Slashdot Mirror


Six Retailers Announce Recall of Buckyballs and Buckycubes

thereitis writes "The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), in cooperation with six retailers, is announcing the voluntary recall of all Buckyballs and Buckycubes high-powered magnet sets due to ingestion hazard. CPSC continues to warn that these products contain defects in the design, warnings and instructions, which pose a substantial risk of injury and death to children and teenagers. An administrative complaint has been filed which is rare, as CPSC has filed only four administrative complaints in the past 11 years." This follows last year's ban on buckyballs.

68 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Seriously? by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does this even need a warning? If you're too stupid not to understand to either A) not ingest these, or B) not give them to someone not old enough to know better, then by all means, swallow them all, then go get an MRI.

    1. Re:Seriously? by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you swallowed them all, you'd be fine. The way I described it to my wife is, eat one. Wait between 1 hour and 6 hours and eat another. Don't see a doctor for abrominal pain, and there's a reasonable chance you'll die. Multiples at once will not cause an issue. One a day will not cause an issue.

      My 5 year old gets to play with my set, but the 3 year old (who doesn't eat toys) has close supervision, especially since these look like dragee, candy he has had before.

      The problem is that a proper warning is hard when everything is deadly already. I'm surprised bottled water doesn't come with a DHMO warning label. When everything has a warning on it, adding a real warning to something that looks safe doesn't have proper effect. People don't read warnings when everything comes with 100 warnings.

    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice work AC, being pedant while missing the point.

    3. Re:Seriously? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People don't read warnings when everything comes with 100 warnings.

      Very good point. Or they read them and laugh.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      "by all means, swallow them all, then go get an MRI"

      No he meant MRI. He is mean :D

    5. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of a warning I saw on a treadmill recently. "Cease use immediately and consult a physician if you experience any of these symptoms: dizzyness, light headedness or shortness of breath."

      On a treadmill? Really?!

    6. Re:Seriously? by oiron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're assuming that the reason for the warnings is to save lives...

      It's actually purely to get themselves off the hook after lives are lost. Plausible deniability!

    7. Re:Seriously? by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      They are required by law, in most cases it's the law that's broken, whether requiring warnings, or making them optional, but required for liability issues.

    8. Re:Seriously? by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Funny

      53% of slashdotters get shortness of breath looking at a treadmill.

    9. Re:Seriously? by c0lo · · Score: 2

      53% of slashdotters get shortness of breath looking at a treadmill.

      Other 46.0% will get dizzy - the remaining 1% are in army service or are girls-in-training (with or without bra).
      None of them will get light-headed though: being predisposed to such symptoms runs counter to being a /.-er.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    10. Re:Seriously? by Fuzzums · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really?! Now that wouldn't be very smart, would it?
      Just like swallowing magnets in the first place.

      I think he did mean MRI for exactly that reason :)

      (My apologies for my sarcasm)

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    11. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope, my boy, you clearly haven't been to an MRI scan before. Just try to go into the chamber with your glasses on, and see the reaction of the operator.

      Nope, my boy, you clearly haven't been exposed to sarcasm before. Just try and go on Slashdot without it, and see the reaction of the intertubes.

    12. Re: Seriously? by N+Monkey · · Score: 2

      Did you miss that if you eat them all at once, they will stick together in one clump and therefore none would be in an "adjacent track of intestine". Although, I would think that just having a, effectively solid, chunk of indigestible material the size of several buckyballs may be a problem in of itself.

      Not if you test first like the monkey ;-)

    13. Re:Seriously? by Bengie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      CPSC has received 54 reports of children and teens ingesting this product, with 53 of these requiring medical interventions.

      Sounds like Darwinism in action. Young children, I can understand, but teens?

    14. Re:Seriously? by rmstar · · Score: 2

      The simple fact is that if you release a dangerous product, no amount of warnings are going to prevent you from being sued. Just because your coffee maker states "always turn off coffee maker to prevent fires" you're still going to be sued if the damn thing bursts into flames because a well-designed coffee maker should not burst into flames, even if left turned on indefinitely.

      That is true. Regulation ensures that we only have well-designed coffee makers. At least on the safety front. Regulation ensures that companies do not compromise safety with cost of production. Personally, I think that this is a good idea.

      Warning labels, like most company to consumer communications, are purely about having something to point at to discourage lawsuits.

      That might be true to some extent, but to a very large extent the warnings are there to prevent accidents. And they do. And most companies do actually care for what happens to their customers. Well, companies that want to be arround for a while do. And it is not all cynicism.

    15. Re:Seriously? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I have in my shopping bag a slice of fish labeled 'contains fish' and a yogurt labeled 'contains milk product.' I've also seen peanut butter with a 'contains nuts' warning, but not recently.

    16. Re:Seriously? by jbengt · · Score: 2

      To be sure, it is amusingly redundant to warn about the food containing fish when buying packaged fish, but it is far easier to write general requirements for labeling then to write all the possible exceptions.
      It is, however, actually a good idea to warn when a jar of peanut butter might contain nuts, as peanuts are legumes, not tree nuts, and not all those allergic to nuts are allergic to peanuts.

    17. Re: Seriously? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This doesn't appear to be the case. Look, for example at this reference, where several magnets had stuck together and yet caused problems. These appear to have been larger than buckyballs, but the idea is that they can loop back and pinch the bowel even if they are stuck together.

      Even a cursory glance at the literature is a bit scary. The problem is that MOST things that kids swallow are pretty harmless and therefore not brought to anyone's attention. We don't know the numbers of kids that swallow magnets yet have no problems - they certainly exist - so the reporting bias is going to be fairly high.

      But I personally would keep kids away from these things. They just don't need to play with them just yet.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    18. Re:Seriously? by RoboRay · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's the point. You actually said the point he made while simultaneously missing that he'd said it.

    19. Re:Seriously? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those seem stupid, but for at least two there's a reason: peanuts are legumes, and people can be allergic to either tree nuts or peanuts, or both; and yoghurts can be soy-based rather than dairy-based.

      Soy based yoghurt? OH MY GOD, WHERE IS MY GUN?

    20. Re:Seriously? by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 2

      Whoosh much?

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    21. Re: Seriously? by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 2

      "Gaaaaah hot hot hot hot. AAAAAh woooooaaaaaah"

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0pdFXygoRY

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    22. Re:Seriously? by Glendale2x · · Score: 2

      You mean CAT scan?

      An MRI is a really big superconducting magnet. If you swallowed some of those balls, had them get stuck in your intestines, then went for an MRI... I can't imagine that would be a very pleasant experience, having several balls forcibly pulled through your soft squishy organs.

      That was the joke, i.e. "eat them and go die".

      --
      this is my sig
    23. Re:Seriously? by Bengie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And they should be treated as such. If a warning says not to let 2-3 year-olds have something, then a teenager with a development issue probably shouldn't play with those things either.

    24. Re:Seriously? by makomk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nope, the problem is that people are idiots, even smart people. On one of the previous /. discussions there were a surprising number of people who posted comments talking about how they'd swallowed all kinds of metal objects as kids, many of which were sharp, and swallowing something round like Buckyballs is no big deal - it's just the nanny state kicking up a fuss about nothing. They did this in response to an article which described, in fairly graphic detail, exactly why swallowing strong magnets was more dangerous than other small metal objects and the actual injuries that had resulted from it.

    25. Re:Seriously? by mysidia · · Score: 2

      And well it should. I fully support the labeling of products that contain dangerous and addictive additives like DHMO.

      Indeed... DHMO consumption is highly correlated to almost every disease and sickness known to man.

      Just about everyone who eventually gets sick or dies has consumed DHMO.

      I'm afraid the warning alone might never be effective. A mandatory recall of DHMO containing products seems the only wise idea.

    26. Re:Seriously? by rmstar · · Score: 2

      How many people lost money with Bernie Madoff, while he didn't murder them, he lost billions of their money and they believed they were OK, because of various government regulations.

      You have that backwards. Bernie wasn't investigated because the regulators are weak. Such things do not happen in well-governed countries were regulators have not been castrated by Randroids.

      I am against all government business regulations, they are all unconstitutional, thus illegal.

      Yeah, right. But then you are deranged and crazy, who cares about what you are against or believe in?

    27. Re:Seriously? by heathen_01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fake tongue piercing. Granted its a stupid idea but it's not the same as an infant putting something in their mouth.

    28. Re: Seriously? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Kids swallow objects; that's nothing new. I'm sure that most people here swallowed a coin or a marble or a pen parts or other indigestibles much larger than a few buckyballs.
      I swallowed a rod magnet myself as a kid. No problems.

      The danger of the buckyballs is (apart from idiots who let kids they're responsible for play with dangerous objects unsupervised) pinching. Not blockage.

      Anyhow, I feel this crusade against buckyballs is misplaced. No kids have died from them. None. And they're not sold as a children's toy either.
      Lots of kids die from balloons every year. Yet they are allowed sold with warnings, while buckyballs are not.
      This is not about protecting children - it's theater to make the public think they do something useful.

      Yes, they can be dangerous. So can many things, and a child cannot possibly grow up without being exposed to thousands of dangers. Use common sense, and if you lack it, don't have kids (or go to jail when your kids die due to your negligence). Don't blame the manufacturer of executive toys.

    29. Re:Seriously? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

      I have in my shopping bag a slice of fish labeled 'contains fish' and a yogurt labeled 'contains milk product.' I've also seen peanut butter with a 'contains nuts' warning, but not recently.

      I agree that the above examples are stupid, but I am generally in favor of the allergy warnings. One of my kids was allergic to all dairy products for a while (he grew out of it, which is common), and it saved me from having to read every ingredient, and also having to remember some oddball ingredients that happen to be dairy.

      Pop Quiz:
      Which of the following ingredients are definitely or likely dairy, and which are not dairy?

      • Lecithin Oleoresin
      • Ammonium Caseinate
      • Milk Thistle
      • Whey Protein Hydrolysate
      • Recaldent
      • Glucono Delta-Lactone
      • Calcium Propionate
      • Margarine
      • Cocoa Butter
      • Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein
      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  2. Yay, we can stop this pernicious danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But if it's guns, well, we can't even suggest that background checks should be implemented or the NRA will unleash a titanic fury of political money to get what they want.

    1. Re:Yay, we can stop this pernicious danger! by Z34107 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Relax. We're laughing that "think of the children" claimed your toys, too.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    2. Re:Yay, we can stop this pernicious danger! by KGIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I was younger we would take the lawn darts out back into the yard at night. We'd throw them straight up and then run around underneath them hoping that we'd not die. Amazingly, nobody died or was ever hurt from that game and I'm not sure how we managed to be that stupid and that lucky. Either way we were really stupid but we had a lot of fun. They need to bring Jarts back and they need to specifically prohibit me and my childhood friends from playing with them. Again, we were really lucky and really stupid. We all survived to adulthood - most of us are quite successful today.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Yay, we can stop this pernicious danger! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Actually you got your wish. Jarts are banned.

      "Lawn Darts Are Banned and Should Be Destroyed". U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. 1997-05-15. Retrieved 2011-01-25. "Pointed lawn darts, intended for use in an outdoor game, have been responsible for the deaths of three children. The most recent injury occurred last week in Elkhart, Ind., when a 7-year-old boy suffered a brain injury after a lawn dart pierced his skull."

    4. Re:Yay, we can stop this pernicious danger! by frisket · · Score: 2

      In fact, it's just as fucking stupid as current gun laws: any imbecile can obtain a gun and ammo and kill anyone they like.

  3. ffs by maliqua · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it the governments job to parent. keep an eye on kids, teenagers? lol teenagers if they eat them that's natural selection

  4. death to children and teenagers. by Osgeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    children, maybe teenagers?

    come on thats not saftey that Darwin, if your teenager is eating magnets then wtf are they going to do with a car, or the right to vote OMFG

    1. Re: death to children and teenagers. by White+Flame · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The situation that I heard about was teenagers (presumably at the lower end of that age range) accidentally ingesting them from putting them on their lips, tongue or teeth in trying to simulate piercings & jewelry.

      It's still absolutely retarded that the CPSC is so bent on banning these things. I think the extent of their influence is getting them off retail store shelves, not outlawing their sale completely.

      "At least" they've only gone after Buckyballs, not the other manufacturers. I bought mine from NeoCube, as they're by far the cheapest for their large combo set. Buckyballs are expensive. As NeoCube and others (like Zen Magnets) generally only sell online, I'm not sure if they're in the CPSC's reach.

    2. Re: death to children and teenagers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, ignorant liberals who use words like Murricans - don't understand that the government's job is to take any role granted to it by its citizens and then do it in the most ludicrously inefficient and inept way possible. Big Government doesn't work, not in a country of real scale in terms of population, resources, and economy. It doesn't matter what political flavor that government is.

      This really is a basic engineering problem, not a political one. Think scaling servers for a large online service, or scaling human effort on a large coding project like the Linux kernel, if you have no background in the history of world governments (or at least, any real insight into how moderns ones are doing) to draw similar lessons from.

      On the small scale, centralized planning and execution can work. 50 people can start a commune, elect one really smart guy as Supreme Leader, let him dictate everything, and if he's benevolent it probably works out pretty well. He can plan what crops they grow and how food is shared, how work responsibilities are doled out, what behaviors are taboo, etc. He's a one-man government. This is basically how most small businesses operate: one or a few at the helm that kinda know what they're doing, centrally controlling a small array of complex bits. Or to jump over to other analogies again: a small but reasonably successful niche open source product, or a small website that has 10 visitors a day and is hoted on some crappy shared webhost service in a single VM.

      Consider the other end of the spectrum: A country of the scale of the US, or Russia, or China (or really any of the next tier down in size either...), the Linux kernel project, a behemoth corporation like GE, a website like Wikipedia. Can you imagine what it would be like for one person to centrally plan the minutiae of any of these entities (or in the case of Wikipedia: having one server directly involved in coordinating all traffic and edits in realtime, instead of a distributed and scalable approach).

      It can't happen: thing naturally become hierarchical and/or distributed, because anything else is crazy. Hierarchical only scales so far, but makes more intuitive sense to puny humans that are merely a few hundred years past the "Hey, we need to take baths regularly?" stage of societal evolution. So big governments and big corporations tend to be hierarchical. It's better than nothing, but it still doesn't scale that great. It's like moving from linear scaling to n/4 scaling or something.

      Wikipedia knows how to scale servers: be distributed to the extent possible, avoid centralized contention points in the architecture. The Linux kernel project knows how to scale human effort in much the same way. GE doesn't really get "distributed human effort", they're still hierarchical. But: they're a hierarchical organization that, amongst a pool of millions of other competitors, *evolved* to be one of the best competitors ever. It's been honed for decades by market forces, and it's probably about as efficient as a behemoth hierarchical corporation can get. The US government (or any other large-scale government, of any political "type")? No real market force action: You get a little of it from geo-politics, but the pool's too small and things move too slow. Even bigger scale. The self-righteous mandate mentality that they are the law. I dare you to find any common task that both the US government and a corporation do, where the government does it more efficiently.

    3. Re: death to children and teenagers. by deimtee · · Score: 4, Informative

      "At least" they've only gone after Buckyballs, not the other manufacturers. I bought mine from NeoCube, as they're by far the cheapest for their large combo set. Buckyballs are expensive. As NeoCube and others (like Zen Magnets) generally only sell online, I'm not sure if they're in the CPSC's reach.

      There's a banner on Neocube's website now that says :
      THESE PRODUCTS ARE NOT FOR CHILDREN UNDER 14!! Please Read All Warnings
      NOT FOR SALE INSIDE THE U.S.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    4. Re: death to children and teenagers. by jbengt · · Score: 2

      There's a very long list of warnings on that site, including how the magnets can fry your electronics, and how you should never put any in a body orifice (are those stupid enough to die from small magnets smart enough to know what an orifice is?)
      The best warning is "This product contains small balls.".

    5. Re: death to children and teenagers. by frisket · · Score: 2

      ...common sense went out the window with this generation of uber-morons.

      No, common-sense went out the window with this (and the previous) generation of judges. You know, the ones who award millions in damages for trivial foolishness that the subject was too stupid to avoid, and deny proper damages in cases of genuine suffering because some company paid them to look the other way.

    6. Re: death to children and teenagers. by Osgeld · · Score: 2

      oh I knew in the back of my head there was going to be a bleeding heart that took "teenagers" as in all teenagers and narrow it down to their specific range of teenagers

      yes all teenagers in the world are affected by autism, Down syndrome, Ceberal Palsey, Rett syndrome, and Martin Bell syndrome at the same time, therefore we should ban these dangerous magnets, while we are at it forks

      jesus

  5. Re:Thanks for the warning, Ill go buy some right a by rusty0101 · · Score: 2

    Dude! Be careful with those parenting skills. Parents have been being arrested and their local police departments are trying to get their children taken away from them for doing such dangerous things to children as teaching them to be responsible, and letting them demonstrate those skills. It's a dangerous world out there for parents these days.

    --
    You never know...
  6. Incredibly stupid by Zaldarr · · Score: 5, Informative

    There was a big hoo-ha in Australia about 6mo ago where a 12 year old kid swallowed a bunch of them that were sitting on a high shelf in his father's locked study. So the kid, who is 12 and should have known better, went into his fathers office, climbed up the shelf, pulled down metal balls and proceeded to eat them. The mother went on to campaign for them to be pulled from Australian stores, which they were 4 months later.

    Now the infuriating thing about this is that because of one *incredibly* stupid kid everybody doesn't get some awesome toys. My 26 year old brother in law is pretty annoyed because he spends a lot of his free time tinkering with big blocks of them and now he can't get anymore. These are not children's toys and it is foolish to ban them entirely because some dumbass kid was stupid. By that logic you'd have to ban every adult product on the logic that it was not safe for children

    --
    I write professional videogame reviews! http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/
    1. Re:Incredibly stupid by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2

      Yeah, just like fireworks!

      ... Oh wait.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:Incredibly stupid by grumbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So the kid, who is 12 and should have known better, went into his fathers office, climbed up the shelf, pulled down metal balls and proceeded to eat them.

      The kid didn't just ate them for the fun of it, it swallowed them accidentally while pretending to have a pierced tongue. You might still call that stupid, but that's well in the realm of normal child stupidity (I for one prefer to call that creativity).

      These are not children's toys

      It's looks like a toy, it plays like a toy and is fun like a toy. The very problem with them is that it is not obvious how dangerous those things can be.

    3. Re:Incredibly stupid by lordofthechia · · Score: 2

      because of one *incredibly* stupid kid everybody doesn't get some awesome toys

      Never has been more relevant

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  7. A growing problem by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    The risk for teenagers comes from attempts to use magnets to simulate piercings.

    See "Magnet Ingestions in Children Presenting to United States Emergency Departments from 2002 to 2011." "A national estimate of 16,386 (95% CI: 12,175-20,598) children The incidence of visits increased 8.5-fold (0.45 per 100,000 to 3.75 per 100,000) from 2002 to 2011 with a 75% average annual increase per year. The majority of patients reported to have ingested magnets were under 5 years (54.7%). From 2009-2011 there was an increase in older children ingesting multiple small and/or round magnets, with a mean average age of 7.1+-0.56 years over the study period. "

    1. Re:A growing problem by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Smoking is a problem. Motor vehicle accidents are a problem. Guns related deaths (some say it isn't) are a problem.

      A product that has sold 2.2million sets resulting in 33 surgical procedures and 1 death since 2010 is NOT a problem.

    2. Re:A growing problem by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Could you please supply the exact number of children's deaths over a 3 year period that you believe would justify banning the product. Thanks.

    3. Re:A growing problem by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Could you please supply the exact number of children's deaths over a 3 year period that you believe would justify banning the product. Thanks.

      For perspective, on average 25 kids die every year from plastic bags. On average, 350,000 kids require emergency room care and 200 kids die every year from bicycle accidents, and that's a toy designed for use by kids. I can't give you an exact number, but it should certainly be several orders of magnitude greater than the number of kids injured or killed by Buckyballs.

      Either that or ban all bicycles and plastic bags, including garbage bags.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:A growing problem by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. But it's damn well higher than one. As a quick guide think of the things we as a society take for granted and then consider how many people get killed by it each year.

      But then it's not a case of absolutes either. The primary purpose of buckyballs is not to be eaten. As such a child related death due to ingestion is simple bad supervision by parents. Accidental deaths are attributed to all manner of products used improperly. A teenager got killed opening a computer powersupply, does that mean we should ban all computers? On the other hand a safety device like a seatbelt pretensioner failing and causing one death over a three year period is cause for alarm as the device failed to perform it's primary purpose.

  8. Wait, just so I understand. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I may not buy magnets because some parents are stupid enough to give high power magnets to kids?

    That's messing with nature, weeding out those too stupid to breed and take care of their offspring. Sorry, but if you're stupid enough to think extra powerful magnets are something that belongs in your kids hands, your genes should go down the tubes.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Wait, just so I understand. by itsdapead · · Score: 2

      I may not buy magnets because some parents are stupid enough to give high power magnets to kids?

      RTFA. The recall is for a particular type of magnetic toy, not "high power magnets" per se. Its one thing to sell potentially dangerous items - its another thing to package them as toys*.

      Also - as someone has pointed out elsewhere - there is a particular problem with older kids using these to make fake tongue piercings - so its not just parents giving them to babies and toddlers who will swallow anything.

      Plus - this threat isn't immediately obvious. There have been magnetic toys since the year dot - but not ones that were (a) small enough to swallow and (b) still powerful enough to clamp your intestines together.

      Remember that when idiots scramble their intestines, the cost of fixing the mess will still make its way through to your tax and/or medical insurance bill.

      * I remember a 1930s book of science experiments for kids that included such gems as making a carbon arc torch from the graphite rods out of batteries using - wait for it - a variable resistor made from two stones in a dish of salty water to cut 110V mains down to 50V**. What could possibly go wrong? They did tell you to wear sunglasses.

      **Not only did they skip Health and Safety assessments in those days, I suspect they skipped the "will it actually work?" assessments, too.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    2. Re:Wait, just so I understand. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of my chemistry book. I guess quoting the more interesting parts might already be illegal itself in this time and age, but allow me to quote this gem: "If the mixture turns pink, an explosion cannot be avoided".

      Period. Next chapter.

      Really lovely.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:Goodbye Buckyballs by luckymutt · · Score: 2

    Way to stick it to the man!? Now where do we get awesome magnets... - HEX

    Right here

  10. Warning by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

    In news tonight the CPSC have called for more warning labels on things that could potentially in rare cases cause death or hospitalisation. This follows the single reported death due to ingestion of bucky balls, a popular product designed exclusively to kill babies. One Californian senator however says the CPSC is dragging its feet and has a long way to go to protect Americans. He has repeatedly criticized the CPSC over its lack of interest and regulation of gun sales urging both the department and retailers to place signs on all ammunition saying "Warning: May contain lead".

  11. Over my dead body by TheReaperD · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can have my BuckyBalls when you pry them from my cold dead fingers!

    --
    "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    1. Re:Over my dead body by cffrost · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can take my Buckballs when you dig them out of my cold, rotting intestines. ;o)

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  12. In releted news ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... CERN's LHC will be decommissioned due to fears that scientists might swallow the accelerator magnets.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  13. Re:BB guns by Bengie · · Score: 2

    all he wanted to do was stop his sister from being harassed by that kid.

    That escalated quickly. Well, it worked, but many times I wonder if these kids are so stupid to not realize what they're doing, or fully understand that they will be ending someone's life. Either way, they should be removed from society forever because something if fundamentally wrong with them.

  14. SC is working on a Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    South Carolina has introduced state legislation that would make possession or sale of spherical magnets smaller than 1 inch in diameter a Class C Felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison, and limits the sale or possession of ALL magnets that are "just magnets" to industrial and commercial use only. For residential use, under the new legislation, all magnets must be part of an assembly that cannot be ingested, and the magnets cannot be removable from the product.

    Idiocracy. For the children.

    1. Re:SC is working on a Law by BLKMGK · · Score: 2

      I call bullshit - citation or it didn't happen. Troll is obvious.

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  15. It's really a gauss rifle ammo ban. by lexsird · · Score: 2

    Look, you can't have people with unsupervised mass accelerators that can fire a bucky ball through the moon, just out firing willynilly about the landscape. It's down right rude, man! Think about it! Nor can you expound upon the issue in public, lest you arouse the leviathan of curiosity, "gauss rifle...wtf is that?" And there we are, with yet another 2nd Amendment crisis on our hands. By the way, I think bullets are a choking hazard as well.

    There are some people who are dangerous with a sharp stick in their hand, right? Qualifications is all I'm saying.

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
  16. Labelling by VirginMary · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I was living in the US, I enjoyed showing my German friends labels from water bottles that listed 0% fat, with the comment: "Look, they sell fat-free water in the US, quite unlike all the fatty water that is being sold in Germany!" ;-)

    --
    When 1person suffers from a delusion,it is called insanity.When many people suffer from a delusion,it is called religion
  17. 54 victims in how many years? by gweihir · · Score: 2

    And only 53 of them required "medical intervention". This is an absolute non-risk. Only credible explanation for this "alert": Some bureaucrats want more importance and are willing to create a lot of fear to get it. That is terrorism at its best. Sadly, these despicable cretins will get away with it as being afraid is now so deeply ingrained in US culture that people probably would not feel right without it.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  18. Re:yes your the retards by KGIII · · Score: 2

    And this, folks, is what happens when you're struck in the head with a lawn dart.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."