Slashdot Mirror


Nanoscale 3D Printer Now Commercially Available

kkleiner writes "Now the field of 3D printing has advanced so far that a company called Nanoscribe is offering one of the first commercially available 3D printers for the nanoscale. Nanoscribe's machine can produce tiny 3D printed objects that are only the width of a single human hair. Amazingly this includes 3D printed objects such as spaceships, micro needles, or even the empire state building."

13 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Amazing technology but micro, not nano. by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Amazing technology but micro, not nano. by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Informative

      > so 30nm resolution is not nano scale enough for you?

      That's 3% at one micron: barely adequate for devices with minimum dimensions of one micron and up. For nanoscale devices you need one nanometer or better.

      Look at the examples. They're all dimensioned in the tens to hundreds of microns.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Amazing technology but micro, not nano. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I get your point, but I think you and Slashdot have to come to terms with the fact that "nano" is now buzz-word compliant. It's like how "Sanitation Engineer" started making everyone an engineer.

      "Nano" actually now means "small" to the press. I'm sorry it isn't technically correct, but you are going to have to get used to it.

      Now, I've got some bad news to tell you about "quantum" as well...

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    3. Re:Amazing technology but micro, not nano. by hairyfish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Nano" actually now means "small" to the press. I'm sorry it isn't technically correct, but you are going to have to get used to it.

      No we're not. I can accept this interpretation in the local rag, but Slashdot's target audience is smart people (apparently). We should be sticking to technically accurate terminology at all times.

    4. Re:Amazing technology but micro, not nano. by dissy · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a bit of a long read, but (IMHO) one of the best sources on the matter is Engines of Creation by Eric Drexler.

      He describes the very concept of nanotechnology, defines it as well as much philosophy around it, with plenty of examples of thing that can be done once manufacturing on this scale is achieved.

      Such machines do technically already exist, such as the ribosome. Once a similar machine is created that is under complete human control pragmatically, it will be a world altering event.

      If you think of the process of a cell performing its work, dividing, assembling its programmed structure, and eventually creating something on the macro scale like a whale or elephant - then you are thinking on the right scale.

      The 3D printer referenced in the article is not yet able to produce structures at this scale, let alone functional machines at this scale.
      At best it might be one step on the path towards true nanotechnology, as smaller tools build smaller tools and so on.

      Some additional material on the subject that found recently was on youtube under productive nanosystems
      While this is purely an artists rendering, one video I happened upon that really brings home the scale factor is their nano-factory video.

      This is what most people are referring to when using the term nanotechnology.

  2. A nanoscale printer sound really awesome by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I'm certain I'd lose it.

  3. This could be a boon to semiconductors and MEMS by asm2750 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Right now it can take weeks to make complete microchip with the current fabrication methods. The fabrication size of this printer isn't that great however since most of what is seen in the TFA looks to be around 100 nanometers compared to the 28 nanometers a modern fab can make. However, it would be great to have for rapid prototypes of processors or be used to make devices that fabricate well at large sizes like flash memory.

    This printer would work extremely well for MEMS devices since the complex structures such sensors can now just be printed rather than deposited and etched over and over again in a microchip fab.

  4. Re:Just what I wanted by TheLink · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's nothing to sneeze at.

    --
  5. Re:Getting Closer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    But there's no trial and error with 3D printing.... Sigh.... No no, it's just like Star Trek, right?

  6. Re:Not molecular printing unfortunately by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Price may, value depends on usefulness.

    Not everything that has a high value has a price tag attached to it. No matter what our market tries to blind you with.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:Okay, that's great. Now scale it. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're barking up the wrong tree. Getting to this precision isn't the problem with "normal scale" prototyping. That could be accomplished long before the advent of 3D printing, and high precision prototypes are not really the area where 3D printers are used. At least not the consumer grade models that most people know about.

    3D printing was and is about is to make the whole deal cheap. To give everyone access to the ability to produce plastic prototypes that doesn't involve a process that resembles playing with very expensive Play-Doh.

    This thing is a completely different beast altogether. From the looks of it alone you can easily tell that "cheap" wasn't really one of the corner stones this project rested on. Building really tiny things was.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. I'll believe it when I see it... by mutube · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Doh!!!

  9. Re:Amazing by kermidge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm childish enough to find many things amazing.

    Sometimes in the wee hours when the mind roams I still get a hint of the simple rush from my first experience with an interactive computer, one of the early 8-bit machines: I press a key, and a letter shows up on the screen. Very simple it is; yet all the tech, all the science underlying it, the full range of variously insightful to plodding accomplishments needed to design and build the circuits and instructions still fascinates. I try to appreciate and accord value to well-designed, well-made items that are shepherded through the constraints of materials, cost to build, and market vagaries, amongst others - be it a nail clippers or a CPU.

    My knowledge being small, my understanding smaller, my ignorance vast as Universe, there's plenty for amazement.

    Am I amazed enough for you, or will you slough me off as simply dotty?