Slashdot Mirror


Landsat's First Images Show Rocky Mountains In Stunning Detail

Zothecula writes "We haven't heard anything from NASA's Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) spacecraft since its launch in February, but the satellite is now ready to start sending its first images back home. The first batch of photos are part of a three-month testing period, and show the meeting of the Great Plains with the Front Ranges of the Rocky Mountains in Wyoming and Colorado. Viewed from space, it's already a pretty spectacular scene, but the images from the LDCM managed to enhance it even further."

8 of 63 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What's so special about that? by gabereiser · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's just they are higher detail and more refined than previous efforts.

  2. Why is every NASA image article a URL cricle jerk? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not add a link to the actual images on NASA's stie, instead of a fucking link to some ad/tracking/whoring site like Gizmodo?

  3. Re:What's so special about that? by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 5, Informative

    Landsat images are used by a variety of government agencies for things like flood hazard mapping and water usage analysis. High resolution Landsat images can help the forest service determine where to search for search and rescue or mete out prescribed burns. The actual value of these images is pretty important and yes it can help augment our understanding of mountainous topography. That is pretty much what is so special about it since the old landsat satellite was recently retired and the new images we're getting are so much better than the last ones.

    First hand knowledge here.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
  4. Re:What's so special about that? by ProzacPatient · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When are they going to come out with a satellite that will let me inspect the gravel in my driveway?

  5. Build Your Own by guttentag · · Score: 5, Interesting

    An engineer at Orbital Sciences created a 1/48th scale paper model of the landsat satellite that you can print, build and hang above your cubicle for nerd cred.

    Printable model here.
    Assembly Instructions here.

    It actually looks pretty cool... not that I'll be spending two hours building it myself.

  6. Re:What's so special about that? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 4, Informative

    These pictures continue our 40-year record of watching the Earth. Because Landsat has such a complete record, we gain a lot of understanding about how the Earth changes with the seasons and over time. LDCM will enable us to continue that record out into the future. So yes, these pictures will help a lot.

    Disclaimer: I work on the LDCM project, and in fact I created that first PR image. It's a shame they chose Colorado because the OLI (Operational Land Imager) instrument was built there. We are looking at some stunning images, and the new data this instrument is collecting will knock scientists' socks off for years to come.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  7. Re:WTF? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Landsat takes images in several infrared bands -- a chlorophyll band, two shortwave IR bands, and with the new instrument we have a cirrus band, a shallow water coastal ultraviolet band, and two thermal IR bands as well. This is not a instrument designed for mapmakers or Google pictures (although it can be used for them.) This is a scientific instrument, and it will help us see where vegetation is damaged, where crops are ripe, what is happening to coral reefs, and the effects of climate change all around the globe.

    Analogy: If normal Google map pictures are made with a camera, you can consider Landsat images to be made with a Star Trek-like planet scanner. 'Scan for life/minerals/fire' is something Landsat can do that normal cameras can not.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  8. Re:What's so special about that? by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Something others didn't mention is that this is SATELLITE data, not data from aerial photos.

    When you look at Google Maps "satellite" view you are likely looking at a photo taken by a plane. Obviously it is much easier to get a high-resolution photo of a house from a plane a mile or two up than from a satellite 350 miles up.

    Satellite photos have the advantage of being easier to acquire more regularly. The satellite flies over the country every day whether you need a photo or not. It will never be able to compete with a photo taken from a plane, let alone one taken from the ground. These are technologies that solve different problems.

    There is definitely a use for regular civilian satellite images of the entire Earth's surface.