Slashdot Mirror


The Hypocrisy In Silicon Valley's Big Talk On Innovation

glowend writes "James Temple writes in the San Francisco Chronicle: 'In the fall of 2011, Max Levchin took the stage at a TechCrunch conference to lament the sad state of U.S. innovation. "Technology innovation in this country is somewhere between dire straits and dead," said the PayPal co-founder, later adding: "The solution is actually very simple: You have to aim almost ridiculously high." But for all the funding announcements, product launches, media attention and wealth creation, most of Silicon Valley doesn't concern itself with aiming "almost ridiculously high." It concerns itself primarily with getting people to click on ads or buy slightly better gadgets than the ones they got last year.' I feel like this may be true as more money and MBA types invade the Silicon Valley. There's a lot of 'me-too' startups with some of the best and brightest figuring out ways to sell me stuff rather the working on flying cars."

4 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. Is that wrong? by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Computers have been getting "slightly better than last year" for a few decades now.

    Because of that, I'm now running a Quad i7 with a Geforce and a couple terabytes of SSD+HDD rather than a IBM PC with a monochrome adapter and two floppies.

    I'm not complaining.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  2. What happend with trillions lost in Silicon Valley by PythonM · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Millions of people lost their real (not paper) money "investing" in Silicon Valley companies. For example AOL’s market value went from $226 billion to about $20 billion now.

    The money did not evaporate like water, so who got the $$$ that millions of american lost by "investing" in Silicon Valley companies?

  3. Re:Forget about flying cars ... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This needs to be +5, Awesome. It's exactly right.

    Flying cars are DOA until we have self driving cars. On the way home last week, I saw a 5 car pile up. Nose to tail, every one. How did that happen? Either some moron managed to plow into the last car in a row hard enough to drive them all together (been there, done that as one of the hit cars, not the moron) or a chain of morons was all following so closely they couldn't stop as the first moron plowed into stopped cars.

    These are the people the "flying car" crowd want flying. I don't even want these people driving, let alone driving over my head at 150 mph or more. These people can have flying cars when we have self-driving flying cars, and never before or the carnage will be obscene.

  4. Re:It's less an article about by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's rare to see someone post something so perfectly opposite of the truth.

    Herbert Hoover spent over $3 billion via the Reconstruction Finance Corporation to bail out Wall Street cronies, instead of letting them go bankrupt as Warren Harding did in 1920. That's why the 1930s depression did not end until a significant fraction of Europe's population was murdered and their industrial production destroyed while the 1920 depression only lasted 18 months.

    Unsurprisingly, Herbert Hoover was the Treasury Secretary in 1920 who argued for bailouts at the time but was ignored. When he was in charge and able to implement exactly what he advocated a decade before the Great Depression was the result.