Slashdot Mirror


Google Forbids Advertising On Glass

An anonymous reader writes "Contrary to widespread thought, Google Glass will not be an advertising platform: 'Google Inc has lately told app developers that they are not allowed to present ads to Google Glass users and they are also not permitted to sell users' personal and private information for the fulfillment of advertising needs. The internet company has explicitly and openly said that the Glass platform should and must be clean and clear of any ads whatsoever, because the technology is designed to facilitate internet browsing and other related activities, therefore, the featured podium cannot be used to advertise products as it will cause the user experience to diminish.' Seems like Google is going for hardware-only revenue on this one." You're not supposed to resell the Glass hardware, either.

17 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Just means they will make their money another way by ModernGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a hard time believing that they will make all their revenue on hardware alone. They will have access to search and activity data combined with a feed that shows people's whereabouts and habits. This marketing data will be worth way more than any direct advertising.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  2. Hardware revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Seems like Google is going for hardware-only revenue on this one

    Or, you know, collecting user data such as location, what the user is looking at and browsing, and so on. Which then in turn can be used to target advertising.

  3. what's the difference? and who does this benefit? by F9rDT3ZE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what is the difference between "presenting ads to Google glass users" and "internet browsing"? Is Glass going to come with built-in ad-blockers for all web pages? Are they going to build special software to prohibit Glass-specific advertising on web pages that are not in any kind of partnership with Glass? This seems to me like a way of controlling the advertising revenue streams for Google more than anything else, since Google's pages are larded with ads and Glass will inherently drive traffic to those pages, both inside and outside of the Glass environment. I wonder if it even raises antitrust implications, as it tremendously biases the products toward Google's advertising & commerce platforms while pushing others out.

  4. Whatever by afxgrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They say this now but after Microsoft or Apple sell an ad supported product for cheaper they'll change their minds quickly.

  5. Contrary to widespread thought... by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Contrary to widespread thought, Google Glass will not be an advertising platform... yet!

  6. Lol by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But "sponsored notices" I am sure will be fully supported.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  7. Re:I think I'll wait for something Free by DragonWriter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As in libre Free. You can't prevent ads without either an onerous EULA with over-the-top enforcement or some hardcore DRM.

    The no ads is a provision of the agreement required to use the API that lets web apps connect to glass, its not enforced by EULA or DRM

  8. Re:Awesome by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's distracting, causes ADD, causes eye strain, will get you mugged, people will use it while driving, induces battery phobia to the max, looks idiotic, causes memory degradation in your brain, and the controls are significantly less fast than a PC, laptop, tablet, or cell phone. Is that a good start?

  9. Re:I think I'll wait for something Free by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?"

    Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  10. Cable TV by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember how Cable TV started out with no advertisements, to give people a good reason to plunk down big wads of cash every month for stuff like what they got free over the airwaves? Remember how short that lasted, once cable acceptance picked up? This no-ads/tracking thing is just a phase to get Google Glasses in front of everyone's eyeballs; then we'll get ads full blast.

    1. Re:Cable TV by femtobyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the first models won't be recording all the time; no they won't hide anything. By the time Google enables recording, it'll be perfectly in the open and normal ("what kind of tinfoil-hatted nutter would care about a few frame grabs in return for all these nifty free services?") --- and it won't matter what your personal privacy votes are, because your visiting house-guests will record your life and habits for you. People choose to pay for stuff all the time --- and still get ads/tracking/intrusiveness added in to paid products. If it's a conspiracy to think that gGlass will follow the same patterns of increasing advertiser pervasiveness as TV, ebooks, music, games, credit cards, magazines, search engines, etc., then I guess I am a conspiracy nut.

  11. Re:Can't resell it... what?! I hope CM is okay... by drakaan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The no resale limitation appears to be on the developer version that is out now. If they did that with the commercial one, they would have a giant shitstorm on their hands, both PR and legal.

    --
    "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  12. Ads in glass apps different from ads in browser by rs1n · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google doesn't want developers to incorporate ads into their apps for glass. Lots of app developers create a "free" version of their app that is supported through advertising. It's this particular aspect of advertising that Google is trying to prevent from happening.

  13. Re:I think I'll wait for something Free by bfandreas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This also means that users can simply uninstall the app. Since it isn't Google that's doing the ads it shhould be fairly easy to get rid of the offender.

    People will not ever get used to having apps constantly and without provocation pushed into their face. You know what you get when you load a website. You know what you get when your turn on your TV or radio. But walking down the street just to have the latest Amazon sale pushed into your peripheral vision will mean that the app will be deinstalled.

    What it won't prevent is showing those email notifications of that shop you once did business with and that has been pestering you ever since. And you will get solicited ads when you ask where to go for lunch. These informations will propably be pulled right off Google Maps and I highly suspect that this is where Google will be making its money.

    Also bear in mind that this thing isn't always on. You will either have to wake it up by fondling it or sloooowly lifting your head. So shoving unsolicited ads into your vision wouldn't work most of the time since it most likely will be turned off. Battery life isn't that good on that thing to have it turned on the whole day.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  14. Re:Just means they will make their money another w by Cinder6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's important to note that only third-party developers are prohibited from placing ads; Google isn't bound by the same rules. My tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory says they want to get people used to Glass first, and then start slowly implementing ads until they feel commonplace and accepted. If Glass is plastered with ads from the beginning, no one will use it, and Google knows this.

    That said, it would be great if it never has ads. I would be willing to pay more (were I in the market for Glass) for no ads on a device such as this.

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
  15. Re:I think I'll wait for something Free by Angostura · · Score: 4, Informative

    You appear to be confusing the end user with the service/app provider.

  16. Re:Just means they will make their money another w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not about active ads. I'm sure they'll get revenue for passive advertising. You're wearing glass, you search for a restaurant, you get a list of local restaurants with directions... I can see pretty easy ways to embed ads into that whole process, and display USEFUL ads.

    Most folks don't have problems with advertising that helps them find what they're looking for.