Slashdot Mirror


Huge Explosion at Texas Fertilizer Plant

A massive explosion took place around 8:50pm ET at a fertilizer plant in a small town in Texas. The cause of the explosion is not precisely known, but the plant was on fire beforehand. The casualty reports are tentative and expected to rise, but two people are dead and over 150 are injured. Firefighters responding to the initial fire are unaccounted for. Over a thousand residents have been evacuated from their homes. Officials are worried about the volatility of another tank at the plant, but also about the potential damage from exposure to anhydrous ammonia. The blast was heard in Dallas, 75 miles away. "There are lots of houses that are leveled within a two-block radius. A lot of other homes are damaged as well outside that radius." A brief YouTube video shows the explosion of the plant.

67 of 422 comments (clear)

  1. How Tragic by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fertilizer plants are dangerous places. I am surprised that in such a sparsely populated part of Texas the plant wasn't further away from houses.

    1. Re:How Tragic by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think its a bit like Bhopal, where an economy grew up around the plant.

    2. Re:How Tragic by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

      As always it likely would have been at the time. Then as the town expanded the plant would have been suddenly across the road. We've gone through the battles with town planners near a refinery here in Brisbane for the same reason. It's apparently prime land, yeah 500m from a 50t supply of HF acid.

    3. Re:How Tragic by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 2

      The cause of the explosion is not precisely known, but the plant was on fire beforehand.

      Golly, do you think there's a connection?

      "Explosion" can mean many things--from a pile of ammonium nitrate being detonated to failure of a tank or tube in an air compressor.

      There is a world of difference between how you need to deal with an ammonium nitrate explosion ("Everything within a mile is flattened and on fire") vs rupture of an anhydrous ammonia tank ("Evacuate everyone 17 miles downwind".)

    4. Re:How Tragic by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Still, if they have the letters "fluor" in them they must be the same thing, right. Them thar chemmerculs.

      I could tell from the url that it's a nutter site.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:How Tragic by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Contrary to what Hollywood may have led you to believe, things on fire do not normally explode. They normally just produce a lot of smoke and burn down. Seriously, go watch the video... it's a big fire, but it's just burning steadily and in a not-even-remotely explosive way... until from one frame to the next it flashes so bright it washes out nearly the entire light sensor of the camera.

      Yes, obviously the fire is related to the explosion, thank you Captain Obvious. The question is, what about the situation even had the potential for such an incredible explosion? Because that shit is not normal for a fire. What part of "not precisely known" are you having trouble understanding? Also, as Phase Shifter pointed out, knowing exactly what blew up and possibly also knowing why is important for proper response to the incident.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    6. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The question is, what about the situation even had the potential for such an incredible explosion?

      That'd be the fact that the massive fire was in a factory where they make explosive stuff.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:How Tragic by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Fertilizer plants are dangerous places. I am surprised that in such a sparsely populated part of Texas the plant wasn't further away from houses.

      Knowing that the facility produced a product that could be explosive (especially after the Oklahoma City bombing by Tim McVeigh), they could have and indeed should have taken some engineering steps to protect not just workers but also the surrounding town.

      I happen to live somewhat near the ATK facility which used to make the solid rocket boosters for the Space Shuttle and also makes the fuel used in other solid rocket missiles used by the military. It is intentionally put out in the middle of nowhere with all kinds of safety berms and evacuation routes for the workers just in case something goes wrong. There isn't a residential house anywhere within a dozen miles of the main manufacturing building, and the only other non-company structure is a visitor's center for the location of the Trans-continental Railroad (aka the "Golden Spike Monument").

      Instead, this looks like some Mom & Pop company that started on some bootstring budget and couldn't afford to put in those kind of safety features into their plant design. Making fertilizer isn't exactly a high profit business anyway, so the design of the building may have been for practical reasons as well. Still, I hope that a good engineering review of this plant will happen and help with town planners and fire safety codes for buildings of this nature in the future. Safety rules are usually created when people die, and this particular plant looks like it will be a good way to learn some lessons about what not to do. Perhaps these deaths will not be in vain.

    8. Re:How Tragic by Goaway · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the fertilizer is explosive.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonium_nitrate_disasters for examples. In particular, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_Disaster .

    9. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      The factory didn't make explosives, it only made fertilizers.

      They put their output in sacks marked "fertilizer" instead of packing it into little red sticks marked "explosive"?

      Apart from that, there's not much difference. The IRA used sacks of fertilizer quite effectively. All you need is a suitable detonator.

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re: How Tragic by CGordy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ammonium nitrate is initially produced as an aqueous solution, and the water is then boiled off using carefully designed heat exchangers. The problem is that the resulting pure AN liquid will freeze if the temperature drops below ~170C but it decomposes increasing rapidly once the temperature rises above 200C, lower if the pH is too high or sensitising agents such as chlorides (salt) or oils are present. Decomposition can result in detonation when the AN is confined, and it's a significant hazard concern when designing or operating an ammonium nitrate plant or even just a large storage facility.

    11. Re:How Tragic by Ash+Vince · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Still, if they have the letters "fluor" in them they must be the same thing, right. Them thar chemmerculs.

      I could tell from the url that it's a nutter site.

      It's not really a nutter site. They are just against the idea of adding small amounts of fluoride to drinking water just because people can't be arsed to brush their teeth. I kind of have a bit of sympathy for this to be honest even though I personally use fluoride toothpaste (some people don't even do that). I have this strange belief that if I want to let my teeth all go to shit that is my prerogative and the local company who supply me tap water have no business trying to prevent me from doing so.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    12. Re:How Tragic by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it will be ignored. I once reviewed a school in West Virginia and when I was done, I told the owner that his floors were only rated for about 1/2-2/3 of what they should be for a school building. He'd built the thing himself (it was constructed much like a pole barn) and hosted underprivileged city kids for year round programs, teaching them about the outdoors. His response: "We don't have codes in WV, I just need to know that it's safe."

      I told him they had basically the same code as everywhere in the US (the International Building Code), but his county simply chose not to spend any money on enforcement. I also mentioned that if anything happened to the building, he would be held personally liable - as the builder - for violating the state building code. I wished him luck and went on my way. I no longer practice engineering in WV - it's just not worth it, as it's several hundred dollars a year to keep my license up.

      Building codes don't address explosions like this. Even OSHA doesn't really have much way to require safety measures that would save people if an explosion occurred. BATFE isn't involved in fertilizer (afaik), though even in a manufacturing facility BATFE regs won't save people in the process area. These people will have died and their legacy will be nothing.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    13. Re:How Tragic by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      No his using the common comparison for "big" when it comes to explosions.

    14. Re:How Tragic by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      The factory didn't make explosives, it only made fertilizers. It is stuff that like many chemicals can in some situations be explosive, no doubt.

      fertilizers and explosives share a common trait:

      lots of nitrogen

      for the fertilizer, it's the bioavailability of nitrogen for plants that is the point

      for explosives, the point is that nitrogen really, really wants to be N2 again

      for explosives, AND fertilizer, when you pack a lot of nitrogen together in a chemical, and then heat it up, the nitrogen tends to figure out how to become happy N2 again, releasing a lot of energy in the process

      a fertilizer factory is basically the same as an explosives factory, in regards to the existence of lots of chemical feedstock compounds containing nitrogen grumbling that it is not N2

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    15. Re:How Tragic by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Protesting the addition of toxins to drinking water is not the same as WANTING toxins added to one's drinking water. The overseers added fluoride to the water, and you act like the guy who wants his water as free of contaminants as possible is the crazy one. You ignored the main argument and substituted a straw man to make yours sound reasonable.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:How Tragic by torsmo · · Score: 2

      Not quite, as Bhopal was already a large city (approx. 350,000 people in 1970; plant construction completed in 1969) even before the plant was constructed.

    17. Re:How Tragic by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2

      This is a very common method of city growth in Texas. Build something annoying/dangerous way out of city limits. People build close to it for jobs,cheap land, and since it's not incorporated, easier building rules. This happened around our local airport, now the people who knowingly built by the airport are bitching that airport wants to expand because 'it will be to noisy'. WTF people.

  2. Detected by seismic network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was detected by seismic networks. Note that the most common reason for "earthquakes" at zero depth is a quarry explosion, so that's how they initially labeled it. They've since changed it to read simply "Explosion". Click the "did you feel it link" and you can see that some people felt it as if it were an earthquake. Strangely, they are north of the event. Either the waves propogated that way, or people south of the event saw the cloud and realized it was an explosion not a quake.

  3. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't blow a fuse; the answer was just in the news! Flaaaming hypocriiiites...

    (To the tune of "Reading Rainbow.")

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  4. Re:20 years passed by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, for starters, they both begin with "W"—what more evidence could you need?!

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  5. Re:20 years passed by Pseudonym · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every day on the calendar is an anniversary of something.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  6. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't blow a fuse; the answer was just in the news!

    True, but a serious disaster is an event of national interest. Even special interest websites like this one are, in addition to being news sources, are also community gathering locations. Which means, we gather here to talk about what's going on in the world. Is there profit to be made? Sure. But there's also a discussion to be had. And our view into this news event may differ from that of the popular media; For example, there are chemical engineers who read this site. They may have something to say about how this happened. Maybe the fire suppression system failed -- maybe it was even due to a computer glitch. Whether it did or didn't, I can't really say. But the point is, we have a different perspective.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  7. And an Exxon refinery caught fire by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    Not quite on the same scale and completely lost in the news of this explosion there was a fire at Exxon in Beaumont with 12 people injured. Not a good day for Texas industry.

  8. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by inasity_rules · · Score: 2

    In this case, it has everything to do with tech. What failed on the plant's systems to cause this? Fertalizer plants are dangerous places, by nature, and (at least in my part of the world) have some hectic safety procedures and equipment up to shutting down if it looks like there is lightning anywhere near....

    Was it human error? Equipment failure? We don't know, but everyone came here to speculate. So, yeah it belongs here.

    --
    I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
  9. Fertilizer hazard underrated by ta_gueule · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fertilizers are extremely dangerous and should be handled with more care. A similar thing happened in my town 12 years ago. If was on 21/9/2001, so 10 days after 11/9/2001 and therefore nobody heard about it but it left some 30 people dead and a city in ruins. Look up AZF in Toulouse on the web to see what I'm talking about. They first blamed it on the terrorists and later admitted it was an industrial accident. Like in Texas, the AZF factory was build out of the town but the town grown and it found itself in the middle of it. Poor urban planning.

    1. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by ta_gueule · · Score: 2

      Well, the explosion propagates at the speed of sound, so abandoning the site is not an option. In Toulouse, the explosion occurred when 2 chemical products entered in contact (ammonium and nitrate if I'm not mistaken) It left a crater 200 meters wide. Although the biggest damage occurred near the factory, Steel girders were found 3km away, windows blown up 20 km away and the seismic activity was recorded in Paris (800 km away)

  10. Re:Coincidence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    How much is that in imperial fuckloads?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Re:Coincidence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    leave an impression

    I see what you did there.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. Eerie recollection of AZF, France by Jesrad · · Score: 2

    This explosion appears very similar to that of the AZF chemical plant near Toulouse in France, though (thankfully) smaller in damage and victims.

    Fire and ammonium nitrate deposits... like match and dynamite.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
  13. Re:20 years passed by darkob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, my deepest condolences to all families and friends of dead and injured in this explosion. Apparently, some facts need further clarification. April 19th is a critical date in US history, since, whereas siege at Waco, TX ended on that date probably by coincidence (ATF went in on that particular day after 50 days of siege, negotiating and waiting), it was Tim McVeigh who "comemoraded" that day (and the deadly siege) two years later by bombing federal building in Oklahoma City. To do that he used masive amounts of fertilizer as an explosive. Fertilizer itself is inert, but under certain conditions it may explode. In any case after that bombing sale of fertilizer is severly restricded and I suppose non-farmers are not even capable of obtaining big amount of it. So, if somone wants to make a huge explosion by fertilizer the only other option (apart from stealing it) is to set it on fire wherever it may be. Either some stock on some farm, or directly in some fertilizer factory. I surely hope that this explosion is caused by an accident. However it's up to authorities to determine how did this happend, and possibly why the affected area had not been evacuated after initial fire broke out.

  14. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by lxs · · Score: 2

    I haven't noticed that.
    In Baghdad and other parts of central Asia huge bombs are set off on a weekly basis with scores of victims but Slashdot doesn't mention it. The odd bomb in the US will get a mention. Attacks in Europe or Russia only get mentioned if they are big. So it's just the spillover of regular news you'd expect from a US based site.

  15. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what i was reading there was a small fire at the plant... Fire dept called... They put it out.

    Some time later it flared up again and got way out of control. fast. And the local fire dept had no idea what they were doing on such a scale... (volunteers) And were in there when it went bang.

    This is a town of about 3000 people... so... yeah. middle of nowhere.

  16. Re:20 years passed by tehcyder · · Score: 2

    These conspiracy theories would be slightly more plausible if this had actually happened on the anniversary, not the day before. As it is, it's not even really a coincidence, is it?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  17. Re:20 years passed by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

    Sure but Timothy McVeigh at least intended to attack the US federal government. Most of the people killed and injured here are people who he would have regarded as peers. His intention wasn't specifically to make things go bang. He had a specific message to send and the only message I see here is about worksite safety.

  18. Re:20 years passed by erroneus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice spin.

    Objectively speaking, the Waco incident was needless as it was. 1) What was being done at the compound was not illegal and amounts to government harrassment. 2) The government tends to be quite full of itself to the point that when someone pushes back, they tend to lose control.

    For another example of such, do a search on "active duty soldier illegally disarmed and arrested" and especially find the Youtube video while it's still up. A couple of cops literally claimed they were above the law and one insisted he was enforcing the will of the people and it didn't matter what the law says.

    But this is rather off-topic you know?

    Anyway, I watched the video -- impressive. The blast was amazingly powerful and the child, despite being scared to death, handled herself pretty well too. I think the end game on this story is that it was industrial safety gone wrong. It happens too often.

  19. Wikipedia has a page of ammonium nitrate disasters by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here, listing 24 previous disasters, the largest of which was also in Texas. You'd think they, of all places, would know to keep large quantities of ammonium nitrate away from population centers (or vice versa).

    Scarily, some of those disasters were from when a large quantity of ammonium nitrate powder had solidified and people tried to break it up with explosives.

    The news reports I'm seeing don't actually say it was an ammonium nitrate explosion in this case, although it seems a reasonable supposition.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  20. Re:Coincidence? by Hentes · · Score: 2

    It did cause more losses, and would make it harder to catch the attacker afterwards. If terrorists wre smart they would do sabotage instead of bombings.

  21. Re:20 years passed by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sure it is. But there has just been a terrorist attack in Boston which no group has taken responsibility for.

    Terrorists do their stuff to send a message. If no one understands what the message is, it's a failure from their perspective. The obvious way to make people get the message, is to say what your message is.

    In some subcultures, certain dates and events have special significance. Neo-nazis, for instance, have a habit of doing stuff on Hitler's or Hess' birthday. Because these days are special to them, they may either

    * Suffer from the misconception that the date is special to everyone else as well, and thus people will get the message without an explicit statement, or

    * Accept that the date isn't special outside the milieu, but their friends and enemies will get it. They are content sending a message to just those groups, rather than the public at large.

    The Boston Marathon terrorist(s) haven't published what message they wished to send. So, they think it will be obvious to everyone, or at least their friends and enemies. That means they are probably not foreign - foreign terrorists know that we don't share their ideas of significant days, and are comparatively more eager to accept responsibility (that they're harder for the USG to track down probably is also a factor).

    Now, is there an US subculture where Patriot's day, Tax day, and the Waco siege anniversary are special days? You bet there is. Could this subculture breed terrorists? It can, and it has.

    It's very legitimate to draw a connection here, this is not just any day on the calendar. Even if this plant's explosion was a complete accident, it will be filled with significance to the anti-government conspiracy theorists centered on Waco. If they don't believe one of their own did it, they're probably going to think God/Fate did it. If the Boston Marathon terrorists come from this subculture, they couldn't have asked for something better. (If they don't, though - if for instance, against the odds, they're islamists - they're probably frustrated as hell at this, and will publish a manifesto or similar in the upcoming days to correct impressions).

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  22. Re:20 years passed by isorox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which has what to do with a chemical plant 40 miles away...? Exactly...?

    The fertilizer plant and the OP are both full of shit?

  23. Re:20 years passed by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every day on the calendar is an anniversary of something.

    Feb 29th has fewer anniversaries than normal though

  24. Ya, happens all too often by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quite often when you see something, even something not particularly dangerous but more annoying like an airport, that is in a populated area and say "Why the hell didn't they build it out in the middle of nowhere?" the answer is often that they did. When they built it, there was nothing around, but things grew up around it, or grew nearer and nearer to it.

    You watch an area over a couple decades and it can go from "a whole lot of nothing" to "very developed".

  25. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since when were tech and computers synonyms?

    Chemical engineering is tech, moron.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. Re:20 years passed by dave420 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Terrorism is a motive, not an action. Until it has been proven that the perpetrator(s) committed their deed in order to coerce people, it's simply not terrorism - just barbaric murder.

  27. Re:Coincidence? by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [Coincidence] or is it related to the Boston bomb attack..?

    Yes. Timing was Coincidental and it was related to the Boston bomb attack: While the terrorist attack in Boston will likely result in less rights for civilians, the West, TX explosion won't cause corporations to be beholden to even basic zoning restrictions; The Boston explosions were committed by a small group of terrorists with the intent to kill, and strike fear into hearts of citizens, but the West explosion were caused by a large corporation on accident, and we should be terrified of their general recklessness, but we aren't. The Boston attack, like most terrorist threats, would have been exceedingly hard to prevent (esp. without stripping away the rights of all citizens), yet most all of the West, TX explosion injuries and casualties could have been easily avoidable by requiring such plants spend the money to relocate further from the towns they cause to spring up as they get filthy fucking rich. The perpetrator(s) of the Boston explosions may be found and put to justice for their crimes, but the rich bastards who are responsible for the West, TX explosion will get a sympathetic pat on the back, and at least a tax break in losses from Uncle Sam. The terrorists wounded many in their Boston attack, but the West, TX explosion was far more lethal and devastating. People will get right fucking pissed off about the terrorist attack in Boston, but they'll exhibit a disproportionate response of only remorse for the victims of the TX explosion.

    So, you see, they are inversely related.

  28. Re:Coincidence? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unlikely. Factory fires (This started off as a fire) happen all the time. This one was just unfortunate enough to happen where a metric shit tonne of amonium nitrate happened to be.

    This wasn't an "unfortunate" accident. This was the result pure unabashed incompetence and greed. It's not like we don't know how far to space apart caches of volatile stuff having a high energy density in order to prevent massive explosions like this. For fuck's sake, do you think even the morons who sign up for the military would put ammo reserves all in one giant pile for safe keeping? No, that's fucking stupid. Stupid and a bit less expensive, but mostly stupid. The fire was an accident, but the explosion was caused by Corporate Negligence.

  29. Re:Wew by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everything's bigger in Texas.

  30. Re:20 years passed by Teancum · · Score: 3, Informative

    You make it sound like any fertilizer will work in any situation as a "one size fits all" position. That isn't how you grow plants, which needs a much more balanced approach and several different kinds of chemicals. It doesn't matter if they are produced in a factory or grown from manure in your back yard.... it is the same thing. Nitrates are one of those key ingredients that plants need in order to grow, and depending on soil conditions and the species of plant you are growing it may need those kind of fertilizers.

    In fact, in earlier times people would literally sell their cess pool contents (not really septic tanks, but the same general construction) to Nitrate manufacturers for the purpose of extracting the Nitrogen compounds to be used in explosives. Cheaper ways of getting that accomplished can be had today, but in theory you could use the stuff that is flowing out of your toilet if you cared.

  31. Re:20 years passed by egcagrac0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Probably going to be Bitcoin.

  32. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by raymansean · · Score: 2

    News for Nerds! There are other nerds than those who sling lines of code all day or design computers. Explosions are of interest to Chemical, Mechanical, Civil engineers, etc. EE's may also be interested depending on what was the ignition source.

    --
    insert inflammatory comment here!
  33. Re:20 years passed by erroneus · · Score: 5, Informative

    A standoff meaning the people pushed back against tyranny and harrassment. What made it a stand off was that the notion that the government players could not and would not admit defeat. Once they start down a path, they can never ever back down and that's for a lot of reasons. Not the least of which is to maintain the perception that they never lose under any circumstances. Right vs wrong and Legal vs Illegal was never going to see any discussion in a court room once the chain of events got started.

    If they wanted him in a court room, they had many other opportunities to snatch him up away from his arms and his bretheren.

    At the end of the day, the government's case was never made, many assertions blaming the victims have been debunked and the teeth of the ATF have been all but removed.

    I'd say proof of fscking-up is well established here.

  34. Re: Coincidence? by CGordy · · Score: 2

    Relocate a plant because houses were built nearby? It would be far cheaper to relocate all the houses.

  35. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am more interested in what Slashdotters have to say on the subject than anyone else. Typically a story like this plays out as follows:
    NPR/BBC - here are the unbiased details of the story
    BS news - OMG Explosion! Think of the children/town/nation! The government should do something/nothing!
    Slashdot - here are similar stories (ammonia nitrate-related disasters), chemical discussion, physics of the matter.

  36. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8r4MK3R4PI

    On March 16, 2013, my son and I were hiking along country roads among pastures and fields with my 15-year old son to help him earn his hiking merit badge. I always enjoy these father/son hikes because it gives me time alone with my son. As I always do when we go on these hikes and walks, I took my trusty rifle with me as there are coyotes, wild hogs, and cougars in our area. In Texas, it is legal to openly carry a rifle or shotgun as long as you do so in a manner that isn't calculated to cause alarm. In other words, you can't walk around waving your rifle at people. I always carry my rifle slung across my chest dangling, not holding it in my hands. At about the 5 mile mark of our hike, a voice behind us asked us to stop and the officer motioned for us to approach him. He got out of his car and met us a few feet later. He asked us what we were doing and I explained that we were hiking for my son's merit badge. He then asked me what I'm doing with the rifle, to which I responded in a calm manner, "Does it matter, officer? Am I breaking the law?" At that point, the officer grabbed my rifle without warning or indication. He didn't ask for my rifle and he didn't suggest he would take it from me. He simply grabbed it. This startled me and I instantly pulled back - the rifle was attached to me - and I asked what he thought he was doing because he's not taking my rifle. He then pulled his service pistol on me and told me to take my hands off the weapon and move to his car, which I complied with. He then slammed me into the hood of his car and I remembered I had a camera on me (one of the requirements of the hiking merit badge is to document your hikes). This video is the rest of that encounter. Up to this point, I am not told why I am being stopped, why he tried to disarm me, or even that I'm under arrest. We did not set out that Saturday morning to "make a point" or cause problems. Our goal was to complete a 10-mile hike and return home without incident. My son chose a route that away from populated areas but near our home. The arresting officer is Officer Steve Ermis and the supervisor is Sergeant Minnicks of the Temple Police Department. If you agree this was a gross act of exceeded authority, please help me fight these charges: http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/2nd-amendment-legal-defense-fund/x/2679348

  37. Re:Bah by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Informative

    People will never agree about what constitutes news for nerds, but the following should be pretty much common ground:

    * Things that go beep.
    * Things that go boom.

  38. Re:20 years passed by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

    David Koresh may have been a child molester but the government chose to try to arrest him in his compound instead of when he went to town. The government double-down on stupid when they created a seige; and doubled-down on stupid again when they attacked. The fault w lies with the Federal Government for unnecessarily creating a seige and attacking the compound. It wasn't necessary. It was an excessive force.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  39. Re:20 years passed by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem with the "resisting arrest" is that he is ALLOWED that by law if the LEOs aren't operating in a legal manner- even to the point of using deadly force if needed. See the Supreme Court decision on John Bad Elk v. United States - 177 U.S. 529 (1900) for more details there.

    The LEOs violated 18 USC 242 and should be decorating a jail cell awaiting trial for the FELONIES they commited, caught on video. Since we're talking a deprivation of rights involving firearms if it were enforced, they'd be facing up to 10 years in a Fed Pen.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  40. Re:20 years passed by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Informative

    While terrorism has not been ruled out based on the ammonium nitrate in the fertilizer the plant produced it is suspected the water from the firefighter's hoses is what caused the explosion. The ammonium nitrate is handled in such as way as to keep it inert but the plant suffered a fire and ironically the water used to put out the fire is most likely what caused the ammonium nitrate to react. This video on YouTube is a guy shooting video of the fire when the explosion occurs. For reference the OK City bombing had a small fraction of the amount of ammonium nitrate this plant had stored in the one tank that exploded. Remarkably a second tank did not explode and is preventing emergency personal from approaching the site for rescue and recovery efforts.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  41. Re:20 years passed by Golddess · · Score: 4, Funny

    Careful, your last name also begins with "W". You don't want people to start making a connection between this and you.

    ...unless this was actually a clever ploy to try and throw people off from making that connection.

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
  42. Re:20 years passed by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

    Three words: "Emergency Broadcast System"

    Almost no one is watching broadcast TV these days. The emergency broadcast system is largely pointless. Even amongst backwoods hicks, a lot of them are watching satellite or on the internet (at whatever speed they can attain where they're at) rather than watching broadcast.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  43. Re:20 years passed by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You make it sound like any fertilizer will work in any situation as a "one size fits all" position. That isn't how you grow plants, which needs a much more balanced approach and several different kinds of chemicals.

    You're right and you're wrong. In theory, you're right. You look at what the plant needs and you give it that. But in proper practice, you're wrong. You simply return the shit to the soil and the system works cyclically, if you plant guilds. It's monocultural so-called "green revolution" farming (which turns nations and indeed whole continents brown) which causes soil depletion. Most of these crops aren't even rotated any more!

    In fact, in earlier times people would literally sell their cess pool contents (not really septic tanks, but the same general construction) to Nitrate manufacturers for the purpose of extracting the Nitrogen compounds to be used in explosives. Cheaper ways of getting that accomplished can be had today, but in theory you could use the stuff that is flowing out of your toilet if you cared.

    We could be using AIWPS to convert our waste into fertilizer, algae as a fuel feedstock, and methane gas, while cutting our water use. Or we could use composting toilets to turn crap into soil directly without any special facilities. By adding compost to your crap and letting it sit for a year (with occasional aeration) you turn it into soil that you can lift out of the digester by hand if you choose, it's that well-cooked.

    The simple fact is that we only need to produce industrial fertilizers with an explosion risk because we are engaging in inherently destructive farming practices instead of employing a cyclical system which existed before we did.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Phone Video Up on Youtube Already by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was detected by seismic networks. Note that the most common reason for "earthquakes" at zero depth is a quarry explosion, so that's how they initially labeled it. They've since changed it to read simply "Explosion". Click the "did you feel it link" and you can see that some people felt it as if it were an earthquake. Strangely, they are north of the event. Either the waves propogated that way, or people south of the event saw the cloud and realized it was an explosion not a quake.

    Here is how it looked dangerously close (warning, the people taking this video were way too close so if you can't stomach listening to young girl in complete fear, don't watch that video all the way through) I'm guessing and hoping those people are okay being that the video is on YouTube.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  45. Re:20 years passed by flayzernax · · Score: 2

    Well, we all know that the rule of law has been questionable for a long while in our country. Back in 1950's if you were black you had this problem, now its just escalated to anyone without official government sanction. Thanks for sharing your story.

  46. Re:Aint it weird... by Khyber · · Score: 2

    You should speak for yourself. More than 10 are dead and almost 200 wounded.

    Including one of my friends, whose family called to tell me he died in that explosion, as he was one of the volunteer firefighters.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  47. Re:Wikipedia has a page of ammonium nitrate disast by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    The problem with economic growth, is that something like a $500M fertilizer plant brings lots of jobs. The people that work those jobs don't like driving 30 miles each way to get to work, so the town that used to be at a safe distance from the half-billion dollar industrial site grows towards it. Then the thing blows up and everyone asks "Why wasn't it in the middle of nowhere?"

    It probably was when it was built 20 years ago.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  48. Re:and this is news for nerds how? by StormyWeather · · Score: 2

    Chemicals, Reactions, Explosions, Response to those, Causes, Effects, new technologies to stop these problems in the future being discussed?

    What about this is NOT science, technology, and stuff that matters?

  49. Re:20 years passed by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 2

    You make it sound like any fertilizer will work in any situation as a "one size fits all" position. That isn't how you grow plants, which needs a much more balanced approach and several different kinds chemicals.

    I don't know where you get that conclusion from. The prior poster asserted that ALL fertilizer is explosive, and I merely pointed out that's false in the vast majority of cases. I was in fact pointing out that his "one size fits all" position was bunk.

    Most fertilizers contain less than 5% nitrate nitrogen, since plants are able to utilize more than one form of nitrogen. Thus there are formulations using ammonium phosphate, ammonium sulfate, urea, biuret, etc.