused by the summary (a point you've addressed elsewhere.) I have now utilized Wikipedia.

      It seems to me like you ought to spend the effort and/or money creating an emoji-creating website. User accounts, a simple javascript pixel art tool, a voting system, a packaging system, and a download system, and maybe a tagging system. The packaging system should be able to just grab the highest-ranked of each emoji and stuff them together, or grab them based on user, tags if implemented, etc. Arguably you don't even need an import function, at least not to start with, since the goal is to produce new emoji.

      Harnessing competitive nature makes us all run faster.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by dkf · · Score: 1

      The "boom boom" used in comedy shows, possibly came from the "dit dit" used by Morse operators for exactly the same purpose.

      Probably not. That more likely came from the habit in music halls of using drums to mark the punchline of a joke so that the... less attentive... would know when to laugh.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    27. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Depending on how you implement that that could be a good idea - though it's a whole other project I think. I'm rolling it around in my head now. Permission to use this idea?

    28. Re:Emoticons are already free and open source. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Permission to use this idea?

      Take and be healthy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They want 40$ per icon with the majority of elements reused between icons... Even if Emoji made sense as a thing (and I'm not convinced it does) their asking price is way to high.

    1. Re:Crazy by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Actually we're charging $20 per emoji. A lot of the elements are not shared. The basic face set has elements shared and that's why it was used to make the samples - because we could do it quickly.

    2. Re:Crazy by Cerium · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the article or kickstarter very closely, so forgive me if you already addressed this.

      The one thing I can't quite understand is that your goal is to make a bunch of little vectorized emoticons that are free to use. Many of these are based on things that already exist, but will be done with your own artistic styling (correct?).

      That's all wonderful and whatever, but why does this project demand $50,000? What's stopping you from taking the week or two to fire these things out and just releasing them under the licensing model you claim you want them to be under?

      I know for a fact many of us here have spent years of our lives on projects simply to fill gaps, make cool stuff or generally just make the internet|world|whatever a little better. So again I ask: why does this demand so much money? Why are you only releasing these things once you hit certain monetary goals? Doesn't that seem shitty to you? Because, no offense, it seems pretty shitty to me.

    3. Re:Crazy by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      > Many of these are based on things that already exist, but will be done with your own artistic styling (correct?).
      No. The existing sets all have copyright and licensing terms that DO NOT allow their free use and many of the emoji in use are being used (EG from Apple) are being used in a way that violates the terms. By distributing a fully free and open source set developers everywhere will not have to worry about violating license terms, but will still be able to use emoji.

      > That's all wonderful and whatever, but why does this project demand $50,000? What's stopping you from taking the week or two to fire these things out and just releasing them under the licensing model you claim you want them to be under?
      Becasue there are a lot of them and we don't want to just release a half assed set. We want animated versions, variations, conversion scripts and pre-packaged library wrappers so every can use an extremely broad set of emoji freely and without hassle. That's impossible in two weeks and we just don't have the financial resources to do it on our own. As a company we've actually carrying a debt and we work overtime every day to stay afloat and get ahead enough to pursue the projets we want to. This benefits everyone and gives us a little funding. Also keep in mind we have no projects that have any particular use of emoji, we undertook this project becuase the distribution of unlicensed sets is a genuine problem and a concern to many developers both OSS and otherwise.

      >Why are you only releasing these things once you hit certain monetary goals? Doesn't that seem shitty to you? Because, no offense, it seems pretty shitty to me.
      We're not holding them captive or anything. The emoji will be created upon funding, they don't exist yet. The reach goals are just stating our bare minimum promises at those levels. If we make some ammount between two levels we won't just stop making emoji at the point of the last level we reached - we'll make as much or more as we were funded for. We're not rich and we don't have free time, but we'd prefer to make our money in ways that benefits people other than ourselves and believe open source is a good way to do that. Sorry if you think that's shitty - but you're totally free to make your own set of emoji with your own time and money if you think that's the only decent way to do open source.

    4. Re:Crazy by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Because we are talking here about a Font. With about 850 chars in that font.
      You don't fire those out in a week. You must be a very good (semi) professional to manage onechar per day ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  5. There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by pecosdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's the Japanese.

    The Japanese are incredible copyright grubbers. When they let lose their pictures of the moon, when they tried to recreate the Apollo pics, they had JAXA and NHK copyright notices on the pictures so big they actually detracted from the pictures. I've worked with documentation handed to me by Japanese clients that was so water-marked I could barely read the poorly written instructions contained on it.

    The overall Japanese mindset is the opposite of the Free and Open Source community. If their own people would put the effort into making an actual Emoji set for their own language it would take less work to get others on-board with making these toy versions.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by yincrash · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, There is a free version courtesy of Google. Android has an ASL available version. preview image and github link

    2. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      There's nothing racist about the actions of a culture bringing about the repercussions of those actions.

      The incredibly racist, it's part of the overall culture. There are people within the race that are not racist, but being racist is a cultural value in the overall national culture. It's not me making this observation. I am speaking of the overall culture, not the race. The race is an Asian person of Japanese person. The culture is the racist copyright grubbing one that I'm referring to.

      If i used your logic every white person would be trailer trash, every black person would be a ghetto thug, and every Asian person would work on an assembly line and live in a sweat shop dorm.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    3. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Sorry I missed that. The article suggesting such a thing didn't exist did sort of throw me off the scent. I would mod you informative if I could.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    4. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Sorry for all the stupid typos. Someone has a TV on next to me at high volume and it really throws my reply ability off.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    5. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      How is this different than saying "American culture"?

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    6. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      What you're saying is, thankfully, from an era past. It used to be this way but that's from old companies with old mindsets and old laws. Things have changed a lot, and there is a huge OSS movement here.

    7. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a glyph set, they are not full emoji. The difference is that these are a true font - the only information is outline and fill, they are not multi-colored images.

    8. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Actually he's kind right. Copyright stuff even up into the early 2000's was crazy here. Now with new laws and the uprise of OSS it's settled down to the point where it's probably better here than in the US.

    9. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by pecosdave · · Score: 2

      I'm glad you came in to say that.

      I don't have a lot of current ties to Japan, and due to the language barrier and the fact English language news reports on the US, a little Canada, England, and maybe a few other places in Europe and leaves the rest of the world as a giant void it's really hard to keep up. When I'm digging through config files most email addresses I see are US, Germany, England or France.

      I would love to see more Japanese influence on OSS. I absolutely love a lot of Japanese commercial products and I would like to see some of that quality and thought being put into OSS.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    10. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between saying it is a cultural norm and attributing it to a specific kind of person. It doesn't help that English doesn't distinquish some of these categories well, so when you say "Japanese" you can easily be referring to those of Japanese decent or those that are natives of Japan.

    11. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      How is calling me a "typical shitfuck American racist" any less racist than calling out the people of another country on a shared attribute? Saying American in this context is no different than when I said Japanese.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    12. Re:There's a reason there isn't a Free Emoji. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't have anything that can be called "culture".

  6. Getting paid to doodle by SampleFish · · Score: 1

    Everyone wants to get paid to doodle little icons. It's the American dream. I fully support this overt waste of time a resources.

  7. /care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a KickStarter to make these go away?

    1. Re:/care by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      If you create one I will put a link in our project and we can compete.

    2. Re:/care by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Wait, isn't not backing Kagetsuki's kickstarter project the same as making a kickstarter to "make them go away"? This sounds like a scam for you to just make money for yourself while accomplishing the same thing not giving you (or him) money would. :P

  8. License by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Our licensing model will be the same as the Font Awesome project which is a combination of the SIL Open Font License, MIT License and the CC 3.0 License.

    Seriously? You can't pick one simple license, its got to be 3?

    You guys and you're "freedom". It does not mean what you think it does. More freedom pretty much explicitly requires LESS license, not more.

    Software licenses are the opposite of freedom. They define a list of restrictions.

    If you want it to be 'free', then just BSD license it (MIT is fine since its in your list) and fucking stop.

    Multi-license crap is only for when you're trying to deal with some retarded license like GPL and its purpose built anti-compatibility/virus license being included in your project.

    If you think you need three license options to define freedom you do not in any way understand the meaning of freedom and you're just warping it around to mean restrictions.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:License by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You guys and you're "freedom". It does not mean what you think it does. More freedom pretty much explicitly requires LESS license, not more.

      licence, n - 1. a certificate, tag, document, etc, giving official permission to do something
      Less licence = less permission given = less freedom

      Software licenses are the opposite of freedom. They define a list of restrictions.

      Copyright law defines restrictions, licences relax those restrictions to a greater or lesser extent.

    2. Re:License by jimshatt · · Score: 2

      You guys and you're "freedom". It does not mean what you think it does.

      I don't think that sentence means anything at all... unless you meant "your freedom" ;-). But anyway, the 3 licenses (in Font Awesome anyway) are for 3 different parts of the project and kinda make sense (being licenses specifically designed for these types of works).

    3. Re:License by game+kid · · Score: 1

      I was less concerned about the quantity of licenses (if they want to value ubiquity over strict copyleft, I won't protest) so much as the vague "CC 3.0" license. The Font Awesome project itself mentions CC BY 3.0 so I presume (and hope) they'll use that.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    4. Re:License by Kagetsuki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Three licenses because there's different ways to distribute it - as source (SVG, scripts), as images (heavy implied copyright) and as a font (f*ing insane restrictions because people who create fonts are evil bastards). The three licenses gets rid of the restrictions despite how you use it.

      If there was one license that covered all coditions I would have used that.

  9. Bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every so often something like this comes along to remind me of just how ridiculously bloated UTF-8 is. If you open up a character viewer and browse through the character sets you will quickly find a load of completely miscellaneous symbol sets that are restricted in use to very tiny niches. Wtf is the point? Who decided that just because UTF-8 can represent a large number of characters it should be filled with every character that's ever been used by more than 5 people?

    Go on, explain to me why it's reasonable to use up character slots for parenthesized numbers and letters (0x2474-0x2487, 0x249c-0x24b5) or why you need multiple snowflake characters (0x2731-0x274b). It's just bloat that requires fonts to implement extra, useless symbols.

    Restrict the standard to characters in officially recognized languages and provide escape sequences to switch to embeddable encodings for niche characters that most of us will never even see. It's meant to provide a universal character set for writing text in different languages, not serve as an anthropological archive of humankind's digital semiotics or a toolbox for people with too much time on their hands to try to be cute.

    Someone press the reset button so we can start over without all of this extra crap. And then get off my lawn!

    1. Re:Bloat by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Why? Because there are 2^21 codepoints and there is nothing better to do.

      Also, I'd say it isn't bloated enough, based only on the clusterfuck that is CJK.

    2. Re:Bloat by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

      True. And if we actually do discover life on other plants with different languages, well, we're screwed. I guess we'll have to move to UTF-64.

      --
      The G
    3. Re:Bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're welcome to use or create fonts that don't implement those glyphs. Just because they are defined doesn't mean you are required to use them.

    4. Re:Bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If each of us is a pretty and unique snowflake then obviously you need multiple snowflake characters to discuss our differences and how we ought to just all come together in peace and happiness. Just like the Unicode character set promotes universal communication and understanding between the nations of our planet. It is all the same ideology, you see.

    5. Re:Bloat by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 1

      If we hit the reset button, can we also fix ASCII? it is by no mean the minimal set most english speakers think it is.

      Why do we need a character to represent to 'v' one after the other? You could write 'w' with to 'v' and handle the ligature where it should be handled, at display time. There are so few words in English with the sequence vv that it makes no sense to have the special case coded in the encoding.

      Also could we handle the dots on the characters 'i' and 'j' like the diacriticals they are? there should be first the the dotless 'i' and 'j' and the some character to add the dots, like all other diacriticals. Also move out the currency symbols ($ and £), they can be represented as text (USD and GBP), no point in have silly symbols in there. Also remove BELL (11), having a symbol for a bell (2407) might be bloated, but having one for the sound of a bell is absurd.

      By the way, why do we need different code points for upper and lower case? They are just variants of each other anyways

      Unicode is certainly messy, but plain ASCII is not much better: the most precious 127 code points of utf-8 are basically wasted to display 32 characters and a bit of punctuation, that is pretty bloated for me, we are just used to it

    6. Re:Bloat by darpo · · Score: 2

      It's just bloat that requires fonts to implement extra, useless symbols.

      Citation needed. There's no requirement. In fact, most fonts have most of Unicode missing. It'd be insane to try to cover the entirety of Unicode with each new font released. The most complete font I've found is Arial Unicode MS, but even that has vast swaths of Unicode missing.

      I think it's neat that there are so many obscure and interesting uses of Unicode. If you don't agree, well, just don't use it?

    7. Re:Bloat by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The parenthesized numbers are symbols used in publishing that they already had fonts for. The goal of Unicode is to support encoding all forms of written communication, so it includes them.

      As to why they can't just put a number in parenthesise, look at the total disaster that is CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean). They tried to combine characters that had the same origin but are written differently in each language, because they are "the same". Now it is impossible to create a font that supports two of those languages because a single Unicode character needs two different glyphs, one for each language. Worse still there is no reliable way to auto-detect which language is in use, and mixed language documents are impossible to represent in Unicode. Lots of people get burned by it every day because they receive emails in two or three of the CJK languages and their browser/email client uses the same font for all of them because the encoding says "Unicode".

      One Unicode character for every glyph in every language. That was the idea.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Bloat by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      While I sort of agree with this I think there is a very real counter-argument - that being that when I use my Japanese font and view a Chinese page I want to see the Japanese version of the shared characters. I'd also like to be able to view less-often used Japanese characters that may not exist in my chosen Japanese font, but would exist in a Chinese font on my system.

      Also, for the most part other than writing style most characters will be recognizably similar. I agree with the Unicode implementation for those technical and practcal reasons.

    9. Re:Bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terminology: You are complaining about Unicode. UTF-8 is not an interchangeable term for Unicode.

    10. Re:Bloat by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Okay, say you manufacturer MP3 players and need a font for the display. You will have to ship a different firmware for Japan, China and Korea. Anyone who listens to both Japanese and Chinese music is still screwed.

      One code point per glyph, that's all I ask.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Bloat by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Most people will never use or even need to understand most words in the dictionary, does it hurt them in any way? The purpose of Unicode is far more practical than "to provide a universal character set for writing text in different languages", it's to end the horrible practice of code pages. To do that, Unicode needs to be a superset of all other code pages, no matter how stupidly they were designed. That is why you have all sorts of control characters and other stuff that absolutely aren't characters, it's pretty hard to complain about that when your ideals are shot after mapping in 7-bit ASCII. I can't speak for the CJK mess, but at least for us here in Europe Unicode has been a big blessing.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:Bloat by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. There's no requirement. In fact, most fonts have most of Unicode missing. It'd be insane to try to cover the entirety of Unicode with each new font released. The most complete font I've found is Arial Unicode MS, but even that has vast swaths of Unicode missing.

      A font represents many characters in a consistent, unique style. Once you have characters that are different enough, trying to have a unique style doesn't make sense. Cyrillic and Latin, that makes sense. You can't really have lowercase greek characters in Arial style, and definitely not Arabic. Just doesn't make sense.

    13. Re:Bloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how ridiculously bloated UTF-8 is

      Compared to other Unicode encodings, I'd say that UTF-8 is the least bloated. Do you know what the words you use mean?

      officially recognized languages

      WTF are "officially recognized languages"? Who decides that?

      and provide escape sequences to switch to embeddable encodings for niche characters that most of us will never even see

      This is exactly what UTF-8 does. It encodes 7-bit ASCII transparently and provides escapes sequences for everything else.

  10. What about autism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if literary works with emoji glyphs in them such as the mentioned Moby Dick would be helpful to people or children with autism.

  11. Lets protect Apple from GPL :) by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    If you want it to be 'free', then just BSD license it (MIT is fine since its in your list) and fucking stop.

    Multi-license crap is only for when you're trying to deal with some retarded license like GPL and its purpose built anti-compatibility/virus license being included in your project.

    How about you stop quoting Fear and Doubt, over a license that does not directly benefit your preferred mega-corporation. Its kind of sad. I'm glad BSD rescued Apple I do, but seriously its depressing, we all know why Apple choose BSD for their limited [often one way takes] from open source projects. The reality is GPL was designed to protect itself from the very abuse of the license you want, and I for one am grateful for that. Seriously Apple has enough cash, seriously there is no need for subterfuge any more.

    1. Re:Lets protect Apple from GPL :) by sdsucks · · Score: 1

      What a skewed and fucked up view you have of the history of OSX.

  12. The best part of the scam... by EETech1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    How we'll use the funds

    We're calculating work time at roughly $20 per work hour for Tohyama, which is lower than what we usually bill him at. Even then half of that rate will go to paying Scroll Ninja lead developer Iwakawa so he can continue working on Scroll Ninja... since we didn't get funded but want to continue anyway

    So half of your money won't even go to the project!

    1. Re:The best part of the scam... by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      Scam? Care to elaborate on how this is a scam? They openly state that this is their plan and it's not even hidden in fine print.

      If you go to a store and someone is selling a new product, tells you the cost, but mentions that half the price of the product is going towards another product he's developing -- is that a scam? Or is that just business in a nutshell?

      Do you honestly think when video game companies make money on games, all that money goes towards patching bugs, creating DLC, or other ongoing maintenance (MMOs)? Because you would hilariously wrong.

    2. Re:The best part of the scam... by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Creator of the project here, and that is correct. Please consider that we won't be selling or profiting from this afterward, and that $10 an hour for a skilled and trained artist is a very low rate. We're scraping by right now, we want a future, and this way we help open source and the community at large.

    3. Re:The best part of the scam... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      But they're explaining that in the project, itself. So what's the scam?

    4. Re:The best part of the scam... by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      I just think that if half of the money raised is really going to another project that they have a responsibility to the potential investors that the other project should be better defined. What is the game? Any screenshots? A link to a demo, or the current Github page? How is the game going to progress through the different levels of funding? What point is the game at now? At what level of funding is it going to be playable? Can it be completed with 250 hours of work if funded to level one? How will going from $5,000 to $50,000 make the game better? None of this is spelled out, yet it is half the cost of the project. Each level of funding should include clear goals for the game. The current state, and the reasons it should be completed should be included in the introduction along with the other half of the project which includes all of those details.

      I've spent 20 years in product development, working with customers, and impressing investors, I know development costs get split, and resources are shared, but when dealing with investors, they typically want to know where the money is going beyond half of it is going to something else we really think didn't get the chance it deserved. The first thing they would ask is tell me more about this other project.

      Imagine making a PowerPoint presentation from the Kickstarter page. You'd have 10 slides, and on the bottom of the 9th slide there'd be two sentences that state half of the money raised is going to something else completely unrelated, and the hands would go up.

      The cost of developing the next iThingy is nowhere close to 50% of the available financial resources of Apple, it's a drop in the bucket, and hardly the same thing as what's going on here.

      When you're standing at the store contemplating a widget, that product is right there in front of you, already done. Even then, if a sign said to purchase this widget, you also agree to purchase our game (or even said the game was included free with purchase) unless you were hell bent on purchasing said widget, you'd likely want to know more about the game because you know that some of your money (and usually not half of it) is going towards the purchase of that game. You would still know that a portion of your overall purchase would be going to the store stocking other items which you have no interest in purchasing, paying employees, keeping the lights on etc. but that (IMHO) is different because it is a part of doing business, not part of the free game offer.

      Would you give to a charity that said half of all the money donated is going to my little sister so she can write that book she's been talking about, or would you perhaps look for a charity that was going to spend all their resources on the cause you wish to help.

      Cheers!

    5. Re:The best part of the scam... by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Hello!

      I guess what strikes me as odd is that you do a good job of providing details about the Emoji, but provide nothing about what Scroll Ninja is even though it is going to consume half of your resources.

      Are there goals for Scroll Ninja to go along with the various levels of funding? Can you provide links to the potential investors that give information on it's current status? What platform is it for? Is it going to be completed (enough to play) if you reach level 1 funding with only 250 hours of time to spend on it? How much will another 2000 hours of time add to the game? Will you make more levels, support more platforms, more weapons etc. What's missing is something to tell how additional funding will help the game as well as it is a significant portion of the project cost.

      Please bear in mind I in no way was trying to implicate that you were going to scam people out of there money (I copied your where's the money going statement) I was only saying that half of the money raised was going to a different unrelated project that does not have any visibility or stated goals in the main description.

      I think actually stating that you have 2 developers working for $10 an hour each will also help your cause, as this is double dirt cheap for anyone talented enough to do these sorts of things!

      I would also donate to Scroll Ninja (if I knew what effect my $ was having) as I am of the side scrolling 2D generation, and enjoy those types of games, so increased visibility of the game in your kickstarter description and goals will IMHO will only help your chances of getting more funding!

      Including a link to the Github page may also increase your odds of gathering investors, or contributors to the game that you may not have gotten before!

      Best of Luck!

    6. Re:The best part of the scam... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Scam? Care to elaborate on how this is a scam? They openly state that this is their plan and it's not even hidden in fine print.

      It's not hidden in the fine print per se, since Kickstarter doesn't allow 'fine print' - but it's not in the title or in the project description or scope of work... it's way down at the bottom.
       
      So, not really a scam - but decidedly misleading, intentionally so.

    7. Re:The best part of the scam... by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      The description was confusing and misleading so I went ahead and changed it. We'll be feeding any excess back into Scroll Ninja is all. Basically this is what happened:
      1. Scroll Ninja kickstarter failed.
      2. Everybody started scrambling to pick up external work.
      3. While picking up a job we realzed one of the libraries we wanted to use was using the copyright and license infringing Apple emoji.
      4. We brought this to the attention of the author, who hadn't realized himself, and there was some panick. We proposed creating the kickstarter and everyone agreed it sounded like a good solution.
      5. Still wanting to continue development of Scroll Ninja, Tohyama decided he would do the emoji project but wanted any excess to continue funding Scroll Ninja (which is essentially -his- game).

      Details of Scroll Ninja are on the (currently neglected due to lack of time and resources) Scroll Ninja webste: http://scrollninja.com/ and on our last kickstarter http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/374397522/scroll-ninja-revised . The source is up on github at https://github.com/Genshin/ScrollNinja .

  13. Unicode Love by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

    I really quite like this project, but love the use [not overuse] of emotions I am actually quite taken with the example Emoji, the examples are all based on a circle [for a simple face] its true, but if you look http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji which covers Tansport/Maps/Symbols and Pictographs. I'm confident I could do a smiley face...but a Pine Decoration or Trumpet not so much. Personally I'd love this project this project to succeed simply because it contains the symbols hot beverage & shortcake.

  14. Hows that a scam by tuppe666 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So half of your money won't even go to the project!

    That is not a scam that is business model [in fact its most business models]. My favourite example of this is Apple make no iPhones...not one; zero; zilch; nada. They get about 40% Net profit on their phones....Foxconn who do the building make 2% profit.

    The reality is if they are not dependent on one stream of revenue...both projects are more likely to succeed.

    1. Re:Hows that a scam by EETech1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the project was desired it should have been able to get funded on it's own. To force it on an unrelated project to me seems dishonest.

      I know we don't like it when Congress sneaks things in like that, and I know that if I spent half my work time or budget working on a project that was canceled that I just really wanted to see finished anyways, it wouldn't go over to well either.

      The slippery ninja should be able to stand on it's own two feet, not ride on the back of something they feel might have a (better) chance of succeeding after it wasn't successful on it's own.

      It could also cost them investors, and ruin their chance to get this project funded. The two are completely unrelated and someone who wants cute smileys might not want a previously failed ninja side scroller.

      It also makes me wonder if they are paying them $10 an hour each or $20, and how much the icons really cost.

      Is the source code or binary of the game going to be released for free as well, or are they going to sell it and make money off a project for a free product?

      Cheers!

    2. Re:Hows that a scam by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      If Apple was going to take half the cost of your itoy (or perhaps double the cost of it so they could make the Apple Lisa the success it should have been, would their investors be all for it?

      Things fail for a reason.

    3. Re:Hows that a scam by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1, Informative

      Scroll Ninja is open source (source available on github) and we believe it failed because we didn't build up enough PR - and part of that is because we didn't have enough of it completed to show off. We'll be re-launching it but we want to have it more completed before re-launch. Figuring doing in OSS project for a flat rate would be something people would approve of we did this.

      You are correct, the rate will be roughly $10 an hour for each of them. Consider that this is well below market rate and that there will not be any residual profits off of the emoji.

      We are trying to be honest in how we will spend the money and that's why we wrote exactly how we would use it. Would you rather we said "hey, we're spending all the money just to pay Tohyama to make these" than "we're going to give everyone something for free and in exchange we're trying to cost-effectively build ourselves a future". Either way you're getting high quality graphics for below market rate.

    4. Re:Hows that a scam by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      If the project was desired it should have been able to get funded on it's own. To force it on an unrelated project to me seems dishonest.

      Well, then how, for example, would Google be able to create and sustain gmail and youtube, without funding from their search activities?

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  15. How about competition. by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    They want 40$ per icon

    If that is really is low, you could undercut them. Kickstarter would be an incredibly safe way to do so.

  16. Another Mans Bloat by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    is another mans treasure....II have finally found reasons for Unicode...the Backward N in Nine Inch Nails; The Lightning in AC/DC my MP3 collection is finally complete

    1. Re:Another Mans Bloat by Kagetsuki · · Score: 2

      Fun fact: The backwards N is a Cyrillic "i", it makes the "i" sound. So you are technically writing NII.

    2. Re:Another Mans Bloat by Drinking+Bleach · · Score: 1

      We are the Knights who say NI!

    3. Re:Another Mans Bloat by Drinking+Bleach · · Score: 1

      I forgot. Slashdot doesn't do Unicode :D

    4. Re:Another Mans Bloat by stoploss · · Score: 1

      I forgot. Slashdot doesn't do Unicode :D

      Slashdot Japan has been UTF-8 for approximately a decade now. So, what's the excuse here?

    5. Re:Another Mans Bloat by dkf · · Score: 1

      So, what's the excuse here?

      Nobody with actual tech expertise on staff? A database schema that's retarded? Who knows?

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  17. Ok your missing my point. by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    If the project team has multiple projects, and its fixed costs can be shared amongst them great, if they manage to produce the final product below the cost of production great...that is profit its what kickstarter is about.

    If you truly believe they are being dishonest [I personally believe what they are doing is a great idea] then to undercut them, is trivial.

    I'm a little concerned that your talking about congress [they have one source of income you] and funding unrelated projects [hey they have multiple kickstarters]. Its you that looking dishonest.

    There are quite a few serious potential pitfalls from running simultaneous projects at once for a small team, but you are not highlighting them simply demonising them.

    1. Re:Ok your missing my point. by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      My comment about Congress was relating to how they put multiple things on the same bill so one gets snuck in with the other that is more popular.

      I just think that a kickstarter should be about one project to be able to have the best chance at success for the investors, especially when the projects as unrelated as these two are.

      Cheers

  18. Diversify by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

    If Apple was going to take half the cost of your itoy (or perhaps double the cost of it so they could make the Apple Lisa the success it should have been, would their investors be all for it?

    Things fail for a reason.

    Your quote is Ironic for a couple of reasons, Even Apple has a diverse portfolio [iPod, IPhone, IPad, Advertising, Selling Content, Selling Search Defaults, OSX [other software], iMac], but its investors have wiped 35% of its value in the last 6 Months because its too reliant on its iPhone.

  19. Haven't we been here before? by captjc · · Score: 1

    1990 called, It wants it's Wingdings back.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
  20. Good Project by SnappyTech · · Score: 1

    Android does not appear to have a standard set of emoji, which is what prevented my wife and I from switching from iPhone to Android. We enjoy texting those funny little pics to each other, which are quickly accessed from the keyboard. Rather than responding "K" I can send a face blowing a kiss, or something equally charming. It would be great to be able to text the same exact icon from any device. The creator of this project knows it will be appreciated by many in the future if all devices can standardize on a common set of emoji.

    1. Re:Good Project by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Android 4.1 has full emoji support.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  21. Well... partly this is true, it is very different by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    If you follow Japanese culture as well as you can from the west, you notice a radically different approach to copyrights. Take "porn". The Disney corporation has cracked down on pornographic parodies of cultural icons it didn't even create. Meanwhile pornographic parody doujins can be sold openly and legally in Japan.

    But within shows, I have noticed far less cross-over. The almost mandatory american sitcom episode where they do an old series seems to be missing from Japan. Or I simply never seen it but in Anime at least I get the feeling that in commercial production, it is not done to touch another show.

    But the real reason you see little OSS from Japan in the west is the gigantic language barriers. The Japanese grasp of English is piss poor. So is the average Americans grasp of English but the Japanese are ashamed of it, so they tend online to either hide to avoid shaming themselves or seclude themselves in corners of the net and not come out.

    And this is NOT limited to the Japanese. Try Europe, there are countries that are far more visible then others. England for its 60 million citizens, some of whom can speak English are not as visible on the net as say the Dutch, a far smaller country whose citizens grasp of proper English is truly shockingly bad (guess where I am from). But we are Dutch, we know we are the largest people in the world and it got nothing to do with our height or waist measurements so we hold our heads tall and don't give a shit. Don't know the difference between where and were? Fuck it, I am Dutch, have some weed and relax.

    Add some country flag plugin to your bittorrent client and look at where people are connecting from. You can see that the number of users from a country have little to do with the size of said country.

    But you have come accross some examples of websites from Japan that block access to your US IP? Yes... they exist... and the same in reverse BUT you would NEVER see them.

    But remember, dear American, almost ALL your content sites, restrict access to foreigners. Netflix, Hulu, CNN, ABC etc etc all have popups "this content not available in your region". Who are the copyright grubbers again? But of course, an American would never ever see them. Do you know that "adult" content on ebay is restricted to the rest of the world despite the majority of the rest of the world havving less restrictive rules? Bet you didn't know if you are American because you never ran into it.

    But you DO notice a Japanese seller on Ebay who refuses to ship outside Japan. But hey, I ran into sellers who refused to ship from Germany to Holland and we are right next door with the same currency.

    Basically it is the old "white male never notices the existence of racism/sexism until affirmative action affects him".

    Let us remember in which country centuries old folk stories are owned by a company that waited with the release of a movie so they wouldn't have to pay for the copyright but have themselves been instrumental in extending copyright into infinity and beyond. In which country parts of century old songs are copyrighted (5 golden rings) and in which singing "happy birthday" commands a royalty payment.

    Copyright grubbers? I would mention something with a pot and a kettle but no doubt some Yank copyrighted it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  22. Handy for some applications by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I use Unicode (non-ISO-8859-1) characters in software I write.

    When writing comments I stick to things I can easily type, i.e. characters accessible using the Compose key — essentially only arrow right/left, double angle brackets and bullet, , , , , . I think "childparent" is easier to read than "child->parent".

    I also use Unicode in interfaces. I need a little warning symbol, it takes a few seconds to go to shapecatcher.net, draw the symbol, and paste it in: . Grepping my source code for Unicode, I've used tick and cross marks, 10 kinds of arrow, the handy "undo" symbol, a clock face ("wait"), and some shapes (triangles, squares). The alternative is a poorer interface, having to draw these things myself (and frequent image elements make HTML harder to read) or finding icons on the internet (© problems?).

    (Oh look, Slashdot ate everything except © and —.)

  23. Re:Well... partly this is true, it is very differe by xaxa · · Score: 1

    But the real reason you see little OSS from Japan in the west is the gigantic language barriers. The Japanese grasp of English is piss poor. So is the average Americans grasp of English but the Japanese are ashamed of it, so they tend online to either hide to avoid shaming themselves or seclude themselves in corners of the net and not come out.

    I spent two weeks on holiday in China, and found it very difficult to talk to people. I made a small effort with Mandarin, but couldn't be understood (beyond some numbers and greetings) even when pointing at the words I was reading from the phrasebook. Adults would talk to me when it was necessary — at hotels, restaurants and so on. But elsewhere, they were really shy. Their children were willing to talk. Several times toddlers walked up to me in the street, "hello, how are you?" "I'm fine, how are you?" "I'm happy!". There'd be a parent watching, having sent them over. I'd ask the parent, "how are you?", and they'd just shy away, embarrassed. Parents of toddlers weren't much older than the teenagers who also spoke to me, but something made it unacceptable for adults to try, but OK for children.

    I wonder if it's similar in Japan, which hasn't had the anti-western (anti-white) propaganda the Chinese have.

    By the way, can you tell where I'm from? You can make an informed guess based on my language, and the time should narrow it down.

    England for its 60 million citizens, some of whom can speak English are not as visible on the net as say the Dutch, a far smaller country whose citizens grasp of proper English is truly shockingly bad (guess where I am from).

    That's citizens' ;-). (And the UK or Britain has 63M people, England has 53M. Compare Netherlands / Holland, which plenty of British people confuse.)

    Anyway, I wouldn't be so sure about that. There are lots of British people on Slashdot, but they're harder to spot. I can tell you're not a native speaker from tiny mistakes ("I simply never seen it") that are different to badly-educated native speakers, and correct bits most native speakers get wrong ("some of whom"), but telling a British person from an American requires a spelling difference (colour/color, -ise/-ize), some slang, a regional expression, occasionally a date (24 Feb/Feb. 24) etc. The time of the comment is also a clue, it's 9:22 here but 1:22 in San Francisco.

  24. those were the days by arnodf · · Score: 1

    There was once a time when people just did this kind of stuff without begging for money. The open source community was founded by people who often didn't have the money so they created stuff themselves and now every idea that spawns needs to be funded.

    Now git off'a ma lawn

  25. I'll pay for them to disappear from this planet by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    People used to do this sort of thing for free and he wants, at a minimum $5,000 for supposedly creating from scratch images that are a copy of something that has already been done a thousand times over for free. This sounds like a kid's kickstarter project to avoid having to get a real job.

  26. eBook reader support for emoji? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since "Emoji Dick" doesn't seem to be available as Kindle or any other eBook format (so far) this is perhaps a moot point - but do any of the current generation of eBook reader hardware and file formats support emoji properly?

  27. Donator beware: crossfunding of unrelated project by mellyra · · Score: 1
    Rei Kagetsuki tried to get kickstarter funding for his Scroll Ninja game just a few months ago - the Scroll Ninja kickstarter failed to meet its minimum goal and was closed in mid January.
    Now Kegtsuki seems to be using this Emoji project as a means to raise funding so he can continue Scroll Ninja development anyways.

    We're calculating work time at roughly $20 per work hour for Tohyama, which is lower than what we usually bill him at. Even then half of that rate will go to paying Scroll Ninja lead developer Iwakawa so he can continue working on Scroll Ninja... since we didn't get funded but want to continue anyway.

  28. Shens! by Ratchet · · Score: 1

    Is it still ok to call Shenanigans on things? If so, Shenanigans!

    $50,000 to to build a set of smilies, and half of that doesn't even go to the smilie thing at all. Kickstarter should shut this one down.

  29. Freetards will pay for anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter how many previous versions there are freely available, freetards will still submit money to this because the summary contains all their feel-good acronyms.

  30. Re:Donator beware: crossfunding of unrelated proje by j-beda · · Score: 1

    Even more dishonest, they are planning on using some of the money for food! Who knows what their workers will do with the big bucks after they get paid? Maybe go to a movie?

    They say that if they get the money they will make the emoji. They are also saying they will do other things too. If you don't think the money will be well spent, then don't support it.

    I think they made an error in detailing exactly how many hours they are expecting people to work and how much money they are going to pay them. They should probably have just said: "Toyama is going to make these emoji and we're managing to pay him a bit less than we would bill him out for to other clients for this project - thanks Toyama!"

  31. Re:Well... partly this is true, it is very differe by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    I admit the U.S. corporations are horrible copyright grubbers, and stupid laws like the Mickey Mouse Protection Act don't help. The offset that we have however is a huge community around creative commons, OSS, and support of things like the Blender Project (mostly European I know) and The Humble Bundle.

    At least Japan did release a Japanese Language version of Nectaris and MegaMan vs. Street Fighter for free.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  32. Bril by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will raze conciseness

  33. Pidgin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, which emojis does Pidgin use? Those aren't free?