Slashdot Mirror


'This Is Your Second and Final Notice' Robocallers Revealed

nbauman writes "A New York Times consumer columnist tracked down the people who run a 'This is your second and final notice" robocall operation. The calls came from Account Management Assistance, which promises to negotiate lower credit card rates with banks. One woman paid them $1,000, and all they did was give her a limited-time zero-percent credit card that she could have gotten herself. AMA has a post office box in Orlando, Florida. The Better Business Bureau has a page for Your Financial Ladder, which does business as Account Management Assistance, and as Economic Progress. According to a Florida incorporation filing, Economic Progress is operated by Brenda Helfenstine, with her husband Tony. The Arkansas attorney general has sued Your Financial Ladder for violating the Telemarketing Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act. The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services investigated Your Financial Ladder, but the investigator went to 1760 Sundance Drive, St. Cloud, which turned out to be a residence, and gave up. The Times notes that you can type their phone number (855-462-3833) into http://800notes.com/ and get lots of reports on them."

37 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These fuckers relentless harassed my grandmother in her final days despite my efforts to put her on the do not call list and working with her telephone company to try to identify them.

    Take all their money. All of it. Take it all and put it into something that helps the elderly.

    1. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on, man, you wouldn't have anything on your conscious if you left them to die in the everglades? I mean, think of the poor alligators that would have to eat their rotten fucking flesh.

    2. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you've got their address.

      Now would be a fantastic time to pay them a visit.

      You know what we do to spammers.

    3. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kind of extreme.......well, maybe not. My father is elderly and it's like he's under assault by these low life scum. There are so many organizations that live off of these kind of scams. I'd like to see drastic action taken.

    4. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative

      1760 Sundance Drive
      St. Cloud, Florida 32771

      http://goo.gl/maps/9P4BX

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      1760 Sundance Drive
      St. Cloud, Florida 32771

      http://goo.gl/maps/9P4BX

      Looks like an easy target for a Predator drone ...

    6. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by WWJohnBrowningDo · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know what we do to spammers.

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

    7. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

      In a perfect world, pervasive rape in jail will not be subject of gleeful jokes (it'd be funny if it weren't a common issue). I would like to see spammers go to jail too, but not like this.

      Even better, maybe we can fine spammers for "whatever the made + X%" and ban them from using computers for a while. This way they can work off their debt to society with some manual labor - outside of jail would be fine too.

    8. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Poisoning alligators isn't very nice....

    9. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by msauve · · Score: 5, Funny

      "In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell"...

      with a telephone which rings randomly, but at least once an hour, for their entire multi-year term. Anytime they fail to answer the phone, their prison term is extended by a month.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    10. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      tl;dr - "To the pain."

      --
      John
    11. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good news everyone! It is near Alligator Lake!

    12. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      The real problem is the possibility that they would end up nourishing the invasive pythons that plague the Everglades, further disrupting that delicate ecosystem.

    13. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're assuming they have some sort of internal "do not call" list. They don't.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    14. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

      In a perfect world, pervasive rape in jail will not be subject of gleeful jokes (it'd be funny if it weren't a common issue). I would like to see spammers go to jail too, but not like this.

      In a perfect world, we wouldn't need prisons, because people would actually obey society's laws and respect the property, dignity, and person of other people.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    15. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny

      In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail

      Your perfect world contains spammers and jails? You should try to get a refund.

    16. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cruel... and unusual. I like it!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    17. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by pwizard2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That, and the Fair Debt Collections Act are unenforceable in the days of IP telephony.

      Partially true. The FDCPA still has teeth but there are far better ways to wield it than talk to those assholes on the phone. If they start calling over unsecured credit card debt, ignore the calls but wait for them to send something in the mail (it will probably happen really soon once they start calling). What you need to do next is send a certified cease-and-desist letter to their physical brick-and-mortar office. Many of these fuckers are sneaky and work out of various PO boxes around the country but they always have a real office somewhere; spending a bit of time on Google usually helps you find it.

      Your c/d letter should make several claims: disavow all responsibility for the debt; Demand an immediate cessation of all phone and written correspondence; if they are out of state demand to see their proof of license (and license number) to operate in [your home state here]; and threaten to report them to your state attorney general if they ever contact you again without providing the required license info. If they do it again, make good on your threat! Don't threaten to report them to the better business bureau---it's an empty threat because for all its posturing the BBB can't do shit. On the other hand, having to deal with an AG investigation usually makes collectors piss themselves. You need to understand that these are real dickless cowards. If you make it clear you intend to fight they will probably leave you alone since there are lots of other people they can shake down instead (they buy these delinquent accounts in bulk for pennies on the dollar and then try to collect).

      If they actually sue you, it's time to break out the big guns: You need to file a Sworn Denial on Account in the jurisdiction that is handling your case. This the the equivilent of a not guilty plea; you officially deny the debt and require the plaintiff to furnish proof. Never take any settlement offers or deals; they will still try to fuck you with those and the burden of proof is always on them. The important thing to remember is that they are fucked unless they can produce the original signed contract in court since that is the only way to prove that you owe a debt.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    18. Re:Break Their Legs and Put Them in the Everglades by aztracker1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a perfect world there wouldn't for-profit prisons, that have lower standards, higher infraction numbers, and higher rates of 'inmate' crimes leading to longer detention terms. (Not to mention the shear corruption). The US has a higher ratio of prisoners that pretty much the anywhere else.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  2. FFS by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is it that the attack-dog AGs of the world are ready to go when somebody runs wget contrary to a site's terms of service; but people like this are allowed to operate unchecked?

    1. Re:FFS by PhamNguyen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would guess that it relates to a certain way of thinking about the world, where everything an individual does on their own is a criminal matter, and everything a person does for a company is a civil matter.

      It probably also relates to the "just doing my job" mentality where something becomes less morally objectionable merely because you're doing it as part of a job.

    2. Re:FFS by Tom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They do not scam large corporations with deep pockets.

      Basically, a good scammer knows to not scam marks that can cause him trouble. You can scam a million people with no resources to fight you and be fine. But go against one mark who does have the resources and you're toast.

      Humans might be the top of the food chain in the animal kingdom, but we are the bottom of the food chain in the society we have built. Corporations, criminals, politicians - every parasite in existence preys upon the common citizen first and foremost, because we are the easy targets.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:FFS by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it that the attack-dog AGs of the world are ready to go when somebody runs wget contrary to a site's terms of service; but people like this are allowed to operate unchecked?

      Well, when Florida lumps their "Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services" into one agency, you really can't expect much from them except bullshit.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  3. Based in Florida by Huntr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To the absolute surprise of no one.

    I think fraud is simply in Florida's DNA. I mean, what is Florida in the early to mid 20th century, if not "buying swampland for cheap?" Now, it's the height of US insurance fraud, medicare fraud, mortgage fraud, and identity theft, in addition to the drug smuggling and human trafficking that comes along with major ports of entry into the U.S. It's a crazy, crazy place and reality is far removed from the Mickey Mouse and orange juice that Discover Florida is selling.

    And before you blow me up, know that I say all this as a long-time Florida resident...

    1. Re:Based in Florida by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You've identified one form of selection while missing the even more obvious one: Florida, south Florida in particular, is retirement central. As such, is it any surprise that Florida is a location where this sort of thing is happening, given that the elderly tend to be most susceptible to it and the elderly tend to migrate to Florida for retirement? That fact alone would account for the medicare fraud, mortgage fraud, and identity theft that you cited.

  4. Follow the wires by PPH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but the investigator went to 1760 Sundance Drive, St. Cloud, which turned out to be a residence, and gave up.

    But the telco has to know where they are sending these calls. Either a landline, digital service or IP address. Either give it up to the authorities or become a co-defendant in the fraud case.

    You download one stinkin' Lady Gaga song and they can find you. Why not now?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Follow the wires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      But the telco has to know where they are sending these calls. Either a landline, digital service or IP address. Either give it up to the authorities or become a co-defendant in the fraud case.

      The telcos make a killing with these kinds of customers, and wont do anything more than their corporate lawyer says they absolutely have to do not to be held accountable.

      And, if your telco (the one of the customer that gets called) sees the number 202-456-1111 coming in over an interconnection link, they simply cannot tell you where exactly the caller came from (assuming the white house does not make Robocalls), so basically they have to backtrace the whole chain, from interconnection to interconnection, and if just one telco in the chain does not cooperate or is outside the US, you're out of luck.

      The last resort would be ALL provider to have search for an OUTGOING call to the customers number to find the real caller. This is REAL work, because you are looking for a needle (the call) in a haystack, with tousands of haystacks (the telcos). And thats assuming, the call even originates inside the US.

      You download one stinkin' Lady Gaga song and they can find you. Why not now?

      Because a complete, working TCP connection is not spoofable. If you want the packet with the Lady Gaga song to reach you, you have to use your real IP adress. With the phone system, the callerid is worth about the same as a sender emailadress...

  5. Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by david.emery · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sent my Senator (Mark Warner (D) Virginia), who sits on the relevant committee, a constituent request asking if anything ever happened as a result of filing "Do Not Call" violations. They sent me a Privacy Act form (so they could query the registry using my personal data.)

    And that was the end of it. I never heard back.

    On a related note, I think the FCC should make Caller ID both required and un-forgeable. (An individual could still choose to not have his Caller ID revealed, and that would be indicated on your Caller ID display.)

    1. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by MBCook · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Do Not Call list works very well for what it was intended to do. It stops legal calls from businesses you have no association with. Do you remember the "would you like to change long distance providers" calls? What if Dish Network could call you every week to ask you if you wanted to switch off cable?

      The problem is that the DNC list does *nothing* to stop the following groups:

      • Political organizations - law doesn't apply
      • Charity solicitation - law doesn't apply
      • Surveys - law doesn't apply
      • Scams - they're already breaking the law

      Congress chose to allow the first 3 for their own benefit, and no law can stop the fourth, only really tough enforcement and holding phone companies accountable.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Effectiveness of "Do Not Call"? by CncRobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What if Dish Network could call you every week to ask you if you wanted to switch off cable?

      I solved a similar situation, a long distance company kept calling me. One day I had some time to burn, sorry for them. Within 2 minutes the guy knew he wouldn't have a sale. 35 minutes into the call his supervisor came on to make sure everything was ok. I finally let him go at 50 minutes. Every time he attempted to hang up I asked "Are you hanging up on me?" which I guess is illegal according to the FCC. I believe I got put on a special list to never call again because aking to not be called by them the 7 times before didn't work but this trick did work.

  6. Too much money .... and too little risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a lot of money in violating the telemarketing rules. One illegal voice broadcaster was paid over $6 million by just one customer in only 10 months [1]. Large fines against violators are often uncollectible and ignored by scofflaws [2]. Violators often engage in money laundering and brag about their “bulletproof” broadcasting facilities that can’t be traced [3]. I personally received over 300 prerecorded telemarketing calls in some years, and I was able to track down the people behind only a tiny fraction of those calls, despite my concerted efforts in recording calls, filing lawsuits, subpoenaing phone company records, and hundreds of hours of my own time. Anyone who tries to find the source of these illegal calls will find the vast majority lead back to shadowy, untraceable names such as Transfers Argentina, Asia Pacific Telecom, TeleEurope, and Castle Rock Capital Management. Trying to track down a text message spammer is a similar exercise in futility.

            Many studies have show that massive penalties don't work as a deterrent because perpetrators never plan to get caught. What does work is increasing the likelihood of getting caught.

    [1] See declaration of Roberto C. Menjivar at 30 (totaling the amount paid to Voice Touch by National Auto Warranty during a 10 month period at $6,013,500). Document 42 in FTC v. Network Foundations, LLC., No. 1:09-cv-02929 (N.D. Ill. 2009).

    [2] See Order of Forfeiture, File No. EB-02-TC-120 (released Jan. 5, 2004) (finding Fax.com liable for the maximum fine of $11,000 for each of the 489 fax violations, for a total fine of $5,379,000).

    [3] Menjivar decl. at 20–22.

    1. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have found a way that gets me off of these lists. All of the automated calls, sooner or later, connect you to someone whose job it is to take down your information so that they can get your money. I always indicate that I am interested. Then when I start talking to someone, I ask questions indicating that I am interested but don't quite understand what they are offering. If I have time, I keep them on the line as long as possible before telling them I think they are the scum of the earth for being involved with such a scam. If I don't at least have time to talk to a real person, I don't answer the phone. It's interesting that after I talk to someone, it is month's before they call me again. A live person costs them money. They don't like it when you talk to a live person and don't "buy".

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Too much money .... and too little risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems as though Wikipedia has acquired sentience.

  7. Supply-side fraud by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All you dirty hippies who are calling for the heads of these "Second and Final Notice" folks must really hate free-market capitalism.

    These are the Job Creators, after all. And anything that's done to stop them is regulation, which is a dirty word.

    We need to just let the free market work and these problems will go away, right?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Re:Greetings friend by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered
    me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam.
    I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one
    dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the
    power.

  9. Blacklists work by zwede · · Score: 5, Informative

    On Android: Create a contact (I call it "Spam"). Click settings->More and add to reject list. Whenever you get a spam call, select "update existing contact", select "Spam" and no more calls from that number. For a home phone, use a VOIP provider (I use and can recommend Galaxy Voice). They should have a web page that lets you add numbers to a blacklist. Also select the "anonymous call rejection" feature which will block all calls where the caller id has been intentionally blocked. By doing the above it is very rare for me to receive a spam call.

  10. The economics of this crap by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The sad thing is that there are enough people buying this shit to keep the robocallers and spammers in business.

    I routinely get robocalls wanting to reduce my credit card debt. A good trick, since I don't have any. I always wonder how the political polling people can possibly pretend their conclusions have any validity, since everybody hangs up on them.

    And so on. A medium that used to be useful has been poisoned by abuse.

    I view Do Not Call as intrinsically self-defeating. Like "opting out" of spam, it provides a list of known-good phone numbers. If the robocalls originate from offshore, there is little the local authorities can do about it anyway.

    ...laura