Slashdot Mirror


Next-Gen Intel Chip Brings Big Gains For Floating-Point Apps

An anonymous reader writes "Tom's Hardware has published a lengthy article and a set of benchmarks on the new "Haswell" CPUs from Intel. It's just a performance preview, but it isn't just more of the same. While it's got the expected 10-15% faster for the same clock speed for integer applications, floating point applications are almost twice as a fast which might be important for digital imaging applications and scientific computing." The serious performance increase has a few caveats: you have to use either AVX2 or FMA3, and then only in code that takes advantage of vectorization. Floating point operations using AVX or plain old SSE3 see more modest increases in performance (in line with integer performance increases).

3 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Let's see... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a joke. The Intel P5 Pentium FPU had a bug where

    4195835/3145727=1.333739068902037589 The correct answer is 1.333820449136241002.

  2. Re:Hope it's going in the new Mac Pro by washu_k · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Core i7's are consumer-grade processors and are slower than the Xeon's the Mac Pros use

    This is completely incorrect. The current Mac Pros use Nehalem based Xeons which are two generations back from the current Ivy Bridge i7s. Xeons may have differences in core count, cache and/or ECC support but their execution units are the same as their desktop equivalents. The base Mac Pro CPU is equivalent to an i7-960 with ECC support. The current Ivy Bridge i7s are a fair bit faster.

  3. Re:Hope it's going in the new Mac Pro by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 5, Informative

    ECC memory is only marginally slower. Considering error rates and modern memory sizes, it is far past time that it became a standard feature. The extra cost would be totally insignificant if were standard, and not used as an excuse to gouge people on Xeons.