Slashdot Mirror


Google Reader Being Retired

Edgewood_Dirk writes "According to the official blog, Google Reader is being retired on July 1st, 2013. The main reasoning seems to be its decline in usage over the last few years. Users and developers will be able to retrieve their RSS data using Google Takeout."

21 of 386 comments (clear)

  1. Petition by abrotman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For what it's worth ...

    https://www.change.org/petitions/google-keep-google-reader-running

    1. Re:Petition by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Signed.
      I'm not interested in the social integration/people following me/me following people that things like google takeout supply, just let me read my feeds in piece!

      Agreed. I need a replacement that syncs across multiple platforms. I don't need a magazine style layout. I learned to read. I don't need pictures. And I don't need some social community to validate my reading choices.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  2. Still not using bloody Google+ by blarkon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Refugees are already saying that http://theoldreader.com/ is the replacement.

  3. Re:Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google is famous for just dropping products, if you are not prepared for your favorite thing to just 'disappear' or a forced migration don't rely on Google.

  4. What a shame by sirwired · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I realize that Google Reader probably did not make enough money, and/or drive enough traffic, to justify its continued existence. But I spend more time on Google Reader than any other website, by a considerable margin, and I'll miss it.

    I'd even pay, if they offered it as a subscription service for a nominal fee.

  5. Grudge by Exitar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Oh, you didn't use Buzz and you aren't using Google+?
    Well, now we're closing something you actually use!
    That will show you to belittle our products!"

  6. Google+ is sort of what killed it by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google Reader used to have some useful features which they actually removed in hopes of pushing people to Google+. Didn't really work, usage declined, now they're killing it.

    1. Re:Google+ is sort of what killed it by icebike · · Score: 5, Informative

      And most reader users were happy to see the social Bullshit deleted.
      All we ever wanted was a cross platform reader that would sync and organize your feeds.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  7. Sue them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I say we start a class action suit and demand our money back. In fact, I want at least twice the money I've paid them back...

  8. Re:Alternatives? by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google is famous for just dropping products, if you are not prepared for your favorite thing to just 'disappear' or a forced migration don't rely on Google.

    I'm still dreading this November when I have to find a replacement for iGoogle. That's honestly the only thing that takes me to Google every day,

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  9. Here we go again by srichard25 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had put a lot of time into Google Notebook. I was using it to maintain a very active log of technical documentation. I carefully choose tags to make it easy to find the information I needed quickly, and I spent a lot of time pruning the information to keep it clean. Then Google said they were no longer going to develop Notebook.

    I started using Google Reader to catalog technical articles. Once again, putting a lot of time/thought into tagging and notes to make it as useful as possible. Now Google is dropping Reader.

    If the product is not making enough money from data/ads, then at least give people the opportunity to pay for it. I would gladly pay for Notebook and/or Reader!

    Should I put the time and effort into gmail? Is that the next Google product to just disappear?? After being burnt twice, I will be thinking carefully before putting a lot of effort into a free Google product.

    1. Re:Here we go again by glwtta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, calm down. All this means is that you have to export your stuff, and import into a different, nearly identical service.

      What do you want them to do, anyway? Swear a blood-oath that once they start up a service, they will continue with it forever?

      If they don't think it makes sense to commit the resources to maintain it, then it's certainly not going to make sense to maintain a paid version - not everything is about revenue.

      You act like this is some kind of galling defect in Google's collective moral fibre - some things don't stick, it happens.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  10. The cloud is the future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google pretty much demonstrates the iron-cast reason why you shouldn't move your apps to the cloud every time they have another round of "cleaning."

  11. Re:WTF Google by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, based on events surrounding their last couple "retirements", it's pretty obvious they're attempting to force people to start using Google+ by retiring most stuff that's external to that product. It doesn't really seem to be working, but it's hard to interpret the tea leaves in any other manner.

    For such a huge company they sure are looking desperate...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  12. It will break a lot of RSS readers by djh2400 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Immediately after seeing the original post from the Google Reader blog, I started looking for a solution. It seems that practically every RSS program or service out there actually uses Google Reader as a centralized syncing platform.

    I read news through RSS feeds at different computers throughout the day and on different OSes. The ability for a service to synchronize between all the places I access the feeds is paramount in a replacement. Thus, all those services which use Google Reader for syncing purposes will break once Google shuts down Reader, so, sadly, they are not a viable option as things stand right now.

    I do like some of the alternatives posted by other commenters; I'll check out some of them when I have the time. I also signed the petition in one of the first comments above — it may have no effect, but it's worth trying, I suppose.

    1. Re:It will break a lot of RSS readers by Bremic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I found this funny. There are Reader Clients for both iOS and Android that are rated as top apps. This means there must have been huge numbers of downloads of those apps, and large numbers of people using them - all requiring Google Reader.

      Yet Google Reader has few users... this just doesn't add up.

      It strikes me this is purely a Google+ selling point, and one that I suspect isn't going to work.

  13. Re:Alternatives? by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its also famous for making sure you can get your data and get out.
    http://www.dataliberation.org/

    Any company can drop products. Google has consistently managed to not be a jerk about it.

  14. They kill Reader we kill Google+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just went and deleted my Google+ account in protest of this and I would suggest that others do also. You are given an opportunity to tell Google why you are leaving Google+ and it seems to me there is no better place to sound off on this incredibly stupid decision to kill Reader.

  15. The nightmare of cloud service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With everything being in the cloud, what if the cloud is gone someday. The google reader is just an example here.
    If google reader is just a desktop app, we can happily conitnue to use it even it is abandoned.
    But if it is in the cloud, we are screwed.

  16. Best in class by ftobin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's one thing to shut down a product that is didn't make it out of the gate (e.g., Buzz), but it's another to shut down a product that is considered to be the premier product in its space.

    I've been using Google products for a long time, and have understood most of their shutdowns. I used to think that as long as the service wasn't "experimental", it'd stick around. But going forward, I have 0 trust, since obviously even having the #1 product isn't enough.

  17. The outrage by slasho81 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've seen so many "Fuck you Google" said today I'm beginning to think Google has officially transitioned into being the new Microsoft.