Slashdot Mirror


Australian Bureau of Statistics Doesn't Like Direct Downloads of Census Data

Bismillah writes "The ABS has released the census data for the country under a Creative Commons license, but instead of making it easy to get, they've put in Javascript to obfuscate file paths and more. All commented in the source code of course." At first glance, it's an attempt to get people to pay $250 for a DVD with the data instead.

136 comments

  1. Bit torrent by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like an excellent use for Bit Torrent? I assume someone will download the whole dataset and make a torrent out of it before long....

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For once, I read the article!

      For those who don't wish to tangle with obfuscating Javascript or pay hefty charges for DVDs, Bowland has made the census data available for download via Bittorrent on his website. - http://blog.angrygoats.net/2013/04/12/2011-australian-census-release-3/

    2. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA includes .torrent file to download the entire dataset.

    3. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As an American, trust me: nobody cares about 95+% of the America-related news reported here, either. To the extent that this particular story is interesting at all (ie, not much), the noteworthy aspect is the attempt to obfuscate accessibility to free data by following the letter of the law and using technology to dissuade people from (rightfully) taking advantage.

    4. Re:Bit torrent by gagol · · Score: 2

      Must be time for another crocodile dundee movie.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    5. Re:Bit torrent by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Careful there, we still remember what happened to the last guy who tried to make public data public...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Bit torrent by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ha, I won't visit sites with goat in the name. Fool me once...

    7. Re:Bit torrent by Bifurcati · · Score: 1
      Well, d'oh ;)

      But it's actually legit - you can follow the link from the OP to get there as well.

    8. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, so true. (Posting anonymously because I'm a crypto-Aussie)

    9. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Paul Hogan's "financial adviser" (offshore "tax minimiser") ran off with his fortune recently.

    10. Re:Bit torrent by cheater512 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually the census data has a whole pile of interesting nuggets in it.
      I do have portions of it right now.

      I didn't notice all the javascript however and thought the download process was straight forward.
      Kudos to the ABS for using Creative Commons.

    11. Re: Bit torrent by jxander · · Score: 1

      Better yet, sounds like a perfect opportunity for the government to learn BitTorrent.

      It's already available for free, and released under CC ... Just seed it yourselves and call it good.

      --
      This signature is false.
    12. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whoooooooooosh!

    13. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't RTFA. "For those who don't wish to tangle with obfuscating Javascript or pay hefty charges for DVDs, Bowland has made the census data available for download via Bittorrent on his website"
      The link to his site is in that sentence. If you want it, RTFA.

    14. Re: Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It may very well be the case that they don't have the right to release it under such a restrictive license as CC, in all seriousness law probably mandates putting it in the Public Domain.

    15. Re:Bit torrent by purpledinoz · · Score: 2

      I'm glad I'm not the only one with this fear.

    16. Re:Bit torrent by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Maybe you can shed some light onto this, I still don't get what crime he actually committed.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:Bit torrent by deimtee · · Score: 2

      Paul Hogan's "financial adviser" (offshore "tax minimiser") ran off with his fortune recently.

      Fair dinkum? Strewth, I bet he's madder 'n a mallee bull.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    18. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTA: "For those who don't wish to tangle with obfuscating Javascript or pay hefty charges for DVDs, Bowland has made the census data available for download via Bittorrent on his website."

      Thank you mr. Bowland.

    19. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He annoyed those in power when he made the PACER documents available for free.

    20. Re: Bit torrent by hawkinspeter · · Score: 2

      Huh? It is released under the Creative Commons license.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    21. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an excellent use for Bit Torrent? I assume someone will download the whole dataset and make a torrent out of it before long....

      Did you even read the article?

    22. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait what, I thought it was some silly case of using a robot on a university network, violating a EULA, with the presumed intent to publish research that might have been related to science, or maybe a few 'quiet' department of energy projects.

    23. Re:Bit torrent by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      "The ABS is constantly looking at ways it can simplify the website and enhance the user experience,"

      While at the same time telling their actual developers to make it more difficult;

      ... generate a random number, which we append to the URL, to make it appear as if a complex key is required. This is a pathetic attempt to discourage someone from downloading the ZIPs directly (ie. without having to login), if they deduce the URL pattern.

      The ironing is delicious.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    24. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Prosecutors in Australia are just public servants. Although we have just as stupid laws (often because the US government "lobbies" for "consistency"), the prosecutors on the whole are actually quite sensible. Yes, there are cases where an over-zealous prosecutor has harassed someone but, (1) these are the exception and not the rule, and (2) the DPP institutions tend to have functional governance structures which identify and correct such misbehavior.

      Indeed, one notable Australian prosecutor, Nick Cowdery QC, who ran the NSW Department of Public Prosecutions from 1994 to 2011, even wrote a book called "Getting Justice Wrong: myths, media and crime" arguing at the appalling outcomes which follow politicization of the public prosecutor's role. The US DoJ should take a read: it's available on Amazon.

    25. Re:Bit torrent by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Yes, the "crime" of making public data public...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    26. Re:Bit torrent by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      It's lame that the ABS doesn't seed a torrent itself though. It'd make a great poster case for the long-term benefits of the NBN (and it's higher upload speeds) for the government.

    27. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur

    28. Re:Bit torrent by kakaburra · · Score: 1

      I assume someone will download the whole dataset and make a torrent out of it before long

      If you RTFA, the guy who actually discovered it torrented the dataset.

    29. Re: Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Havent you heard australia is the new america!

    30. Re: Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In commonwealth countries copyrights on materials created or compiled by government agencies or employees are typically held by the crown rather than being in the public domain as is the case in the US.

    31. Re: Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Aussies, but in the US, all state created works are public domain. This is why NASA satalite photos are all in the public domain.

      That doesn't prevent the government from classifying them, but at least they can only get you for aiding the enemy instead of hitting you with the much worse copyright infringement.

    32. Re:Bit torrent by houghi · · Score: 2

      You don't have to commit a crime to be convicted.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    33. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesnt Australia have a China style national firewall to block porn and politics?

    34. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fairly certain that Bifurcati's "Well, d'oh ;)" negates any whooshes.

    35. Re:Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got bored and wrote this to screw with them.

      Works by using their own code and tweaking it slightly.

      Instructions: visit the page, then pop this in your address bar

      javascript:(function($){eval(‘window.linkZip = function’ + window.getZip.toString().substr(15, 552) + ‘$(“body”).append(“Download ” + fileName + ““);}’);$(‘td span’).find(‘.S,.L,.Q’).each(function(){window.linkZip(constructFilenameForZip($(this)))})})(jQuery)

    36. Re:Bit torrent by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, but the person I answered to said he committed one. So I wanted to know which one.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    37. Re:Bit torrent by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And what part thereof even borders on touching criminal code that could possibly land someone in jail? I am not aware of a single bit in civil code that end up in possible jail time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    38. Re: Bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    39. Re: Bit torrent by Meski · · Score: 1

      Moderate as ironic.

    40. Re:Bit torrent by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      "Call that a tax fraud?"

      [Pulls out sheaf of papers]

      "THIS is a tax fraud!"

      Not one of the best movies ever, but one of the better movie moments ever.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Link to torrent by sdreader · · Score: 5, Informative

    Link to the torrent of the census data from the article:
    http://blog.angrygoats.net/2013/04/12/2011-australian-census-release-3/

    Since the data is available for free (obfuscated or not) and was released under a CC license, technically this should all be considered legal, right? Not that it should be necessary of course.

    --
    Apparently being anti-Steam is grounds for insults, even if there's basis. I shall learn to keep my mouth shut.
    1. Re:Link to torrent by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Link to the torrent of the census data from the article:
      http://blog.angrygoats.net/2013/04/12/2011-australian-census-release-3/

      Since the data is available for free (obfuscated or not) and was released under a CC license, technically this should all be considered legal, right? Not that it should be necessary of course.

      The obfuscation is probably because hosting and bandwidth are not cheap in Oz and some inventive public servant (stop snickering, they do exist, there aren't many of them but they do exist) came up with a way to reduce the bandwidth bill. With the current emphasis on public service spending and impending election, this wouldn't surprise me.

      Either that or some hopeless public servant coder has no idea what they've done.

      Could be either case really, I've seen both.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Link to torrent by countach · · Score: 1

      There may be inventive public servants, but I highly doubt they are inventive enough to make a stupid obfuscated download system just so that some guy would bittorrrent it, and thereby save the government a small amount of money on bandwidth. I mean really.

    3. Re:Link to torrent by mjwx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There may be inventive public servants, but I highly doubt they are inventive enough to make a stupid obfuscated download system just so that some guy would bittorrrent it, and thereby save the government a small amount of money on bandwidth. I mean really.

      You've never worked in the APS have you. The fewer people you have to serve, the better your balance sheet looks. If someone else can do it, why not.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Link to torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      especially since it would be a whole lot easier to just put up a torrent yourself.

    5. Re:Link to torrent by GerryHattrick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Usual reason for doing this with official data is to avoid sensation-seekers 'hotlinking' to specific data without noting the disclaimers, statistical cautions, changes of basis etc. which moderate any interpretation.

    6. Re:Link to torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      some hopeless public servant coder has no idea what they've done.

      Hopeless? No idea? Put yourself in their shoes. Here you've got some CC licensed data. Manager tells you he wants to dissuade people from downloading it, charging 250 pop for the data on DVD instead. You just *know* that this is a waste of time, because the first getting the DVD is gonna be disgruntled and will legally put the stuff on bittorrent anyway. So technically, you're just wasting everyones time: Yours, your managers, and the downloaders'.

      What do you do to take revenge, without looking unprofessional? That's right... you comment the hell out of your code, making sure not to mention you think it's a stupid idea.

    7. Re:Link to torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're unlikely to care about someone making a bittorent. They probably do care about companies that constantly web scrape their site.

    8. Re:Link to torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they just put the ISO for the DVD up, you would have the same disclaimers you get with the dvd

    9. Re:Link to torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what bandwith limits are for. No need for obfuscation, just make sure the census data only gets a small fraction of the bandwith they have. If many tries to download, their census downloads slow down. But not the rest of the site!

    10. Re:Link to torrent by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There may be a usual reason to ensure disclaimers, etc are read, but javascript is definitely not the way to go. You can very easily require a specific http referrer URL by configuring Apache to require it for a file or directory. Or you can simply have a plain old README or LICENSE file included in the tarball. Javascript just hurts usability and makes things over complicated and broken.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  3. Re:Criminals and retarded monkeys by Noir+Angellus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... descended from criminals and retarded monkeys.

    No, we're not all descended from the English let alone Americans.

  4. Torrenting by Artea · · Score: 1

    I saw the title text and thought the census data was being provided through bittorrent. A few games including the popular World of Warcraft distribute their updates through the protocol, seeing it adopted in other areas to reduce the bandwidth costs seems like a good idea.

  5. Licensing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't something the the Open Database license make more sense? I mean, census data isn't exactly a creative work. OpenStreetMap made the change when they realised something similar about map data.

    1. Re:Licensing by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      And if I remember rightly, that change didn't go down too well in Australia.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

  6. Excellence in Government by edibobb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that is really funny! They declare the data free and then make an inept attempt to force people to pay for it. It's almost as bad as copyrighting public laws.

    1. Re:Excellence in Government by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Funny, isn't it? Laws are the only thing corporations invest a lot of money in that they don't try to copyright or patent.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Excellence in Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's almost as bad as copyrighting public laws.

      I'm not sure if you're joking here but the Australian government actually DOES copyright legal documents. For example to comply with telephone wiring regulations requires access to a document released by "Standards Australia" which costs about $200 last I checked. I don't doubt that the document was developed using public funds. I'm sure this shit happens a lot more than people realise.

    3. Re:Excellence in Government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make an inept attempt to force people to pay for it

      In the US, if data is copyrighted, it's illegal to circumvent any copy protections on it. By extension, if data is to be released under a free license, it would only be fair if it were illegal for those responsible of the data to try to prevent copying it.

  7. Damn Streisand Effect by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks a lot Slashdot. Now I have a sudden urge to know precisely how many married couples with the husbands between the ages of 30 and 32 inclusive have children in Queensland, and what the genders of and ages of the children are.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Damn Streisand Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like an awesome way to plan for a vacation, did they happen to get statistics on large breasted blondes?

  8. If you're wondering why the data are licensed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember that in many countries works of the national government are not automatically in the public domain like they are in the US. In Commonwealth realms this is called Crown Copyright.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_copyright/

  9. What would Aaron Swartz do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this data already paid for with people's dime?

    1. Re:What would Aaron Swartz do? by gagol · · Score: 2

      This is the idiot tax. By taking wealth from people unable to think, we restrict their ability to feed children and slow down the epidemic. Brilliant!

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  10. Dataz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your dataz, you can't hide them.

  11. You Know What They're Up To? by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This follows on my "best method to get tech support from a computer person." You don't ask "How do you...?" You assert, loudly, within hearing range of the computer person "This is the absolute beset way to do it!" and provide a woefully incorrect method of getting to the result you're trying to achieve. One of these methods will have the computer person falling over himself to help you. Guess which one. Have I mentioned that I'm Evil lately?

    Anyway, they're pulling the same thing here. They want someone to gather up their data and present it in a nice package for free. The best way to do that is to drop an ineptly-presented steaming pile of crap on the internets. There'll probably be 15 open source projects to slice and dice it on github by the weekend, and it didn't cost the Australian government a dime! It's brilliant!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:You Know What They're Up To? by martas · · Score: 2

      Yes, because it takes a lot of technical know-how to create a zip file and making it available as a torrent... /s

    2. Re:You Know What They're Up To? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      Damn, I would've never thought of that. I gotta keep this in mind, knowing how to manipulate people is an exceedingly useful skill.

    3. Re:You Know What They're Up To? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the absolute best way of manipulating people!

    4. Re:You Know What They're Up To? by TheMathemagician · · Score: 1

      An alternative is to sadly declare that some simple task you're experiencing resistance over simply cannot be done.

    5. Re: You Know What They're Up To? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No...here let me show you...

    6. Re:You Know What They're Up To? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "computer person"? You must mean an android, right?

    7. Re:You Know What They're Up To? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Of course! Androids hate that shit. Man, this one time I was talking to a T1000 and told it the absolute best way to kill Sarah Conner was to make it look like an autoerotic asphyxiation accident. Oh it got ALL pissed off! It was like "Nuh uh! Here! Watch this!"...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  12. Obfuscation of Creative Commons data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only effective as long as there exists nobody who is interested in the data, able to crack the obfuscation, and willing to distribute it.

    (... and willing to overlook that Aaron Schwartz died for something quite similar, I suppose.)

  13. It's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Magnet link for the lazy:

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:EE2DEAA27287952089AE257EC8B009E382598239&dn=2011%20Datapacks%20BCP_IP_TSP_PEP_ECP_WPP_Release%203.tar.xz&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.publicbt.com%3a80%2fannounce&tr=udp%3a%2f%2ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3a80%2fannounce

    or
    http://mgnet.me/DTyE

    or torrent: http://grond.angrygoats.net/torrent/2011%20Datapacks%20BCP_IP_TSP_PEP_ECP_WPP_Release%203.tar.xz.torrent

  14. Crazy like a fox by davidwr · · Score: 1

    No, Br'er Rabbit, don't tell the world we are hiding our data, they might get copies and make sure the whole world has access to it, no, don't do that Br'er Rabbit.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  15. Re:If you're wondering why the data are licensed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, no, you're right, the US government is always transparent and forthcoming with information

    (yes it was sarcasm)

  16. Do not attribute by charlism · · Score: 2

    to conspiracy that which can be explained by incompetence. The real goal could of had nothing to do with "hiding" the data.

    1. Re:Do not attribute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost reminds me of how I go to sears.ca instead of sears.com for various appliance manuals. The Canadian version of the site lets me download a .pdf for free as fast as my internet connection allows, as where the U.S. site wants me to buy a printed booklet for $20 and wait a week for it to arrive in the mail.

      But at least with a company like Sears there's definitely a greed-driven profit motive by somebody in management, as where a government shouldn't have that problem - that's what tax money is for.

  17. Crikey! by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Crikey, they're a bunch of naughty little critters for doing that!

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  18. Re:Criminals and retarded monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Flight of the Conchords" aren't funny in the slightest. I never understood how they got so popular in the US.

  19. Re:Government is here to help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice theory, until they threaten you with fines and jail time. (You're legally required to fill out census forms, truthfully even.) And then the fuckers have the hide charge money for your data that you had to supply to them for free.

  20. Spokesperson said there was room for improvement by scdeimos · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    "The ABS is constantly looking at ways it can simplify the website and enhance the user experience," iTnews was told via email.

    Stop hosting it on Lotus Domino servers and you won't have to worry about how many people download the damned data.

  21. No copyright on facts by kawabago · · Score: 1

    What is the point of putting a creative commons license on data that is not copyrightable. Anyone can take the data and do anything they want with it and there is nothing anyone can do about it. If it were otherwise, no one would be able to broadcast the temperature without permission from the weather office. How well would that system work?

    1. Re:No copyright on facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which Australian laws can you cite to show this?

    2. Re:No copyright on facts by FireFury03 · · Score: 2

      What is the point of putting a creative commons license on data that is not copyrightable. Anyone can take the data and do anything they want with it and there is nothing anyone can do about it. If it were otherwise, no one would be able to broadcast the temperature without permission from the weather office. How well would that system work?

      You can't copyright facts, but there are copyright-style laws covering a collection of facts organised into a database. That said, creative commons probably isn't the right licence for the same reason it wasn't the right licence for open street map (who have now migrated to a different permissive licence designed for databases of facts).

    3. Re:No copyright on facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Creative Commons is in fact a copyright licence and has restrictions. Public Domain would have been better.

    4. Re:No copyright on facts by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      What is the point of putting a creative commons license on data that is not copyrightable.

      You can't copyright facts, but there are copyright-style laws covering a collection of facts organised into a database.

      Or everybody could just understand that US copyright law does not apply world-wide and that, in many more countries than not, facts and collations of facts are often copyrightable.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  22. Re:s/months/decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, he was facing over 50 years in prison.

  23. Re:Spokesperson said there was room for improvemen by c0lo · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    "The ABS is constantly looking at ways it can simplify the website and enhance the user experience," iTnews was told via email.

    Stop hosting it on Lotus Domino servers and you won't have to worry about how many people download the damned data.

    U crazy? After millions paid for the Lotus servers and zillions in staff training (or... was it train stuffing? in the context, the results would be the same), you want the IT dept head to... well, lose her/his head?

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  24. I can see the conversation that happened.. by gregmac · · Score: 2

    From the code:

    // Also, generate a random number, which we append to the URL, to make it appear as if a complex
    //key is required. This is a pathetic attempt to discourage someone from downloading the ZIPs
    //directly (ie. without having to login), if they deduce the URL pattern.

    Translation:

    Coder: "Here's the census web application."
    PHB: "Great. But wait..I can just type in these other names and download them really easily! People will hack us and we'll be out possibly a COUPLE THOUSAND DOLLARS! "
    Coder: "It is Creative Commons data, so of course we added no protection. Changing that now will be a massive rewrite and take months."
    PHB: "So let's add some random numbers to the end so it looks really complex and people can't guess how to get in."
    Coder: "But they still will eventually see the links because they do actually have to download it, so this is not really doing anything."
    PHB: "Psh, no one is smart enough to figure that out. I read about this GUID things and they're really hard to guess. It will work. This is your job today."
    Coder "..Ok, fine. I'll do it exactly the way you asked."

    --
    Speak before you think
    1. Re:I can see the conversation that happened.. by robot5x · · Score: 2

      ya the code snippet provided in parent post indicates to me that this was something forced upon a level-headed coder by some moronic middle manager.

      --
      Hej! Nasi tu byli!
    2. Re:I can see the conversation that happened.. by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Coder: (And then I'll put it in the comments so that everyone can see what idiots we are)

      Yeah, nice try. But the coder actually thinks he's being really clever and doesn't realize all his Javascript comments are available for the world to read because he's actually an idiot (but he's a coder working for a government institution, so that's pretty much a given). No conspiracy here. They probably don't even realize what it means that it's under a CC license.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:I can see the conversation that happened.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He thinks his code is clever? Then why did he call it "pathetic"?

    4. Re:I can see the conversation that happened.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're the idiot.
      Any js'er that is smart enough to write useful comments knows their javascript is visible to everyone.

    5. Re:I can see the conversation that happened.. by tqk · · Score: 1

      But the coder actually thinks he's being really clever and doesn't realize all his Javascript comments are available for the world to read ...

      More likely he knows exactly what he's doing, meaning he's telling all the world what a blithering moron of a manager told him to do today. There are times when diplomacy is contra-indicated and the potential downside (blithering moron manager finding out about it) is very small. I'd say blithering moron manager painted himself into this corner.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:I can see the conversation that happened.. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Hey, PRMan, allow me to introduce you to my friend Passive A. G. Gressive.

      The actual thought process behind the comments would have been more like:

      Coder: (And then I'll put it in the comments so that everyone can see what idiots my bosses are)

      I have news for you: The geek community laboring in bondage to governmental PHBs lives for the opportunity to secretly sabotage their masters' moronic agendas while looking like the perfect collaborationist stooges to everyone who can't read code. A nerd underground, if you will.

      Long live the geek resistance!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:I can see the conversation that happened.. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      that this was something forced upon a level-headed coder by some moronic middle manager.

      That describes 99.5% of all software written since the time of Noah.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  25. use wget and spidermonkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easiest way to get the javascript obfuscated data is to write a simple perl script using wget plus spidermonkey to run the javascript. News Ltd used to try the same thing with their online tv guide, but it was trivial to circumvent.

    I don't understand why certain organizations want to publish their data yet not publish it at the same time. They cannot have it both ways. If they publish it then they are allowing everyone to have it.

    1. Re:use wget and spidermonkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why certain organizations want to publish their data yet not publish it at the same time. They cannot have it both ways. If they publish it then they are allowing everyone to have it.

      It's because they don't want to publish the data, but their boss told them to make it available, so they weigh up how difficult they can make it without getting a reprimand and then make it so.

  26. Mirror sites .... by PPH · · Score: 0

    .... in 3... 2... 1...

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  27. Good one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You almost had me, but the phrase "simple Perl script" is a dead giveaway.

    1. Re:Good one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your phrase "dead giveaway" has done exactly the same for you.

  28. Re:Criminals and retarded monkeys by VortexCortex · · Score: 0

    ... descended from criminals and retarded monkeys.

    No, we're not all descended from the English let alone Americans.

    Az cornvicted monktard, am mad you cumpare wif Americalfs or Englushes.

  29. Why on earth did they waste time and money by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Why on earth did they waste time and money obfusticating something that is licensed on the creative commons. All someone has to do is either buy the DVD or reverse engineer the site once and they can put it up on their own website

    1. Re:Why on earth did they waste time and money by TheMathemagician · · Score: 2

      It's because bureaucrats everywhere have a visceral belief that THEY own the data and it should never be released to the public without the maximum of foot-dragging, time-wasting and hoop-jumping.

  30. Re:Criminals and retarded monkeys by lisaparratt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you've answered your own question.

  31. Re:If you're wondering why the data are licensed.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    In Commonwealth realms this is called Crown Copyright.

    Did someone say apply the CC licence and not specify which?

  32. Re:If you're wondering why the data are licensed.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More reason to argue for a republic.

  33. wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow! I found the "hard to find" register page within 15 seconds. I must be some kind of eentelectual sooper-wonder... or portuguese... wait! Yes, portuguese...

    1. Re:wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lets see...
      abs.gov.au
      census
      data an analysis
      data packs
      register

      doesn't seem too hard to me.

  34. Why isn't taxpayer-funded data public domain? by davide+marney · · Score: 1

    I gather this is data being published by a government agency. As all agencies are funded by taxpayers, all records -- with exceptions for security and privacy -- should already be open to the public. Creative Commons seems inappropriate here; the correct notice should be "Public Domain", or is Aussie law different in this respect from US law?

    --
    "We receive as friendly that which agrees with, we resist with dislike that which opposes us" - Faraday
    1. Re:Why isn't taxpayer-funded data public domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gather this is data being published by a government agency. As all agencies are funded by taxpayers, all records -- with exceptions for security and privacy -- should already be open to the public. Creative Commons seems inappropriate here; the correct notice should be "Public Domain", or is Aussie law different in this respect from US law?

      The police service is also taxpayer funded. How do you think it would go over if you told a police officer that you pay their wages, thus you're their boss, and that yes they really should "shove off" when you tell them to.

    2. Re:Why isn't taxpayer-funded data public domain? by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      I gather this is data being published by a government agency. As all agencies are funded by taxpayers, all records -- with exceptions for security and privacy -- should already be open to the public. Creative Commons seems inappropriate here; the correct notice should be "Public Domain", or is Aussie law different in this respect from US law?

      US law is actually the one out of step with the rest of the world - in the vast majority of countries, government records are under some form of copyright, not PD.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  35. Re:Government is here to help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never filled out a census in my life, I hear all kinds of threats of fines and jail time, yet when I laugh and tell them to "fill their boots" nothing happens.

  36. Javascript?? Really?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Javascript? who the f*** still uses that? And is that even considered a layer of security? Whoever is in charge of "security" there should move beyond Windows 98.

  37. Re:Government is here to help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As census collectors we're told to say that. Having done it several times now, the worst part is morons getting on their high horse about it. We don't care what reasons you have for not doing the census, they're probably illogical and tin-foil hat anyway. There is a process we have to go to (to ensure everyone is accounted for as far as humanly possible) and report to our supervisor, so that's what we do. Telling you there is a fine and handing out the related material is part of that process.

    Besides, I fail to see how completing a census implies central planning works. The data is used for more than just that, and by the time any personally identifying information is made public, you will be long dead buried and forgotten.

  38. Re:Government is here to help by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And we all know all forms of central planning always fail at everything. That's why centrally planned, hierarchical organisations like religions, corporations and military forces have never been successful at anything.

  39. TheDailyWTF got first post by greyblack · · Score: 1

    Was certain I had read those comments before. Yep

    --
    Everybody uses broad generalizations.
  40. Re:s/months/decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but white upper middle class techno-geeks really are pussies, so they get scared that easily into believing it's true.

  41. Typical by JamesRing · · Score: 1

    The Australian government is excellent at selling to the public products that the public have paid to produce. In the US (at least in theory) products of the US government are in the public domain and not eligible for copyright. I know, there are tons of things the US government produces that are exempt from this. I know this is a simplistic view, but Australia should not be selling things to people that they have already bought with their tax dollars.

  42. Point of order ... by tqk · · Score: 1

    The real goal could of had nothing to do with "hiding" the data.

    If you could read, you might have seen that phrase spelled "could've", which is a contraction of the phrase "could have". Instead, you heard it spoken out loud and parsed it incorrectly as "could of". What the !@#$ does "could of" even mean?!?

    You're welcome.

    --
    "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  43. Re:Criminals and retarded monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans are significantly more intelligent than most other nationalities.

  44. Re:If you're wondering why the data are licensed.. by Nugoo · · Score: 1

    How is it that census data is creative enough to merit a copyright?

    --
    I explicitly release the above into the public domain.
  45. Re:If you're wondering why the data are licensed.. by suutar · · Score: 1

    same way a phone book is, I guess.

  46. what's the big deal with the licence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/ licence (attribution 2.5 australia).

    You are free:
    to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
    to make derivative works
    to make commercial use of the work

    Under the following conditions:
    Attribution — You must give the original author credit.

    With the understanding that:
    Waiver — Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
    Public Domain — Where the work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
    Other Rights — In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license:
    Your fair dealing or fair use rights, or other applicable copyright exceptions and limitations;
    The author's moral rights;
    Rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, such as publicity or privacy rights.

    Notice — For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the licence terms of this work.

    ie. as long as you say it's ABS data you're peachy

  47. DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a DVD?