Slashdot Mirror


Will Future Tesla Cars Use Metal-Air Batteries?

thecarchik writes "Most advocates and industry analysts expect lithium-ion batteries to dominate electric-car energy storage for the rest of this decade. But is Tesla Motors planning to add a new type of battery to increase the range of its electric cars? Tesla has filed for eight separate patents on uses of metal-air battery technology (for example, #20120041625). The metals covered for use in the metal-air battery are aluminum, iron, lithium, magnesium, vanadium, and zinc. Metal-air batteries, which slowly consume their anodes to give off energy, hit the news last month when Israeli startup Phinergy demonstrated its prototype battery and let reporters drive a test vehicle fitted with the energy-storage device. Mounted in a subcompact demonstration car, Phinergy's aluminum-air battery provides 1,000 miles of range, it said, and requires refills of distilled water (which acts as electrolyte in the cells) about every 200 miles."

30 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. My car has a range of 6000 miles by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    1,000 miles of range, it said, and requires refills of distilled water about every 200 miles.

    My car has a range of 6000 miles. That is how often I have to stop to change the motor oil. Of course, I also have to stop every 300 miles to get some gas.

    1. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Yeah. It looks like these are nonrechargeable cells.

      In short, a car that consumes aluminum instead of gasoline to run.

      There's a brief reference to rechargeable zinc-air cells - but the aluminum-air cells seem to be nonrechargeable.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was probably the 'healthy whole grains' that gave her the cavities. The flouride just masks the effect a bit. That and a K2 deficiency.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by mlts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is a misnomer: These are not batteries but fuel cells. The way the aluminum is "recharged" is by hauling the alumina (aluminum oxide) back to a smelting place and spending 15,000 watts per kilo of aluminum made in electricity.

      My concern about this type of battery is the fact that it requires so much energy to "recycle". Already, 1/20 of all US electric output goes to smelt aluminum, and going with aluminum/air fuel cells would add to something that is a ferocious energy user. (Not to knock the aluminum business -- it is a very useful and vital metal, but it is highly dependent on electricity.)

    4. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by sulimma · · Score: 2

      Botteled distilled water costs 11ct per Barrel (0,3ct/Gallon) on Alibaba.com.
      The price in industrial quantities without bottles will be much lower.

    5. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by Hylandr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am expecting this Battery doesn't have a 15 gallons to fill either. Today's lead-water batteries only hold a couple of quarts.

      I would expect the new batter to have a capacity maybe 2 to 3 times the size of a regular battery, which would be just about a gallon. Which would come to about 200 milers *per gallon*

      Include a holding tank of water for refills on the road and you can extend that significantly. Perhaps even route the drip from the A/C into the tank ( or windshield reservoir ) and maybe save some weight.

      That said, it would be an amazing circle for technology to have come around to the point of requiring water tanks to be carried at all times in order to move again. That would just be amazing, and tickles my imagination!

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    6. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      The Fluoride, not.

      Other minerals in the water absolutely more healthy. If you drink pure water you MUST supplement or face much more grievous consequences than cavities.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    7. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 2

      Oh sure, if you're willing to buy the cheap stuff. Tesla drivers are going to want name brand water with pictures of mountains on the label.

    8. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Very pure water is very aggressive. For example spray nozzles that spray RO or distilled water get eaten up very quickly.

      Industrially, you have to often add controlled salts back into distilled water to keep it from destroying your machines by dissolving them.

      So it's entirely plausible that distilled water had a negative effect on her teeth.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by iroll · · Score: 2

      Many water sources are naturally fluoridated, and having a minimum fluoride content can be directly correlated with occurrence of cavities in the population. Fluoride is not any less natural than any other salt (sorry, "mineral"), and varies geographically like all the rest.

      My city has fluoridation equipment that it never uses, because the source water always exceeds the recommended dose.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    10. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by crunchygranola · · Score: 4, Informative

      The so-called aluminum-air battery actually consumes water also as part of its fuel. The consumption of water is an equal mass with the aluminum consumed, and that 1000 mile batter pack weighs 25 kg, so it should consume 25 kg of water, or about 7 gallons per 1000 miles. So the water consumption cost will be around 0.6 cents per mile.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    11. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Fluoride argument is like the Stem Cell argument. Stem Cell proponents shout "STEM CELLS STEM CELLS! LOOK, SO MUCH POTENTIAL, LOOK HOW MANY TREATMENTS HAVE SUCCEEDED!" ... and you look and they're all Adult Stem Cell treatments, while people are arguing over killing babies.

      Fluoride in ground water comes from fluoride crystal deposits--it's F+ ion. Fluoridated water has F+ ion as well, IIRC... I may be wrong there. The way it gets there, however, is by adding either a fluoride salt (NaF) or complex fluorochemicals, some of which are actually acids. This is toxic industrial waste with hazmat handling restrictions.

      Yeah, you want fluoride in your water. You want it in trace amounts, though; and you want F+ ion, not all the other garbage that gets dumped in your water to get F+ ion into it artificially. If they artificially produced F+ ion by stripping it out of toxic waste, you'd get something vastly different--and the argument would be entirely stupid. Instead, the argument is between people shouting "FLUORIDE" while the reality is between Fluoride and Toxic Fluoride Compounds.

    12. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by crunchygranola · · Score: 2

      According to Alcoa, the world's largest producer of aluminium, the best smelters use about 13 kilowatt hours (46.8 megajoules) of electrical energy to produce one kilogram of aluminium; the worldwide average is closer to 15 kWh/kg (54 MJ/kg). Each kilogram of aluminum in the battery produces about 8 KWH of energy, so the efficiency from plant to engine is around 60%, maybe a bit lower than charging a battery from house-delivered electricity (10% transmission loss, 80% charging efficiency, 0.9*0.8 = 0.72).

      The cost of that electricity though will be the wholesale grid cost, about 3.5 cents/KWH. What do you pay for your electricity (probably three times that and up)?

      Aluminum is a good way to export electricity. Iceland does this with its hydropower.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    13. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Factoring that in along with anode replacement makes those batteries sound a *LOT* less pleasant compared to gasoline.

      Funny how everyone thinks gasoline is the perfect fuel. As for Gasoline's pleasantness:

      1 out of every 5 fires is an vehicle fire

      33 car fires are reported across the US every hour

      one person per day died in a car fire between 2002 and 2005

      258,000 vehicl fires in 2007 with 395 deaths and 1675 injuries.

      Vehicle fires cost Americans 1.4 billion dollars in 2007

      Citation: http://www.chandlerlawgroup.com/library/national-vehicle-fire-statistics.cfm

      People are just used to cars, and have familiarity bred contempt for Gasoline, a poisonous, Carcinogenic liquid that sits near the line of deflagration and explosiveness. It has awesome energy density and portability, but that doesn't chenge the danger in it that most of us choose to ignore.

      I doubt the issue you bring up is all that big a problem anyhow. Likely the battery replacement will be just that - pull the battery after a thousand miles. All done by the same service station that changes your oil. Then the AlOx gets recycled. The distilled water will indeed have some cost. Probably will come down when produced in bulk amounts needed

      The interesting thing about this technology is that it doesn't require petrochemicals. Doesn't require much exotic materials either. So you can expect a Koch fueled disinformation campaign very soon. the rest of the world will be driving around in these while Americans will deny that the concept works.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by iroll · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ever heard of having just enough rope to hang yourself? That's what happens with a lot of scientific arguments, just like you implied with your stem cell analogy.

      Fluoride in ground water comes from fluoride crystal deposits--it's F+ ion. Fluoridated water has F+ ion as well, IIRC... I may be wrong there. The way it gets there, however, is by adding either a fluoride salt (NaF)...

      Yes. Basically. Fluoride is an anion (F-), and your "fluoride crystals" are fluoride salts. Fluoride (the ion) must have a counter ion with it; very simple forms would be NaF (sodium fluoride) or HF (hydrofluoric acid).

      or complex fluorochemicals, some of which are actually acids.

      Define "complex," and why do we care if they are acids? The water won't be acidic when it reaches your tap.

      This is toxic industrial waste with hazmat handling restrictions.

      This statement adds nothing to your argument. There are plenty of beneficial compounds that are toxic at high concentrations and regulated as hazards. Furthermore, there are plenty of beneficial compounds that are byproducts of other processes. You're thinking of Hexafluorosilicic acid, and you're talking about it like it's dihydrogen monoxide--you know, the dangerous toxic waste that kills millions yearly and was used by Hitler and Stalin.

      Yeah, you want fluoride in your water. You want it in trace amounts, though; and you want F+ ion, not all the other garbage that gets dumped in your water to get F+ ion into it artificially.

      The amount added to drinking water is a trace amount, and may be less than many natural waters have. If the concentrations are the same, what's the problem?

      Furthermore, in the case of the two examples you gave, the "other garbage" (also in trace amounts) is sodium or silica, both of which you unquestionably consume in much greater quantities daily.

      Yes, that's right, silica. According to wikipedia, in water at neutral pH, Hexafluorosilicic acid decomposes into silica, and the F- ions that kids crave:

      SiF6^2- + 2 H2O => 6 F- + SiO2 + 4 H+

      Silica, by the way, is the active ingredient in sand.

      If they artificially produced F+ ion by stripping it out of toxic waste, you'd get something vastly different

      No, no you wouldn't, because you can't just strip out the fluoride. That's not how chemistry works. You could spend money to convert it into another fluoride compound (like NaF), but the safety of the consumer would be exactly the same either way, as long as it was pure. In fact, it's probably better that they don't use NaF, because we get plenty of Na on our french fries.

      --and the argument would be entirely stupid.

      No comment.

      Instead, the argument is between people shouting "FLUORIDE" while the reality is between Fluoride and Toxic Fluoride Compounds.

      It's really a shame that you have no idea what you're talking about, because there is actually a huge issue at stake that is just over the horizon from your argument, and that is the growing use of fluorinated carbon compounds. These are persistent, carcinogenic, endocrine disrupting, bioaccumulating, and every other dangerous word you can think of.

      If you want to talk about that, then I'm sure we'd agree that we don't want halocarbons of any kind used any more than absolutely necessary (are you listening to me, State of California?), but unfortunately you've been suckered by a bunch of pseudoscientific babble.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    15. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      You are so correct... If we were smart, we'd use diesel like our European friends. Higher energy density, greater combustion efficiency, longer engine life, and not nearly as flammable. But soot looks dirty, so we stick with gas...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    16. Re:My car has a range of 6000 miles by aurizon · · Score: 2

      12.4 cents/KWH here in Canada. The path to recycle this aluminium is more tortuous and costly, but with enough cars buying new AL battery inserts and dropping off oxidized slush they will find a way, even if not economic compared with new mined alumina where the power is. If this works it will take 40-50 years to be put in place wlong with the others, like Vanadium and Lithium.

  2. Re:If you build it..... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
    Whatever they do...PLEASE start making the roadster again, put the battery in it, and get it down to the price level of a Vette.

    We will buy it....in droves.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Re:Rrrrrecharge by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Metal-air batteries don't even pretend to be rechargables.

    The little ones(most notably the zinc-air coin cells that pharmacies stock, heavily overpriced, in areas where gullible old people with hearing aids might find them) you just throw away.

    The bigger ones are either a 'send back to factory' arrangement or a 'the anodes are an FRU' arrangement.

  4. Re:Rrrrrecharge by Animats · · Score: 2

    Metal-air batteries don't even pretend to be rechargables.

    Right. Remember, primary batteries have higher energy densities than rechargable batteries. An electric car loaded up with non-rechargeable lithium batteries would have a range over twice what it has with rechargeables. Then the batteries would have to be replaced.

    Someone might do this for a race car. As a production product, not too useful.

  5. Re:Maybe for range extension, but not day to day. by miroku000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I looked up the recycling efficiency of Aluminum in this case and found it was about 15%. This is worse efficiency than the lowest number you see for an Gas Engine. So using something like this for day to day usage seems out of the question.

    But with the right packaging it might be a decent range extender in addition to a Lithium main battery pack.

    Internal combustion engines are only 13% efficient. "The total fuel efficiency during the cycle process in Al/air electric vehicles (EVs) can be 15% (present stage) or 20% (projected), comparable to that of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEs) (13%). " See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium%E2%80%93air_battery

  6. if slashdotted trends like by nimbius · · Score: 3, Funny

    the pi and the arduino are any indication, the new Tesla vehicles will be made entirely of metal-air batteries. the user will interface with the radio using ruby, and the turnsignals will be excreted in realtime by a makerbot.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  7. Re:If you build it..... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    They can't.
    The Lotus Elise is no more.

  8. Re:If you build it..... by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

    They will buy it, but seeing is believing

    Do you think air batteries could become vapor ware?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  9. Error in your calculation: 200 milers *per gallon* by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2
    re 200 milers *per gallon*

    First of all, the MPG (miles per gallon) quoted for combustion engines consuming standard gasoline or diesel gasoline are stated for the amount of miles driven per gallon of fuel expended.
    .
    The "gallon of water" expended is not the consumible fuel, but part of the solvent required to dissolve the metal which serves as the consumible fuel. So you're comparing apples and oranges, or to use a car analogy, you're comparing a consumible fuel (gasoline) to a solvent (distilled water) rather than comparing it to the cost of the dissolved metal electrode lost (the consumed electrode is the fuel).
    .
    So to get a real cost comparison, you'd have to know how many miles (M) you'll get out of the battery and what the replacement cost of the battery is (B), and add it to the cost of the "demineralized" distilled water that will have to be added until the battery needs to be replaced (will that be 100 "fill ups" or 267 fill ups and how many gallons will it be?) Say you need G gallons, and distilled water costs D per gallon. So now your miles are M, and your total cost (not counting oil, repairs, and whatnot) is B + G*D.
    .
    So your cost per mile is M \div (B + G*D). The IRS allows you to deduct about 0.555 dollars per mile for business use, so say that a car costs in toto 55.5 cents per mile. Say you've got a car that gets 30 MPG nowadays, and gas is just under $4 per gallon. You're paying 13.33 cents per mile in consumible fuel costs for that gas combustion engine. (So the IRS is guessing that the rest of the cost for running your car [insurance, maintenance, oil changes, etc] is about 40 cents per mile). Can your electric car really come in under that cost? Tesla wants to charge $15000 for a 60kwh battery that may (only "may") last 6 or eight years. What's the replacement electrode and battery cost for this thing? When there are concrete numbers out there, then it's viability or utility can be calculated.
    .
    But you can't just count the cost of the distilled water or calculate a miles per gallon of distilled water when the distilled water alone is NOT the consumible fuel component!

  10. Re:Maybe for range extension, but not day to day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Posting AC to preserve mods... ICEs are considerably better than 13%. And you don't have to throw them away after 1000 miles...

  11. Research on Metal Air Battery by IBM by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Several years ago I read that IBM set up a team on researching Metal Air Battery ... lemme search the link ... ah, found it

    http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_project.php?id=3203

    The project started around 2009

    Unfortunately there is no news on the Metal Air Battery project from IBM

    If you have any info regarding the latest development(s), would you kindly share with us here?

    Thanks !!

    A link to another startup that is researching Metal Air battery --- http://gigaom.com/2013/03/01/fluidic-shows-a-peek-of-its-metal-air-batteries-for-off-and-on-the-grid/

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  12. Re:Metal Air fuel cells are not new by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

    If only it were possible to edit comments.

    Here's the key, and definative patent for air-metal batteries using a liquid electrolyte. Notice the date on that sucker.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  13. Re:Error in your calculation: 200 milers *per gall by rally2xs · · Score: 2

    (Hand waving wildly) Me me me me me!!!

    I don't need that sort of expense any more often than I absolutely have to replace it because it is worn out, and costing me more in repairs than the new one would cost in car payments. The 2005 WRX finally got sold last year, and replaced by the 2012 WRX. I loved the 2005 WRX, and if it wasn't lunching things like the power steering pump ($525, plus $300 installation), timing belt and rollers at 210,000 miles ($1300), radiator ($400), and other stuff, I'd still have it.

    The current car has an early start toward getting replaced early, tho. The power steering rack went west, developing a leak, which would have cost $1200 outside the warranty, but $100 inside the warranty - it should have been free but Subaru was all sideways about my having used the car in a road rally - which is really just normal driving down the roads on a Sunday afternoon - but they tried to use it as a get out of jail free card. Also have had the brake light switch go west - don't know how much that would have cost to get fixed, and now the Steering Wheel Angle Sensor is fried, causing the stability control function and the "hill holder" function to fail. Since it's outside the warranty now, those functions will be forever silent, because I'm not paying the $700 or so cost of buying a new sensor and having it replaced. Don't think I'll be keeping this car as long as the 2005.

  14. Re:Error in your calculation: 200 milers *per gall by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Informative

    How many people keep a car for more than 6 years?

    Anyone who's not a consumerist snob or travelling salesman? Here in the UK, a lot of people do less than 5,000 miles a year, so 10 years is a more than reasonable life expectancy. Most people don't buy a new car every 2 or 3 years, there's no real need apart from showing off to the neighbours your new registration.

    If you're doing 30,000 miles a year and can't afford a Mercedes, then you have a point.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it