Slashdot Mirror


Discovery Increases Odds of Life On Europa

tetrahedrassface writes "Observations of spectral emissions from the surface of Europa using state of the art ground based telescopes here on Earth have lent data that indicate the surface of the Jovian moon is linked with the vast ocean below. The observations carried out by Caltech's Mike Brown and JPL's Kevin Hand show that water is making it from the ocean below all the way up to the surface of the moon. In their study (PDF) they noticed a dip in the emission bands around lower latitudes of the moon, and quickly honed in on what they were seeing. The mineral of interest is epsomite, a magnesium sulfate compound that can only come from the ocean below. From the article: 'Magnesium should not be on the surface of Europa unless it's coming from the ocean,' Brown says. 'So that means ocean water gets onto the surface, and stuff on the surface presumably gets into the ocean water.' Not only does this mean the ocean and surface are dynamically interacting, but it also means that there may be more energy in the ocean than previously thought. Another finding is that the ocean below the icy surface of Europa is basically very similar to an ocean on Earth, giving the neglected and premier solar body for life past Earth another compelling reason for being explored."

39 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 3, Informative

    and a series of flybys began in the 1970s. Pioneer 10 and 11 visited Jupiter in 1973 and 1974 respectively.

    Two Voyager probes traveled through the Jovian system in 1979 providing more detailed images of Europa's icy surface. The images caused many scientists to speculate about the possibility of a liquid ocean underneath.

    Starting in 1995, the Galileo probe began a Jupiter orbiting mission that lasted for eight years, until 2003, and provided the most detailed examination of the Galilean moons to date. It included, Galileo Europa Mission and Galileo Millennium Mission, with numerous close flybys of Europa.

    Neglected indeed.
    Not.

    (Paraphrased from Wikipedia)

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
    1. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Depends what you compare with. Justin Bieber certainly gets more attention... an unfortunate thing, really.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's very neglected compared to what we've sent to Mars isn't it? Now we are floating *another* rover while the data for Europa continues to build up to the point that we really should go there in a two part mission. One would be a dedicated orbiter, and then a landing...

    3. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is that a Eurpoa rover would need to be powered by an RTG, which means you have to send a vehicle about the size of curiosity. So thats 1000kg that you have to land. Maybe the descent stage would be another 1000kg to get you from low orbit to the surface. Then that 2 tonne package has to be powered into the gravitational fields of Jupiter and Eurpoa. You are talking about a lot of fuel. Galileo just barely went into an elliptical orbit. In energy terms that is a long way from a landing. My rough guess is that the total mass of the vehicle would be 10 tonnes in low earth orbit. Maybe more.

      Maybe it could only be done with a proper fission reactor and ion drives.

    4. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 2

      Right, well the Planetary Society has proposed the JEO, Jupiter Europa Orbiter. That would be a great start to actually close enough to really see what's going on. Then we don't need or even have to land a super heavy rover on Europa. If we took data from the JEO and were smart about it, we could land a few very small probes to sample the surface of the ice where the upwellings occur.

      We have the capability to go there today, if we really wanted to. I guess it's just not politically expedient to go there, since Mars captures the interest of the population so well..... and that's a disappointing, because Europa or one of it's sister moons has water today.

      I hope I live long enough to see a landing.

    5. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can aerobrake with Jupiter to get you into a descent path for the moon using almost no fuel

      You are understating the difficulty. Aerobraking will leave you in a highly elliptical orbit with a significant velocity difference to Eurpoa where it crosses the orbit of Europa. It might be possible to circularise that orbit with slingshots among the moons, but that would take years. Also there is a significant hazard from meteors going so close to Jupiter, and an extreme radiation hazard.

    6. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by icebike · · Score: 3

      The problem is that a Eurpoa rover would need to be powered by an RTG, which means you have to send a vehicle about the size of curiosity. So thats 1000kg that you have to land.

      Meh! Details....

      The day before Curiosity landed the general opinion here among the Slashdot Rocket Scientists that it had ZERO chance for success. Too complicated. Too Rube Goldberg. Parachutes, Rockets, and Skycranes! Such foolishness. Stupid arrogant NASA/JPL about to get their comeuppance.

      Well...

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Yeah but in energy terms a landing on Europa is much harder because there is no atmosphere.

    8. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by mooingyak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So thats 1000kg...

      Nobody ever says Megagram, or Megameter either for that matter. I for one would like to see that become commonplace.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    9. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by smellotron · · Score: 2

      We have the capability to go there today, if we really wanted to.

      I can't think about exploring Europa without getting that tingly sensation that I am being watched:

      ALL THESE WORLDS
      ARE YOURS EXCEPT
      . . EUROPA
      . ATTEMPT NO
      .LANDING THERE

    10. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So thats 1000kg...

      Nobody ever says Megagram, or Megameter either for that matter. I for one would like to see that become commonplace.

      I wouldn't count on that happening in the next couple of gigaseconds.

    11. Re:Europa was discovered in 1610 by Galileo... by kwerle · · Score: 2

      With no atmosphere and such a great distance from the sun - and given that there is geological activity making its way to the surface, I have to imagine the surface is anything but smooth. I mean - that recipe is basically volcanic with no atmosphere to weather down the resulting mountains and debris.

      I doubt lithobraking is an option.

  2. And after another disappointment by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't matter how well you do in your endeavours if we continuously push 'Chance of life' as a way to get the general public interested. How many times do you think the public can hear about 'Nope, nothing there' when the original headline was 'Amazing new possible discovery that will rock the foundations of the space program". Don't get me wrong, I find the concept of alien geology to be very interesting and love these stories, but please cut back on the 'hints/signs/rumor/promise of life' in headlines.

    Before anyone responds with "But we have to make it interesting for the unwashed masses...", I'm going to preempt that with the fact that you don't want space exploration to be relegated to the same 'Overhype/Overpromise' location in the collective consciousness currently reserved for late night infomercials and miracle health products.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    1. Re:And after another disappointment by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      But wait! There's more! We'll throw in this miniature monolith absolutely free to the first 3,000 customers!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  3. Re:Hmm by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

    Or maybe just cracks in the ice caused by tidal changes. Then water down below would sublimate. rise to the surface. and freeze. Maybe the vapour would carry some metals with it. Magnesium is a good construction material BTW.

  4. Re:Misread the title by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sadly, so did I, thinking that they finally left Leeds and discovered the existence of Amsterdam.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  5. Re:Misread the title by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was more disturbed by the mention of "lent data" from ground based telescopes, which sounds like certain kinds of data collection were given up until Easter.

  6. Agreed. by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 4, Funny

    Almost certain he gets more probing as well.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  7. Re:language issues? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    "lent data"??? "honed in"????

    Not sure what's up with "lent data". (Typo of "sent data"? Odd translation of an idiom from a non-English language?)

    I've heard the "honed in" misusage a lot. It seems to be a Mondegreen> from "homed in" (like a homing pigeon.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  8. A simple solution by Grayhand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just spread the rumor that Europan whales make the best sushi in the Universe and the Japanese will launch a mission to Europa within the year. As an added bonus Iceland would start a space program.

    1. Re:A simple solution by Spinalcold · · Score: 2

      that or Spock and Kirk will come back in time to save them.

  9. Re:Hmm by Mystakaphoros · · Score: 2

    Tidal forces seem like a good culprit, considering the extreme gravitational forces involved.

  10. Re:Too far away by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Europa is too far away. We should just send it on a crash course for mars. By the time it gets there we will have found a way to thicken up the atmosphere a bit so the water doesn't evaporate right away.

    Do you plan to do the pushing?

    No kidding on "by the time it gets there". It will take a LOT of pushing to get it up out of Jupiter's orbit and then downhill to an impact orbit with Mars.

    After that Mars will be too hot for life for a long time.

    Meanwhile, if there is life on Europa OR Mars, you've just created an extinction (event or two) of total-biosphere magnitude. Here's hoping nobody does that to Earth.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  11. We were warned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All these worlds
    Are yours except
    Europa
    Attempt no
    Landing there

    1. Re:We were warned by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Burma Shave

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  12. It's things like this... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's things like Europa and robots on Mars that make me want to punch the 'Cry, cry, we need to put a man back on the moon, because something!' crowd.

    Was the Apollo program a heroic piece of engineering? No question. But does the moon have any major virtues aside from being close enough to man-in-a-can with relatively primitive life support gear? It's a hostile, sterile rock with not a whisper of atmosphere(and conveniently close and well-lit for the telescope crew). We have basically no reason to suspect that it has, or ever had, anything approaching life. Mars is a practically shirtsleeves environment by comparison, and Europa is under serious suspicion of having some serious organic chemistry going down under the ice. What sort of grainy, sepia-toned nostalgia wankfest would have us putzing around the moon, again, when there is other cool stuff to poke at?

  13. Re:Hmm by icebike · · Score: 2

    Tidal forces seem like a good culprit, considering the extreme gravitational forces involved.

    Which is interesting because enough gravitational heating of the moon's core to keep an ocean liquid suggests the possibility of life even in the absence of sunlight, just as is found in some deep oceans on earth. I suppose its possible for there to be enough infrared near thermal vents, but by and large, you would expect any putative life to have evolved completely without any form of photoreceptors, let alone eyes.

    Some clever minds are probably already at work conceptualizing payload packages to investigate these cracks for an under-ice rover.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  14. Re:We've been warned about this... by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Came for the 2001 reference. Left satisfied (Eventually. I mean, WTF, mentioning both 'Discovery' and 'Europa' in the title, and a 2001 reference wasn't the frost piss?)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  15. Re:language issues? by icebike · · Score: 5, Funny

    "lent data"??? "honed in"????

    Not sure what's up with "lent data". (Typo of "sent data"? Odd translation of an idiom from a non-English language?)

    I've heard the "honed in" misusage a lot. It seems to be a Mondegreen> from "homed in" (like a homing pigeon.)

    Lent is the past tense of lend. Data from one discovery was lent to a totally different theory.
    Honed in is fairly common usage when working toward a goal.

    The so called "translation" is from a language called English, with which it appears you are only tangentially acquainted.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  16. Re:Hmm by m0n0RAIL · · Score: 2

    An under-ice rover isn't likely in the near future, as estimates of the ice thickness range from 30km to at least a few kilometers.

  17. Re:All these worlds are yours, except Europa! by crossb0nez · · Score: 3, Funny

    My God! It's full of Starfish!!!

    --
    Rule of Acquisition #19: Satisfaction is Not guaranteed.
  18. This is bad news by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2

    Please recall this article about "panspermia". It means that we are practically certain to find Earth-originated life-forms down there in the ocean of Europa. If life originated there independently of Earth, there might not be any evidence of it left!

  19. alternative uses for an RTG by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 2

    Given that this thread mentioned using an RTG (a Radioisotope Thermal Generator, which is just an electrical generator that operates off of waste heat produced by a radioactive material decaying), it seems like the solution here is pretty obvious, even if it might be a painfully slow.

  20. Re:but what if they do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And you've sentenced them to extinction by sushi?

    When they're approaching they'll get a message reading:

    ALL THESE WORLDS
    ARE YOURS EXCEPT
    EUROPA
    ATTEMPT NO
    LANDING THERE
    THEY ARE NOT FOR SUSHI

  21. Re:language issues? by negablade · · Score: 4, Informative

    'Hone' means to focus in or to work towards a specific goal, and is listed in reputable print dictionaries (i.e. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hone%20in). Honed in is the past tense of hone in. It is true that some people think it is wrong, and that opinion is open to debate, as it should be for any living language. But the deciding factor is whether the intent of the phase is understood by the majority of readers. Since it is in common use, it follows that it has become accepted phraseology.

  22. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I have a distinct recollection of how some Nasa engineer had a probe design in mind that would work. It would melt itself through several kilometers of ice in a few months and leave a cable behind connecting it to a transmitter on the surface. I don't think it's too hard for engineers that are capable of constructing such a probe to stick a couple of propellers on it for diving. Although, I don't know about appropriate precautions to prevent it from ending up as an appetizer for some Europian super sharks. Maybe mirrors to reflect lasers..?

  23. Re:Jelly fish by physburn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be extermely interesting biochemically, would probably be made up of different organic compound than earth life.

  24. Re:Misread the title by RaceProUK · · Score: 2

    Reporting from Europe. Can confirm life. Intelligence yet to be confirmed.

    FTFY

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  25. Re:Hmm by invid · · Score: 2

    If there is life in the ocean under the ice and if there are interactions with the surface then it could be possible to find evidence of life from the chemical composition of the surface ice in selected areas. We should send an orbiting probe to determine the most likely spots and then send a lander.

    While I would love for NASA to send a submarine, just trying to imagine the engineering effort makes my head spin. It's possible but would cost tens of billions and the chances for failure for something that complex is very high. Not very likely to get the green light with current budgets.

    --
    The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.