Slashdot Mirror
Landsat's First Images Show Rocky Mountains In Stunning Detail
Zothecula writes "We haven't heard anything from NASA's Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) spacecraft since its launch in February, but the satellite is now ready to start sending its first images back home. The first batch of photos are part of a three-month testing period, and show the meeting of the Great Plains with the Front Ranges of the Rocky Mountains in Wyoming and Colorado. Viewed from space, it's already a pretty spectacular scene, but the images from the LDCM managed to enhance it even further."
No, but it augments our knowledge of where the hemp and coca plantations are.
Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
You are probably correct, the military satellites have a ton of data, but it never hurts to have another. In addition, this data will be released to the public: "data from OLI and TIRS will be processed and added to the Landsat Data Archive at the Earth Resources Observation and Science Center in South Dakota, where it will be distributed for free over the Internet."
Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
It's just they are higher detail and more refined than previous efforts.
Why not add a link to the actual images on NASA's stie, instead of a fucking link to some ad/tracking/whoring site like Gizmodo?
Landsat images are used by a variety of government agencies for things like flood hazard mapping and water usage analysis. High resolution Landsat images can help the forest service determine where to search for search and rescue or mete out prescribed burns. The actual value of these images is pretty important and yes it can help augment our understanding of mountainous topography. That is pretty much what is so special about it since the old landsat satellite was recently retired and the new images we're getting are so much better than the last ones.
First hand knowledge here.
I got here through a series of tubes
When are they going to come out with a satellite that will let me inspect the gravel in my driveway?
An engineer at Orbital Sciences created a 1/48th scale paper model of the landsat satellite that you can print, build and hang above your cubicle for nerd cred.
Printable model here.
Assembly Instructions here.
It actually looks pretty cool... not that I'll be spending two hours building it myself.
I really don't see much difference between these photos and what is available on Google Earth. How much did NASA pay for this?
If you don't see the difference, you aren't trying very hard. Google earth pictures are much more detailed, but eliminate the spectral information that Landsat concentrates on.
The ones on google earth not only show the same horseshoe reservoir, but also allow you to zoom in to see a power boat pulling a water skier.
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
Google doesn't provide resource management capabilities of Landsat spectral images. Read the second link in the story, scrolling down to the second image where they start explaining all the different capabilities.
Google deliberately gets rid of those layers as they optimize only on human vision imagery.
Also, don't discount the probability that the images shown on NASAs sight are not at the maximum resolution possible.
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
GizMag is *NOT* Gizmodo.....
They were going to launch it last Thursday, but scrubbed the launch due to weather at the launch site. Unfortunately, they missed the narrow launch window where you both your car was not in the driveway and your bushes were trimmed. Satellites with an perigee altitude of 3 ft are vulnerable to local traffic patterns and neighbors' pets, so launch windows are very rare and narrow. There is hope they can try again in 12 years when there is a grand alignment between your mailbox, lawn chair and BBQ.
These multispectral images are a lot more useful for finding where you stoners are growing your pot.
Have gnu, will travel.
These pictures continue our 40-year record of watching the Earth. Because Landsat has such a complete record, we gain a lot of understanding about how the Earth changes with the seasons and over time. LDCM will enable us to continue that record out into the future. So yes, these pictures will help a lot.
Disclaimer: I work on the LDCM project, and in fact I created that first PR image. It's a shame they chose Colorado because the OLI (Operational Land Imager) instrument was built there. We are looking at some stunning images, and the new data this instrument is collecting will knock scientists' socks off for years to come.
Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
Landsat doesn't blur any images it collects. But it only collects at 15 meter resolution, at max. So yes, you can see Area 51 in Landsat images, but not at any detail that will affect national security.
Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
Landsat takes images in several infrared bands -- a chlorophyll band, two shortwave IR bands, and with the new instrument we have a cirrus band, a shallow water coastal ultraviolet band, and two thermal IR bands as well. This is not a instrument designed for mapmakers or Google pictures (although it can be used for them.) This is a scientific instrument, and it will help us see where vegetation is damaged, where crops are ripe, what is happening to coral reefs, and the effects of climate change all around the globe.
Analogy: If normal Google map pictures are made with a camera, you can consider Landsat images to be made with a Star Trek-like planet scanner. 'Scan for life/minerals/fire' is something Landsat can do that normal cameras can not.
Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
Something others didn't mention is that this is SATELLITE data, not data from aerial photos.
When you look at Google Maps "satellite" view you are likely looking at a photo taken by a plane. Obviously it is much easier to get a high-resolution photo of a house from a plane a mile or two up than from a satellite 350 miles up.
Satellite photos have the advantage of being easier to acquire more regularly. The satellite flies over the country every day whether you need a photo or not. It will never be able to compete with a photo taken from a plane, let alone one taken from the ground. These are technologies that solve different problems.
There is definitely a use for regular civilian satellite images of the entire Earth's surface.
Plus I thought that higher resolution images means that the quantitative analysis has more precision and accuracy. Now they can quantitate the land-mass that is covered by vegetation of type-A vs. type-B based on differences in visible and infrared absorption/reflectivity, and they can quantitate changes over time of vegetation and of wetlands and dry-lands/deserts with more precision.
.
Absolutely. So in a very real way, those images do, in fact, augment our understanding of Earth Mountains.
tl;dr gp is a troll.
I got here through a series of tubes
Heard a rumor you took at least one really cool picture of the moon with it too. Can you confirm or deny?