Slashdot Mirror


Man Has 75% of Skull Replaced By 3D-Printed Materials

redletterdave writes "An un-named male patient in the U.S. has had 75 percent of his skull replaced with 3D printed materials. The undisclosed patient had his head imaged by a 3D scanner before South Windsor, Conn.-based Oxford Performance Materials (OPM) gained approval from US regulators to print the bone replacement. OPM's final skull replacement was built within two weeks, and inserted in the patient's skull in an operation performed earlier this week; this cutting-edge procedure was only just revealed on Friday. OPM's 3D-printed process was granted approval by the FDA back on Feb. 18, which means the company can now provide 3D printed replacements for bones damaged by trauma or even disease. The company says this technique could benefit more than 500 U.S. citizens each month, from injured factory or construction workers to wounded soldiers."

12 of 74 comments (clear)

  1. Backbone printing by M3.14 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally a solution for people without any backbone.

    1. Re:Backbone printing by Grayhand · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally a solution for people without any backbone.

      Now if they can perfect brain transplants we can finally fix Congress.

  2. Re:Designer skulls by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you spell "Minbari"? ;-)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  3. Re:This worries me by Algae_94 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's get this straight. You don't want to see any banner ads on a bus? When was the last time you saw a public bus?

  4. Trauma by JamJam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trauma injury that caused 75% of the skull to be destroyed surely must have a huge impact on the brain. Hopefully the patient isn't in a vegetative state...

    1. Re:Trauma by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Article does mention that they scanned the patient's skull and made an as close to possible replica of it. I don't think that'd be an option if the guy got hit by a bus.

  5. Re:This is nothing new. by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hidden in the rectum != Replacement

  6. Re:a vegetative state by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, brain dead, more like Texas.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  7. Re:pics or it didnt happen by godel_56 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    pics or it didnt happen

    You asked for it.

    http://www.technewsdaily.com/images/i/000/011/153/original/osteofab-cranial-device.jpg?1362591104

    TFA says they use some sort of plastic called polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) so I'm guessing structual strength won't be a major selling feature.

  8. Re:How about a bullet-proof skull then? by Troll-in-Training · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can someone knowledgeable (i.e. not speculating) or working in the medical device industry explain why we can't use some really hard material like a titanium alloy or Kevlar to make the skull bullet-proof, especially for those in combat?

    Transfer of Kinetic Energy. If you just used a hard bullet proof material the kinetic energy would pass straight through and liquefy the brain.

    To make a bullet proof skull you would have to use a hard outer shell, a collapsable inner filler to absorb the kinetic energy and a hard inner shell to prevent spalling from shredding the brain. With current materials science it would be ridiculously thick and heavy and cause more problems than it would solve unless you could reinforce the spine and neck muscles, and it would have to be replaced/rebuilt after every impact.

    Take a look at the size and thickness of current combat helmets to see what I mean, and remember that current helmets will not stop a high caliber round or an armor piercing one in a direct impact. They only protect against shrapnel, glancing blows from assault rifle rounds and some light pistol rounds under the right conditions. They have to be discarded after one serious protective use as they are designed to stop the damage by sacrificing their structural integrity (they only stop one hit in the same spot).

  9. Re:Dude by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Funny

    They forgot to mention that it was adamantite.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  10. Re:Dude by craigminah · · Score: 3, Funny

    They also omitted that the procedure was done by Cyberdyne Systems.