Slashdot Mirror


Krebs Hacker Unmasked, Hit Ars and Wired's Honan

altjira writes "Brian Krebs, hot on the tail of the hacker who DDOS his site and SWATted his home, followed up on a tip, found the dox, called and then outed his hacker. Turns out it may have been the same guy who hit Wired's Mat Honan and Ars Technica." The attacker is ... a 20 year old guy who apparently has too much time on his hands, and was surprisingly careless with his personal information for someone exploiting the personal information of others.

164 comments

  1. SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Given the propensity of the American police responding to that sort of call to shoot first and possibly get round to asking questions a bit later on, SWATting somebody should be charged as attempted murder

    1. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree it should be a crime of some sort, the person pulling the trigger should be the one charged with murder.

    2. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given the propensity of the American police responding to that sort of call to shoot first and possibly get round to asking questions a bit later on, SWATting somebody should be charged as attempted murder

      No, the policemen doing the shooting before asking questions should be charged with attempted murder.

      In the same way that, if I told a bully someone insulted him behind his back, and he went and punched that guy, the bully would be charged.

    3. Re:SWATting by Motard · · Score: 2

      It might be murder. In my state, if someone dies as a result if a crime being committed (say, arson) the perpetrator can be charged with murder.

    4. Re:SWATting by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If your intend was to get the other person punched then you should be charged AS WELL. One does not exclude the other.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like saying that someone willfully speeding should be charged with attempted murder. After all, we know that higher speeds lead to more fatal wrecks, thus you're willfully risking your own life and the life of others by going above the speed limit.
       
      Now, had someone died in the "SWATting" I would agree that the hacker should have been hit with capital murder and likely would have.

    6. Re:SWATting by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      You are giving the reason why American police, and who trained/put them into that way, should be put right now in jail as preemptive punishment. They will kill innocent people, sooner or later, phone jokes or not, things like this or this will continue to happen,

      And with guns practically mandated to normal citizens, social engineering could be a lethal weapon too, but again, the one shooting would still be the real killer.

    7. Re:SWATting by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Given the propensity of the American police responding to that sort of call to shoot first and possibly get round to asking questions a bit later on, SWATting somebody should be charged as attempted murder

      Well, the SWAT guys get to shoot someone and your tormentor gets you (or at least your dog) killed. It's a win-win for the bad guys. And I seriously doubt that there would be any repercussions for the shooter, except high-fives all around.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    8. Re:SWATting by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was on a jury that convicted a man of reckless homicide after a street race ended up in a horrible crash.

      So yeah if someone had been shot then a similar charge should apply.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    9. Re:SWATting by belligerent0001 · · Score: 0

      SWAT....Sit Wait And Talk. As defined by 4 seperate SWAT members in 3 different departments in my area. Just saying....

      --
      "...a civilian some of the time, a soldier part of the time and a patriot all of the time." -Brig. Gen. James Drain
    10. Re:SWATting by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      "Conspiracy to commit #####" - hell we already have charges for it!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:SWATting by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Reckless homicide is not murder. Neither is manslaughter.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:SWATting by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Hurry up and wait.

      Sound familiar?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I agree it should be a crime of some sort, the person pulling the trigger should be the one charged with murder.

      You're right. If, say, the person being SWAT'ed pulls a gun in self defense, because all he knows is his house is being invaded, and a police officer sees it and fires, as they are trained to do when seeing a lethal threat, that is TOTALLY murder.

      More accurately, I think SWATing somebody should be negligent homicide if somebody dies, reckless endangerment if (as usually happens) nobody is hurt.

    14. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going over the speed limit isn't SWATing...

      Doing 120 in a 65... is definitely different than sending a truck load of armed police to someones personal residence.

    15. Re:SWATting by tokencode · · Score: 2

      Are you sure you really want to set a precedent of pre-emptive punishment?

    16. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an opponent of police brutality and prosecutorial over-reach, your proposal sounds fair and level headed. You would never make it in the DoJ of 2013!

    17. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is hardly new to the Criminal Justice system, people have used Police as Instrumentalities in murders before.

    18. Re:SWATting by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that it was. I was simply implying that a similar charge to reckless homicide could apply if an actual shooting had taken place.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    19. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be murder. In my state, if someone dies as a result if a crime being committed (say, arson) the perpetrator can be charged with murder.

      It usually requires the crime being committed is a felony. In some states, SWATing may only be a misdemeanor.

    20. Re:SWATting by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given the propensity of the American police responding to that sort of call to shoot first and possibly get round to asking questions a bit later on, SWATting somebody should be charged as attempted murder

      While I understand your sentiment, I have to disagree with you. In cases like "SWATting" these officers have been called to a scene where the assumption is that there is an armed person who has already killed a loved on and is emotionally distraught. As most law enforcement officers will tell you, domestic disturbances are some of the most unpredictable calls to go to. So a call like this would be about as scary as most police will ever get.

      Granted, there are some pretty bad police officers out there. But there are a lot more really good ones. It's just that nobody seems to pay attention to them, except on rare occasions. Go check to see how much they get paid. It's pretty poorly in most cases. The average patrolman's salary is just over $50K An entry level application engineer makes a little over $54K. Barring natural disasters, a bad day at work for someone in IT is to have to work late. How much fun do you think it is to investigate a murder scene? Or a fatal car crash with children involved? For a patrolman a bad day could include coming home in a bag. In most professions a mistake will cost the company money. For an officer it could be someones life, or their own.

      How would you handle call like this? Would you allow yourself to get shot prior to opening fire? Have you ever been shot at? Judging a situation after the fact from your nice comfy chair is just a little bit different than being an active participant.

      It's funny that we will spend money to go see a movie and cheer on the cop who shoots the bad guy. But in 99.9% of the times you see this in movies, the "good guy" would be criminally charged for acting the way they do. But when a cop shoots someone who feigns having a gun and does not respond to commands to submit we through a fit. The asshole that called this in is the one at fault here for abusing the system that is in place to protect us.

    21. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That argument is like someone putting child porn on anothers computer and then getting them arrested for being child pornographers.

      Completely and utterly stupid argument.

    22. Re:SWATting by deoxyribonucleose · · Score: 2

      If you read a bit more carefully, you might discover you actually agree with the essence of the AC post. 'The guy doing the SWATting' does not refer to the police officer pulling the trigger (well, not very likely, though that'd be an interesting way of getting away with murder...).

    23. Re:SWATting by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Preemptively not training for doing it would be better. If someone gives you a weapon and tells to you go outside and kill some, the option you have is to stop him before it does some damage, reeducate telling that the first person was wrong, and put in jail the first person. Or just live with the fact that a lot of people will be killed and the first person will get a medal for that, and surely will move more people to kill, that is the usual way to do things, and that it will keep happening if the other alternatives are not taken.

    24. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...cough throw .....cough

    25. Re:SWATting by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      And using a car analogy too.

      Well done sir!

    26. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That argument is like someone putting child porn on anothers computer and then getting them arrested for being child pornographers.

      Completely and utterly stupid argument.

      So you got child porn somewhere. Then you put it on another persons' computer. I think the first sentence make you guilty of trafficing in child porn.
      If it is simply an arrest, then that is one thing. If the person you set-up was tried and convicted even if you were known to be the person who orginally obtained and planted the porn, then perhaps the officer should be charged with criminal conspiracy too.

    27. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taxi driver is a more dangerous occupation than policeman, yet we do not excuse taxi drivers who shoot first and ask questions later. The problem people have here with police tactics is not when police have to deal with someone pointing a gun at them. In situations like that, we all understand that police can have a legitimate need to kill or at least incapacitate someone. Yet that is an exceedingly rare situation and it's not what people are referring to here. If you are SWATting someone the whole point is that the person being SWATted doesn't actually pose a threat, so something like that would never happen. So if SWATting could reasonably be expected to involve deaths, to the extent that the SWATter should be charged with murder, something is wrong.

    28. Re:SWATting by slew · · Score: 1

      It might be murder. In my state, if someone dies as a result if a crime being committed (say, arson) the perpetrator can be charged with murder.

      It usually requires the crime being committed is a felony. In some states, SWATing may only be a misdemeanor.

      AFAIK, most juristiction are allowed to charge SWATing depending on the nature of the false report. Generally, if you falsely report a felony and the police take immediate action, then felony charges will usually be brought (although they are often plea-bargined). If you falsely report a misdemenor, or if the police don't take any immediate action, then it's highly likely that you won't get charged at all. Almost all laws are structured that way (allowed to be felony or misdemenor depending on degree) to give room for plea-bargining (w/o the "stick" of a felony-charge, too many misdemenor cases would end up going to trial).

      Since most SWATing perpetrators want to bring overwhelming action to their victim, they often falsly report heineous felonies in progress which would generally draw the felony charge for malicious false reporting to police. If the overwhelming police action got someone killed and thus made the police look bad, you can be sure that they'd use any option to charge the SWATing as a felony false police report which would likely make the person eligible for murder charges as well.

    29. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sigh... becoming a police officer is a CHOICE. Investigating murder scenes, cleaning up car crashes, and keeping angry wives and husbands from killing each other is part of the job. The people who become police officers CHOOSE to deal with these and other stressful situations, they CHOOSE to (occasionally) risk their lives. CHOOSING to put yourself in the line of fire is no excuse to trample on the rights of the people you're supposed to protect. If they want a bigger paycheck with safer working conditions, they can find different jobs.

      I've seen this attitude plenty of times, where people seem to want to excuse the terrible behavior and the military-style tactics of police because "the poor dears have a tough job without much pay, cut them some slack." Well, NO! As people to whom the rest of us have given the right to use lethal force and invade and seize private property, the police should be held to a much higher standard, and they should be trained to understand that they work for us, not the other way around.

      The bad apples in the police forces may very well be in the minority, I don't know. I've known cops who are friendly and cops who are psychopaths or arrogant jerks. For example, I knew a guy who worked as a juvenile prison guard (while studying to become a full-fledged cop) and bragged about "putting the smackdown" on teenagers who ran their mouths.

    30. Re:SWATting by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, the 'spoofing' they use to fake the caller ID could count as felony (interstate) wire fraud.

    31. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow. Construction workers are FAR more likely to be injured or killed than police officers. The injury rate for police is relatively low compared to many other blue collar jobs.

      AC

    32. Re:SWATting by Golddess · · Score: 1

      That argument is like someone putting child porn on anothers computer and then getting them arrested for being child pornographers.

      Not really. Punching someone in the face requires you to perform an action. Having someone else put CP on your computer requires you to, well, it doesn't require you to do anything. A person in a coma can have CP put on their computer by another party. A person in a coma cannot very well punch someone in the face.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    33. Re:SWATting by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      where i live, the *starting* salary is ~$72k. now factor in overtime, benefits, paid training, and the 2nd job security gigs, and premiums for special assignment. 6 of the top 15 paid city employees are police officers.

    34. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a patrolman a bad day could include coming home in a bag

      "Being a cop is a dangerous job" is a myth

      In the US, the following professions have fatality rates that are more than ten times greater than law enforcement:

      Fishing
      Logging
      Aircraft Operation
      Firefighting & Rescue
      Garbage & Recycling Collection
      Roofing
      Structural Iron & Steel
      Farming/Ranching/Agriculture
      Trucking & Driver/Sales
      Electrical Power-line
      Taxi & Chauffeur

      If you ONLY consider homicides (which pale in comparison to fatal accidents), Taxi & Chauffeur are STILL 10x more likely to get killed on the job than Police. If you take the typical career patrolman (i.e. can't make detective), and look at the possible occupations available to someone with those abilities, then being a cop is a very safe job.

    35. Re:SWATting by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Taxi driver is a more dangerous occupation than policeman,

      No, it's not

      Yet that is an exceedingly rare situation and it's not what people are referring to here. If you are SWATting someone the whole point is that the person being SWATted doesn't actually pose a threat, so something like that would never happen.

      Really? You know that for a fact? Do you think the person setting this crap up knows the victims well enough to know that for a fact too? I know many people who keep guns in close proximity to their bed. If someone broke down their door, in all likelihood several police would be shot as well as the person being SWATted.

      So if SWATting could reasonably be expected to involve deaths, to the extent that the SWATter should be charged with murder, something is wrong.

      Anytime you are forcibly entering someones home the risk of someone being injured or killed can be very high.

    36. Re:SWATting by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Sigh... becoming a police officer is a CHOICE. Investigating murder scenes, cleaning up car crashes, and keeping angry wives and husbands from killing each other is part of the job. The people who become police officers CHOOSE to deal with these and other stressful situations, they CHOOSE to (occasionally) risk their lives.

      They do. But putting up with some asshole who thinks it's funny to abuse a system that is designed to protect its citizens is not something they choose to put up with.

      CHOOSING to put yourself in the line of fire is no excuse to trample on the rights of the people you're supposed to protect.

      I couldn't agree more.

      If they want a bigger paycheck with safer working conditions, they can find different jobs.

      If they all choose to do that, then who will be left to protect Anonymous Cowards like you?

      I've seen this attitude plenty of times, where people seem to want to excuse the terrible behavior and the military-style tactics of police because "the poor dears have a tough job without much pay, cut them some slack."

      Not at all. What I do get tired of seeing is people like you, who somehow think every cop should be crucified for making a mistake in a dangerous situation and yet you have no idea what it's like.

      Well, NO! As people to whom the rest of us have given the right to use lethal force and invade and seize private property, the police should be held to a much higher standard, and they should be trained to understand that they work for us, not the other way around.

      And most do. I've had and have many friends who are in law enforcement. Do you know the reason most of them chose that profession? Because the wanted to help people. Unfortunately most get in the system and discover they can't help anyone. Once that sinks in, they do their 20, and get out.

      The bad apples in the police forces may very well be in the minority, I don't know. I've known cops who are friendly and cops who are psychopaths or arrogant jerks. For example, I knew a guy who worked as a juvenile prison guard (while studying to become a full-fledged cop) and bragged about "putting the smackdown" on teenagers who ran their mouths.

      Those are the type who should never make it past the psych evaluation. But when you have a shortage of candidates, you sometimes have to take what you can get.

    37. Re:SWATting by Rufus+Firefly · · Score: 1

      ... cough douche-bag ..... cough

    38. Re:SWATting by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      In other words, SWATting somebody should be charged as attempted murder.

    39. Re:SWATting by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      For a patrolman a bad day could include coming home in a bag

      "Being a cop is a dangerous job" is a myth

      In the US, the following professions have fatality rates that are more than ten times greater than law enforcement:

      No, it depends on how you define it. If it's the total percentage of fatalities of those in the field, yes patrolman in not number one. It also depends on what list you look at. According to the Bureau of Labor, police officer 18.6 fatalities per 100K. 176 officers were kill in in the line of duty in 2011.

      Fishing - 121.2 deaths per 100K However there very few fishermen in the US, so it's a total of 40 deaths.

      Logging - 102.4 per 100K. Again, not very many loggers. At total of 64 loggers died in 2011.

      Aircraft Operation - 57 per 100K. The vast majority died in Alaska in old equipment in hostile areas. total deaths, 72. These also include people who walk into propellers and such.

      Firefighting & Rescue - Sorry, you don't get this one. It was 2.5 per 100K in 2011. While 80 died in the line of duty, 53 were from heart attacks.

      Garbage &; Recycling Collection - 41.2 per 100K. Actual number 34.

      Roofing - 31.8 per 100K. Actual number 56

      Structural Iron &; Steel - 26 per 100K. Total number of fatalities 16

      Farming/Ranching/Agriculture - 25.3 per 100K Here's one that has higher total fatalities. 260. Of course this includes horse and ATV accidents and the fact that most farmers are never "off duty". Any accident on the property in which they live would be considered a workplace accident.

      Trucking & Driver/Sales - 759 total deaths. The worst of any profession. 24 per 100K

      Electrical Power-line - 27 people killed.

      Taxi & Chauffeur

      If you ONLY consider homicides (which pale in comparison to fatal accidents),

      Obviously the roads are dangerous. Truck drivers have the highest number of fatalities. In the last two years I've read in my local paper about several patrolmen dying in wrecks on the way home after a long shift. Those didn't get counted as killed in the line of duty either.

      Taxi & Chauffeur are STILL 10x more likely to get killed on the job than Police.

      Average cab driver homicides per year from 1980 to 2009 is 38.

      How many other professions have to worry about being stalked when off duty? Or worry about some idiot tracking down their family? It's not a safe or easy profession to be in.

    40. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they should charge him with something IP related (like unauthorized copy of a callerid number). He'll get more time that way.

    41. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's what I said but you got modded up for it. Either you didn't read my post clearly or you just repeated what I said. Slashdot is really becoming a shithole for retards anymore.

    42. Re:SWATting by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the situation could easily be resolved with a megaphone, or just ringing the doorbell.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    43. Re:SWATting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the propensity of the American police responding to that sort of call to shoot first and possibly get round to asking questions a bit later on, SWATting somebody should be charged as attempted murder
       
      Better to charge with "copying a file", or "blah blah blah with a computer". That would result in greater punishment.

    44. Re:SWATting by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      If someone gives you a weapon and tells to you go outside and kill some,

      ... you shoot the person who gave you the gun and the instructions. That way everyone wins.

      If you're good enough with the gun and just destroy one of his legs and his gonads (much harder if he's a she), then everyone wins, including the idiot who gets an unearned second chance.

      You should be able to argue it down to a self-defence charge - you thought that he was going to pull another gun to duel you, or something.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Most Crimes Are Solved by hduff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most crimes are solved because the criminal is careless or stupid or both.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    1. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by slashmydots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most hackers especially are careless, stupid, and usually both. They think they're so invincible and cool and above security that they don't even take basic precautions. They think they have some kind of magical aura from being so tech savvy that protects them from "lesser" beings. Lol, good luck with that.

    2. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most crimes are solved because the criminal is careless or stupid or both.

      While true, this criminal is a teenager. Most teenagers are careless or stupid or both whether they have committed a crime or not.

    3. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by SirGarlon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I considered crime as a career option when I was young, and decided that it was for losers. Concealing repeated crime would require so much hard work and attention to detail, that anyone qualified to do it is also qualified for a rather high-paying job.

      If you think about it, the saying "crime doesn't pay" is just another way of saying the labor market works.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    4. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Twenty is not a teenager. Notice the lack of "teen" in the number.

    5. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I pronounce it "tweenty", you insensitive clod.

    6. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're retarded. Thanks for playing!

    7. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by organgtool · · Score: 4, Funny

      And your decision to play it straight has obviously paid off since it has taken you all the way to knighthood! :)

    8. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by HeX314 · · Score: 0

      Most crimes are "solved" because police think the evidence points to what they think it does.

      Would a hacker that hit at least three high-profile targets and caused SWAT to raid the wrong guy really be that careless, or could it be another red herring?

    9. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      The neniTY y.o. teens salute your wisdome!

    10. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sir Garlon is a villain from an obscure, early part of the King Arthur legend. He had the power of invisibility and used it to ambush and murder other knights, apparently just for the lulz. So really that choice of nick is a nod to my repressed impulses for mayhem and the way anonymity encourages snarkiness. :-)

      Oh, BTW, crime did not pay for Sir Garlon, either. He got whacked, I believe by Sir Balan, to avenge one of Balan's kinsmen.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    11. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or it's a confidence bluff. "I decided crime didn't pay, and now thanks to my hard but legal work I'm Sir Garlon. True story! Now, about that bridge you were going to buy from me..."

    12. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Inda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most crimes are solved because people talk. Loose lips sink ships, and all that stuff.

      People in the story are more than willing to talk. It's a bit sad.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    13. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I prefer your old sig, about just that.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, you've seen too many movies

    15. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would a SCRIPT KIDDIE that hit at least three high-profile targets and caused SWAT to raid the wrong guy really be that careless, or could it be another red herring?

      FTFY.

      Yes, no.

    16. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concealing repeated crime would require so much hard work and attention to detail, that anyone qualified to do it is also qualified for a rather high-paying job.

      Beware. This kind of thinking is how the hacker character becomes employed by the evil overlord. "Just do your wizardry, I'll handle the overall operations, and pay you handsomely."

    17. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by babywhiz · · Score: 2

      I thought teens were anyone under 30.....

    18. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by hduff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I considered crime as a career option when I was young, and decided that it was for losers. Concealing repeated crime would require so much hard work and attention to detail, that anyone qualified to do it is also qualified for a rather high-paying job.

      If you think about it, the saying "crime doesn't pay" is just another way of saying the labor market works.

      I once spoke with an FBI agent about bak robberies. Most theft from banks is from employees, is almost always caught but rarely prosecuted because banks don't want the negaive publicity. They catch the regular bank robbers because they are careless or stupid or both. But there is a small number of inelligent, skilled bank robers that will never get caught because they know the system well, don't get greedy, don't live flamboyantly and never make mistakes. Fortunately, there are very few of these people, but a succesful life of crime is possible, but as you realized, way too much work.

      --
      "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
    19. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concealing repeated crime would require so much hard work and attention to detail, that anyone qualified to do it is also qualified for a rather high-paying job.

      For the best criminal minds, a high paying job is just one of the tools they use to unlock ever more lucrative opportunities, and to evade prosecution.

    20. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I've seen too many Slashdot articles and security conventions. Trust me, it's reality. In fact, what planet are you watching movies on? Because on Earth they make hacker looks cool. In reality, they're immature and have no self esteem so they can never resist bragging online about their exploits. That's actually usually half the reason they did it.

    21. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      Oh, I should add that in some parts of the world, where law enforcement is weak, white-collar crime *does* pay. This is why, in my opinion, rings of computer criminals in Eastern Europe or (famously) Nigeria are hard to eradicate: financially there's more reward there for crime than honest work.

      I've come to regard law enforcement as creating a climate where crime can't flourish. Not totally preventing it, but preventing escalation.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    22. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came to the same conclusion. I'm a [congressman] now!

      [bail bondsman]
      [police officer]
      [district attorney]
      [judge]
      [real estate agent]
      [investment banker]
      [stock broker]
      [Chief Executive Officer]
      [Chief Financial Officer]
      [Tow Truck Operator]
      [Congressman]

      [Congressman], the only job lower than a [Tow Truck Operator]!

    23. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one said anything about maturity, dipshit. Teenager means someone between thirteen and nineteen.

    24. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its more for the person. Some people get hit with the responsibility fairy from an early age (15 year old working part time to help their mother who had a spinal injury, while getting good grades and being active in the community), and some never get it (the 50 year old man that has been in and out of jail since he was 20 because he keeps doing things like petty theft and aggravated assault).

      though teens and twenty are more likely to do stupid stuff because of lack of experience, but this is all anecdotal and should be held with a large grain of salt

    25. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by yurtinus · · Score: 3, Funny

      He had the power of invisibility

      Oh, you mean Sir Not Appearing In This Film?

      --
      +1 Disagree
    26. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ding ding ding. The guys who are doing it just for the money, as opposed to "the lulz", you never hear about it until the FBI tracks them down by following the money. If you're not trying to profit it seems like you could pretty much do anything from some random location on earth as a starting point with a throw away computer, and never get caught (or caught with any evidence) if you keep your mouth shut. But of course if you're doing it for the lulz, you need other folks to lulz with, so invariably they spill the beans to somebody who turns them in (for even bigger lulz!)

    27. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most crimes are not solved. The cops' job is not to solve crimes, it is to make arrests leading to convictions, and that's what they do. Usually they start with a suspect and work backwards to the crime (inventing evidence as necessary). Only occasionally do they start with a crime and track down a suspect (usually whoever is conveniently nearby and looks convictable). Most "criminals" are caught because they can't fight back against the police and legal system.

      Toning down the cynicism a bit... The cops' job is maintain peace and order. They do this by moderating violence and disorder, by imprisoning or intimidating those elements of society most likely to be violent or disorderly. Once again their job is not to solve crimes per se, except as it helps to isolate those violent and disorderly people, so that they may be imprisoned or intimidated more effectively.

    28. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      In reality, they're immature and have no self esteem so they can never resist bragging online about their exploits. That's actually usually half the reason they did it.

      This is only partially true. You are describing script kiddies. But there is another, much scarier kind of black hat hacker. Ruthless criminals with much deeper knowledge, who do it for the money and know how to hide and protect themselves effectively. They don't brag or show off and are much less likely to get caught due to doing something stupid.

    29. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by PRMan · · Score: 1

      There was a show called "Masterminds" where they talked about people who did "get away with it" for a year or more. Almost all of them got caught by bragging eventually. The two I saw that were really long-term NEVER talked about it.

      It's not just hackers, no criminal can keep their mouths shut. Even Bradley Manning got caught bragging to Adrian Lamo. If he hadn't, he'd probably still be free. But "confession is good for the soul".

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    30. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      I considered crime as a career option when I was young, and decided that it was for losers. Concealing repeated crime would require so much hard work and attention to detail, that anyone qualified to do it is also qualified for a rather high-paying job.

      So in other words your decision had nothing to do with crime being, you know, wrong? You're really a criminal at heart who just opts not to actually do any crime for practical reasons? That doesn't exactly speak highly to your moral character...

    31. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by PRMan · · Score: 1

      The other was that they got ridiculously greedy, BTW.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    32. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by slew · · Score: 1

      "Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead." - Ben Franklin

      "Let me alone for keeping this secret between you and me. Howbeit, three may keep counsel, if two be away; and, if I knew my cap was privy to my counsel, I would cast it into the fire and burn it..." - King Henry the 8th

    33. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Is a 113 year old a 'teenager' then?

    34. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by chromeronin799 · · Score: 1

      Those smart enough to cover up massive amount of crime on a continuing basis probably end up in politics.

    35. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      No, my folks are more or less teenagers with big credit cards. They're in their 80s. By 113 you are back to being a toddler.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    36. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Many crimes aren't 'wrong'.

      Many things that are 'wrong' aren't crimes.

      It's wrong to pay your taxes and it's a crime not to.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    37. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Ha! Bankers calling others criminal for stealing other people's money. Can't make this stuff up.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    38. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad, a former prison warden, says the same thing: Prisoners are the suckers that get caught. They are not smart.

    39. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd brag about how I hacked this cool computer system, but I'd be lying. Also, I never took $10 million from any government to write a program that }}};}};};;};

    40. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      It's wrong to pay your taxes ...

      Thanks for demonstrating my point!

    41. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your whole premise is flawed - you've stated that there is nobody out there who "got away with it" because everyone brags, and look! There are arrests, so that must be everybody!

      See the flaw?

    42. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me, but these are not hackers. They are kids.

    43. Re:Most Crimes Are Solved by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Most hackers especially are careless, stupid, and usually both. ... they don't even take basic precautions.

      Not true, many wear condoms on their fingers whilst typing so as not to get infected by a computer virus!

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  3. So now the Pentagon will call the guy . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    . . . and offer him a job.

    Pentagon: "Do you also do SCADA stuff . . . ?"

    Pentagon: "And windows? Good help is hard to find these days. And would you mind driving Miss Daisy . . . ?"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:So now the Pentagon will call the guy . . . by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More likely the DOJ will have him in Federal PoundYourAss Prison for 30 years.

    2. Re:So now the Pentagon will call the guy . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice if the Pentagon was that determined to win on this domain, but "the eric conspiracy" is probably closer to the truth.

      I think Le Femme Nikita could only be an agent after a Judge had her killed. CIA may pull people from prisons all the time for all we know. All they would have to do is have the prisoner "die" under falsifiable circumstances. IE: failed escape, then light them up with squibs.

    3. Re:So now the Pentagon will call the guy . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that, or NASA will hire him to replace the Chink they caught at Dulles yesterday with a bunch of flash drives
      filled with sensitive information from Langley Research that he was about to sneakernet to Beijing on a one-way ticket...

    4. Re:So now the Pentagon will call the guy . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey cool! Prison rape reference! Haven't seen one for ages, thought it was gone out of fashion.

  4. Social enginering by houghi · · Score: 1

    As we can see here, the most important hacking tool is social engineering. He did not get the name by technical skills. Not by running telnet and traceroute, but by following a tip.

    Could have been the DDOS person himself for all we know.

    So I would not say he was 'hot on the tail'.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Social enginering by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Hot on the... tail?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Social enginering by Xest · · Score: 1

      Basically there was some dodgy site where you could pay for DDOSs which was believed to be behind these attacks. This site was amusingly and somewhat ironically insecure such that if you knew the right URL you could view a list of clients for this site to see who had paid for what, and on this list were attacks corresponding to Krebs and Ars with an e-mail address for the client stored alongside them (along with many other attacks/clients, some of which had previously been verified). Turns out this e-mail address was also registered to a Facebook account of a guy in the UK, and voila, Krebs gets the guy's identity.

      Sure it could all be some master ploy to throw Krebs off the scent, but more realistically what we have here is a script kiddie who was careless with his details and just got himself caught.

      So I'd say his tip is pretty decent grounds at least for the police to investigate the person in question if nothing else.

    3. Re:Social enginering by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      It's a economics philosophy.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  5. Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matter by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This story is still in progress, but it's clear that this "Phobia" punk is intelligent enough in ways that really don't matter much and too stupid in ways that actually do matter. His father should have figured out what the son was doing a while ago, as his son is in the crime scene, stealing or helping to steal and use credit cards, SSNs, etc., breaking into private people's accounts and messing with them, paying for DDOS attacks against websites and sending SWAT teams to people's homes, so that somebody could actually get shot. This is all a punk move, what this idiot needs is about 3 years of labour camp, so that he'd at least repay some of the damage and 10 minutes of flogging on monthly basis, so that what could not be peacefully inserted into his brain would be painfully inserted into his back.

  6. Re:I'm still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B&E and other more "minor" felonies should be dealt with with labor camps.

    I think you're behind the times a bit, except they've improved the formula such that those you would kill offhand are instead kept as taxpayer subsidized labour as well, to reduce costs for American corporations.

  7. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The stupidest part might have been deleting the YouTube videos once he was caught. Now when the police see it, they will charge him with destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice.

  8. Painful to Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, it's hard to read the Kerbs post. Not because of what's he's saying, but the fact that the kid is engaging with him. First rule of fight club is you don't talk about fight club. When the cops come knocking on his door that kid is going to squeal.

    1. Re:Painful to Read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When the cops come knocking on his door that kid is going to squeal.

      Oh, I think he'll be squealing for a number of different reasons soon.

  9. LOLWOT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any chance of reposting the article in English?

  10. Throw the Book At Him by organgtool · · Score: 1

    The practice of SWATting needs to stop immediately. SWAT raids are very tense for all parties involved and they can go wrong in a hurry. One of these days an innocent person is going to end up dead because of this practice. The prosecutors need to go after this guy, get him the maximum sentence for all of his many crimes, and broadcast his prison rapes so that no one ever thinks of doing something like this again.

    1. Re:Throw the Book At Him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly why you need something that burns through body armor.

      My top two choices are the Five Seven for a sidearm and any given AR-15 variant chambered in 6.8mm

      Also, they're not nearly as trained as you think they are, at least from what I've seen of them.

      What I can't wait for is one of the squads of assholes to raid the wrong house and end up with somebody who has a lot of ACTUAL experience in MOUT

    2. Re:Throw the Book At Him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't take anything from WND seriously. The site owner is either completely delusional, or making a living off of the deeply delusional. It's all wingnuts and birthers there.

    3. Re:Throw the Book At Him by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

      "One of these days an innocent person is going to end up dead"? Clearly, sir, you have paid no attention to Libertarian media in the past decade or two. Go hop over to reason.com, ignore their tax policy proposals for a moment if they annoy you, and just do a search for all the fun articles about how a SWAT team prevented paramedics from going to work for hour and fourteen minutes after shooting a veteran as part of a drug raid on the neighbors.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:Throw the Book At Him by joh · · Score: 2

      The practice of SWATting needs to stop immediately. SWAT raids are very tense for all parties involved and they can go wrong in a hurry. One of these days an innocent person is going to end up dead because of this practice. The prosecutors need to go after this guy, get him the maximum sentence for all of his many crimes, and broadcast his prison rapes so that no one ever thinks of doing something like this again.

      What makes you think that being raped in prison makes you a better person who will not behave like an anti-social idiot anymore? Or that seeing this happen makes others better?

      This kind of response really is as part of the problem as what this guy was doing. The US is turning more and more into a failed state it seems.

    5. Re:Throw the Book At Him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Five Seven doesn't sell the good ammo to civilians. It's hard to say what percentage of SWAT use Class III body armor. 7.62x25 Tokarev is known for blowing holes in Class II. Rifle Cartridges generally do a pretty good job as well.

      Nobody makes a face shield that can deflect a 7.62 Tokarev, but that is an asymetrical combat scenerio requiring the defender have much better placed(time consuming) shots vs the incoming hail of 9mm Luger from LEO only MP5s and such.

      M14 or anything in 7.62x54R should take care of Class III, but the smart money is on lining the hallways with Claymores. Cement houses don't burn very good so Donner's undoing wouldn't apply, but this is a suicide scenario in any case. They'll start sending in Packbots with frag grenades.

      Best bet is to keep a FAL next to the bed and then immediately surrender if you survive the ambush to claim self-defense.

      Regarding the value of experience, a veteran of MOUT would be better off one on one, but these fuckers are happy to smoke people out by setting the house on fire. That's my input from watching the news and reading /k/ anyways.

    6. Re:Throw the Book At Him by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      the best way to punish ugly abuses (swatting), is not to champion ugly abuses (prison rape)

      if someone violated my family in such a way, i would have violent fantasies about them getting their comeuppance too

      but we're talking about governmental policy here, not private revenge fantasies

      when the state itself is in the business of violent revenge, then the state itself is the worst offender

      it also teaches society how to function, how to handle yourself: with brutality. the state sets the tone for how society should solve its disputes

      you actually end brutality by structuring society's punishments so they are neither retributive nor punitive, but more like grey cold empty chill out sessions

      there's no punishment worse than a boring, mundane, pointless existence. but inflicting pain, psychologically, focuses the mind, it gives it something to organize the meaning of life around. it turns criminals into martyrs, at least in their own mind, and it makes them and others who sympathize with them (and when you inflict pain, you always find sympathizers) organize their lives around finding meaning in being your enemy and inflicting YOU pain. you basically starting up a cycle of violence

      TL, DR: your approach backfires

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    7. Re:Throw the Book At Him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The practice of SWATting needs to stop immediately.

      Why? It's not like most people are going to get busted for it. We're on the internet, man! We can do whatever we want!

      SWAT raids are very tense for all parties involved and they can go wrong in a hurry.

      Who cares? Those are other people. Other people don't matter. They're just names on a screen, after all.

      One of these days an innocent person is going to end up dead because of this practice.

      Again, other people. This doesn't sound like it affects ME at all!

      The prosecutors need to go after this guy, get him the maximum sentence for all of his many crimes, and broadcast his prison rapes so that no one ever thinks of doing something like this again.

      What, just for a few innocent lulz? Man, you stuck-up assholes are all the same. You're the reason the internet's falling apart, you prudes don't let anyone have a bit of innocent fun! Look, how long did it take until this guy got caught? And who had the potential of getting hurt? Exactly, other people. I rest my case, because I am so awesomer than you.

      </satire>

    8. Re:Throw the Book At Him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The practice of SWATting needs to stop immediately. [...] broadcast [the SWATter's] prison rapes so that no one ever thinks of doing something like this again.

      The practice of prison rapes needs to stop immediately. Broadcast the rapists' SWATting so that no one ever thinks of doing something like this again.

    9. Re:Throw the Book At Him by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Nice moral code there. I want SWATting to stop and to do it, I'll over-punish the guy illegally by ensuring he gets multiple rapes...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    10. Re:Throw the Book At Him by organgtool · · Score: 1

      That part of my statement is admittedly an emotionally-charged and exaggerated response to this heinous crime. I do not really believe that this guy should be subjected to broadcasted rape. I just think it's sad that if he is convicted for any of these crimes, he will probably serve more time for the DDOS attack than he would for defrauding the government to deploy a tactical team to threaten the life of his victim. When a person shows a blatant disregard for another person's life and goes out of their way to endanger that person's life, then I relinquish just about any empathy I had for that person as a fellow human being. I won't go out of my way to do them harm, but I also won't go out of my way to draw support for any reduced sentence - this guy deserves whatever he gets.

    11. Re:Throw the Book At Him by alexo · · Score: 1

      Any society that condones prison rape cannot be considered civilized.

    12. Re:Throw the Book At Him by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that being raped in prison makes you a better person who will not behave like an anti-social idiot anymore? Or that seeing this happen makes others better?

      I think the idea isn't that it would make him a better person. The idea is that it might make someone who had his house attacked by a SWAT team feel better. Whether that works, I don't know, but that's the idea.

  11. The Mysterious Death of Shannon Larratt and Encryp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mysterious Death of Shannon Larratt and Encryption/Privacy/Deep-Dark-Web/

    http://hpaste.org/raw/84300
    http://pastebin.com/6yR0FTfp

  12. Keep in mind, hereditary nobility. by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

    Garlon was the brother of King Pellam. He killed Sir Herlews le Berbeus and later Sir Perin de Montbeliard. A life of crime is easily contemplated when one has slain two men of honor, and possesses a cloak of invisibility.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  13. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dumbest thing was to talk but also to involve cops with the SWAT thing. If he just kept to online stealing and harassment this wouldn't be as bad as the SWAT thing, now the cops have a personal issue as well with him. The way he just blurted everything out showed how really 'smart' he is.

  14. Haste makes waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now he is the prime suspect, but you need proof he committed the crime.

  15. Bait and switch? by gmclapp · · Score: 1

    Just a thought... If I was going to commit these crimes I would consider having a seemingly careless 20 year old fall guy around...

    --
    Common Sense (+1)
  16. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

    I have regrets about mean stuff I did as a young man, but I'm glad I can say I never did anything like erase someone's photos of their daughter being born or get SWAT called on someone else. Not because I wasn't a spoiled, spiteful little chode would have done something like that, simply because I was too impatient and stupid to figure out how to cause much trouble online. I guess that's something.

    The scary part is I don't know what my parents could have done to prevent that. I have no idea how to keep my son from doing stupid shit like this.

  17. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by joh · · Score: 2

    This is all a punk move, what this idiot needs is about 3 years of labour camp, so that he'd at least repay some of the damage and 10 minutes of flogging on monthly basis, so that what could not be peacefully inserted into his brain would be painfully inserted into his back.

    What he actually needs is an education and a job.

  18. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    The scary part is I don't know what my parents could have done to prevent that. I have no idea how to keep my son from doing stupid shit like this.

    - but I think I know what can be done (I don't know that it will guarantee success, but I think it would limit the probability of this type of behaviour).

    Something to do. Something to do that is rewarding, something to do that is useful in some way, that teaches the kid, that gives him the satisfaction of seeing the results of his work.

    Something productive to do that would channel the kid's energy.

    I think the society went in the wrong direction in many ways, from the way the kids are treated with 'kid gloves' (really, everybody should be allowed to take a chance and dive into the Hudson river and swim in raw sewage, or maybe something less extreme but productive, like working at an earlier age) to the way the education system seems to inspire confidence instead of knowledge.

    Basically I think you have to help the kid to find a productive way to occupy himself, maybe learning about tech stuff, building computers and robots from scratch, maybe it is sports, after all that's what Americans value most it seems. Maybe it is starting his or her own little business from early on and learning about the real world that way.

    The "Phobia" guy could have been using his 'mad skills' for something productive, maybe building tools and websites for some small amounts of money for people who'd pay or audit security, etc., instead he does this. Of-course he was probably never really properly taught a lesson* in his life, but that's about to change.

    (* - what can you tell a guy with 2 black eyes? Nothing. He's been told twice already.)

  19. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    I agree about a job, but I personallywouldn't hire him before he got his flogging and 3 years of paying back the money he stole, but maybe you would.

  20. WTF? Is Krebs For Real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    How is any of this possible?

    How does Krebs reach, let alone convince that boot.tw operator to give him a copy of their operations database and tell him other details?

    How does the boot.tw operator know any of these other details?

    I'll accept the anonymous tipster.

    Why would, so called, Phobia take Krebs' call? Why would he confess to this stuff? Why would his father engage in the call rather than putting an end to it? Why would his father admit and partially deny Phobia's actions?

    Why would ANY of this transpire?

    It makes me question Krebs' credibility.

    It's all so absolutely fantastic, I feel like I'm watching a hacker movie. The implausibility of it all makes me want to vomit. Yet krebs supposedly does this all the time.

    1. Re:WTF? Is Krebs For Real? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      It takes a hacker to catch a hacker.

    2. Re:WTF? Is Krebs For Real? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      How does Krebs reach, let alone convince that boot.tw operator to give him a copy of their operations database and tell him other details?

      He didn't have to, the SQL file was publicly-accessible if you knew the URL (how did he get the URL? I'm sure he has plenty of sources). He linked to it from his earlier article, still on their domain. It looks like that link is no longer in the article, but I downloaded the SQL file and went through it. It was a dump of what looked like their entire user/attack database, including each attack, who paid for it, how they paid, and how much.

      Why would, so called, Phobia take Krebs' call? Why would he confess to this stuff?

      Because he's a stupid, arrogant kid. It doesn't have to be complex. He even said he was the guy who was talking to Mat Honan, and that nothing bad came from that. Sounds like he wants to be important, or wants to be seen as important.

      It makes me question Krebs' credibility.

      I think if you'll look into Brian Krebs, his credibility is beyond question. He takes care to make sure that's true in what he publishes. He is very highly respected in the security journalism world.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  21. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by Pope · · Score: 1

    I, too, take health advice from standup comics.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  22. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    I'd rather take advice from Carlin than from Bloomberg even though I don't actually drink sugar water.

  23. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it destruction of evidence if the company that actually manages the data doesn't actually delete it?

  24. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all a punk move, what this idiot needs is about 3 years of labour camp, so that he'd at least repay some of the damage and 10 minutes of flogging on monthly basis, so that what could not be peacefully inserted into his brain would be painfully inserted into his back.

    I agree, but if he gets caught a bunch of people on Slashdot will cry a stream of tears if he gets any jail time.

  25. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I doubt this was the first thing he did wrong. I bet it escalated from somewhere.

    In order to keep him from getting to this point, you employ the same simple rules of parenting employed on everyone else who isn't a constant fuck-up:

    1. Scold him harshly.
    2. If that doesn't work, or if the infraction is grave enough, beat the shit out of him.
    3. Repeat as needed.

    Worked for me. I had wooden spoons snapped over my ass and got to taste the belt buckle once or twice. There's a reason why the old-school punishments lasted so long.

  26. What a headline by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Krebs Hacker Unmasked, Hit Ars and Wired's Honan

    It looks almost like someone had an attack of aphasia half way through writing that headline. Using a transitive verb (which could also be mistaken for a noun), especially a short one like "Hit", next to another short, and unusual word (Ars) makes for tricky parsing.

    Not only that, but:

    Turns out it may have been the same guy

    So it's okay, only the headline is potentially libelous.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:What a headline by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Krebs Hacker Unmasked, Hit Ars and Wired's Honan

      It looks almost like someone had an attack of aphasia half way through writing that headline. Using a transitive verb (which could also be mistaken for a noun), especially a short one like "Hit", next to another short, and unusual word (Ars) makes for tricky parsing.

      Not only that, but:

      Turns out it may have been the same guy

      So it's okay, only the headline is potentially libelous.

      You wouldn't think it was so funny if someone hit your Honan.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:What a headline by altjira · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll take that as constructive criticism. In my defense, for the few times I have noticed interesting news that isn't already on Slashdot and I was preparing a submission, I have worried more about providing relevant, interesting links and an accurate and reasonable summary. But the submission process starts with writing the headline, and editing is a low priority if you're trying to get it in first. Who knew? Journalism seems to be real work.

    3. Re:What a headline by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      There's always a risk of a blind spot when writing, because you already know exactly what you mean and once you're locked in it's hard to appreciate the alternatives. That's what the editors are (should be) for...

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  27. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, this is not another Shwartz? No Goverment conspiracy? No gold standard? You moved to country with free health care and started taking drugs?

  28. I'd say enough is enough by whitroth · · Score: 1

    If it were me, I'd be talking to the FBI, since this probably falls under a) wire fraud, and b) interstate commerce.

                      mark "my 'social media' are email lists"

  29. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, that will certainly teach him how to be honest and decent.

    inflict pain on him.

    if that teaches him anything is to be more careful of being caught in the future.

    *you* might understand what he did was wrong and that he shouldn't be doing it, but he is not of an age where the corelation 'if something hurts i shouldn't be doing it' works anymore.

    you're either joking or out of touch.

  30. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    yes, that will certainly teach him how to be honest and decent.

    - no, he will learn that actions have consequences, that's all.

    Actions ... consequences.

    see? If he derives the wrong lessons from his actions and he doesn't connect that the consequences are due to his actions and after he is out of prison and is no longer flogged he still continues to do the same, then he will get caught again or maybe he'll get killed.

    Do you know what's happening in Cyprus right now? The banks loaned the money the Greek government and the Greek government blew the money on various government programs and subsidies. The Greeks have nothing to repay their bonds with and the Cypriot banks have no way to get back the billions that they gave the Greeks.

    There are people that the bankers owe money to now that are not the kind of people one wants to owe money to. I don't think the Cypriot bankers and politicians quite realise all of the negative consequences of what they have done.

    You see, if somebody taught those bankers and politicians the simple connection between actions and consequences at a much earlier age, they might not have gotten into this mess and then most of them would live through their entire natural live spans. As things are today, it's not at all clear that many of them will.

  31. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    It doesn't work anymore thanks to the child abuse laws.

  32. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    he isn't dead yet.

    There is an old saying --- People don't drop tears until they see blood.

  33. Hope the little bitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope the little bitch enjoys receiving anal sex. Because he's about to get a lot of it in jail.

  34. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by wywh · · Score: 1

    photos of their daughter being born

    Hardcore stuff!

  35. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 3

    He stole NO money.

    - wrong, he did, read TFA. He is part of the network that steals and deals credit cards.

    He steals money, why would anybody want to hire him unless they are a government propped bank? Maybe he has a future in current version of government propped banking or politics, but normal people will look at him and his approach and won't want to have anything to do with him.

    He also stole private information of people, so how can he be even trusted to deal with customers, with anything?

    He endangered lives of people by calling SWAT teams on them, I don't know how difficult it is to understand - this is not a fucking game, he could have caused real damage this way, to actual health and lives of people. I don't see any redeeming qualities in him yet, for me to see it he has to be punished and he has to learn something as well, and punishment is part of that learning process. As I said: actions ... consequences.

  36. Surprisingly careless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wasn't careless, he just wants some good exploits on his resume. Ex-hackers get good jobs because they've got verifiable street cred.

    1. Re:Surprisingly careless? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      He won't pass any background check and most jobs if he gets stuff on his rap sheet. He probably won't survive FPMITA jail either. Aaron Swartz knew this. He would rather suicide then die in jail.

  37. HE hasn't been indicted yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can jump into a Chinese or North Korean embassy and seek political asylum, claiming political persecution like Aaron Swartz.

  38. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by cusco · · Score: 1

    Holy crap, I actually agree with you about something. Doesn't happen often . . .

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  39. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Told me by a required reporter (ER nurse and mother of a hell child): 'Use a wooden spoon on the bottom of their feet. Don't break bones and there is no way to tell. They will be reminded with every step they take.'

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  40. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Russian mafiosos get rich via government connections, they get fucked via government connections.

    This is just Act1, Scene 2 of the Euro follies. It's going to get worse.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  41. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Certainly there are a number of those, but it's not just 'mafiosos', actually a very large number of companies that operate in Russia keep headquarters and money in Cyprus because of how uncertain and difficult the political situation is in Russia. Many thought that they are playing it safe by not keeping money in Russia, enough people lose their shirt in Russia to the government officials, who when they just want to steal a business would raid it and take over, part of that is called a 'mask show', when SWAT like forces show up (special forces maybe) and shut down a business and just take everything, arrest everybody and then the next day the business may reopen with new owners already.

    As you can imagine this type of property violation is a very sensitive issue for people who run all sorts of businesses. Of-course there are also large Russian businesses, like banks that even have some branches or a subsidiary in Cyprus. All of that is shut down. Actually about 10 to 20 billion USD are inaccessible by large Russian banks right now and can you imagine what this does to payments on business deals?

    Even just salaries, those are payments on business deals. What if you run a business in Russia and at the end of the month you move money out of Cyprus to Russia to pay salaries, rent, etc.? Now do you see a potential problem of a very large size if it's 10-20billion dollars locked that are not money that is just sitting there, it's moving back and forward all the time, basically normal bank account activities.

    There are obviously just generally people's accounts that are locked, nobody can access funds. You want to make a rent payment or to buy groceries? Can't do it with your bank card or credit card!

    But yes, there is some money there belongs to Putin and some of his friends and large size business people, who are mostly seen as legitimate, but some of them will not actually stop at anything if they want revenge, that's what I am talking about. Not the kind of mafia that you see in the movies, not this clan stuff. No, I am talking about the 'legitimate' mafia that runs the country. Large bankers, large energy and raw material exporters, politicians, Putin himself... you don't even want to be on Putin's shit list AFAIC, not unless you are impervious to polonium 210. And of-course most people are not impervious to beating and gun wounds.

  42. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    It's a mess, and it's going to get worse. The Euro is a fucking disaster.

    Who is Putin going to have killed? Seriously, it's not like someone stole from him. He put money into a broken institution and it is gone.

    What I don't understand is what would have possessed the bankers to buy Greek bonds in the first place. Sure they offered nice returns.

    Greece in bankrupt. Anything short of kicking them out of the Euro is just kicking the can down the road. Their are further traps behind that.

    The Euros politicians don't have the balls to deal with their mess. Same as the USA. The Euro states are even more fucked. They owe as much as the USA, have moribund economies, can't raise their taxes and expect to increase revenue and don't have control of their currency.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  43. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Putin will get his money back, so will the biggest account holders. The bankers and the politicians of Cyprus are probably not stupid enough to cause some of these people lose their money. A likely scenario: Russia extends a large line of credit to Cyprus and in exchange Gazprom gets the rights to drill for gas in the country and Russian bankers are 'asked' to manage the restructuring of the failed Cyprus banks. That's one possibility, this includes a new Russian military base on Cyprus.

    This would be a kick in the balls to the EU.

    Another possibility is the EU finds a way to kick the can down the road and extend more credit to Cyprus, the lower amount accounts (0-20K) are spared, anything above it loses 10-15% of money and the banks are opened with capital controls, so that nobody can pull out more than say 5% of their money per month from a bank (and people WILL be pulling money out), but the largest account holders will have exemptions, otherwise again, there will be actual physical damage to a number of people.

    Another possibility is: Cyprus fails to open the banks, the banking system there collapses, and it goes into some form of bankruptcy court and I don't know what that means to the small account holders, but the middle are probably wiped out (between 100K and 500K are wiped out) and the bottom get their '100K insurance' somehow from EU and a few people on the top get all of their money back, otherwise again, you think it's silly, but there will be actual corpses found in the sea there.

  44. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I don't doubt there will be a corpse or two. Most likely in Russia (the ones who made the decision to keep money in Cyprus).

    Under 100K will get their insurance, everybody else (including Putin) will get a haircut of 15-20%.

    Putin will learn that his money is safer in Russia then overseas, where he doesn't own the cops. The people who are deciding how this works out aren't scared of Putin. Want to see Putin go all white? Tell him the Rothschilds are pissed and 'want their money right the fuck now!' He'll shake while he cuts the check.

    Cyprus is still in NATO, this won't change that.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  45. Re:Young punks, too stupid in most ways that matte by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Well, Berezovsky is dead now. He brought Putin to power and taught him whatever he needed to know, including all about the money handling. Not that this is related, just a timely coincidence.