Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Should Happen To Your Data After You Die?

Nerval's Lobster writes "Death is Nature's way of telling you it's time to get off the Internet. But when you finally shuffle off this mortal coil, you leave something behind: all your email and other digital assets. That's a huge problem not only for the deceased — once you're on the wrong side of the Great Beyond, there's no way to delete those incriminating messages — but also any relatives who might want to access your (former) life. And it's a problem Google's seeking to solve with the new Inactive Account Manager. (In an April 11 blog posting, Google product manager Andreas Tuerk suggested that Inactive Account Manager wasn't a 'great name' for the product, but maybe the company shouldn't be so hard on itself: it's a way better name than, say, Google Death Dashboard.) Inactive Account Manager will delete your Google-related data (Gmail, etc.) after a set amount of time, or else send that data to 'trusted contacts' you set up before your untimely demise. Which raises an interesting, semi-Google-related question: What do you want to have happen to your data after you die? Give it to loved ones, or have an automated system nuke it all? Should more companies that host email and data offer plans like Inactive Account Manager?"

122 comments

  1. Where's the... by MasseKid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't care, I'm self centered and dead option?

    1. Re:Where's the... by click2005 · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. Now you have to opt-out of Google's spying every time your account is deleted.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:Where's the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After I am dead this meta-data is of no use for me... My heirs can figure it out...

      Why not do what millions of others have done? Nothing.

    3. Re:Where's the... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      I don't care, I'm self centered and dead option?

      When you are gone you cease to be self-centered, you are dead-centered. A target! Ripe for bruteforced attacks on your history! Just a matter of time before some character in North Korea and completely re-done your entire browsing and interweb content history as a life-long supporter of Dear Leader Fatty-fattington.

      Best buy some After-life Insurance or something.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Where's the... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Just leave a trail of baffling BS. It's the least you can do for your legacy. Maybe you'll end up with a cult following, like L. Ron.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Where's the... by Seumas · · Score: 2

      What the fuck do you think I've been doing for the last 15 years on Slashdot?! :D

    6. Re:Where's the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care, I'm self centered and dead option?

      That's an odd sentiment really. Think about it, we're talking about dictating what should happen with our data after we die. Isn't that the self centered option really? Personally, I leave it to those who stay behind to decide what should happen to it. To try to obligate them to any particular course of action from the grave seems self centered to me.

    7. Re:Where's the... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Then leave somewhere some hidden caches with statements your cult following are all wackos, nuts, loonies, etc. hidden all over the place, along with a signature and photo of you doing something contrary to their beliefs.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Where's the... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      I call bullshit. Now you have to opt-out of Google's spying every time your account is deleted.

      How many times are you planning to die, Mr. Bond?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Where's the... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Why not do what millions of others have done? Nothing.

      I suppose for AC's, this is a particularly attractive option.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Where's the... by houghi · · Score: 2

      I also do not care. I also have no will. I want everybody to genuinely be grieving.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Where's the... by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      I believe it's standard policy for IT to re-visit then re-invent the wheel every so often. At that point, what's been done historically regardless of how successful or unsuccessful it is doesn't matter. And learning from competitors is way below google's pay grade!

    12. Re:Where's the... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      You can show them goatse in your will. That is a form of data, and they will genuinely grieve after seeing it.

      --
      C|N>K
    13. Re:Where's the... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      I don't care, I'm self centered and dead option?

      This is pretty much what I was thinking: if I'm dead why the fuck would I care what happens to my data as I'm no longer around to see it? I just really don't care, they may do with it as they please at that point. If someone found something in my belongings that offended them, well, that would be their own problem -- shouldn't be digging in stuff if you aren't prepared to find stuff and all that.

    14. Re:Where's the... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      photo of you doing something contrary to their beliefs

      i think he may have been referring to http://www.goatse.info/hello.jpg

    15. Re:Where's the... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      the "i'm self centered and dead" option would be to require cramming all google servers into your coffin with you for burial so that you'll have ready access to plenty of porn in the afterlife

  2. Nuke it all by alen · · Score: 2

    It will be like you never existed

    1. Re:Nuke it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some ways, this is true all the time anyway.

    2. Re:Nuke it all by stewsters · · Score: 2

      From orbit. Its the only way to be sure.

    3. Re:Nuke it all by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      It will be like you never existed

      Is it possible to be low-level formatted after you are gone?

      "How'd he die?" "Head crashed." "Oh, ow."

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Nuke it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It will be like you never existed

      As it should be.

    5. Re:Nuke it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is it possible to be low-level formatted after you are gone?

      Yes. It's called composting.

    6. Re:Nuke it all by korgitser · · Score: 2

      obligatory xkcd: http://xkcd.com/686/

      --
      FCKGW 09F9 42
    7. Re: Nuke it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best comment, except no one is taking an inventory of your non-compostable parts - hint visible and invisible parts.

    8. Re:Nuke it all by crutchy · · Score: 1

      there should be a +6 funny for this one :-D

    9. Re:Nuke it all by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i clicked the link and then clicked random and got this one... http://xkcd.com/26/

      is it wrong that i thought it was one of the funniest things i think i've ever seen on the internets?

  3. Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Husband dies, google releases data, wife finds out husband spent all excess cash on cam whores.
    2. Google deletes husband's data, treasure map / account numbers are lost.
    3. Husband makes another unrelated gmail account, a set time later, wife is notified husband is dead while eating dinner with him.

    Google just can't win here can they? :)

    1. Re:Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      4. Kid gets grounded from the computer, mom receives all his porn.

    2. Re:Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3. Husband makes another unrelated gmail account, a set time later, wife is notified husband is dead while eating dinner with him.

      If the wife is checking her google mail during the family diner, she has it coming!

    3. Re:Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Google expects to always win, by keeping every last byte it can snarf of your existence and doing whatever the hell it pleases with you.

    4. Re:Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Damn smartphones.

    5. Re:Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Husband makes another unrelated gmail account, a set time later, wife is notified husband is dead while eating dinner with him.

      I have of course not read TFA, but you'd hope they did sensible things like send out warnings in advance.
      Probably something like

      Dear Mr./Mrs. X. This email has been automatically sent out because [explanation of inactive account system]. We hope this is all some silly mistake and that Y is doing fine. If we do not detect further activity on Y's account within 10 days, [stuff will happen]. Y can prevent this by [various ways to notify Google of non-deadness].

      Ads:
      Compare prices on tombstones and funeral services.
      Recently single? Search thousands of hot girls and guys in your area!

    6. Re:Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Curupira · · Score: 1

      5. Google deletes Paranoid Peter's data, real threats and conspiracy evidences are lost forever. Whoa, it could be a Hollywood script!

    7. Re:Hilarious scenarios for Friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. wife deletes husband

  4. Nerval's lobster by oldhack · · Score: 2

    Is he a slashdot staffer?

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  5. Seems like a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's say you die and your wife (this is a hypothetical situation for some!) finds all your gay sex pictures and home movies. That sure would help the grief process!

  6. Doesn't matter by linear+a · · Score: 5, Funny

    Taking everybody with me.

  7. Depends on the Data by ilikenwf · · Score: 2

    My git repos, some of which just mirror other projects, others which are private to me, would be opened up to the public, except for code that isn't mine to relicense as GPL. Other data released publically via webservers would include archival data of various rare tv, books, etc that I have collected.

    Emails, banking stuff, and all that would go to the appropriate family members.

    1. Re:Depends on the Data by mysidia · · Score: 1

      except for code that isn't mine to relicense as GPL

      I'd just open it all up, with appropriate disclaimers, just because of the fact that the information ought to be free, and you cannot sue a corpse

    2. Re:Depends on the Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could sue the estate, though.

    3. Re:Depends on the Data by kermidge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the way, I think, except for those who flat out don't care. I've given a few people, the same that I've named and filed with my advanced directive, an envelope with master password to 'The Vault' so that they can unload what they please and close the accounts. Still have to write a will and have it notarized.

      It's not so much that I care a lot about digital stuff vanishing into mass storage somewhere but I don't want to leave the people I care about with possibly vexing dangling digital details.

      Computer goes to a friend anyway, so no worries about anything embarrassing on the drives; my home folder will be available to family and friends - family pics, favorite comics, possibly useful links and documents and some stray writing. They don't want it, erase it.

      I'm not sure I'm entirely comfortable with Google's approach to a dead man switch, but it's a helluva good start; it's a nice thing to do and it could help keep things smooth for them as well.

      But I'd suggest doing the bulk of arrangements in meat space. Do it now: we don't know our time, so it doesn't hurt to not leave as much of a mess behind as doing nothing. Folks above are right, tho - when I'm gone I'm likely not going to care anymore. Dead is probably just that. If there is anything after, whatever one's beliefs, you won't find out until it happens.

    4. Re:Depends on the Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cannot sue a corpse

      i wouldn't put it past SCO to try

  8. And to my beloved wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bequeath my collection of Japanese tentacle porn and pregnant dildo bondage.

    1. Re:And to my beloved wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some Japanese pregnant dildo tentacle porn, wanna see?????

  9. My family knows my pw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12345

    The same on my luggage!

  10. What is the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you die in the matrix you die in real life, it must be the same the other way around.

    1. Re:What is the matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you die in the matrix you die in real life

      unless you're chuck norris

  11. Buried with it by MrYingster · · Score: 2

    Assuming I don't die an untimely, unforeseen death, I had always planned on consolidating my data, and preparing it to be buried with me. I don't want to burden my family with having to sort through things. Plus in the future, in the case that reanimation is made possible I can have my stuff again, or in the more likely event that future paleontologists dig me up, they will have lots of history/information to figure out what made us primitive humans tick.

    1. Re:Buried with it by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you might just be making a case for later warrant to have your corpse and data exhumed. save your family the trauma, torch your shit

    2. Re:Buried with it by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Plus in the future, in the case that reanimation is made possible I can have my stuff again

      “Good morning sir, and welcome to the future. Technology has advanced to the point where we can revive a corpse that was embalmed and stuffed in a box for centuries. Unfortunately, it seems that we can't read the Office 2083 files that all your data are stored in, so we're just going to have to kill and re-bury you now in hope of future research advances.”

  12. Here's my plan (no stealing it!!) by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Remember how everyone is supposed to have their 15 minutes of fame, like Andy said?

    So my figuring is this - there are more celebs and notable people than ever before, thanks in part to the web.

    Therefore the gross overall amount of fame has increased, while time has remained constant, so people will have less than 15 minutes of fame. Gotta be down to about 10 minutes, or less by now. Right?

    So my plan is to go about making everyone else famous. The more fame and notoriety of ordinary clods applies downward pressure on minutes of fame. With luck I can get it down to less than 10 seconds. People could then look back upon my shameful, scandelous existence and forget about it almost immediately as they move on to what World Famous Slashdot Poster #218171 has had to say lately.

    (c=

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Here's my plan (no stealing it!!) by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      But, time could be infinite, or near to it. Who says you have to be famous while you are alive? Perhaps some random bit of data or code you have now will be found by archeologists in the far future, and it will solve some massive problem saving their civilization. Heck, look at some of the famous authors, artists, composers, etc. thru time, where their bio ends with "... succumbed to the ravages of syphilis and died a homeless pauper in the winter of ..." or whatever.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  13. Nuke my bookmarks by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

    All that I ask is that my browser history is nuked. The world would be a better place without knowing the websites I have been to. I should have a bracelet made that says, please delete my browser history if I die.

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

    1. Re:Nuke my bookmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that I ask is that my browser history is nuked. The world would be a better place without knowing the websites I have been to. I should have a bracelet made that says, please delete my browser history if I die.

      If this is important (only you know), then you should man up and take care if it today. I'd suggest storing it encrypted, so you can die with the password.

    2. Re:Nuke my bookmarks by antdude · · Score: 1
      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  14. Could the question be any less specific? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    "What Should happen to your data after you die?" is a question so vague as to be vacuuous.

    Fairly obviously, just like any other flavor of cruft you accumulate during your time as a successful combatant against entropy, different flavors of data are best disposed of in different ways. We've only had more-or-less-all-of-recorded-human-civilization to work on this problem...

    The new issue on the plate isn't so much 'OMG! 'Data' is a mysterious and fundamentally novel category!!!' but "Shit, huge swaths of 'my data' are locked in various 3rd party locations, and often very, very, poorly segregated by category." By way of analogy, if my bank safe deposit box was where I stored family heirlooms; but was also the location where I received reams of junk mail, recordings of a substantial percentage of casual conversations, and my collection of hideous donkey/tentacle hentai, writing my will would get a trifle more complex.

    We may have had it easier historically because preserving the ephemera wasn't even an option, without substantial effort; but the major issue is really with the fact that everybody hates sorting shit, and various 'service providers' seem to adore tying as much data as possible to a single account, with efficient segregation of different flavors of data anywhere between 'a hassle' and 'overly contrary to the TOS'.

  15. Graveyard shift by macraig · · Score: 1

    There should be a giant online cemetery where a person's online presence can retire when the body withers. Oh, wait... we already have one and it's called the Wayback Machine. Maybe there just needs to be more explicit cooperation with it about things like forum user profiles and social networking accounts? And maybe better funding?

  16. Let them decide by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    Let your family decide what they want to do with your data. Write down all of your passwords (if you're like me, you've got about a dozen) along with your usual accounts on a piece of paper and put them in a safety deposit box. When you pass and they go through your deposit box, they'll come across your credentials and decide what they'd like to do with your digital data. Some people would like to read it, others would prefer not to.

    This strategy has an added bonus; if they ever come across a site that you belonged to, they've got a login that'll probably work.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    1. Re:Let them decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you handle the must change password ever x days/months stuff? I have a spreadsheet with 100+ logins, no way that work in a safe deposit box easily.

    2. Re:Let them decide by mysidia · · Score: 1

      How do you handle the must change password ever x days/months stuff? I have a spreadsheet with 100+ logins, no way that work in a safe deposit box easily.

      By including the master password in the box, with the instructions for using it to unlock the digital keychain. Besides, you need backups anyways

    3. Re:Let them decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This strategy has an added bonus; if they ever come across a site that you belonged to, they've got a login that'll probably work.

      Careful with that bonus. If they use it, they'll have committed a felony under the CFAA.

  17. Just a automatic cleanup program by fermion · · Score: 1
    This sounds more like a system implemented so Google does not have to deal with old accounts. It sounds good to me. If a user does not log in for a couple years, delete the data. Why should google have to pay to maintain old data that no one probably wants. Even banks get to close accounts after a number of years inactivity. This is the basis for all those commercials that proclaim "Government has billions of dollars of publics money, some of it could be yours!" In this case there is good legal reasons for Google to enact this. If data is lost, no one can sue google. It is in the terms and services that data will regularly be purged.

    The issue is, that like with annuities and death benefits, many people do not remember to update the record as beneficiaries move out of their lives. It seems likely that for something as low priority as a gmail account is to some people, data could indeed inadvertently make it to a person who would use for no good.

    If it were an actual death scenario, they should handle it like anyone else. The firm receives a death certificate with the name of the legally certified agent, and whatever assets are sent to that agent. No need to reinvent the wheel.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Just a automatic cleanup program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should google have to pay to maintain old data that no one probably wants

      The cost of data storage is perpetually declining. In the long run (which is where Google is looking) it would cost more to delete data.

      Note that hard disk density has increased roughly 1000x in the last 20 years. You may crap your pants now.

  18. Your spouse by hey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or its a sneaky way of Google finding the email address of the person your trust the most?
    Probably your spouse.

    1. Re:Your spouse by Waldeinburg · · Score: 1

      The algorithm that reads all my email already told them.

  19. Just put passw0rds in your will by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 1

    What is so fucking complicated about this?

    I was sorting out a will recently and even my non-clued up solicitor (US=lawyer) recommended putting passwords in my sealed will. Apparently, this is a standard recommendation from the law society for every will written in the UK.

    Without a doubt, every other country on planet Earth must have it's lawyers recommend something similar.

    What is the story here?

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
    1. Re:Just put passw0rds in your will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sealed wills aren't web scale in the cloud.

      Unless it's unproven, overblown technology, we want no part of your perfectly reasonable solution!

    2. Re:Just put passw0rds in your will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time you update your password you have to rewrite your will?

      Sounds like a scam by your lawyicitor. Make sure he doesn't take a peak before your beneficiaries and help himself to your assets....

    3. Re:Just put passw0rds in your will by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is your passwords (hopefully) change occasionally which means you have to pester the lawyer / solicitor / brother / turtle (they live a long time) constantly and what's worse, you have to remember to tell them. A better method is a password safe like 1Password or KeePass. Then you only have one password to change. Furthermore, with at least 1Password, you have an encrypted file of lots of other useful legal bits, your SSN, bank account numbers, etc. Of course, that makes for one stop shopping for Mr. Nefarious so as usual you have to balance security with usability.

      However, this doesn't address your online presence which for many people seems more important than their real lives. Thus, you need a mechanism that you can deal with all of those posts / blogs and nasty pictures that have littered your digital life. This is just a small step in some direction. I guess it's positive.

      Interestingly, people who use paid-for services don't have this problem as much. If I still have my vanity website when I kick over, the first month that the ISP fails to get it's payment, it gets knocked off line. I don't have anything on my Google account except for a couple of Google maps tracks - they can stay there for all eternity as far as I'm concerned. Anything important and / or compromising on my personal drives is encrypted and the password goes away whenever I do. Anything that is important to my estate is in 1Password and my wife and lawyer and brother have the master password for that.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Just put passw0rds in your will by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 1

      Every time you update your password you have to rewrite your will

      OK :-)
      "Provide access to your computer passwords"......
      I don't remember my solicitors exact words offhand, but his point was, give the location of your passwords in your will.

      Granted though..... some lawyers could use this an a money making opportunity!
      Trust the law society to give skewed advice :-)

      --
      Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
      Don't believe what you read is the truth.
    5. Re:Just put passw0rds in your will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have an encrypted file holding all your real passwords, then the key to it is what you put in your will.

  20. a data harvesting effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It refuses to take my alternate email or notify others without giving my mobil number... I don't have one!
    This appears to be a data harvesting effort

  21. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot. Olds for nerds, stuff that doesn't matter.

  22. Rickroll by phorm · · Score: 2

    If I'm old and wrinkly but don't lose my (admittedly odd) sense of humor, I'd be tempted to rick-roll my family.

    As a final farewall, he's a few pictures of my wrinkly butt. The code to the account with your inheritance is hidden somewhere in there...

    1. Re:Rickroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we ever have digital gravestones- where most people were to use it as a "hit this button to play this video montage in honor of the dead... Then a rickroll instead would be quite amusing.

      In all seriousness to answer the question in the article- I'll be dead, I won't care.

    2. Re:Rickroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are my new hero.

    3. Re:Rickroll by stackOVFL · · Score: 1

      You sir are awesome and are my new role model.

  23. It is common knowledge by goffster · · Score: 2

    St Peter asks your for all social media passwords.
    I, for one, would want to make sure those accounts no longer exist.

  24. Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have stave IV lung cancer, and maybe a few weeks left to go. Since I was an only child, both of my parents are gone, and I never married or had children, I basically have nobody who would want to have my data.

    So, I am basically just erasing myself from existence. There is very little on the Internet with my name on it to begin with - no facebook, LinkedIn, or any other social media like that. I do have a few hundred family photos from when I was much young that I scanned in. When I am close, I will say my goodbyes to my parents (again) and delete those, too.

    Death is a profound experience. When you realize yours is coming and there isn't anything that can be done about it, you begin to want to disconnect from the hive and spend your last days alone to ponder your life and existence. It's not something I expected - when I was first diagnosed I thought I would want to party as much as possible until I passed - spend as much time with friends as I could. But, that turned out not to be the case.

    I'm really too weak at this point to do much of anything except sit around and talk or surf, but when I left my job and cashed out my life insurance, I did spend some time volunteering and giving money away. I didn't feel any need to take pictures, or develop memories. It felt much more like a final responsibility to dispose of my wealth and give it to people who could do something good with it.

    Now I really only get online to talk about my imminent death and try to pass on what little knowledge I have about the subject when the topic comes up. The truth is, death makes you grow old. I'm 40 and feel like I have lived 90 years.

    Anyway, your data may mean something to someone - why wait until you die to pass it on? Give it to people now - especially those good thoughts that you think might make them happy. There's no reason for you to make someone think "why couldn't he have said this to me while he was alive??" That's just cruel.

    Life is short. Shorter than you think.

    1. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When a friend of mine died in his thirties from cancer, I got to 'hang around' with him for the months leading up. Enough weird, unexplainable things happened then, like his seeing kids flying in through the windows, his seeing 7 doors in the wall, and one night him talking to/asking someone in the empty chair next to me if 'Jack' was coming over tomorrow. He got mad at me when I interuppted. Nodding at where the person's head would be (if they were visible) he said, "Uh huh..., he is..." 'Jack' was a hospice head nurse who never worked Sundays. He had to fill in the next day (Sunday) when an aide called in sick. Over the years I've had a few dreams of him from 'the other side', and of some family members who've "crossed over". And I'm not that creative a person to come up with those dreams. At times I wish I'd not been given this 'knowledge', because it's taken well over a decade to wrap my brain around it all.

      We go somewhere, is what I'm trying to get across here. You'll be all right. We all will, when it's our time to take that ride. Best wishes to you Sir/Madam. God bless. :-)

    2. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't delete your all your data. Like your photos. Go through a few of them and let your loved ones cherish them. Being left behind sucks too. You're probably not up to make a big deal out of it at this point, but the trivial things we do in this life do count.

    3. Re:Apropos by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

      All great points. You may also have distant relatives or old friends who may still be interested in your life either now or later. At the very least, historians may be interested in your life, including in your local historical society. See for example:
      "Why do historians value letters and diaries"
      http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mse/letters/whydo.html
      "Thus, the historical value of reading diaries and letters involves understanding the significance of how individual writers employed, experimented with, or altered the conventional forms alive in their time. Perhaps more than any other kind of historical text, the personal writing we are considering reveals how people both embraced and resisted the time and place in which they lived. Their personal motives for employing either form -- the emotional and intellectual energy infusing the form with life each time it is written with a new subjectivity -- suggest much about how people in the past made their cultures, but made them from the materials at hand."

      In any case, whether pictures or writings remain, you've made ripples in the world in all the lives you've interacted with. What is the universe quantum physicists describe but the sum total of all those sorts of waves?

      Probably too late, but might give you a bit more time to make a few more ripples:
      http://sciencenordic.com/cancer-patients-high-vitamin-d-levels-live-longer
      "For example lung cancer patients, the median survival rate after the cancer diagnosis was 5.3 months for patients with low vitamin D levels, whereas it was 22.6 months for patients with high levels."

      More about other cancer options in this thread:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3610805&cid=43358733

      You might find parts of this book by Thomas Moore "Dark Nights of the Soul: A Guide to Finding Your Way Through Life's Ideals" of interest, or at least, just the summary:
      http://books.google.com/books?id=RKZreNYKNHQC
      "Our lives are filled with emotional tunnels: the loss of a loved one or end of a relationship, aging and illness, career disappointments or just an ongoing sense of dissatisfaction with life. Society tends to view these "dark nights" in clinical terms as obstacles to be overcome as quickly as possible. But Moore shows how honoring these periods of fragility as periods of incubation and positive opportunities to delve the soul's deepest needs can provide healing and a new understanding of life's meaning. Dark Nights of the Soul presents these metaphoric dark nights not as the enemy, but as times of transition, occasions to restore yourself, and transforming rites of passage, revealing an uplifting and inspiring new outlook on such topics as:
      * The healing power of melancholy
      * The sexual dark night and the mysteries of matrimony
      * Finding solace during illness and in aging
      * Anxiety, anger, and temporary Insanities
      * Linking creativity, spirituality, and emotional struggles
      * Finding meaning and beauty in the darkness"

      Although it sounds like you have already found a way to honor and respect the dark night you are facing. So, I link to that more by way of honoring what you say.

      A key point he makes is that in mainstream Western culture, we usually see "growth" as about like a caterpillar getting bigger, but ignore growth as "transformation", like a caterpillar becoming a butterfly. "Groundhog Day" is a favorite funny movie that connects with that.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groundhog_Day_(film)

      I wrote about my mother's last days here:
      http://www.pdfernhout.net/reading-between-the-lines.html
      " I'm glad I had the "free" time

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    4. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what else to say than platitudes. It's very weird what you're saying: that death makes you grow old. It seems to be something I'll understand one day.

      From my GMail and Yahoo email accounts any single other site's password can be reset (and GMail emails are all forwared to Yahoo!, just for safety) so I left my GMail password in a safe at the bank. My family shall have the rights to have this safe opened the day I die.

      Now my hard disks are encrypted (Debian) and that one password noone has it. So the day I'll die these data and backups are going to be locked by the cryptographic gods and so be it. Nothing of importance.

      I hope you won't suffer too much and I'll watch /., looking for your "So long, and thanks for all the fish" : )

    5. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Every breath we draw wards off the death that constantly impinges on us... Ultimately death must triumph, for by birth it has already become our lot and it plays with its prey only for a short while before swallowing it up. However, we continue our life with great interest and much solicitude as long as possible, just as we blow out a soap bubble as long and as large as possible, although with the perfect certainty that it will burst." - Arthur Schopenhauer

    6. Re:Apropos by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Best, most important Slashdot thread ever, IMO. Cool.

    7. Re:Apropos by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, I am glad that the timing of everything was such that this story came along for you to post in before you could not do so; I am better for having read it and will carry the thoughts with me going forward.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll remember you, Anonymous. So long.

    9. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for sharing, it means a lot. My wife passed away from cancer a few months ago and I watched her slowly disconnect from friends, music, movies, eventually food. Looking back it was a graceful transition, our hospice nurse told me she didn't need any of these where she was going. Your posting is a bit of your data - you have left it with us.

    10. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.amazon.com/Biogenealogy-Sourcebook-Healing-Resolving-Traumas/dp/1594772061

    11. Re:Apropos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not have immediate relatives, but do you have cousins, aunts, uncles, second cousins, etc.? Even if relations are strained or non-existent, you may want to communicate with them and share your photos, etc. Your parents may have cousins they were close with as children who would really enjoy having the info, and could continue to pass it down to those that share at least some of your genes.

    12. Re:Apropos by fezzzz · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

  25. Ashes to ashes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and bits to trash.

  26. bequeath to posterity by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

    What should happen, at a minimum, is that your data gets packaged up and archived for maybe a hundred years, and then open sourced.

    Basically, what a lot of historical people have always done with their personal papers.

    The historical value of a lifetime of data for everyone who dies would be immense. And for fans of Caprica, maybe they'll bring "you" back.

    1. Re:bequeath to posterity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you don't want it to be available. Finding Grandpa's illegal handgun stored in grease since WWII and a pile of love letters that were not to Grandma comes to mind.

  27. BBC radio 4 - digital legacy programme by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

    Check out the radio 4 (truly excellent channel)'s recent episode on our digital legacy (ep3 of Out of the Ordinary) - it discusses not only what happens to your data after you die (eg people can still send you emails and unless they know you're dead just assume you're ignoring them), but also your online presences (eg your facebook page that is still active). Then there's the issue that accessing your old data might help your grieving relatives (assuming you use a different email account for porn) or hurt them if they log on to the net and facebook helpfully sends to suggestions you connect with your dead friend, whose account is still active and un-closeable.

    Who do you want to be able to read your old emails when you die? Are the dead entitled to privacy? Jolyon Jenkins reports on the increasingly contentious issue of our digital legacy.

    As we lead more of our lives online, we leave behind an ever bigger digital footprint when we go. There are the public parts - the blogs, the tweets, the forum posts - but also the private things such as the emails stored on servers owned by companies like Google. Sorting out the digital legacy is becoming as onerous as being a traditional executor.

    But it brings entirely new problems: in the case of people who have died suddenly or mysteriously, relatives sometimes feel that they are entitled to get access to the email accounts of dead person to try to find a clue to what was happening in their lives. But many email providers resist handing over this material because of a confidentiality clause in their terms and conditions. Jolyon Jenkins talks to the Stassen family in Wisconsin who took both Facebook and Google to court to gain access to the accounts of their son Benjamin who committed suicide. He also talks to Esther in Kenya who similarly would like to get into her dead sister's email account to try to find a clue to her unexplained death. But unlike the Stassens, Esther has had no luck.

    These are uncharted waters, where analogies with old technology quickly break down, where the principles are unclear, and where important private and personal matters seem to be left to the discretion of big corporations.

  28. e-books and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There can be real money tied up in your 'cloud presence' now. Books, movies and music for example. That should be transferable somehow, just like dead trees and CD's.

    Other than those and the family pictures, nuke the rest.

    1. Re:e-books and such by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
      I've heard that music bought from Apple is drm'd, but burning them to disc then copying them from disc removes the drm. As for movies and books there are programs that available to remove drm from them, otherwise you can't pass them on to family or friends. You don't really 'own' them, you lease them.

      Some celebrity once challenged Apple for the right to pass on his Apple bought mp3 collection after his death, and learned that his account is non-transferable.

  29. Re: "Real" money could go poof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If bitcoins are not recognized as "real" money how is inheritance protected?

    Does your iTunes account just get closed when the credit card company tells Apple you died? It could take thousands of dollars of songs, movies, books and apps away from your family.

  30. The acronym is wrong by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    The name needs a few more words. Instead of IAM, the acronym should be IAMNOT.

    1. Re:The acronym is wrong by fox171171 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe:

      After Our Lives?

  31. In My Will ... by Improbus · · Score: 1

    I am leaving everything to my AI avatar. May the "Lord" have mercy on his/my soul, err, mind.

  32. What really happens? by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    So, ummm... do they actually delete your data? Or just your account? I didn't think they ever delete data.

  33. Keep it if you want it. by Seizurebleak · · Score: 1

    A good friend of mine recently died of a heart attack quite young. It was quite a shock, and there's not much to remember him with but I do have many years of MSN Messenger chat logs that I always made a point to keep for some reason. I haven't gone through them yet, but I would like to soon.

    I wouldn't mind if my data was left up after I'm gone, in case anybody cares to see it. If you've ever contributed to a site or an online community, I think that information is nice to see for your still living loved ones. The memories I have with my friends online are sometimes just as good as the ones we've had in person, especially with people I don't get to see as much anymore.

  34. I was actually thinking about this the other day by aklinux · · Score: 1

    I think having something available like "Inactive Account Manager" is a good idea. It could be set up to either nuke, or give an estate executor legal access as desired by the account owner. Some of us may not want to leave the people we leave behind hanging.

    While I tend to agree, on personal aspects, with the guy that's stage IV, I was thinking more of business type things. I sell real estate, I would hate to go out thinking I left someone unable to complete a sale or purchase and thus be unable to get on with their own lives because something happened to me. Maybe you're a coder and the project will die with you without the research you've accumulated. I don't think that because we're dying, we stop caring.

  35. Sea Burial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I'm gone, I want all my ones and zeroes scattered in the Seas of the Web.
    As I've been surfing these realms during my life, there will come a time to return the gifts I've been given to the waves and the tides and the vast waters that are the Internet.

    (Also, I'd prefer that to happen in the Bay of Drama: http://xkcd.com/802/)

  36. In Soviet Russia TV watches you! by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    In America, you can always find a party . In Soviet Russia, the Party always finds YOU!! So I decided to encrypt ALL my data. The data I am going to give to my heirs will be encoded with some key on bootable flash drives and entrusted to 3 different persons, each having 2/3 of total key length. Any 2 of them (but no single person) will be able to decode them. If the Party finds any one of them while I live it will be impossible to obtain the data.

  37. subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    As long as it doesn't embarrass or incriminate my friends or family members, why would I give a shit? I'd be dead.

    1. Re:subject by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Why do you think that it will NOT incriminate your family members? For instance, my friend's granddaddy was a hunter and left a lot of rifles and ammo. My friend does not want to surrender it due to understandable self-defense concerns (It's Soviet Russia!) but if he dies his family members should know where his arsenal is hidden.

  38. Re:Nuke it all, even the static by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Tibetans cut up their loved one's remains and fed left them out for the vultures. Not unlike what will happen in the state and corporate databases that will outlive us all.

    In the digital age you will never die, your data will just age out. The IRS, then the census bureau will be the first to back up what little of you was relevant to their raison d' etre. Your remaining relevance will fade with changing social fads to which your personal data was related. Your bank account will cease activity. The other corporations you did business will be cannibalized or go bankrupt, and your former account number will be reassigned to a new customers. Your social network connections will dwindle to a digital dribble. Your twitter account's silence will go unretweeted.

    The coup de grace won't come until all the listservs you signed up for cease to operate. Then the dark daemon will back up your account at 2:34 AM local time and wait...
    every so often the pining routine will be called, along with Ray Kurzweil timeout, waiting for you to be authenticated... again.

    Then Major Tom will enter stasis.

  39. Last Will and Testament by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Whatever provisions you write in your will should be followed.

    1. Re:Last Will and Testament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless those provisions conflict with TOS, of course.

    2. Re:Last Will and Testament by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

      Except these provisions will be known to notary who will send them to KGB before one's death.

  40. If you really were there would be no question by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't care, I'm self centered and dead option?

    If you were REALLY self centered, then obviously you'd want many people to be able to read your brilliant thoughts long after you are gone.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  41. Oh they'll be grieving by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I also have no will. I want everybody to genuinely be grieving.

    Once the legal battles and government intervention grabs much of your assets, they'll be grieving plenty.

    Having no will is what lawyers would term a "Dick Move".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. Your family inherits your data by evilandi · · Score: 1

    I realise that we all like to make jokes about Slashdot readers being nerds and never having a girlfriend, but seriously... by the time most of us die, we will be married with kids and grandchildren.

    If you're a newbie geek, under 20, maybe even under 30, chances are you might be single, sure.

    But don't believe the stereotype. You won't be single forever.

    Once you get over 30, and your attractive-to demographic becomes 25+ , CHICKS DIG STABILITY. Yeah, sure, your dream girl at school rejected you for some sports moron, but now that sports moron is working for minimum wage, he doesn't look so attractive any more. Over 25, people start looking for stability, for a partner who can provide a good steady income, for someone they can start a family with.

    If you're over 30 and have a steady job that pays well enough to afford a car that doesn't break down and somewhere to live that has more than one bedroom, that is pretty much all you need to get hitched. Just join a club that has members of the opposite sex in it, and stuff will just happen. Relax, you're male, your biological clock is not running out, theirs is.

    After that, you just write down a master pass-phrase to a master email account (e.g. the email account which is the registrant for your vanity domain), seal it in an envelope and ask your bank or whoever drew up your will to look after it. Then your family inherits your data by using that master email account to unlock everything else.

    I've written a complete Handbook For The Recently Bereaved for my missus, that contains a complete list of where my will is, who our phoneline and utilities are with, who my various pensions are with, where all our family photos are stored (all she knows right now, is that when she clicks a symbolic linked directory, the photos just appear), etc. But if it came down to it, as next of kin holding my death certificate, she wouldn't need a master pass-phrase, she could just use a lawyer to get the hosting company to hand it over. And she knows enough of my geeky friends to find someone who'll help her track down where our data is stored (if you're reading this, dear, that little black box on my book shelf, that is what is called a "NAS" and it has two hard drives both containing identical "mirrored" copies of all our family photos and home videos; there's also a portable harddrive at my parents house with a backup, and if my parents are dead, I'll have moved that drive to my sister's house).

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Your family inherits your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure, your dream girl at school rejected you for some sports moron

      But then they hit an existential crisis at 30. Long ago dumped by the sports moron, they'll go for anyone they know that pays them enough attention and is some tie to happier days. The trick is to make it worth their attention, not be a bastard about it, and treat them well enough that they will not regret it - so becoming and staying a "good guy" for "bad" reasons, the "bad" becoming more and more irrelevant over time. It's not really taking advantage if you deliver what is promised and keep on delivering.

  43. Make history public by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    I think there should be a default setting where all your information is made public after 100 years and immediately becomes public domain. All our photos, and most private conversations become publicly searchable and usable in any way whatsover. This will provide future generations with a wealth of historical and research information like we have never seen. Besides the historical value... this may also assist in other research such as disease and mental illness or just understanding human behaviour. I think it is very selfish to be concerned about privacy 100 years after youre dead.

  44. What about this? by eecanglo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps in the future some budding entrepreneurs will come up with an idea of setting up a company that collects the deceased's data with their sophisticated web crawlers and preserve in their specially designed vaults (micro SDs:)). Just like people keep their loved ones ashes ! One copy for them and one copy for the family! What do you think?