Developers May Be Getting 50% of Their Documentation From Stack Overflow
New submitter gameweld writes "Software companies, such as Microsoft, create documentation for millions of topics concerning its APIs, services, and software platforms. Creating this documentation comes at a considerable cost and effort. And after all this effort, much documentation is rarely consulted (citation) and lacking enough examples (citation). A new study suggests that developers are increasingly consulting Stack Overflow and crowd-sourced sites over official documentation, using it as much as 50% of time. How should official documentation be better redesigned? What are the implications of software created from unruly mashups?"
News at eleven.
It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
- E. Debs
Don't worry, he's just making sure none of us get Scroogled.
Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
How should official documentation be better redesigned?
It should exist.
That kind of depends on what help you need. For example, if you are looking for some facial feminisation surgery, you may find what you need at expertsexchange.com.
If it's in you sig, it's in your post.
[This page intentionally left blank.]
To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?