Slashdot Mirror


Australian PM Targets Imported IT Workers

beaverdownunder writes "A debate 'down under' has started to rage surrounding the importation of 'temporary' IT workers on so-called 457 visas, with the Prime Minister promising to bring in tough new restrictions on foreign workers in a pre-election pledge, despite evidence that there are insufficient numbers of Australians to fill the skills gap. Some quarters argue the foreign workers are necessary to drive growth in Australia's IT industry, while others have cited examples where large Australian companies have imported workers needlessly, displacing qualified Aussie personnel."

26 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. Mah nishtanah, ha-laylah ha-zeh, mi-kol ha-leylot? by jacobsm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And how is this different from the controversy over this exact same subject here in the US, and I'm sure in other countries too?

  2. Just a desperate PM by Silicon-Surfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is just a ploy by a desperate PM way behind in the polls and facing a wipeout in the upcoming federal election. She's trying to gain some mileage by playing on the fears of Australians, who are suspicious of imported temporary workers. It doesn't matter whether there is a skill shortage or not, the public doesn't actually get the real facts...

    1. Re: Just a desperate PM by AndrewKennedy4867 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "real facts" are that both sides do this.

    2. Re:Just a desperate PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, we are all much better off if the corporations can import a cheaper workforce. It's trickle-down economics! We will all get richer if we abolish the protectionist policies that secure our jobs, because they're just another sort of socialism standing in the way of the rising tide.

    3. Re:Just a desperate PM by bug1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is just a ploy by a desperate PM ...

      Oh lovely, its blame Julia time again, do you have a spare pitchfork and ditch the witch badge ?

      the public doesn't actually get the real facts...

      Many in academic circles have stated that there is a clear media bias against the government. I guess its Julias fault people watch MSM too ?

    4. Re:Just a desperate PM by bug1 · · Score: 3

      Election at any cost, screw Australia. Reality and what's even good or necessary for this country to 'move forward' are irrelevant to this woman who's twice got into the role via a backdoor.

      Whats good for this country is implkementing the Goonski recommendations, something this PM is committed to.

      Twice go in through the back door... its called politics mate, she was pushed to the top by her peers, and she deserves to be there, best PM since Hawk.

  3. Import the workers or offshore the jobs... by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whether or not there is a shortage of native IT workers in Australia, companies could potentially switch to off shoring the jobs if the government prevents importing of workers.

    1. Re:Import the workers or offshore the jobs... by twisteddk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, or.... Which has been the debate over here, the hired labor costs maybe underbidding the local labor costs. Thus displacing local talent because of the cost. Most businesses doesn't run on philanthropy after all, which makes it a legislation issue to protect local jobs (albeit fighting globalization would seem futile)

      We've had examples of companies (well at least one that got some press) where they show one contract to immigration services that shows the foreign IT hires as getting at least minimum wages. but the local hires also had another contract stating how much they would ACTUALLY get and that they'd be fired or fined if they did not lie about their salary to immigrations.

      I was appalled, and quit the company shortly after. I continue to be amazed at the lengths people will go to turn a profit.Professional businesses should be able to see the huge impact illegal or immoral activities can have on their sales, brand or reputation in the market.and no secret is safe enough that it will never become public knowledge.

      --
      --- To err is human... Am I more human than most ?
    2. Re:Import the workers or offshore the jobs... by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Where it's possible they already off-shore jobs. If it could be off-shored to India they'll do it.

      The jobs which are here are the ones they can't move overseas, or, more usually, where they know the local talent is good and are trying to war the price down with imported labor that isn't actually as productive - which is exactly the same problem as in the US with H1Bs.

      More importantly, the ability to import cheap foreign labor means a lot of businesses which should be employing graduates or running apprenticeship programs aren't. Which means allowing it to continue unchecked means Australia winds up being no more valuable then cheap foreign labor in the first place, which takes away the only thing we have going for us.

    3. Re:Import the workers or offshore the jobs... by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Companies could potentially switch to off shoring the jobs whether the government does everything, nothing, or any point in between.

      The only way to prevent that is to make labour and production as cheap, disposable, exploitable and polluting everywhere as it is in the worst country in the world.

      Do you want to keep arguing the point, or just shush up now?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  4. Temporary transfers too by Bronster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, this is going to be an extra-large shit for us, where me spending 2 years in Norway at head office was significantly easier than bringing people over here for 6 months at a time for skills exchange. HR tells me that Australia is the hardest country in the world they've tried to give people "bridge the world" temporary transfers to. Insular much?

  5. Re:Mah nishtanah, ha-laylah ha-zeh, mi-kol ha-leyl by helobugz · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's different because the aussie leadership actually recognize it as a problem. In the US it's just business as usual.

  6. No, they haven't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You need to actually live here to understand the politics of the situation. The problem is that the government has lost control of illegal immigration (purely their fault, because they're the ones who dismantled a border-control regime that worked), so in order to signal to the electorate that they're very very very concerned about illegal immigration, they're... cracking down on legal immigration.

    People on 457 visas have average annual incomes safely over ~$90k, which makes sense - the 457 program is targeted at areas of skills shortage. There is no comparison with the H1B visas in the US.

  7. Shortage is NOT the Problem by XopherMV · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem is not a shortage of engineers. The problem is that software companies don't want to pay competitive salaries. Were salaries higher, that would attract capable workers into the software field such as engineers or physicists. It would also further increase the number and quality of students studying computer science.

    There's a reason interest in software development work peaked in the late 1990s. That was also when salary increases peaked.

    1. Re:Shortage is NOT the Problem by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This depends upon what you call competitive. If your competition is only within your borders, then you have a level playing field. When you go global, you're suddenly competing with people who don't have the same overhead, standards of living, taxes, etc., etc. So, the question for all nations to answer is if they're willing to forsake jobs for their own people, increasing unemployment, though benefiting corporations, by lowering their costs, but also driving down salaries for those still employed within their borders. It's an issue that should be agreed to at a national level.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  8. Re:Mah nishtanah, ha-laylah ha-zeh, mi-kol ha-leyl by TheLink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you are growing GDP just by importing workers you're often not growing GDP per capita. Which means you're not actually making the country's people richer on average.

    It is of course usually harder to grow GDP by increasing productivity per person.

    --
  9. International Competition Vs Cost of Living by realxmp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I disagree, I think software companies would love to pay a competitive salary, as long as ALL of their competitors are paying it too. Your problem is that your competition is now international, and Australia has a very high cost of living. In the late 1990's the internet hadn't properly taken hold in CEO's brains so your competition for software was still mostly domestic (international companies like Microsoft, IBM, etc were the exception).

    Politicians don't seem to get is whilst high tech jobs are the future, they're not subject to the same geographical constraints that low tech jobs like farming are. Why would a company want to pay an Australian developer a high rate of pay when he can pay an Indian developer a lower wage and the Indian guy gets to live in the lap of luxury? Why would a company or consumer want to buy software developed in Australia, when Indian, American or European software can be bought cheaper over the net? (Region locks have plusses and minuses in this case)

    The causes of the high cost of living needs to be tackled, but this is probably going to involve low-skilled immigration and they've sealed that exit off.

  10. Re:Mah nishtanah, ha-laylah ha-zeh, mi-kol ha-leyl by SourceFrog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You do realize that any reasonably non-crap programmer ALREADY basically competes with you no matter what country you live in. I know "out of sight out of mind" but programmers don't just disappear because they live in a different country, and the market is pretty well globalized. So you can either let programmers create jobs in another country or contribute to your own economy.

    --
    My other UID is three digits.
  11. Abuse is rife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone in the IT industry in Oz who has not seen 457 visa abuse, especially by the large system integrators, is simply not paying attention. Bringing in dirt cheap labor who are on-sold to customers at a very high profit margin is rife. Some of these people are good, some are bad. But all are basically being used to reduce IT wages and increase the profit margins of the SI's.

    Here's a question: if there is an IT skills shortage, why have IT wages been flat for five years.

    And the opposition trying to play this as racism is beyond offensive, given their demonization and wolf-whistling around refugees. I'd like to think Abbott couldn't go lower, but I am pretty sure there are much further depths of depravity and hypocrisy that man and his supporter are capable of.

    Plus their fans in News Ltd (aka. News Corp elsewhere).

  12. What happened to the new careers in IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a teenager, we were encouraged to study engineering and computing. IT jobs were sold to us as genuine careers. So we spent our four plus years at uni only to find that outsourcing is the new black, and all our study is for naught. Thanks.

  13. More accurately by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...despite evidence that there are insufficient numbers of Australians willing to fill the skills gap at slave-wage rates.

    Just like the BS about US corporations whining they desperately need more H1B visas, this is about increasing profits by replacing living wage jobs with the modern IT equivalent of indebtured servants; compliant, desperate folks willing to work way too hard for pennies on the pound / dollar. And if they ask for a raise or complain about 60-hour work weeks? DEPORTED.

    1. Re:More accurately by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was hoping someone would have left this comment, and was not disappointed.

      Visa workers are just a way for companies to never pay for training. In the long term, that leads to your workers being unqualified, a lot of turnover, and a lot of unemployment. Congratulations for following us in everything we do, Australia.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Re:So more jobs for Aboriginal Australians? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But they got to Australia BEFORE the pale people did, and you didn't follow THEIR immigration laws, did ya?

  15. I've seen both sides of this by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, I've been on both sides of this as I've been to Australia three different times for work (but not with the visa they talk about). When I was brought in I was brought in because they had fewer than 10 people in the entire country that were certified to do what I was doing at the time (there were only a few hundred total worldwide). There well and truly was a shortage of the skills they were looking for and they could not have possibly met that need in country.

    Cases like mine are the exception though, and most visas issued for workers to come in and perform IT work are issued to avoid hiring native workers. Someone who is working on a visa is much more likely to be able to be pressed to work additional free hours, won't have costs like retirement and is really easy to get rid of if you don't want them anymore. In short they are viewed as disposable workers that do more at less cost.

    There is a relatively easy and balanced fix for these problems (it's a problem when large quantities of natives can't get work and your importing people to work). If you really want to measure if there is actually a shortage of workers for a given field all you have to do is monitor average pay and benefits for native workers. If there is a genuine shortage you will see pay and benefits rise accordingly (market dynamics). When average pay and benefits rise to a certain level you allow for more visas to be issued. This avoids a hard cap while allowing for genuine shortages to be addressed without decimating native workers careers.

    I also think you should allow people who come in like this to stay for a limited number of years with a fast track for citizenship. If they don't obtain their citizenship after X years they return home. /Loved Australia

  16. Re:So more jobs for Aboriginal Australians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah and the aborigines arrived second http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2001/01/01/2813404.htm possible wiping out other inhabitants - but lets all ignore that and the fact that aborigines will not let further DNA testing on the remains even though the oldest fossil remains in Australia DO NOT match current modern day aborigines. http://www.convictcreations.com/aborigines/prehistory.htm

  17. This kills me. by BVis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whenever I hear people whining about a "skills shortage" I call bullshit. There's no "skills shortage", there's a "people who will work for low wages" shortage. If companies wanted to hire domestic workers, they could, they just don't want to. They love it when supply-and-demand benefits them, but when the workers try to do the same thing (salaries go up when the demand for the skills goes up), well, we can't have that, can we. Those executives might have to forgo that second vacation home or have to settle for a BMW instead of a Bentley.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.