Slashdot Mirror


Google Chrome Getting Audio Indicators To Show You Noisy Tabs

An anonymous reader writes "Google is working on identifying Chrome tabs that are currently playing audio (or recording it). The feature is expected to show an audio animation if a tab is broadcasting or recording sound. François Beaufort spotted the new feature, a part of which is already available in the latest Chromium build."

27 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Good idea by swinferno · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This could actually be useful...hopefully FF will follow

    --
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    1. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Better yet, each tab should have an individual "mute" button, enabled by default. Nothing makes me close a tab quicker than unwanted noise.

    2. Re:Good idea by rainmouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Im glad they came up with this rather than having Apple patent it.

    3. Re:Good idea by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about muting all tabs except the one currently open with the option of enabling/disabling any tab explicitely?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think this is the only reasonable solution...

      If I open 20 tabs, I don't want to mute 10. I just only want the current one...

      and I would love a mute button for the current one...

    5. Re:Good idea by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, Apple's probably going to patent it, anyway.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    6. Re:Good idea by ikaruga · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Useful? What an understatement. This feature is could potentially being a life saver for the porn addicts browsing websites that open multiple tabs with video/chat feeds in the background.

    7. Re:Good idea by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for making it harder for me to mix Beethoven and Lady GaGa, you insensitive clod.
      Da-Da-Da-DUHHHHH. . .'Pa-Pa-Pa-Poker Face'

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    8. Re:Good idea by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 3

      How about muting all tabs except the one currently open with the option of enabling/disabling any tab explicitely?

      I like this, but the problem I see is the unexpected suddenly blast of noise when you switch tabs--if the irritating people who use sound on their web-site to grab your attention know most browsers are "muted by default" their tendency will be to have a constantly looping message playing (braying) at maximum volume so that if you switch to that tab you almost certainly hear the message. Or they'll figure out how to discern if their tab is "muted" and wait to start the noise until you shift focus to that page and "unmute" it.

      All things considered, it seems unfortunate that web-developers can't just get the message: "NO WE DON'T WANT TO HEAR YOUR FUCKING NOISE!"

      --
      Who did what now?
    9. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      First hit when doing a Google search, have you tried http://www.mutetab.com/

    10. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the point is, all unselected tabs are muted by default, but you can selectively unmute them.

    11. Re:Good idea by fragfoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I find these ideas awesome, another thing browsers could is to color code tabs by cpu/memory usage or something. So you know which tab is slowing you down.

      --
      Sig? Heil
    12. Re:Good idea by mbstone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How about identifying noisy websites in Google search results?

    13. Re:Good idea by Your.Master · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The part where you explain how selective unmuting isn't a huge pain in the ass? Whatever selective unmuting UI is created will have to be something fiddly, since background tabs don't have a lot of screen real estate and all the mouse buttons are allocated.

      Myself, I'd adapt by dragging those tabs into a new window, rather than fiddling with some control. Still, I think for a general audience, selective muting will be way more palatable than selective unmuting*. As a user, I don't expect Pandora to mute when I switch tabs and I also don't expect there to exist an "unmute" button, anymore than I expect it to mute when I minimize an application, or hit alt-tab, or something like that.

      With that said, tablets are causing people to adapt their expectations. I think that pisses people off fairly often, though.

      * you might even be able to justify having some buried config option for mute-by-default for those really desperate for that behaviour.

    14. Re:Good idea by Eraesr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Good point. Also, after I posted my message I clicked one of the links in the article and found that so far it appears to work only for the HTML5 version of YouTube, which makes me believe that this only works for HTML5 controls, which means that annoying flash ads with sound can still creep through.

    15. Re: Good idea by cynyr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I assume that there would be a whitelist "allows allow tabs at these sites to play sounds" sort of a thing.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    16. Re:Good idea by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Informative

      IE10 does exactly that. If you open YouTube videos to background tabs, they won't start playing until you activate the tab.

      For Firefox, I recommend installing the Flashblock addon, which allows you to start Flash plugins manually by clicking them.

    17. Re:Good idea by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even easier: Make the "indicator" they're adding into a toggle. Then it's a complete non-issue on "quiet" tabs, it's not buried in a context menu, and it works just like the one on phones, tablets, and the various other gadgets-for-the-ui-impaired that are so popular now.

    18. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, here we say "Mod parent up" :-)

  2. Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    21 Web Browser Features We Desperately Need

    How long has this been in development again?

    1. Re:Coincidence? by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Longer than 6 days I would bet.

      What they need is a fix to rid the world of all of these ridiculous, horrible "Slideshow" websites. 21 fixes? OK Give me a list on one page - maybe two if you want to increase your ad revenue. There's not much in Web 3.0 or whatever the fuck we call ourselves on, but it's horseshit.

    2. Re:Coincidence? by istartedi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That would have looked better if my browser had "turn slide show into one page" and "automatically unpaginate pages without forcing you to hunt for printer icon". On the other end of that spectrum we need, "turn disk thrashing page archives and continuous scrollers into paginated pages". Seriously.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  3. Flash and plugin sounds by etnoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember this being discussed on the FF bugzilla years ago. It was seen as a very good idea, but the issue was (at least then) that most audio is played by Flash applets which the browser can't control, thus making it useless in most scenarios. I wonder how Chrome tackles the issue of plugin content playing audio.

    --
    Quantum hacker.
    1. Re:Flash and plugin sounds by slart42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I remember this being discussed on the FF bugzilla years ago. It was seen as a very good idea, but the issue was (at least then) that most audio is played by Flash applets which the browser can't control, thus making it useless in most scenarios. I wonder how Chrome tackles the issue of plugin content playing audio.

      Chrome uses it's own build of the flash plugin, which is not using the NPAPI plugin API, but Google's own Pepper API, which has support for Audio built into the API - and thus will handle playback of the audio through the browser, so the browser has full knowlegde and control of the audio.

  4. even better by smash · · Score: 4

    How about also DISABLING/muting audio in all inactive tabs?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  5. Re:Not just for memory management by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Slightly OT) Like Slashdot? Not sure what was up yesterday, but I kept getting a (Swedish) ad on this site, one that expanded by itself even without rolling over it, and played video with (loud) audio. Great fun when idly browsing ./ during a conference call.

    I thought advertisers wised up about doing that that sort of thing in the last decade. Suffice to say I finally disabled ads on ./

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  6. A website that records sound? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know that I have ever encountered such a site. Not that one couldn't exist, but I've never seen one. What am I missing out on?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.