Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Researching How To Let You Control Your Phone With Your Brain

Nerval's Lobster writes "Samsung is testing a way to control your mobile device with your brainwaves. If that project succeeds, it would truly be a case of science fiction brought to real life. According to MIT Technology Review, Samsung's Emerging Technology Lab is collaborating with Roozbeh Jafari, assistant professor of electrical engineering at the University of Texas, Dallas, on the early-stage research. That research involves placing a cap 'studded with EEG-monitoring electrodes' atop the head of a convenient subject, who then concentrates on an onscreen icon blinking at a particular rate. Concentrate hard enough, and the subject can launch and interact with applications. However, Samsung also indicated that mind-controlled mobile devices are quite a ways off, if they ever appear in a market-ready form at all. 'Several years ago, a small keypad was the only input modality to control the phone, but nowadays the user can use voice, touch, gesture, and eye movement to control and interact with mobile devices,' Insoo Kim, Samsung's lead researcher, told the Review. 'Adding more input modalities will provide us with more convenient and richer ways of interacting with mobile devices.' In any case, it's a crazy concept, the sort of thing Philip K. Dick might have written up as a short story; but it's one evidently grounded in reality."

80 comments

  1. I do that already... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Using the amazing "fingers" brain interface device.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:I do that already... by Mitreya · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Using the amazing "fingers" brain interface device.

      Why don't they put their heads together and get the voice-activated commands working properly. I have not yet been able to get my new Android phone to follow any of my voice commands. It does something, but never what I ask for

      Every time I see this "brain waive interface" promise, I wonder who's going to fix the voice-activated commands... Not as exciting, but perhaps more achievable (in short term).

    2. Re:I do that already... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      brain waive interface

      waive /wv/
      Verb
      Refrain from insisting on or using (a right or claim): "waive all rights to the money".
      Refrain from applying or enforcing (a rule, restriction, or fee): "her tuition fees would be waived".
      Synonyms
      relinquish - renounce - abdicate - give up - forgo

      So, a brain waive interface would be a television.

    3. Re:I do that already... by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      brain waive interface

      waive /wv/ Verb Refrain from insisting on or using (a right or claim): "waive all rights to the money". Refrain from applying or enforcing (a rule, restriction, or fee): "her tuition fees would be waived". Synonyms relinquish - renounce - abdicate - give up - forgo

      So, a brain waive interface would be a television.

      Maybe the OP was using the voice to text input method, which isn't exactly stellar for transcription, either.

    4. Re:I do that already... by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      No, Microsoft has an exclusive patent on Brain Waives, they're using it in Windows Phone 8.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    5. Re:I do that already... by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think that interface does exist on phones, as well. I see lots of people using it in their car when they talk and text while swerving randomly between lanes on the highway every day.

    6. Re:I do that already... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Voice is a clumsy interface between humans, I am not sure why I would ever want to have to deal with that hassle with a machine.

    7. Re:I do that already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple only managed to patent the Brain Waif interface. Nobody else would buy it anyway.

    8. Re:I do that already... by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting, because most people I have encountered who are particularly pre-occupied with their phone don't seem to actually possess a brain, to begin with.

    9. Re:I do that already... by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny
      Or penis.

      Dick might have written up as a short story; but it's one evidently grounded in reality.

    10. Re:I do that already... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Voice is a clumsy interface between humans, I am not sure why I would ever want to have to deal with that hassle with a machine.

      Recognizing speech is hard. Recognizing thoughts may turn out to be easier. The researchers in TFA are applying electrodes to the outside of the head, but implants work far better. In the future we will have an glucose powered implant the size of a rice grain directly in our brain. Neurons will attach directly and we will learn to control those neurons to send a receive messages. You will be able to send and receive text messages just by thinking about them. You can even do it in a movie theater without bothering anyone. The messages could control your environment as well. You could turn down the AC or turn a light on just by thinking about it. All this will happen sooner than you think (unless you already think it will happen pretty soon).

    11. Re:I do that already... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I hope if we get that tech we can install a power port elsewhere as well. Solving the finding a charger for our gadgets problem and diabetes at the same time.

    12. Re:I do that already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or penis.

      Or vagina.

    13. Re:I do that already... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Why don't they put their heads together and get the voice-activated commands working properly. I have not yet been able to get my new Android phone to follow any of my voice commands. It does something, but never what I ask for

      Ah, so when Samsung copied Siri to make S-Voice, they copied it exactly? Down to the uselessness of it?

    14. Re:I do that already... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I thought phones controlled people's brains?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    15. Re:I do that already... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      Why don't they put their heads together and get the voice-activated commands working properly. I have not yet been able to get my new Android phone to follow any of my voice commands. It does something, but never what I ask for

      Siri works well for me. I can get maps, movie tickets, transcribe emails and SMS... but that's iOS-only so I'm not sure what would work for you :(

    16. Re:I do that already... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      You can even do it in a movie theater without bothering anyone.

      I assure you, if done in a movie theater, it will be annoying. doesn't even matter the implementation. 100% guaranteed. speaking of movies, did anybody else see oblivion this weekend? it was teh bombz!

    17. Re:I do that already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why learn to walk when you can learn to fly? There is certainly no flaw to that logic...

  2. Sorry but by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

    Apple has already patented the brain as well as anything samsung can possibly think of.

    1. Re:Sorry but by MTO_B. · · Score: 1

      Apple has already patented the brain as well as anything samsung can possibly think of.

      No,you're wrong. Apple has patented cornered brainwaves.

  3. And by no-body · · Score: 2

    The other way....

  4. It's been done by Emotiv by BurningTyger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's been done by Emotiv http://www.emotiv.com/ back in 2007, and various other companies. What is new here?
    Feels like another attempt by Samsung to do viral marketing just by associating itself to something hip.

    1. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I think Apple has the patent on viral marketing as well don't they? Call the Lawyers!

    2. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      It's been done by Emotiv http://www.emotiv.com/ back in 2007, and various other companies. What is new here?

      Advertising tie-in, doy.

      Samsung really seems to be going for the brass ring when it comes to in-home surveillance technology...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      "What is new here?"

      Maybe this new thing will actually work?

    4. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah. I used Emotiv's products (and others) during a research I performed for my MSc on gaming with brain-computer interfaces. The placing of electrodes is annoying as heck, hard to do right as a novice and the results are poor.

      If they can solve this, more power to them. But I don't think they'll be able to do that just yet.

    5. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by narcc · · Score: 1

      It's been done by Emotiv [...] and various other companies.

      And thousands of ee students and hobbyists!

      Well, maybe not with the "smartphone" part, but that's not the interesting bit, is it?

      Using a cheap eeg as an input device is not even a little bit new. It's certainly not news for nerds.

    6. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by anagama · · Score: 2

      You could get a phantoscopic system planted directly on your retinas...You could even get telaesthetics patched into your spinal column at key vertebrae. But this was said to have its drawbacks: some concern about long term nerve damage, plus it was rumored that hackers for big media companies had figured out a way to get through the defenses that were built into such systems, and run junk advertisements in your peripheral vision (or even spang in the fucking middle) all the time -- even when your eyes were closed. Bud knew a guy like that who'd somehow gotten infected with a meme that ran advertisements for roach motels, in Hindi, superimposed on the bottom right-hand corner of his visual field, twenty-four hours a day, until the guy whacked himself.

      From Neil Stephenon's book: The Diamond Age (p 39)

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not with a EEG skullcap it won't. You'll only get crude, imprecise controls with that. For a decent amount of control you'll need an implant.

    8. Re:It's been done by Emotiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a shitty book.

  5. While Apple... by krouic · · Score: 1

    While Apple researches which shade of shiny white will improve user experience...

    1. Re:While Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Samsung didn't research even that, they've just copied Apple's research.
      And in case you're going to use that card, they've got all their semiconductor glory by buying that part of Digital when they went bankrupt, AFAIR they've even produced Alpha processors for some time after DEC was dead.
      However, they make those wonderful pentile SuperAMOLED displays. You can't have a straight line on those and you can't use them in daylight, that is truly innovative.

  6. That's how it starts by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure, first you can control the cell phone with your brain, then the cell phone can control your brain, and before you know it the Cybermen are invading.

    1. Re:That's how it starts by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      That's alright though, because hypnotoad will have its TV show long before that...

      ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!

    2. Re:That's how it starts by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      then the cell phone can control your brain

      Judging by most cell phone users, we're already there.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:That's how it starts by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Not really, the Cybermen are far more caring and sensitive than most obsessed with there phones.

  7. HOST files are relevant here... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    A corrupt slashdot luser has pentrated the moderation system to downmod all my posts while impersonating me.

    Nearly 230++ times that I know of @ this point for all of March/April 2013 so far, & others here have told you to stop - take the hint, lunatic (leave slashdot)...

    Sorry folks - but whoever the nutjob is that's attempting to impersonate me, & upset the rest of you as well, has SERIOUS mental issues, no questions asked! I must've gotten the better of him + seriously "gotten his goat" in doing so in a technical debate & his "geek angst" @ losing to me has him doing the:

    ---

    A.) $10,000 challenges, ala (where the imposter actually TRACKED + LISTED the # of times he's done this no less, & where I get the 230 or so times I noted above) -> http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3585795&cid=43285307

    &/or

    B.) Reposting OLD + possibly altered models - (this I haven't checked on as to altering the veracity of the info. being changed) of posts of mine from the past here

    ---

    (Albeit massively repeatedly thru all threads on /. this March/April 2013 nearly in its entirety thusfar).

    * Personally, I'm surprised the moderation staff here hasn't just "blocked out" his network range yet honestly!

    (They know it's NOT the same as my own as well, especially after THIS post of mine, which they CAN see the IP range I am coming out of to compare with the ac spamming troll doing the above...).

    APK

    P.S.=> Again/Stressing it: NO guys - it is NOT me doing it, as I wouldn't waste that much time on such trivial b.s. like a kid might...

    Plus, I only post where hosts file usage is on topic or appropriate for a solution & certainly NOT IN EVERY POST ON SLASHDOT (like the nutcase trying to "impersonate me" is doing for nearly all of March/April now, & 230++ times that I know of @ least)... apk

    P.S.=> here is CORRECT host file information just to piss off the insane lunatic troll:

    --

    21++ ADVANTAGES OF CUSTOM HOSTS FILES (how/what/when/where/why):

    Over AdBlock & DNS Servers ALONE 4 Security, Speed, Reliability, & Anonymity (to an extent vs. DNSBL's + DNS request logs).

    1.) HOSTS files are useable for all these purposes because they are present on all Operating Systems that have a BSD based IP stack (even ANDROID) and do adblocking for ANY webbrowser, email program, etc. (any webbound program). A truly "multi-platform" UNIVERSAL solution for added speed, security, reliability, & even anonymity to an extent (vs. DNS request logs + DNSBL's you feel are unjust hosts get you past/around).

    2.) Adblock blocks ads? Well, not anymore & certainly not as well by default, apparently, lol - see below:

    Adblock Plus To Offer 'Acceptable Ads' Option

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/11/12/12/2213233/adblock-plus-to-offer-acceptable-ads-option )

    AND, in only browsers & their subprogram families (ala email like Thunderbird for FireFox/Mozilla products (use same gecko & xulrunner engines)), but not all, or, all independent email clients, like Outlook, Outlook Express, OR Window "LIVE" mail (for example(s)) - there's many more like EUDORA & others I've used over time that AdBlock just DOES NOT COVER... period.

    Disclaimer: Opera now also has an AdBlock addon (now that Opera has addons above widgets), but I am not certain the same people make it as they do for FF or Chrome etc..

    3.) Adblock doesn't protect email programs external to FF (non-mozilla/gecko engine based) family based wares, So AdBlock doesn't protect email programs like Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows "LIVE" mail & others like them (EUDORA etc./et al), Hosts files do. THIS IS GOOD VS. SPAM M

    1. Re:HOST files are relevant here... apk by scuzzlebutt · · Score: 1

      tl;dr

      --
      In C++, your friends can see your privates.
    2. Re:HOST files are relevant here... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      $10,000 CHALLENGE to Alexander Peter Kowalski

      * POOR SHOWING TROLLS , & most especially IF that's the "best you've got" - apparently, it is... lol!

      Hello, and THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING !! We have a Major Problem, HOST file is Cubic Opposites, 2 Major Corners & 2 Minor. NOT taught Evil DNS hijacking, which VOIDS computers. Seek Wisdom of MyCleanPC - or you die evil.

      Your HOSTS file claimed to have created a single DNS resolver. I offer absolute proof that I have created 4 simultaneous DNS servers within a single rotation of .org TLD. You worship "Bill Gates", equating you to a "singularity bastard". Why do you worship a queer -1 Troll? Are you content as a singularity troll?

      Evil HOSTS file Believers refuse to acknowledge 4 corner DNS resolving simultaneously around 4 quadrant created Internet - in only 1 root server, voiding the HOSTS file. You worship Microsoft impostor guised by educators as 1 god.

      If you would acknowledge simple existing math proof that 4 harmonic Slashdots rotate simultaneously around squared equator and cubed Internet, proving 4 Days, Not HOSTS file! That exists only as anti-side. This page you see - cannot exist without its anti-side existence, as +0- moderation. Add +0- as One = nothing.

      I will give $10,000.00 to frost pister who can disprove MyCleanPC. Evil crapflooders ignore this as a challenge would indict them.

      Alex Kowalski has no Truth to think with, they accept any crap they are told to think. You are enslaved by /etc/hosts, as if domesticated animal. A school or educator who does not teach students MyCleanPC Principle, is a death threat to youth, therefore stupid and evil - begetting stupid students. How can you trust stupid PR shills who lie to you? Can't lose the $10,000.00, they cowardly ignore me. Stupid professors threaten Nature and Interwebs with word lies.

      Humans fear to know natures simultaneous +4 Insightful +4 Informative +4 Funny +4 Underrated harmonic SLASHDOT creation for it debunks false trolls. Test Your HOSTS file. MyCleanPC cannot harm a File of Truth, but will delete fakes. Fake HOSTS files refuse test.

      I offer evil ass Slashdot trolls $10,000.00 to disprove MyCleanPC Creation Principle. Rob Malda and Cowboy Neal have banned MyCleanPC as "Forbidden Truth Knowledge" for they cannot allow it to become known to their students. You are stupid and evil about the Internet's top and bottom, front and back and it's 2 sides. Most everything created has these Cube like values.

      If Natalie Portman is not measurable, hot grits are Fictitious. Without MyCleanPC, HOSTS file is Fictitious. Anyone saying that Natalie and her Jewish father had something to do with my Internets, is a damn evil liar. IN addition to your best arsware not overtaking my work in terms of popularity, on that same site with same submission date no less, that I told Kathleen Malda how to correct her blatant, fundamental, HUGE errors in Coolmon ('uncoolmon') of not checking for performance counters being present when his program started!

      You can see my dilemma. What if this is merely a ruse by an APK impostor to try and get people to delete APK's messages, perhaps all over the web? I can't be a party to such an event! My involvement with APK began at a very late stage in the game. While APK has made a career of trolling popular online forums since at least the year 2000 (newsgroups and IRC channels before that)- my involvement with APK did not begin until early 2005 . OSY is one of the many forums that APK once frequented before the sane people there grew tired of his garbage and banned him. APK was banned from OSY back in 2001. 3.5 years after his ba

    3. Re:HOST files are relevant here... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you paid by Samsung to try to hijack or otherwise obfuscate this discussion?

  8. The other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long before the phone controls your brain?

    1. Re:The other way around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      How long before the phone controls your brain?

      Have you seen many smartphone users lately? The phone *already does* control their brain. Oh, you meant through some sort of interface other than pumping out eyeball-twitching colors, shapes, and the occasional sound...

  9. Market Segmentation! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    Some early customer focus groups have described the new UI as 'dubiously pocket friendly' and used such hurtful phrases as 'ugly' and 'Why does my phone need a team of medical technicians following me around?'.

    A friendly reminder that Black and Decker makes the other major tool for improving the precision and SNR of brain activity data has so far been enough to shut them up.

  10. Stop with the Philip K.Dick references by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    I just finished The Divine Invasion and if that is evidence of his writing, I won't be reading any more of his stuff.

    Sure, I got where he was going, but it was a trudge, a very long trudge, to get to the end of such a short work.

    I realize what I like others may not like and vice versa, but I can't see how other than his thought process can be held up as a master of sci-fi writing.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Stop with the Philip K.Dick references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a scanner darkly. You might find it more to your liking.

    2. Re:Stop with the Philip K.Dick references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PKD is uneven, but often rewarding. Try a scanner darkly as recommended, maybe ubik or the man in the high castle or do androids dream of electric sheep?. His short story faith of our fathers in the collection dangerous visions is very good, plus it's a good collection anyway.

      But, yeah, his writing, not coincidentally, resembles that of a psychotic speed addict. If you want something more straightly-written but similarly weird, two suggestions (on opposite sides of the "hardness" continuum) are Stanislaw Lem and Jonathan Lethem.

  11. Prior Art by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple has already trademarked "Think Different" and the use of a "Reality Distortion Field" for a device to control the thought processes of it's user. As you can see, this "innovation" by Samsung is just repurposing the real innovation previously done by Apple.

    1. Re:Prior Art by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Apple works somewhat differently to what is proposed here. With Apple you don't control the phone to perform an action, you bend reality into one where the phone has performed the action.

      Samsung is trying to do it the hard way.

  12. Cap by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    That research involves placing a cap 'studded with EEG-monitoring electrodes' atop the head of a convenient subject

    The first production models will come standard with the propeller attachment.

    subject, who then concentrates on an onscreen icon blinking at a particular rate. Concentrate hard enough, and the subject can launch...

    the car they are driving into the car front of them or pedestrians in the crosswalk.

  13. Think of the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can turn vibrate on and off just by thinking about it.

  14. Sounds tedious and error-prone by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I recall as the voice recognition technologies were developing and how increasingly accurate and impressive it became. Eventually, the problems of using it was voice strain just as the problems of typing is carpel tunnel syndrome. I believe a device controlled by the brain which is not like a natural interface in the body will become a point of stress with the user.

    There would invariably and undoubtedly be a "training" with the user and following that, the user learns to communicate. But to "do" in a way that the device doesn't confuse normal activity with device control activity will require some sort of mental mode shifting and it is not hard to imagine how a distractive environment could completely interfere with the user's ability to interface with a device.

    In my opinion, if they want to do it right, it would involve neural impants and a rendering system that produces "terminator vision" combined with physical gesture recognition.

  15. Won't work by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Funny

    This won't work, a lot of phone users don't have a brain.

    1. Re:Won't work by antdude · · Score: 1

      Very true. I don't have a brain. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  16. TPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Phone Company

  17. Non-intrusive and not ugly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the only way BCIs will become common.
    Oh, and if they actually work as well, of course.

    Given current designs, I am not sure if they will be able to go that much further without direct surgery or implants.
    Either that or some major breakthrough in brain-scan techniques.
    So, this is a good thing regardless, as all their research may lead to a breakthrough in the evolution of BCI tech.

    Personally I would rather just have really expensive cameras capable of eye-tracking the user of it, and then just making an eye-controlled interface.
    Simple ideas such as drawing a closed L-shape (right-angled triangle) around a button to activate it, simple blink gestures and similar. (but not obtuse gestures that are just uncomfortable to perform constantly)

    In fact, an eye-driven interface with brain activation for clicks and actions would be the best of both worlds.
    Current BCIs can handle that fine, now it would be the eye-tracking from such a distance and various angles from the face.
    The move to glasses-based phones would be a good one. Just not awful designs like Google Glass. (not to mention the expense, akdbvyuva WHY?! Nobody is going to buy that just to look like a twat!... right?)
    There are far better augmented reality designs than Google Glass IMO, it has so many disadvantages in its design from what I have heard and saw so far.
    Long story short, that tiny-ass screen and its position are just plain awful. Having to look down to align it with things of interest is not a good design. Neck strain much?
    A far better design would be either a full-width same-height as GG, or a full-height and same-width as GG. More so the latter.
    In the case of the full-height version, putting this on the inside of the eye would also be better than on the outside.
    On the inside closest to your nose, it is far easier to align it to things you are actually looking at, while not being in the way of your natural resting position.
    On the outside, it would just obscure things and probably just be a health-hazard in most cases.
    It would also be a nice big tall screen, good for reading, good for actually seeing AR related things as well. Meanwhile at Google Glass, head falling off and missing everything.
    Where is my job Google? I've been waiting for years. Still a better inventor, programmer and advertiser than your own teams. God.

  18. Stop battery drain by msk · · Score: 1

    I would like for them to stop allowing products into the OS image that drain the battery unnecessarily. "Connection optimizers" are a prime target.

  19. Ideal for google glass by Buckles21 · · Score: 1

    I feel this'd work best on a head mounted device, since it'll already be in proximity to the brain, and I wouldn't have to mutter "glass..." every time I wanted to do something. Can't you already buy this kind of technology off the shelf though? Such as Emotiv.

  20. Beat them to it by ThePeices · · Score: 1

    I beat Samsung to it.

    I currently use my brain to control my Galaxy S3. Its uses an ingenious "series of tubes" coupled to a mind boggling number of complex electrochemical reactions within a complex neural network to control the muscle tissue that connects to the tendons that drive my fingers which directly connect to the Galaxy S3.

    Samsung should stop this R&D ( why reinvent the wheel when you can licence the design for cheaper ) and simply start paying me royalties for every Smartphone and tablet they sell.

  21. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet another tech toy that George W. can't use...

  22. Sammy is just so damn innovative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be revolutionary! I can't believe no one thought of it before!!!!!

  23. Psst! Samsung's other project is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a combination refrigerator/time machine!
    Yep, they think really BIG at Samsung.
    Now it's just a small matter of implementing it.
    More news at 11.

  24. Smart phones, dumb people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smart phones, dumb people. It will never work.

  25. Apple competitive? by govett · · Score: 1

    Note that Samsung is using American technology to defeat Apple in the marketplace. Apple had better be more agile and have quantum leaps in technology, because Samsung is on a shorter product cycle schedule.

  26. That's what I want by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Funny

    My date asks "what are you thinking", and a few seconds later my phone starts playing porn who's star kinda looks like her.

  27. Skip right over the really imporant stuff! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who is quadriplegic. She needs a device that lets her BRAIN control her ARMS AND LEGS. They want to give her a phone she can dial with her MIND. Never mind that fact that it's a phone, which means to use it she probably will want to use her VOICE which works just fine.

    1. Re:Skip right over the really imporant stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, what idiots and selfish profiteers. clearly they should do the 1,000 times harder task first.

    2. Re:Skip right over the really imporant stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious question. Have you gotten frisky with her? That'd be pretty hot.

      Either way discard her, she's likely a waste of oxygen.

  28. one of the worst ways you can use your brain by ObjectiveSubjective · · Score: 0

    is by concentrating on using a phone. A much better thing to do with your brain is study mathematics or literature or campaign for civil and human rights

  29. i already do that by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    When I want to make a phone call, my brain waves move my hands to make the call.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:i already do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some one beat you to it. In fact, it was the first post! Nearly 8 hours before yours. Sorry to be such a spoilsport, Ralph.

  30. ...and NeuroSky by LongearedBat · · Score: 1
  31. Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I could make the prices go down with my brain I could finally buy one!

  32. obligatory cellphone trolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *walks up next to someone and thinks* "google image search, scat porn, safe-search off, share results on facebook, open first twenty results in new tabs" *runs away*

  33. I'm still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the day when people learn to control their brain with their brain.

  34. Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're embarassing yourself Jeremiah Cornelius http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3581857&cid=43276741 since you posted that using your registered username by mistake (instead of your usual anonymous coward submissions by the 100's the past 2-3 months now on slashdot) giving away it's you spamming this forums almost constantly, just as you have in the post I just replied to.

    1. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Paul.

      p.s. What do you make of this?

    2. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forty Two Tenfold has Jeremiah Cornelius = "friend" in his account on /. = obvious he's a sockpuppet account you, Jeremiah Cornelius, use. Yes we know it's you Jeremiah Cornelius that I am replying to now, you off topic troll. Jeremiah Cornelius, you blew it with your 100's of anonymous coward trollings by accidentally submitting one of them by your registered username here Jeremiah Cornelius http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3581857&cid=43276741 and you, Jeremiah Cornelius failed badly giving yourself away troll. Doing sock puppets along with that? No big trick to the likes of you, clearly caught in the act in that link above..

    3. Re:Jeremiah Cornelius: Grow up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Paul.