Slashdot Mirror


Syrian Electronic Army Hijacks Guardian Twitter Feeds

judgecorp writes "The Syrian Electronic Army has hijacked various Twitter accounts belonging to the Guardian newspaper. Guardian journalists report that the pro-Assad hacking group used a campaign of spear phishing to seize various of its feeds, following success hacking other media outlets including CBS."

22 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. The Best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Syrian Electronic Army are the greatest hacking minds in the world! These guys are elite. It's like we're living in Neuromancer or something! Soon they'll be posting ASCII penises to mid-sized news outlets and the imperialist West will tremble.

    1. Re:The Best by currently_awake · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are assuming this really was the Syrian army. I'm sure the NSA would have no difficulty running this as a false flag operation, they could intercept the passwords or use their access to twitter management to do this easily. It certainly makes the media want to champion the cause of military intervention.

    2. Re:The Best by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      User: GuardianLTD
      Password: 123password

      Yeah, it takes high caliber NSA types to "hack" into most systems.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:The Best by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Ms Hillary sold a lot of weaponry during her tour as Secretary of State. Now we have to sell the war to make sure those weapons get used up. That's how you create a market.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:The Best by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Funny

      User: GuardianLTD
      Password: 123password

      It's the Grauniad. It was more likely to be '123passwrod' [sic].

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    5. Re:The Best by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      What?!? That's crazy talk! CLEARLY it was the syrian army:

      1. Hack the guardian twitter
      2. Post false stuff there and gather other twitter accounts
      3. ????
      4. THE REBELLION SURRENDERS!!!

      (/s) In all honesty, a false flag makes sense to me, while I can't see a real motive for the actual Syrian Army to do this.

    6. Re:The Best by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

      In 1964, Democrat LBJ ran on a "no war" platform and smeared Republican Barry Goldwater as a crazed war-monger. LBJ won. I ended up in the infantry running patrols around Chu Lai.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    7. Re:The Best by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Colossus links to Guardian.

      Forbin expresses privacy concerns.

    8. Re:The Best by odigity · · Score: 1

      I hate when people say "we" when referring to the actions of the government that claims ownership of them.

      Stop that. You didn't personally send anyone to kill/die, and it sounds like you were against it, too.

  2. They wouldn't dare by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    Its the big redline. I'm coming Wheezy.

    1. Re:They wouldn't dare by PPH · · Score: 1

      I have drawn a red line. Do not cross it or I shall draw another.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  3. The weakest link by Megane · · Score: 1

    Isn't it funny that no matter what you do to secure your computer usage, the weakest link is always the ID10T sitting between the chair and keyboard. You can talk about "cyber warfare" all you want, but in reality, it all comes down to P.T. Barnum tricks.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  4. Re:It's the Guardian by isorox · · Score: 4, Funny

    No-one would notice the difference

    The tweets were spelt correctly.

  5. I have an idea by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Maybe if they're going to hire a person to run an entire corporation's Twitter account, they should know basic internet security. They damn well better fire that idiot.

  6. oh em gee by fazey · · Score: 2

    They are so 31337, haxing up twitter accounts and all! They probably chill on dalnet.

  7. Because twitter. by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Hacking a twitter account seems to present all the difficulty of cutting a silk gown with a chainsaw, or shoving a battering ram through a spider web. As an added bonus, their little "Verified" badge makes people who read the pretenders' tweets think they are that much more accurate all the while.

    Something is clearly very wrong with security there; I guess we will MySQL never know.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:Because twitter. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Something is clearly very wrong with security there

      They have users who can be so easily tricked with false information.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  8. "Hacking"? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    Most corporate social media sites are the domain of the marketing department. Am I the only one who thinks there isn't much hacking involved?

    Username -- BigCorpTwitter
    Password -- password1

    If I were a company's IT department, I would make sure the marketing people were using a 40 character complex passphrase. Unfortunately there's no way to enforce it, and making it complex means that it'll be written under the keyboard of the Associate Twitter Specialist who has to write all the "spontaneous, off-the-cuff, edgy Web 2.0" marketing messages every day.

    1. Re:"Hacking"? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Perhaps Twitter needs to give corporate customers the option of additional security tools, like one of those changing-numbers keychain thingies or at least an 'allow login from this IP only' setting.

    2. Re:"Hacking"? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Most corporate social media sites are the domain of the marketing department. Am I the only one who thinks there isn't much hacking involved?

      Username -- BigCorpTwitter
      Password -- password1

      Plus the password would have been emailed to all and sundry because the Media unit thinks everyone needs access and the IT department will automatically protect them from anything computer.

      Seriously, I had to explain to a media consultant why we couldn't "just email" a 40 MB video clip to 248 people yesterday. They are retards.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  9. I don't care by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    I'm quietly rooting for the Assads.

    The reason is that while both sides of that squalid little war are a bunch of murderers, the Syrian government are the good guys. They are secular, non-sectarian, believe in women's rights and the rights of minorities.

    The other guys are a bunch of terrorists with big filthy dirty beards, who take money from Wahhabi extremists in the Gulf states, and would rape and/or cut the throats of anybody who does not live up to the utterly extreme brand of conservative Islam.

    They're both fighting like animals. The secularists are fighting like animals because their lives depend on it. The other side are fighting like animals because of their religious fervour and political ideals -- they ARE animals. Our enemies are Al Qaeda, the EXACT same monsters Assad is fighting in Syria.

    Frankly, I think we're backing the wrong horse. I think that nerve gas and cluster bombs is too good for the dirty bearded terrorists they're fighting, and we should be thanking Assad and kissing his arse for taking out this Wahhabi trash for us.

    Why are we backing the terrorists in this war? Because a bunch of undereducated, illiterate idiots in the "Arab street" root for the terrorists? Fuck the Arab Street, let's not bow to cheap populism, and just do what's right for a change.

  10. Re:It's the Guardian by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Whoever smelt it dealt it. Which wood be yew.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.