Slashdot Mirror


Lawmakers Seek To Ban Google Glass On the Road

An anonymous reader writes in with news about a West Virginia bill that would prohibit drivers from "using a wearable computer with head mounted display." Republican Gary G. Howell sponsored the bill in reaction to reading an article on Google Glass and said: "I actually like the idea of the product and I believe it is the future, but last legislature we worked long and hard on a no-texting-and-driving law. It is mostly the young that are the tech-savvy that try new things. They are also our most vulnerable and underskilled drivers. We heard of many crashes caused by texting and driving, most involving our youngest drivers. I see the Google Glass as an extension."

11 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. HUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But some cars have a heads up display... which is basically a car-mounted version of the same thing. Can't we just have an administrative ruling that it falls under driving while distracted, or reckless driving, or whatever the legal term is, and not create a new law everytime someone makes something new?

    Next up, no looking at your wristwatch while driving! It's the new technological menace!

    1. Re:HUD by mjr167 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because that would require admitting that the problem is between the seat and steering wheel?

    2. Re:HUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cars heads up displays don't include emails and google+ messages. Don't be obtuse.

    3. Re:HUD by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fighter pilots aren't 16. They are college-educated military officers who have had several years of driving behind them to get used to operating a large death machine, followed by extensive classroom training and instructor-led seat time before they are allowed to operate the jet solo. Additionally, they have simulators with which to get used to monitoring all necessary instrumentation as well as keeping an eye out for enemy planes.

      High school kids cannot be compared to fighter pilots in any meaningful way with regards to the ability to safely operate a large machine with multiple points of distraction, on public roads, surrounded by other drives of various skills and levels of distraction.

    4. Re:HUD by rioki · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But technically I could run a app that is beneficial to my driving. This week end rented a car and got one with a HUD. It displayed three things, the speed limit, the current speed and the navigation instructions. It "floated" over the hood and I could read the information without taking my eyes off the street. This is VERY beneficial when you are currently doing a maneuver in heavy traffic. It also made the audio queues obsolete. (It had none.) Oh and this implementation of a speed limit indicator works, you see your speed and the speed limit all the time. You really have to willfully be speeding, you can't speed "by mistake".

      The only thing the Google glasses need are a driving mode.

    5. Re:HUD by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, Google's driverless car is almost ready...

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:HUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google Glass will probably cause people

      Legislation should not be based on "probably" and "maybe" and other shit people are basically pulling out of their asses.

  2. Couldn't a HUD actually help you drive safer? by FictionPimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It could display driving speed, detect emergencies and notify you of them, pop up weather warnings. Overall I see a device with a HUD giving you an advantage driving..

  3. Oh yeah, I'm sure it would be used as an aid... by oic0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In reality, it will rarely be used as a HUD. We all know with a fair degree of certainty it will be used for things like email, video, texting, etc... Sure it may have the possibility of being useful, but that is NOT what it will be used for. Just like most cellphones in cars aren't being used for GPS and traffic allerts. People these days are just too distracted while they drive. Most people barely have enough intelligence to safely pilot a vehicle to begin with. Cellphones have made things much worse. Having things distractions constantly put into your line of sight will be ever worse. While people do have rights, on the road you holding the lives of others in the balance so some of your personal freedom takes a back seat. As a motorcyclist, I think texting while driving should get you a DUI and be pursed just as heavily.

  4. Why? by sqlrob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Enforce the distracted driving laws, done. Covers all current and future technology.

  5. Re:Young most vulnerable and underskilled drivers by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Young people in good health, with good motor skills and high response time are the worst drivers, right?

    The precise shape of the curve isn't 100% clear; but new drivers are shitty drivers. It takes time to accumulate the experience that weak hominids need to respond automatically to common situations that are at or beyond the edge of being slow enough to respond to by conscious thought.(inconveniently, since the problem is inexperience rather than merely youth raising the starting driver's age helps less than people would like.

    Once they get some experience, young drivers are better than older drivers; because their vision, reflexes, and motor skills are superior, and the amount of additional improvement possible from additional experience tapers off.

    From there, it's all downhill; but old people vote at substantial rates compared to the population at large, so they are less likely to be taken off the road.